博碩士論文 101430014 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:58 、訪客IP:18.226.104.127
姓名 邱玳琳(Tai-lin Chiu)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 會計研究所
論文名稱 選擇權及限制型股票薪酬對會計穩健性之影響-在 FAS123R改革前後
(The effect of options and restricted stocks compensation on accounting conservatism: Evidence from FAS123-R)
相關論文
★ 以房養老貸款政策-由台灣金融業之觀點論析★ 企業導入電子商務對經營績效之影響-以N公司為例
★ 台灣網通業應收帳款管理-論析信用保險之功能★ 蘋果概念股金屬機殼產業之投資分析
★ 由鑑識會計角度偵測公司之舞弊-以某個案公司為例★ 企業流程再造-以某食品原料加工公司之報價作業流程為例
★ 企業資源規劃系統導入之關鍵成功因素與效益評估-以某個案公司為例★ 企業組織再造之分析-以某醫材業公司為例
★ 金融機構執行共同申報及盡職審查作業辦法之影響★ 中美貿易戰對台灣企業之影響 -以某公司為例
★ 管理報表編制對企業經營績效之影響—以A公司為例★ 現金減資宣告之股價異常報酬-以台灣上市公司為例
★ 公司價值評估-以半導體產業某公司為例★ 公司併購價格之決定-以電子業大聯大收購文曄為例
★ 製造業轉型之研究-以某個案公司為例★ 鑑識會計於政府採購招標階段之應用
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   [檢視]  [下載]
  1. 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
  2. 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
  3. 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。

摘要(中) 本文探討選擇權及限制型股票薪酬對會計穩健性之影響。使用績效薪酬佔總薪酬變數及績效薪酬相對比例測試其對會計穩健性之不同意義。實證結果顯示選擇權績效薪酬減少會計穩健性,限制型股票績效薪酬增加會計穩健性,其主要導因於薪酬獲利曲線特性,選擇權具無上限獲利曲線特性,使經理人有提升股價之較高誘因。我們發現在FAS123-R實施前,選擇權績效薪酬增加會計穩健性,限制型股票績效薪酬則減少會計穩健性,FAS123-R實施後則反之,FAS123-R改革大幅減少選擇權之財報誘因,同採公允價值衡量後,純導因於獲利曲線特性為之。本研究之意涵為未來公司內部設計獎酬制度之建議,提供員工績效薪酬影響會計穩健性之證據,公司獎酬制度應將會計穩健性及員工獎酬特性納入考量。
摘要(英) We provide evidences on the relationship between the performance-related compensation and accounting conservatism. Our results do support that using more option compensations would decrease the accounting conservatism. On the contrary, company using more restricted stocks would have higher accounting conservatism. The main reason leading to the result is the profit curve of options and restricted stocks. For the options, the profit curve has no limit on the top. Manager has more incentives to raise the stock price. We found that using more option compensation would increase the accounting conservatism before the implement of FAS123-R. However, after the implement of FAS123-R, using more option compensation would decrease the accounting conservatism. The implement of FAS123-R significantly reduce the incentives of earnings for using option evaluated by intrinsic value methods. Since both option and restricted compensation evaluated by fair value methods, the effect of performance-related compensation on accounting conservatism would mainly lead by the profit curve. We provide the suggestion on the compensation design. Company should consider the accounting conservatism and the feature of different compensation into the consideration when establishing the regulation of compensation.
關鍵字(中) ★ 選擇權
★ 限制型股票
★ 員工績效薪酬
★ 會計穩健性
★ FAS123-R
關鍵字(英) ★ options
★ restricted stocks
★ compensation
★ accounting conservatism
★ FAS123-R
論文目次 目錄
頁次
摘要 i
Abstract ii
目錄 iv
圖目錄 vi
表目錄 vii
第一章、緒論 1
1-1 研究背景、動機與目的 1
1-2 研究架構 5
第二章、會計穩健性、FAS123-R與美國選擇權醜聞 6
2-1 會計穩健性定義 6
2-2 FAS123-R之改革 8
2-3 美國選擇權醜聞 10
第三章、文獻探討 13
第四章、研究設計 18
4-1 研究設計、樣本標準與資料蒐集 18
4-2 模型發展及變數衡量 18

伍、實證結果 22
5-1 敘述性統計 22
5-2實證分析結果 24
5-3敏感性分析 28
5-3-1使用不同方法衡量薪酬 28
5-3-2控制時間序列影響 33
陸、結論 33
參考文獻 35
參考文獻 [英文部分]

[1] Aboody, D. and R. Kasznik, 2000. CEO stock option awards and the timing of corporate voluntary disclosures. Journal of Accounting and Economics 29: 73-100.

[2] Aboody, D. and R. Kasznik, 2008. Executive stock-based compensation and firms′ cash payout: the role of shareholders′ tax-related payout preferences. Review of Accounting Studies 132-3: 216-251.

[3] Ahmed, A. S., Billings, B. K., Morton, R. M. and Stanford-Harris, M., 2002. The role of accounting conservatism in mitigating bondholder-shareholder conflicts over dividend policy and in reducing debt costs. The Accounting Review 774: 867-890.

[4] Ahmed, A. S. and S. Duellman, 2007. Accounting conservatism and board of director characteristics: An empirical analysis. Journal of Accounting and Economics 432: 411-437.

[5] APB, 1972. Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. APB Opinion No. 25. New York, Accounting Principles Board.

[6] Ball, R. and P. Brown., 1968. An empirical evaluation of accounting income numbers. Journal of Accounting Research 62: 159-178.

[7] Ball, R., Kothari, S. P. and Robin, A., 2000. The effect of international institutional factors on properties of accounting earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics 291: 1-51.


[8] Ball, R. and L. Shivakumar, 2005. Earnings quality in UK private firms: comparative loss recognition timeliness. Journal of Accounting and Economics 391: 83-128.

[9] Basu, S., 1997. The conservatism principle and the asymmetric timeliness of earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics 241: 3-37.

[10] Beatty, R. P. and E. J. Zajac, 1994. Managerial Incentives, Monitoring, and Risk Bearing: A Study of Executive Compensation, Ownership, and Board Structure in Initial Public Offerings. Administrative Science Quarterly 392: 313-335 .

[11] Beaver, W. H. and S. G. Ryan, 2000. Biases and lags in book value and their effects on the ability of the book-to-market ratio to predict book return on equity. Journal of Accounting Research 38: 127-148.

[12] Beaver, W. H. and S. G. Ryan, 2005. Conditional and unconditional conservatism: Concepts and modeling. Review of Accounting Studies 102-3: 269-309.

[13] Beyer, A., D., et al., 2010. The financial reporting environment: Review of the recent literature. Journal of Accounting and Economics 50: 296-343.

[14] Brooks, L. and D. Buckmaster, 1976. Further evidence of the time series properties of accounting income. Journal of Finance 31: 1359-1373.

[15] Brown, L. D. and Y. Lee, 2007. The impact of SFAS 123R on changes in option-based compensation. Working paper.

[16] Brown, L. D. and Y. Lee, 2010. The relation between corporate governance andCEOs′ equity grants. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 296: 533-558.

[17] Bryan, S., Hwang, L. and Lilien, S., 2000. CEO Stock-Based Compensation: An Empirical Analysis of Incentive-Intensity, Relative Mix, and Economic Determinants. The Journal of Business 734: 661-693.
[18] Bushman, R. M. and J. D. Piotroski, 2006. Financial reporting incentives for conservative accounting: The influence of legal and political institutions. Journal of Accounting and Economics 42: 107-148.

[19] Carter, M., Lynch, L. and Tuna, I., 2007. The role of accounting in the design of CEO equity compensation. The Accounting Review 82: 327–357.

[20] Carter, M. E. and L. J. Lynch, 2003. The consequences of the FASB′s 1998 proposal on accounting for stock option repricing. Journal of Accounting and Economics 351: 51-72.

[21] Chauvin, K. W. and C. Shenoy, 2001. Stock price decreases prior to executive stock option grants. Journal of Corporate Finance 71: 53-76.

[22] Chhaochharia, V. and Y. Grinstein, 2009. CEO compensation and board structure. The Journal of Finance 641: 231-261.

[23] Chi, W., Liu, C., and Wang, T., 2009. What affects accounting conservatism: A corporate governance perspective. Journal of contemporary accounting & economics 51: 47-59.

[24] Choudhary, P., Rajgopal, S. and Venkatachalam, M., 2009. Accelerated Vesting of Employee Stock Options in Anticipation of FAS 123‐R. Journal of Accounting Research 471: 105-146.

[25] Collins, D. W., Kothari, S. P., Shanken, J. and Sloan, R. G., 1994. Lack of timeliness and noise as explanations for the low contemporaneuos return-earnings association. Journal of Accounting and Economics 183: 289-324.

[26] Easton, P. D., Harris, T. S. and Ohlson, J. A., 1992. Aggregate accounting earnings can explain most of security returns: The case of long return intervals. Journal of Accounting and Economics 152: 119-142.

[27] Frederic W. Cook & Co., I., 2003. The 2003 Top 250 Report - Long-Term Incentive Grant Practices for Frederic W. Cook & Co., INC.

[28] Frederic W. Cook & Co., I., 2005. The 2005 Top 250 Report - Long-Term Incentive Grant Practices for Frederic W. Cook & Co., INC.

[29] Frederic W. Cook & Co., I., 2008. The 2008 Top 250 Report - Long-Term Incentive Grant Practices for Frederic W. Cook & Co., INC.

[30] Frederic W. Cook & Co., I., 2011. The 2011 Top 250 Report - Long-Term Incentive Grant Practices for Frederic W. Cook & Co., INC.

[31] Göx, R. F. and A. Wagenhofer., 2009. Optimal impairment rules. Journal of Accounting and Economics 48: 2-16.

[32] Givoly, D. and C. Hayn, 2000. The changing time-series properties of earnings, cash flows and accruals: Has financial reporting become more conservative? Journal of Accounting and Economics 293: 287-320.

[33] Goh, B. W. and D. Li., 2011. Internal controls and conditional conservation. The Accounting Review 86: 975-1005.

[34] Guay, W. and R. Verrecchia., 2007. Conservative disclosure. Working paper, University of Pennsylvania.

[35] Hanlon, M., Rajgopal, S. and Shevlin, T., 2003. Are executive stock options associated with future earnings? Journal of Accounting and Economics 361: 3-43.

[36] Heron, R. A. and E. Lie, 2007. Does backdating explain the stock price pattern around executive stock option grants? Journal of Financial Economics 832: 271-295.

[37] Holthausen, R. W. and R. L. Watts, 2001. The relevance of the value-relevance literature for financial accounting standard setting. Journal of Accounting and Economics 311: 3-75.

[38] Huson, M. R., et al., 2011. Compensation committees′ treatment of earnings components in CEOs′ terminal years. The Accounting Review 871: 231-259.

[39] Iyengar, R. J. and E. M. Zampelli., 2010. Does accounting conservatism pay? Accounting & Finance 50: 121-142.

[40] Kellogg, R. L., 1984. Accounting activities, security prices, and class action lawsuits. Journal of Accounting and Economics 63: 185-204.

[41] Kothari, S. P., 2001. Capital markets research in accounting. Journal of Accounting and Economics 311: 105-231.

[42] Kothari, S. P., Ramanna, K. and Skinner, D. J., 2010. Implications for GAAP from an analysis of positive research in accounting. Journal of Accounting and Economics 502: 246-286.

[43] Lafond, R. and S. Roychowdhury, 2008. Managerial ownership and accounting conservatism. Journal of Accounting Research 461: 101-135.

[44] LaFond, R. and R. L. Watts, 2008. The information role of conservatism. The Accounting Review 832: 447-478.

[45] Lambert, R. A., 2006. Agency theory and management accounting. Handbooks of Management Accounting Research 1: 247-268.

[46] Lambert, R. A. and D. F. Larcker, 1987. An Analysis of the Use of Accounting and Market Measures of Performance in Executive Compensation Contracts. Journal of Accounting Research 25.

[47] Lambert, R. A. and D. F. Larcker, 2004. Stock options, restricted stock, and incentives. Working paper.

[48] Landsman, W., Lang, M. and Yeh, S., 2007. Governance and the Split of Options between Executive and Nonexecutive Employees. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance 222: 109-138.

[49] Lara, J. M. G., Osma, B. G. and Penalva, F., 2009. Accounting conservatism and corporate governance. Review of Accounting Studies 141: 161-201.

[50] Lie, E., 2005. On the timing of CEO stock option awards. Management Science 515: 802-812.

[51] Lubberink, M. and C. Huijgen, 2001. A wealth-based explanation for earnings conservatism. European Finance Review 53: 323-349.

[52] O′connell, V., 2006. The impact of accounting conservatism on the compensation relevance of UK earnings. European Accounting Review 154: 627-649.

[53] Press, E. and M. D. Beneish, 1993. Costs of technical violation of accounting-based debt covenants. Accounting review: A quarterly journal of the American Accounting Association 682: 233-257.

[54] Price Water House Coopers, 2006 FAS123-R, Share-based payment: A multidisciplinary approach.

[55] Qiang, X., 2007. The effects of contracting, litigation, regulation, and tax costs on conditional and unconditional conservatism: cross-sectional evidence at the firm level. The Accounting Review 823: 759-796.

[56] Sterling, R. R., 1970. Theory of the Measurement of Enterprise Income.


[57] Watts, R. L., 2003. Conservatism in accounting part I Explanations and implications. Accounting horizons 173: 207-221.

[58] Watts, R. L., 2003. Conservatism in accounting part II Evidence and research opportunities. Accounting horizons 174: 287-301.

[59] Watts, R. L., 2006. What has the invisible hand achieved? Accounting and Business Research 36: 51-61.

[60] Watts, R. L. and J. L. Zimmerman, 1986. Positive accounting theory.

[61] Wittenberg-Moerman, R., 2008. The role of information asymmetry and financial reporting quality in debt trading: Evidence from the secondary loan market. Journal of Accounting and Economics 46: 246-260.

[62] Yermack, D., 1997. Good timing: CEO stock option awards and company news announcements. The Journal of Finance 522: 449-476.

[63] Zhang, J., 2008. The contracting benefits of accounting conservatism to lenders and borrowers. . Journal of Accounting and Economics 45: 27-54.

[中文部分]

[1] 林宛瑩、許崇源、戚務君與潘虹華,2012,「穩健會計對員工分紅之影響」 會計評論,第五十五期:37-39。

[2] 林淑惠與胡星陽,2003,「上市公司高階經理人之酬勞結構」,經濟論文,第三十一期:171-206。

[3] 許崇源與陳昭蓉,2008,「員工分紅、公司治理與未來績效」,中山管理評論,第一百六十四期:671-702。
指導教授 王曉雯(Hsiao-wen Wang) 審核日期 2014-7-4
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明