博碩士論文 101421601 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:84 、訪客IP:3.148.106.31
姓名 張甜(Tian Zhang)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 企業管理學系
論文名稱 辨別虛假評論之研究 -以旅館業為例
(Identify the online review with fake content:The case of Hotel Industry)
相關論文
★ 在社群網站上作互動推薦及研究使用者行為對其效果之影響★ 以AHP法探討伺服器品牌大廠的供應商遴選指標的權重決定分析
★ 以AHP法探討智慧型手機產業營運中心區位選擇考量關鍵因素之研究★ 太陽能光電產業經營績效評估-應用資料包絡分析法
★ 建構國家太陽能電池產業競爭力比較模式之研究★ 以序列採礦方法探討景氣指標與進出口值的關聯
★ ERP專案成員組合對績效影響之研究★ 推薦期刊文章至適合學科類別之研究
★ 品牌故事分析與比較-以古早味美食產業為例★ 以方法目的鏈比較Starbucks與Cama吸引消費者購買因素
★ 探討創意店家創業價值之研究- 以赤峰街、民生社區為例★ 以領先指標預測企業長短期借款變化之研究
★ 應用層級分析法遴選電競筆記型電腦鍵盤供應商之關鍵因子探討★ 以互惠及利他行為探討信任關係對知識分享之影響
★ 結合人格特質與海報主色以類神經網路推薦電影之研究★ 資料視覺化圖表與議題之關聯
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)
摘要(中) 隨著互聯網經濟的發展,各類網站上累積了眾多消費者對於各種產品或服務的評論。這些評論成為除官方的產品信息,專家意見以及推薦系統自動產生的個性化建議之外的重要信息來源。調查顯示利用網絡獲取購買信息的行為比例逐年提升,相關研究人員也已經證實消費者對於來自其他使用者的親身經歷的評論越來越重視,並深切的影響了消費者的購買決策。不幸的是一些業者利用這一趨勢蓄意操縱評論,故意誇大自身產品或詆燬競爭對手之商業信譽,對消費者及商業個體都帶來了嚴重的損害。
本研究以虛假評論為研究對象,以語法特徵及文體特徵的角度探討虛假評論與真實評論的差異。以美國網站TripAdvisor旅館業真實評論與對比組虛假評論為分析對象,將評論內容的提取出3個要件:評論中獨特詞彙、明確的數量詞及名詞、動詞比例。運用文字探勘技術對評論進行處理,建立一套可自動分類虛假評論的模型。
本研究所發展出的模型結果顯示,包含獨特詞彙,明確的數量詞及名詞越多,其評論為虛假的可能性則越小。
摘要(英) With the development of the internet economy, various websites accumulate tons of reviews about different product and service. Those reviews have become one major information source besides official product information, expert opinion, and automatically generated individualized advice. The survey shows that percentage of gathering buying information on internet gradually increases by years, and the relevant researchers have also proven that consumers pay more attention to others’ reviews, thus deeply affect consumers’ shopping decision. Unfortunately, by taking advantage of this trend , some dealers manipulate reviews in order to exaggerate their own product or defame their rivals. Those behaviors have brought severe damage to consumers and commerce.
This study takes fake reviews as research object, using grammar and style stamp as cutting angle, and discusses the differences between fake reviews and real reviews. Take real reviews on America website “TripAdvisor” and the comparison group “Fake reviews” as analysis objects, and extract 3 major points: unique vocabulary, specific quantifier, and noun verb ratio. Deal those reviews with character prospect technique and build up a model which can automatically classify fake reviews.
The result, generated by developed model in this research, shows that the more unique vocabulary and specific quantifier and noun it contains, the less possibility it is fake.
關鍵字(中) ★ 資料探勘
★ 文字探勘
★ 虛假評論
★ 網路評論
關鍵字(英) ★ Data mining
★ Text mining
★ Fake reviews
★ Online reviews
論文目次 目錄
中文摘要 i
Abstract ii
目錄 iii
圖目錄 v
表目錄 vi
一、 緒論 1
1-1研究背景 1
1-2研究動機 1
1-3研究目的 2
1-4論文架構 3
二、文獻探討 4
2-1謠言 4
2-1-1謠言的定義與分類 4
2-1-2虛假評論 5
2-1-3評論的可信度和效用 6
2-2資料探勘 8
2-2-1 資料探勘之定義 8
2-2-2 資料探勘之方法 8
2-3 文字探勘 10
2-3-1 文字探勘之定義 10
2-3-2文字探勘的架構 11
2-3-3 SVM演算法 14
2-4 對虛假評論文字探勘相關研究文獻 15
三、 研究方法 17
3-1研究設計 17
3-2 詞頻計算 18
3-3 特徵詞權重計算 18
3-4研究模型 20
四、研究結果 22
4-1 資料集 22
4-2模型結果 22
4-3模型比較 29
4-4結果分析 30
五、 結論 31
六、 參考文獻 33
參考文獻 [1] Sernovitz, A., Word of Mouth Marketing., New York: Kaplan Publishing., 2009.
[2] Ott M, Choi Y J, Cardie C, et al. Finding Deceptive Opinion Spam by Any Stretch of the Imagination [C]. In: Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. Stroudsburg, PA, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2011: 309-319.
[3] Jindal N, Liu B. Review Spam Detection [C]. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on World Wide Web. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2007: 1189-1190.
[4] Mukherjee A, Venkataraman V. What Yelp Fake Review Filter Might Be Doing? [C]. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. Palo Alto: AAAI Press, 2013: 409-418.
[5] Wu G, Greene D, Smyth B, et al. Distortion as a Validation Criterion in the Identification of Suspicious Reviews[C]. In: Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Social Media Analytics. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2010: 10-13.
[6] 李霄, 丁晟春. 垃圾商品評論信息的識別研究[J]. 現代圖書情報技術, 2013(1): 63-68. (Li Xiao, Ding Shengchun. Research on Review Spam Recognition[J]. New Technology of Library and Information Service, 2013(1): 63-68.)
[7] 邱雲飛, 王建坤, 邵良杉, 等. 基於用戶行為的產品垃圾評論者檢測研究[J]. 計算機工程, 2012, 38(11): 254-257, 261. (Qiu Yunfei, Wang Jiankun, Shao Liangshan, et al. Research on Product Review Spammer Detection Based on Users’Behavior[J]. Computer Engineering, 2012, 38(11):254-257, 261.)
[8] 孫升芸, 田萱, 何軍. 基於評論行為的商品垃圾評論的識別研究[J]. 計算機工程與設計, 2012, 33(11): 4315-4319. (Sun Shengyun, Tian Xuan, He Jun. Research on Product Review Spam Detection Based on Review Behavior[J]. Computer Engineering and Design, 2012, 33(11): 4315- 4319.)
[9] 吳敏, 何瓏. 融合多特徵的產品垃圾評論識別[J]. 微型機與應用, 2012, 31(22): 85-87, 90. (Wu Min, He Long. Fuse Multi-features to Identify Product Review Spam[J]. Microcomputer & Its Applications, 2012, 31(22): 85-87, 90.)
[10] 陸軍, 洪宇, 陸劍江, 等. 基於全局用戶意圖的評論自動估價方法研究[J]. 中文信息學報, 2012, 26(5): 79-87. (Lu Jun, Hong Yu, Lu Jianjiang, et al. Automatic Reviews Quality Evaluation Based on Global User Intent[J]. Journal of Chinese Information Processing, 2012, 26(5): 79-87.)

[11] Dellarocas C. The Digitization of Word of Mouth: Promise and Challenges of Online Feedback Mechanisms [J]. Management science,2003,49( 10) : 1407-1424
[12] Chevalier J A,Mayzlin D. The Effect of Word of Mouth on Sales: Online Book Reviews [ J ] . Journal of Marketing Research,2006,43( 3) : 345 - 354;
[13] Cone Research. “Game changer: cone survey finds 4-out-of-5 consumers reverse purchase decisions based on negative online reviews”. Available at: http://www.conecomm.com/contentmgr/showdetails.php/id/4008.
[14] Michael Anderson, Jeremy Magruder. Learning from the Crowd: Regression Discontinuity Estimates of the Effects of an Online Review Database 9 MAR 2012
[15] Opinion Research Corporation, Online consumer reviews significantly impact consumer purchasing decisions, 2008.06, http://www.opinionresearch.com/fileSave/Online_Feedback_PR_Final_6202 008 .pdf
[16] 資訊工業促進會產業情報研究所: 台灣網友線上購物行為調查http://ecommercetaiwan.blogspot.tw/2013/12/2013_4026.html
[17] Hu, Nan and Liu, Ling and Zhang, Jie (Jennifer), Do Online Reviews Affect Product Sales? The Role of Reviewer Characteristics and Temporal Effects (January 7,2008).
[18] Hu,N., Liu, L., and Sambamurthy, V., Fraud detection in online consumer reviews, Decision Support Systems, vol.50, pp.614-626, 2012.
[19] Kapferer, J. N., Rumors- Uses, Interpretations, and Images, New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 1990. 鄭若麟、邊芹譯,謠言,台北:桂冠圖書,民國 81 年。
[20] Knapp, R. H. “A Psychology of Rumor”, Public Opinion Quarterly, (53), 1944: pp. 467-481.
[21] Koenig, F., Rumor in the Marketplace, Dover: Auburn House, 1985.
[22] Shibutani, T., Improvised News: A Sociological Study of Rumor,Indianapolis: Bobbs Merrill, 1966.
[23] Allport, G. W. and Postman, L. “An Analysis of Rumor”, Public Opinion Quarterly, (10), 1947: pp. 501-517.
[24] Allport, G. W. and Postman, L., The Psychology of Rumor, New York: Henry Holt, 1947.
[25] Rownow, R. L., “On Rumor”, Journal of Communication, (24:3), 1974: pp.26-38.
[26] Jindal N, Liu Bing. Opinion spam and analysis[C]//Proceedings of the 1st ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM’08), California, USA, Feb 11-12, 2008. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2008: 137-142.
[27] Sammons,M.C. (1999).The Internet Writer’s Handbook. Boston: MA: Allyn and Bacon.
[28] Nie Hui,Wang Jiajia. Review of Product Review Spams Detection, 2014
[29] Kusumasondjaja S, Shanka T, Marchegiani C. Credibility of Online Reviews and Initial Trust: The Roles of Reviewer’s Identity and Review Valence[J]. Journal of Vacation Marketing, 2012, 18(3): 185-195.
[30] Pan L Y, Chiou J S. How Much Can You Trust Online Information? Cues for Perceived Trustworthiness of Consumer-generated Online Information[J]. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 2011, 25(2): 67-74.
[31] Lim E P, Nguyen V A, Jindal N, et al. Detecting Product Review Spammers Using Rating Behaviors [C]. In: Proceedings of the 19th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2010: 939-948.
[32] W. J. Frawley, G. Piatetsky-Shapiro, and C. J. Matheus, Knowledge Discovery in Databases: An Overview, AI Magazine, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp.57-70, 1992.
[33] Berry, M. J. A. & Linoff, G., Data Mining Techniques: for Marking, Sales, and Customer Support. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc., 1997.
[34] D. Hand, H. Mannila, P. Smyth (2001). Principles of Data Mining. MIT Press, Cambridge,MA. ISBN 0-262-08290-X.?
[35] Jiawei Han and Micheline Kamber,Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques, Simon Fraser University, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers,2001.
[36] Feldman R., Dagan I., “Knowledge discovery in textual databases (KDT).” Proceedings of the First International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD-95), Montreal, Canada, 1995, AAAI Press, pp.112-117.
[37] Hearst M. A.,“Text data mining: Issues, techniques, and the relationship to information access.” Presentation notes for UW/MS workshop on data mining, 1997.
[38] Fayyad U., Piatetsky-Shapiro G., Smyth P., Uthurusamy R., From data mining to knowledge discovery: “An Overview. In Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining.” MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1996, pp.1-36.
[39] Simoudis E., “Reality check for data mining.” 1996, IEEE Expert, (11:5)

[40] Tan, A.-H. (1999), “Text Mining: The state of the art and the challenges”, in Proceedings, PAKDD’99 workshop on Knowledge Discovery from Advanced Databases, Beijing, April, 1999.
[41] Losiewicz, P., Oard, D. W., & Kostoff, R. N. (2000). Textual data mining to support science and technology management. Online: http://www.onr.navy.mil/sci_tech/special/technowatch/textmine.htm
[42] 國家實驗研究院—專題企劃:提昇國家競爭力-科技政策研究與資訊服務http://www.narl.org.tw/tw/pressroom/topic/topic.php?group_id=21&topic_id=79
[43] Li Fangtao, Huang Minlie, Yang Yi, et al. Learning to identify review spam[C]//Proceedings of the 22nd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI ‘11), Bar celona, Spain, Jul 16-22, 2011. Palo Alto, CA, USA: AAAI, 2011: 2488-2493.
[44] Feng Song, Banerjee R, Choi Y. Syntactic stylometry for deception detection[C]//Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL’12), Jeju Island, Korea, Jul 8-14, 2012. Stroudsburg, PA, USA: ACL, 2012: 171-175.
[45] Jindal N, Liu B. Opinion Spam and Analysis[C]. In:Proceedings of the 2008 International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2008: 219-230.
[46] Lappas T. Fake reviews:The malicious perspective. Procedings of the 17th International conference on Applications of Natural Language Procesing to Information Systems,2012:23~34.
[47] 雷秉翰,許秉瑜,辨別含有可疑內容網路產品評論之研究(Identify the online product comments with suspicious content),2013
[48] Ott M,Choi Y,Caridie C, et al. Finding deceptive opinion spam by any stretch of the imagination[C]//Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies , Portland,USA,Jun 19-24,2011.
[49] Schultz C.K., H.P. Luhn: Pioneer of Information Science - Selected Works, Macmillan,. London,1968.
[50] REN Yafeng, YIN Lan, JI Donghong Deceptive Reviews Detection Based on Language Structure and Sentiment Polarity,2014
[51] Jindal N, Liu B. Analyzing and Detecting Review Spam [C]. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Data Mining. Washington, DC, USA: IEEE Computer Society, 2007: 547-552.
[52] Cortes, C. (1995) Prediction of Generalization Ability in Learning Machines., Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Rochester.
[53] LeCun, Y., Jackel, L. D., Bottou, L., Brunot, A., Cortes, C., Deker, J.S., Drucker, H., Guyon, I., Muller, U.A., Sackinger, E., Siard, P. and Vapnik, V., (1995)Comparison of Learning algorithms for handwritten recognition , International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks, Fogelman, F. and Gallinari, P. (Ed.), pp. 53-60.
[54] Yin-Wen Chang, Cho-Jui Hsieh, Kai-Wei Chang, Michael Ringgaard and Chih-Jen Lin (2010). Training and testing low-degree polynomial data mappings via linear SVM. J. Machine Learning Research 11: 1471–1490
[55] 徐晶凝,現代漢語話語情態研究,北京:崑崙出版社,2007。
[56] 陳韻竹,現代漢語可能性副詞可能性排序之研究,碩士論文:國立台灣師範大學華語文教學研究所,2009。
指導教授 許秉瑜(Ping-Yu Hsu) 審核日期 2014-7-29
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明