 |
|
|
|
以作者查詢圖書館館藏 、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 、以作者查詢全國書目 、勘誤回報 、線上人數：50 、訪客IP：3.147.27.154
姓名 陳蓮娟(LIEN CHUAN CHEN alias LIN KUN CHAN) 查詢紙本館藏 畢業系所 財務金融學系 論文名稱
(Market Efficiency and Market Stability under Short Sale Constraints)相關論文 檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]
[相關文章]
[文章引用]
[完整記錄]
[館藏目錄]
[檢視]
- 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
- 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
- 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。
摘要(中) 摘要
本論文由兩篇關於賣空限制對市場效率性以及對市場穩定性的影響之文章所構成。台灣股票市場於 2002 年至 2009 年間實施過多次賣空限制政令改變，提供很好的機會檢驗不同的賣空限制程度對於市場效率性和穩定性有何影響。在第一篇文章中，我們利用買賣權評價理論 （put-call parity） 所推衍的理論價格檢驗價格調整的效率性，發現越嚴格的賣空限制會造成價格調整所需的時間和速度不對稱，以及延遲價格調整的速度，即使控制市場狀況和流動性後仍發現一致的結果。
有趣的是，在擬真分析中，全面禁賣的政策宣告有助於防止價格崩跌，然而，我們發現嚴格賣空限制會引起較高的市場總風險與下方風險；更值得一提的是，我們偶然發現，先前的文獻在賣空限制對市場穩定性影響的討論中，明顯忽略內生性的問題，也就是政府監管單位通常在市場波動性特別高時限制賣空交易，如此難以判別賣空限制與市場波動性之間的相互關係。
為了解決內生性的問題，在第二篇文章中，我們利用Barndorff-Nielsen and Shephard (2004) 和 Huang and Tauchen (2005) 的跳躍偵測方法來控制內生性問題，進而探討不同賣空限制強度下的價格異常跳動。我們發現在嚴格賣空限制下，向下價格異常跳動明顯較大;然而，向上異常跳動在不同賣空限制強度沒有顯著的差異。
本論文的兩篇文章皆不支持政府對賣空限制的主張，實證發現限制賣空交易非但不能穩定市場價格，還令市場更波動且效率性降低。
第一篇文章是探討賣空限制對價格調整速度的影響以及檢驗賣空限制的施行是否符合主管機關所預期的市場穩定效果。台灣股票市場於 2002 年至 2009 年間曾有過多次賣空限制政令改變，提供很好的機會檢驗不同的賣空限制程度對於市場效率性和穩定性的影響。市場效率性定義為市場價格調整到選擇權市場隱含的現貨理論價格所需要的速度與時間長度，該理論價格由買賣權評價理論（put-call parity） 推衍，具有不須假設報酬分配型態和避免波動性估計誤差的優勢。此外，本文另一優勢，使用日內高頻資料分析，可觀察到更多價格發現的資訊內涵，在賣空限制相對嚴格的期間，被高估的市場價格下調到理論價格平均所需的日內調整時間，相較於寬鬆賣空限制期間的所需調整時間長，顯示賣空限制的嚴格程度與下調時間長度有顯著的關係；而低估的市場價格上調到理論價格平均所需的時間，在不同賣空限制程度下沒有顯著差異，此結果與賣空限制延遲負面消息反應在價格上的過去實證發現一致，故而嚴格賣空限制下所需的下調時間較長。進一步使用門檻誤差修正模型 (TECM），控制交易成本、市場微結構因素以及市場摩擦後，同樣發現價格調整到理論價格的速度在方向上有不對稱的現象，向下調整速度顯著比上調速度延遲許多，尤其嚴格賣空限制期間差異更大；也發現嚴格賣空限制相較於寬鬆期間的下調速度顯著減緩。我們亦透過政策擬真 (counter factual) 分析，雖然發現若不施行全面禁賣限制的價格會比實際實施全面禁賣期間的價格下跌地更劇烈，但嚴格賣空限制卻引起較高的總風險和下方風險，綜合以上結果顯示，賣空限制是犧牲市場流動性和市場效率性卻無法保證換取穩定市場。本文中釐清並佐證不同賣空限制對市場效率性與穩定性之各種實證效果探討，或可提供主管機關在實施賣空限制政策時的參考依據。
關鍵字：賣空限制、價格效率、市場穩定性、買賣權評價理論、門檻誤差修正模型、擬真分析。
第二篇文章經由跳躍活動的偵測（jump detection），探討賣空限制對市場穩定性的影響，本文是第一篇探討市場跳躍活動與賣空限制的關係，利用跳躍大小衡量市場穩定性，具有免除市場波動性與賣空限制的內生性問題。定義市場價格偏離買賣價評價理論推衍的理論價格之程度為賣空困難程度，市場價格偏離正值越大，顯示市場反應訊息的受阻程度越高。使用 2002 年至 2009 年的台灣股票市場加權指數日內資料，發現在高賣空限制強度下，市場價格異常向下跳動的程度相較於在低賣空限制強度下顯著大許多，但是對於向上價格異常跳動在不同賣空困難程度下沒有顯著的差異。實證結果沒有發現支持主管機關施行賣空限制能夠穩定市場的論點。
關鍵字：賣空限制、市場穩定性、買賣權評價理論、跳躍活動。
摘要(英) Abstract
This dissertation contains two essays for discussing the effects of short sale constraints (SSC) on market efficiency and market stability. We take advantage of a natural experimental environment provided by the imposition of various short-sales policy regimes between 2002 and 2009 in the Taiwan stock market. In the first essay, we examine the put-call parity-defined price deviations in an attempt to assess the efficiency of price adjustments, and find that more extreme constraints lead to asymmetric and delay adjustment speed even when market conditions and liquidity are controlled.
Interestingly, in our counterfactual analysis, short-sales bans help to prevent price collapse, nonetheless, we find that the tightening of short-sales restrictions leads to increases in both market volatility and downside risk. We also occasionally found that there is an overlooked endogeneity among previous literature on the stabilization effect of short sale constraints in that regulator usually restrict short-selling to prevent market abnormal movements when the market volatility is particularly high. Therefore, a period of high price variation per se (as it can be the cause instead of the consequence) does not preclude the stabilizing effectiveness of the SSC.
To resolve the picture, in our second essay, we thus control for the endogeneity concerns by probing the jump activities under SSC using a jump identification approach by Barndorff-Nielsen and Shephard (2004) and Huang and Tauchen (2005). We observed that the abnormal downturns under tighter short sale constraints are significantly larger whereas there is no difference for abnormal upturns across different short-sale regimes.
Both of the two essays do not support the claims by regulators that restraining short-sales can stabilize prices; instead, SSC has led to a more volatile and less efficient market.
First Essay
Market Efficiency, Stability and Short Sales Constraints: Evidence from Taiwan
Market efficiency under short-sales constraints has long been an issue of debate within the related literature. In this study, we take advantage of a natural experimental environment provided by the imposition of various short-sales policy regimes between 2002 and 2009 in the Taiwan stock market. We examine the put-call parity-defined price deviations in an attempt to assess the efficiency of price adjustments, and find that more extreme constraints lead to asymmetric adjustment rates in upward and downward convergence to theoretical price; although short-sales constraints are generally found to suppress the effects of negative information on prices, our application of a ‘threshold error correction model’ (TECM) reveals more rapid convergence to theoretical price from upward adjustments than downward adjustments. Furthermore, price efficiency is found to be improved when such constraints are relaxed. These results hold even when market conditions and liquidity are controlled. Interestingly, although evidence from our counter-factual analysis suggests that tighter constraints help to prevent price collapse, despite the fact that prices may fall more sharply without short-sales bans, our findings refute the claim that tighter constraints can help to stabilize the market. Instead, we find that the tightening of short-sales restrictions leads to increases in both market volatility and downside risk.
Keywords: Short Sale Constraints, Price Efficiency, Market Stabilization, Put-call Parity, Threshold Error Correction Model, Counterfactual Analysis
Second Essay
Stabilizing the Market with Short Sale Constraint?
New Evidence from Price Jump Activities
This essay re-examine the impact of short-sale constraints (SSC) on market stabilization via realized jump activities during 2002~2009 to circumvent the reverse causality in identifying the policy effects of SSC. We observed that the abnormal downturns under tighter short sale constraints are significantly larger whereas there is no difference for abnormal upturns across different short-sale regimes. The findings do not support the claims by regulators that restraining short-sales can stabilize prices; instead, SSC has led to a more volatile and less efficient market
Keywords: short sale constraint, market stabilization, put-call-parity, jump activity
關鍵字(中) ★ 賣空限制
★ 價格效率
★ 市場穩定性
★ 買賣權評價理論
★ 門檻誤差修正模型
★ 擬真分析
★ 跳躍活動關鍵字(英) ★ Short Sale Constraints
★ Price Efficiency
★ Market Stabilization
★ Put-call Parity
★ Threshold Error Correction Model
★ Counterfactual Analysis
★ Jump Activity論文目次 Contents
Abstract in Chinese I
Abstract IV
Acknowledgements VII
Contents VIII
List of Figures XI
List of Tables XII
First Essay: Market Efficiency, Stability and Short Sales Constraints: Evidence from Taiwan
1. INTRODUCTION 1
2. DATA AND DESCRIPTION OF SHORT SALES POLICIES 6
2.1 Data 6
2.2 Short-sales Constraint Proxies 8
2.3 Short-sales Constraint Policy Changes 9
2.4 Theoretical Index Price 12
2.5 Control Variables 13
3. HYPOTHESIS DEVELOPMENT AND EMPIRICAL DESIGN 17
3.1 Asymmetric Adjustment and Market Efficiency Improved after Lifted SSC 17
3.2 Improved Speed of Price Adjustment 18
3.3 Price Stabilization and SSC 23
4. EMPIRICAL RESULTS 24
4.1Asymmetric Duration and Shorter Adjustment Period after Relaxed SSC 24
4.2 Enhanced Adjustment under Relaxed SSC 26
4.3 Rapid Upward and Sluggish Downward Adjustment 26
4.4 Enhanced Downward Adjustment 28 4.5 Tighter SSC, Higher Risk and Price Fluctuations 28
5. ROBUSTNESS CHECKS 30
5.1 High Short Demand Transactions, Arbitrageur Behavior and Short-sales Policy Changes 30
5.2 Further Evidence on Transactions with High Short Demand 33
5.3 Counter-factual Analysis of a Zero-SSC Scenario 34
5.4 The Causes of Increased Downside Risk 35
5.5 Other Robustness Check 36
6. CONCLUSIONS 37
REFERENCE 39
Appendix A: Appendix A: The Example of Calculating Adjusting Period Unconditionally 44
Appendix B: The Counterfactual Analysis: The Simulation With A Stationary Bootstrap Algorithm 45
Appendix C: Robustness Check with 5-minute Frequency 47
Appendix D: Counterfactual Analysis with Random Error 51
Appendix E: Robustness Check with Derived Index Price from Black and Scholes Model 52
Second Essay: Stabilizing the Market with Short Sale Constraint? New Evidence from Price Jump Activities
1. INTORDUCTION 86
2. EMPIRICAL DESIGN AND DATA 88
2.1 Equilibrium Deviation from Put-call-parity as Proxy for SSC Strength 88
2.2 The Jump Size and Jump Intensity 89
3. EMPIRICAL RESULTS AND ROBUSTNESS ANALYSIS 90
3.1. Empirical Results 90
3.2. Robustness Analysis 91
4. CONCLUSION 94
REFERENCE 95
List of Figures
First Essay: Market Efficiency, Stability and Short Sales Constraints: Evidence from Taiwan
Figure 1 Short-sales rule policy changes, Jan 2002 to 2009 55
Figure 2 Time plot for index prices, index returns and price deviation, 2002-2009 56
Figure 3 Distribution of price deviations and index returns 57
Figure 4 Price with and without short sales ban from the counter-factual analysis 58
Figure 5 Fixed equilibrium price from the counter-factual analysis 59
Figure 6 Price difference from counter-factual analysis with/without short sales ban 60
Figure C1 Time plot for index prices, index returns and price deviation with 5-minute frequency, 2002-2009 71
Figure D1 Fixed equilibrium price from the counter-factual analysis with random error 72
Figure D2 Price difference from counter-factual analysis with/without short sales ban (with random error) 73
Figure D3 Fixed equilibrium price from the counter-factual analysis with residual during 74
Figure D4 Price difference from counter-factual analysis with/without short sales ban (with residual during ) 75
Figure E1 Time plot for index prices, theoretical index price derived by BS, index returns and price deviation, 2002-2009 76
Second Essay: Stabilizing the Market with Short Sale Constraint? New Evidence from Price Jump Activities
Figure 1 The Time Plot 96
List of Tables
First Essay: Market Efficiency, Stability and Short Sales Constraints: Evidence from Taiwan
Table 1 Unit-root and cointegration tests 61
Table 2 Summary statistics 62
Table 3 Sustained periods of price overvaluations or undervaluations 63
Table 4 VECM estimates under different policy changes 64
Table 5 Three-regime TECM estimates under different policy changes 65
Table 6 Short-sales constraint policies versus return distribution characteristics 67
Table 7 VECM estimates with ‘high propensity to short’ (HPTS) 68
Table 8 Short-sales constraint policy and risk with market expectations of investor concerns 70
Table A1 A Part of Data 77
Table A2 The Example of Calculating Adjusting Period 77
Table C1 Unit-root and cointegration tests for 5-minute frequency 78
Table C Summary statistics for 5-minute frequency 79
Table C3 Sustained periods of price overvaluations or undervaluations for 5-minute frequency 80
Table C4 VECM estimates under different policy changes for 5-minute frequency81
Table C5 Three-regime TECM estimates under different policy changes for 5-minute frequency 82
Table C6 Short-sales constraint policies versus return distribution characteristics for 5-minute frequency 83
Table E1 Sustained periods of price overvaluations or undervaluations with implied theoretical price from BS 84
Table E2 Three-regime TECM estimates under different policy changes with implied theoretical price from BS 85
Second Essay: Stabilizing the Market with Short Sale Constraint? New Evidence from Price Jump Activities
Table 1 The Association Between Jump Activity and Characteristics of Index Return Distribution 97
Table 2 SSC Stabilization Effect and Jump Activity 98
Table 3 Robustness Check 99
Table 4 Unconditional/conditional mean of (il)liquidity measures 100
Table 5 Unconditional/Conditional Correlation of (il)liquidity and SSC Strength 101
Table 6 Robustness Check (II) Jump Size over SSC Regimes Controlled for Liquidity 102
Table 7 Robustness Check (III) Jump Size over SS Ban Controlled for Liquidity103
參考文獻 Abreu, D. and M.K., Brunnermeier, 2003, Bubbles and crashes, Econometrica 71, 173–204.
Ackert, L.F. and Y.S. Tian, 2001, Efficiency in index options markets and trading in stock baskets, Journal of Banking and Finance 25, 1607-1634.
Allen, F. and D., Gale, 1991, Arbitrage, short sales, and financial innovation, Econometrica 59, 1041–1068.
Amihud, Y. and H. Mendelson, 1986, Asset pricing and the bid-ask spread, Journal of Financial Economics 17, 223–249.
Amihud, Y., 2002, Illiquidity and stock returns: cross-section and time-series effects, J. Financial Markets 5, 31–56.
Autore, D.A., R.S. Billingsley and Tunde Kovacs, 2011, The 2008 short sale ban: liquidity, dispersion of opinion, and the cross-section of returns of US financial stocks, Journal of Banking & Finance 35, 2252-2262.
Bakshi, G., C. Cao and Z. Chen, 2000, Do call prices and the underlying stock always move in the same direction? The Review of Financial Studies 13, 549-584.
Barber, B.M., Y.T. Lee, Y.J. Liu, and T. Odean, 2004, Who gains from trade? Evidence from Taiwan, working paper, University of California.
Barber, B.M., Y.T. Lee, Y.J. Liu, and T. Odean, 2009, Just How Much Do Individual Investors Lose by Trading? Review of Financial Studies 22, 609-632.
Bargeron L., M. Kulchania and S. Thomas, 2011, Accelerated share repurchases, Journal of Financial Economics 101, 69-89.
Barndorff-Nielsen, O.E. and N., Shephard, 2004, Power and bipower variation with stochastic volatility and jumps, J. Financial Econometrics, 2, 1–37.
Bernardo, A. and I., Welch, 2004, Liquidity and financial market runs, Quart. J. Econ. 119, 135–158.
Boehmer E. and J. Wu, 2013, Short Selling and the Price Discovery Process, The Review of Financial Studies 26, 227-322.
Boulton, T. J. and M. V. Braga-Alves, 2010, The skinny on the 2008 naked short-sale restrictions, Journal of Financial Markets 13, 397-421.
Bris, A., W.N., Goetzmann, and N., Zhu, 2007, Efficiency and the bear: short sales and markets around the word, J. Finance 62, 1029–1079.
Brooks, C. and I. Garrett, 2002, Can we explain the dynamics of UK FTSE 100 stock and stock index futures markets? Applied Financial Economics 12, 25-31.
Chang, E.C., J.W., Cheng, and Y., Yu, 2007, Short-sales constraints and price discovery: evidence from the Hong Kong market, J. Finance 62, 2097–2121.
Charoenrook, A. and H. Daouk, 2005, A study of market-wide short-selling restrictions, working paper.
Chen, C. X. and S. G. Rhee, 2010, Short sales and speed of price adjustment: Evidence from Hong Kong stock market, Journal of Banking & Finance 34, 471-483.
Chiou, J.R., W.L.G. Hsieh, and Y.Y. Lin, 2007, The Impact of Execution Delay on the Profitability of Put-Call-Futures Trading Strategies – Evidence from Taiwan, Journal of Futures Markets 27, 361-385.
Connolly, R. A., 1989, An examination of the robustness of the weekend effect, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 24, 133-169.
D’Avolio, G., 2002, The market for borrowing stock, Journal of Financial Economics 66, 271–306.
Danielsen, B. and S. M. Sorescu, 2001, Why do option introductions depress stock prices? An empirical study of diminishing short sale constraints, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 36, 451-484.
Danielsen, B.R., R.A. Van Ness and R. S. Warr, 2009, Single stock futures as a substitute for short sales: evidence from microstructure data, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 36, 1273-1293.
Diamond, D. W., and R. G. Rajan, 2010, Fear of Fire Sales and the Credit Freeze. Working Paper, University of Chicago.
Diamond, D., and R. Verrecchia, 1987, Constraints on short-selling and asset price adjustment to private information, Journal of Financial Economics 18, 277-311.
Diether, K.B., K.H. Lee and I.M. Werner, 2009a, Short-sale strategies and return predictability, The Review of Financial Studies 22, 575-606.
Diether, K. B., K. H. Lee, and I. M. Werner, 2009b, It’s SHO time! Short-sale price tests and market quality, Journal of Finance 64, 37-73.
Dimson, E., 1979, Risk measurement when shares are subject to infrequent trading, Journal of Financial Economics 7, 197–226.
Duan, Y., G. Hu and R.D. McLean, 2010, Costly arbitrage and idiosyncratic risk: evidence from short sellers, J. Finan. Intermediation 19, 564-579.
Duffie, D., N. Garleanu, and L. H. Pedersen, 2002, Securities lending, shorting, and pricing, Journal of Financial Economics 66, 307–339.
Dwyer Jr, G.P., P. Locke and W. Yu, 1996, Index arbitrage and nonlinear dynamics between the S&P 500 futures and cash, The Review of Financial Studies 9, 301-332.
Easton, S. A., 1994, Non-simultaneity and apparent option mispricing in tests of Put-call parity, Australian Journal of Management, 19.
Enders, W. and P. L. Siklo, 2001, Cointegration and threshold adjustment, American Statistical Association 19, 166-176.
Figlewski, S. and G.P. Webb, 1993, Options, short sales, and market completeness, Journal of Finance 48, 761-777.
Figlewski, S., 1981, The informational effects of restrictions on short sales: some empirical evidence, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 16, 463-476.
Franklin, A. and D. Gale, 1991, Arbitrage, Short Sales, and Financial Innovation, Econometrica 59, pages 1041-68
Fung, J. and L. Jiang, 1999, Restrictions on Short Selling and Spot-Futures Dynamics, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 26, 227-248.
Geczy C. C., D. K. Musto, A. V. Reed, 2002, Stocks are special too: an analysis of the equity lending market, Journal of Financial Economics 66, 241–269.
Hong, H. and J.C. Stein, 2003, Differences of opinion, short-sales constraints, and market crashes, Review of Financial Studies 16, 487-525.
Hong, H., T. Lim and J.C. Stein, 2000, Bad news travels slowly: size, analyst coverage, and the profitability of momentum strategies, The Journal of Finance 55, 265–295.
Hoshi, T., and A. K. Kashyap, 2010, Will the U.S. Bank Recapitalization Succeed? Eight Lessons from Japan, Journal of Financial Economics 97, 398–417.
Hsu, P.H., Y.C. Hsu, and C.M. Kuan, 2010, Testing the predictive ability of technical analysis using a new stepwise test without data snooping bias, Journal of Empirical Finance 17, 471–484.
Huang, X., Tauchen, G., 2005. The relative contribution of jumps to total price variance. J. Financial Econometr. 3, 456–499.
Hull, J. C., 2003, Options, Futures, and Other Derivatives, Prentice Hall.
Jennings, R.H. and L.T. Starks, 1986, Earnings announcements, stock price adjustment, and the existence of options markets, Journal of Finance 41, 143–161.
Jiang, L., J.K.W. Fung and L.T.W. Cheng, 2001, The lead-lag relation between spot and futures market under different short-selling regimes, The Financial Review 38, 63-88.
Jones, C. and M. Lipson, 1999, Price Impacts and Quote Adjustment on the NASDAQ and NYSE/AMEX, Paine Webber Working Paper No. 99-08.
Jones, C.M. and O. A. Lamont, 2002, Short-sale constraints and stock returns, Journal of Financial Economics 66, 207–239.
Kamara, A. and T. W. Miller, 1995, Daily and Intradaily Tests of European Put-Call Parity, The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 30, 519-539.
Kim, K. A. and S. G. Rhee, 1997, Price Limit Performance: Evidence from the Tokyo Stock Exchange, The Journal of Finance 52, 885-901.
Lim, B.Y., 2011, Short-sale constraints and price bubbles, Journal of Banking & Finance 35, 2443-2453.
Martens M., P. Kofman, and T. C.F. Vorst, 1998, A threshold error-correction model for intraday futures and index reurns, Journal of Applied Econometrics 13, 245-263.
McMillan, D. G., 2005, Threshold adjustment in spot-futures metals prices, Applied Financial Economics Letters 1, 5-8.
Miller, E., 1977, Risk, uncertainty, and divergence of opinion, Journal of Finance 32, 1151–1168.
Mørck, R., B. Yeung, and W. Yu, 2000, The information content of stock markets: Why do emerging markets have synchronous stock price movement? Journal of Financial Economics 58, 215–260.
Ofek, E., and M. Richardson, 2003, DotCom mania: The rise and fall of internet stock prices, Journal of Finance 58, 1113-1137.
Ofek, E., M. Richardson, and R. F. Whitelaw, 2004, Limited arbitrage and short sales restrictions: evidence from the options markets, Journal of Financial Economics 74, 305–342.
Patell, J. and M. Wofson, 1984, The intraday speed of adjustment of stock prices to earnings and dividend announcements, Journal of Financial Economics 13, 223-252.
Phillips, B., Options, short-sale constraints and market efficiency: A new perspective, Journal of Banking & Finance 35, 430-442.
Politis, D.N., and J.P. Romano, 1994, The stationary bootstrap, Journal of the American Statistical Association 89, 1303–1313.
Roll, R., 1984, A simple implicit measure of the effective bid-ask spread in an efficient market, J. Finance 39, 1127–1139.
Roll, R., E. Schwartz, and A. Subrahmanyam, 2007, Liquidity and the Law of One Price: The Case of the Futures-Cash Basis, Journal of Finance 62, 2201-2234.
Sadka, R., and A. Scherbina, 2007, Analyst Disagreement, Mispricing, and Liquidity, The Journal of Finance 62, 2367–2403.
Saffi, P.A.C. and K. Sigurdsson, 2011, Price efficiency and short selling, The Review of Financial Studies 24, 821-852.
Senchack, A. J., and L. T. Starks, 1993, Short-Sale Restrictions and Market Reaction to Short-Interest Announcements, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 28, 177-194.
Shleifer, A., and R.W. Vishny, 1997, The Limits of Arbitrage, The Journal of Finance 52, 35-55.
Tsay, R. S., 1989, Testing and modeling threshold autoregressive process, Journal of the American Statistical Association 84, 231-240.
Veronesi, P. and L. Zingales, 2010, Paulson′s Gift, Journal of Financial Economics 97, 339-368.
指導教授 周冠男、葉錦徽(Robin K. Chou Jin-Huei Yeh) 審核日期 2014-7-28 推文 plurk
funp
live
udn
HD
myshare
netvibes
friend
youpush
delicious
baidu
網路書籤 Google bookmarks
del.icio.us
hemidemi
facebook
twitter
google
reddit