| 摘要(英) |
In response to the fierce competition among globalized organizations, not only must product and marketing strategies be competitive, but employee performance also becomes the key to enterprise’s success. In the case of this study, Company A is a mid-sized enterprise, with around 250 employees. While companies are facing the current homogeneous rivals in this operation scale of “Size-Does-Matter”, how can they advance the management capabilities of mid-level managers and the work performance of the entry-level employees in order to compete with their rivals? Mid-level managers are the key to the success of organization management. Managers’ leadership styles and personality traits influence employee’s performance. Understanding the relationship with managers and employees helps the advancement of organization performance greatly. The company in this case study was researched to probe into the association between the personality traits and leadership styles of mid-level managers and the work performance of employees as the guidelines of and the reference to the recruitment of mid-level managers for this company. A survey was conducted on personality traits and leadership styles of mid-level managers and the work performance of employees. 200 questionnaires were issued to sales staff with 179 valid samples.
The result of the survey shows:
1. Statistically significant association is found between personality traits of mid-level managers and work performance of employees.
2. Statistically significant association is found between leadership styles of mid-level managers and the work performance of employees.
In the study, the result of the hierarchical regression analysis can be explained as the high association among two personality traits, conscientiousness and extroversion, leadership of transformation and employee’s high work performance. If it is hope to effectively and properly adjust managers’ personality traits and leadership styles to elevate employee’s performance on the basis of this study, although it is difficult to change managers’ personality traits in the short term, it is possible to educated managers to assist employees with improving performance through management skills and leadership behavior and help managers utilize their positive personality traits to effectively exercise their leadership capabilities.
Keywords: Leadership style, Personality, Job performance, leadership of transformation
|
| 參考文獻 |
一、中文部分
王佳玉（民 88），轉換型領導與領導效能關聯之研究，政治大學未出版碩士論文。
司徒達賢(2009，10 月)。中階主管需要的個案教學，天下雜誌，432， 162。
江福興（2004），「以社會資本觀點探討國內製造業員工之人格特質與工作價值觀對其工作績效之影響」，國立成功大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
吳志正（民 83），企業領導人之個人特質、領導型態、績效評估之相關性研究，人事月刊，18 卷 4 期。
吳秉恩(1986)，組織行為學，台北市：華泰。
吳桂雲（2003）「企業轉型下中階主管策略角色與組織績效關係之研究」，國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
吳萬益(2008)，企業研究方法，三版，台北市：華泰。
李文娟（民 87），領導型態、工作滿意度與工作績效相關支個案實證研究，中央大學人力資源管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
李炳賢(2005)，中階主管的人格特質、領導風格及情緒智力與工作績效關聯之研究---以汽車零件製造業為例，碩士論文，國立成功大學，台南市。
李誠 主編(2006)。人力資源管理的 12 堂課，第三版。台北市：天下遠見。
周惠莉（2003），「五大人格特質、性別角色與轉換型領導關聯性之研究」。中原大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
林元山（2000），人力資源管理滿意度、領導型態對員工工作滿意度之研究－以中部四縣市證券商為例，私立靜宜大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
林志峰(2006)，主管領導型態、人格特質、組織承諾與工作績效關聯性之研究—以國防部軍備局生產製造中心生產工廠為例，未出版碩士論文，南台科技大學， 台南縣。
柯惠玲，工作滿足、工作績效與離職傾向之關係研究，國立政治大學企業管理研究所，碩士論文，1989
張火燦（民 85），策略性人力資源管理，台北：揚智書局。
張宦民（2004），「組織文化、主管領導型態、員工工作滿意度對企業創新能力之影響－以臺灣上市電線電纜公司為例」，國立成功大學高階管理碩士在職專班碩士論文。
張智強（民 87），台灣企業資訊主管領導與決策風格對資訊人員工作滿意之影響，國立中央大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。
陳昭輝（2004），「主管的領導型態、情緒能力與員工對工作投入關係之研究」，國立中正大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
陳腕純（2004）「台灣製造業中階管理者管理才能特質與其變遷之探討」，東海大學工業工程與經營資訊學系碩士論文。
黃國彥、翁一峰（民 69），領導方式與人格特質對工人工作滿足的影響，國立政治大學學報，第 41 卷，第 5 期，頁 45-49。
蔡欣嵐（2001），「工作特性、人格特質與工作滿意度之關係－以半導體業為例」，國立中央大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
蔡國隆、蔡啟通（民 87），工作價值觀與領導行為對員工效能的影響，台大管理論叢，9 卷 1 期，51 – 85 頁。
謝界田（民 90），轉換型領導與領導績效之關聯性研究-以交通部公路總局所屬之間理處為例，文化大學政治研究所未出版碩士論文。
羅虞村（民 84），領導理論研究，第四版，台北：文景出版社。
二、英文部分
Abelson, M. A.（1986）Strategic management of turnover : A model for the health
service adminstrator. Health care Manage Review，11（2），p61-71.
Armstrong ,M. & Baron ,A.（1998）,＂Out of The Tick Box＂People Management,London：Jul 1998.4（15）.pp38.
Bass, B. M. (1985), Leadership and Performance beyond Expectations, Free Press, New York
Bass, B. M. (1990). “From Transactional to Transformational Leadership:Learning to Share the Vision,” Organizational Dynamics, Winter, 22
Borman, W. C. (1991), “Job Behavior, Performance and Effectiveness,”Handbook of Industrial Organizational Psychology, Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto,CA,271-326.
Davis ,K . & Newstrom,J.W.（1989）,Human Behavior at Work：Organization Behavior .McGraw – Hill .
Davis, H.(1977), Human Behavior at Work: Organizational Behavior（5th ed）, New York: Mcgraw-Hill.
Drucker, P. F.(1988), The coming of the new organization，HarvardBusiness Review, January-February，45-55
Edmund, R. G. and Smeltzer, R.（1989）Management : The Competitive Edge.Macmillan Publishing Co.
Griff, R. W.（1999）.Management （6th Ed.）. Boston:Houghton Mifflin，p515.
Hemphill, J. K. and Coons, A. E.（1957）Development of The Leader Behavior Description Questionnaire. Columbus college of education，Ohio State University.
Hersey ,P. & Blanchard ,K.H.（1982）, Management of Organizational Behavior：
Utilizing Human Resources ,Englewood Cliffs ,N.J：Prentice-Hall.
House ,R.J.（1971），”Path Goal Theory of Leader Effectiveness”Administrative Science Quarterly .16.pp321-338.
Lawler, E.E.（1971）, Pay and Organizational Effectiveness, New York: McGraw Hill, pp.218
Mintzberg, H.（1973）, Mintzberg on management： inside our strange world of organizations. NY：The Free Press
Nelson ,D .L. & Quick ,J.C.（2003）,Organization Behavior .Thomson South –Western .
Porter ,L.W. & Lawler ,E.E & Hackman ,J.R.（1975）, Behavior in Organization ,New York：McGraw-Hill .
Steers, R. M.（1977）Antecedents and Outcomes of Organizational Commitment. Administrative Science Quarterly，22，p46.
|
[Endnote RIS 格式]
[相關文章]
[文章引用]
[完整記錄]
[館藏目錄]
至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)
plurk
funp
live
udn
HD
myshare
netvibes
friend
youpush
delicious
baidu
Google bookmarks
del.icio.us
hemidemi
facebook
twitter
google
reddit