代理問題、公司治理與銷管費用僵固性

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：54

、訪客IP：52.14.204.156

姓名

李芳如(Fang-ru Lee) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

會計研究所

論文名稱

代理問題、公司治理與銷管費用僵固性
(The Agency Problem, Corporate Governance, and Stickiness of SG&A Costs)

相關論文

★ 利害關係人包容性：企業社會責任報告書揭露內容個案探討	★ 盈餘目標的誘因對成本不對稱性之影響 -以母公司單獨報表與合併報表分析
★ 銷管費用的成本結構-以台灣公司為例	★ 差異化策略對成本不對稱性之影響
★ 前期銷貨變動方向對成本習性及不對稱性之影響—營運成本之組成份分析	★ 公司治理與股權結構對資訊透明度之關聯性
★ 公司治理、公司避稅與現金持有	★ 台灣企業社會責任報告書自願性揭露之影響因素
★ 企業社會責任與成本僵固性之關聯性-以台灣公司為例	★ 企業社會責任績效與企業社會責任報告書確信選擇之關聯-以台灣為例
★ 企業社會責任活動與成本僵固性之關聯──以台灣編製企業社會責任報告之公司為例	★ 企業社會責任活動對股東權益報酬率、資產報酬率及股價報酬率之影響：以企業社會責任願景為調節變數
★ 企業社會責任願景對會計績效之影響:企業社會責任績效之中介效果	★ 企業社會責任治理績效與財務績效之雙向因果關係-以無形資產為中介效果
★ 企業社會責任報告書確信提供者之選擇：選擇現任財簽會計師事務所與否之影響因素	★ CSR績效對CSR揭露量之影響：以社會參與面向為例

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

摘要

先前研究主要將成本僵固性解釋為經濟因素，而忽略管理者自利動機對成本習性的影響。因此，本研究控制已知的經濟因素，探討經理人建立帝國動機所引起銷管費用僵固性，我們使用四種變數(自由現金流量、經理人任期、經理人即將卸任、變動薪酬)以捕捉由代理問題所引起經理人建立帝國動機。此外，本研究也探討公司治理能夠減弱代理問題對銷管費用僵固性的影響，其中公司治理變數包括董事會規模、董事長不兼總經理、獨立董事比率、法人持股比率。

本研究以2005年至2012年間台灣上市、上櫃、興櫃公司作為研究對象，實證結果發現，自由現金流量越高、總經理任期越長、總經理即將卸任，所引起經理人建立帝國的動機與SG&A僵固性呈正相關。此外，我們也發現，董事會規模越小、獨立董事比率越高、法人持股比率越高，越能夠減弱由代理問題所引起銷管費用僵固性。

摘要(英)

Abstract
Prior studies have predominantly explained cost stickiness with economic factors and have largely ignored the impact of managerial incentives on cost behavior. Therefore, this study is to examine the manager’s empire building incentives that lead to SG&A costs stickiness, after controlling for known economic factors. We use four variables to capture manager’s empire building incentives arising from the agency problem: free cash flow (FCF), chief executive officer (CEO) horizon, tenure, and variable pay. In addition, we also examine the corporate governance would mitigate the effect of the agency problem on SG&A costs stickiness. Our governance variables are the size of the board, CEO and Chairman separate, the ratio of outside directors, the ratio of institutional investor’ ownership.
We used companies listed on TSE, OTC, and Emerging-Market in Taiwan from 2005 to 2012 as sample. The empirical result shows while FCF is higher, CEO’s tenure is longer and CEO recently expect to leave , Manager’s empire building incentives be more positive associated with SG&A costs stickiness. Moreover, we also found that the size of the board is smaller, the ratio of outside directors is higher and the ratio of institutional investor ownership is higher would mitigate the effect of the agency problem on SG&A costs stickiness.

關鍵字(中)

★ 代理問題
★ 公司治理
★ 銷管費用僵固性

關鍵字(英)

★ Agency Problem
★ Corporate Governance
★ Stickiness of SG&A Costs

論文目次

目錄
摘要 i
abstract ii
致謝 iii
目錄 iv
圖表目錄 v
第壹章緒論 1
第一節研究動機及目的 1
第二節研究問題 2
第三節研究流程 2
第貳章文獻探討 4
第一節成本僵固性 4
第二節代理問題與SG&A僵固性之關聯 6
第三節公司治理減輕代理問題所引起之SG&A僵固性 8
第參章研究方法 10
第一節觀念性架構及建立研究假說 10
第二節研究模型之建立與變數衡量 17
第三節資料來源與樣本選擇 22
第四節資料分析方法 23
第肆章實證結果及分析 24
第一節敘述性統計分析 24
第二節相關係數分析 25
第三節實證分析結果 27
第伍章研究結論、貢獻、建議及限制 34
第一節研究結論 34
第二節研究貢獻 35
第三節研究限制 36
第四節研究建議 37
參考文獻 38

參考文獻

參考文獻
中文部分
林旻毅，2004，〈銷管費用僵固性之額外證據〉，碩士論文，私立輔仁大學會計研究所。
曾聯洲，2003，〈銷管費用僵固性之研究〉，碩士論文，國立政治大學會計研究所。
楊昌智，2005，〈銷管費用僵固性之個案研究－以國內買賣業為例〉，碩士論文，私立輔仁大學會計研究所。
林有志，傅鍾仁，陳筱平，2011，〈成本僵固性之實證研究〉，《當代會計》，191-220.

英文部分
Anderson, C. A., & Anthony, R. N.1986. The new corporate directors: Insights for board members and executives. Wiley.
Anderson, M. C., Banker, R. D., & Janakiraman, S. N. 2003. Are selling, general, and administrative costs “sticky”? Journal of Accounting Research 41(1): 47-63.
Anderson, M. C., R. D. Banker, R. Huang, and S. N. Janakiraman. 2007. Cost behavior and fundamental analysis of SG&A costs. Journal of Accounting, Auditing, and Finance 22(1): 1-28.
Atiase, R., W. J. Mayew, and Y. Xue. 2006. Institutional monitoring and corporate restructurings. Working paper, University of Texas at Austin, Duke University, and George Washington University.
Balakrishnan, R., and T. Gruca. 2008. Cost stickiness and core competency: A note. Contemporary Accounting Research 25(4): 993-1006.
Banker, R., D. Byzalov, and J. M. Plehn-Dujowich. 2010. Sticky cost behavior: Theory and evidence. Working paper, Temple University.
Banker, R., R. Huang, and R. Natarajan. 2011. Equity incentives and long-term value created by SG&A expenditure. Contemporary Accounting Research 28(3): 794-830.
Baysinger, B. and R. E. Hoskisson .1990. The Composition of Boards of Directors and Strategic Control: Effects on Corporate Strategy. Academy of Management Review 15 (1): 72-87.
Beasley, M. S. 1996. An empirical analysis of the relation between the board of director composition and financial statement fraud. The Accounting Review 71(4): 443-65.
Berger, Philip G., Eli Ofek, and David L. Yermack. 1997.Managerial entrenchment and capital structure decisions. The Journal of Finance 52(4): 1411-1438.
Bertrand, M., and S. Mullainathan. 2003. Enjoying the quiet life? Corporate governance and managerial preferences. Journal of Political Economy 111(5): 1043-75.
Bethel, J. E., and J. Liebeskind. 1993.The effects of ownership structure on corporate restructuring. Strategic Management Journal 14(S1): 15-31.
Bourgeois, L. J. 1981.On the measurement of organizational slack. Academy of Management Review 6(1): 29-39.
Boyd, B. K. 1994. Board control and CEO compensation. Strategic Management Journal 15(5): 335-344.
Brickley, J. A., Coles, J. L., & Jarrell, G. 1997. Leadership structure: Separating the CEO and chairman of the board. Journal of corporate Finance 3(3): 189-220.
Brickley, J. A., J. L. Coles, and R. L. Terry. 1994. Outside directors and the adoption of poison pills. Journal of Financial Economics 35 (3): 371-90.
Brickley, J., A. Lease, and R. C. Smith .1988. Ownership structure and voting on Antitakeover Amendments. Journal of Financial Economics 20: 267-291.
Bushee, B. 1998.The influence of institutional investors on myopic R&D investment behavior. The Accounting Review 73(3): 305-33.
Byrd, J. W., and K. A. Hickman. 1992. Do outside directors monitor managers? Evidence from tender offer bids. Journal of Financial Economics 32(2): 195-221.
Chen, C. X., Lu, H., and T .Sougiannis. 2012. The agency problem, Corporate governance, and the asymmetrical behavior of selling, general, and administrative costs. Contemporary Accounting Research29(1): 252-282.
Core, J. E., R. Holthausen, and D. Larcker. 1999. Corporate governance, chief executive officer compensation, and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics 51(3): 371-406.
Datta, D. K., J. P. Guthrie, D. Basuil, and A. Pandey. 2010. Causes and effects of employee downsizing: A review and synthesis. Journal of Management 36(1): 281-348.
Dechow, P. M., R. G. Sloan, and A. P. Sweeney. 1996. Causes and consequences of earnings manipulations: An analysis of firms subject to enforcement actions by the SEC. Contemporary Accounting Research 13(1): 1-36.
Denis, D. K., and D. K. Shome. 2005. An empirical investigation of corporate asset downsizing. Journal of Corporate Finance 11(3): 427-48.
Fama, E. 1980. Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm. Journal of Political Economy : 288-307.
Fama, E. F. and M. C. Jensen .1983. Separation of Ownership and Control. Journal of Law & Economics 14: 301-325.
Goodstein, J., K. Gautam, and W. Boeker. 1994. The effects of board size and diversity on strategic change. Strategic Management Journal 15(3): 241-50.
Hanlon, M., S. Rajgopal, and T. Shevlin. 2003. Are executive stock options associated with future earnings? Journal of Accounting and Economics 36(1-3): 3-43.
Hill, C. W. L., and P. Phan. 1991. CEO tenure as a determinant of CEO pay. Academy of Management Journal 34(3): 707-17.
HOPE, O. K., and Thomas, W. B. 2008. Managerial empire building and firm disclosure. Journal of Accounting Research 46(3): 591-626.
Jensen, M. C. 1986. Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. American Economic Review 76(3): 323-29.
Jensen, M. C. 1993. The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. The Journal of Finance 48(3): 831-80.
Jensen, M. C. and W. H. Meckling .1976. Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Cost and Ownership Structure. Journal of Finance Economics 3(4): 305-360.
Jiambalvo, J., S. Rajgopal, and M. Venkatachalam .2002. Institutional Ownership and the Extent to which Stock Prices Reflect Future Earnings. Contemporary Accounting Research 19(1): 117-145.
Kanniainen, V. 2000. Empire building by corporate managers: The corporation as a savings instrument. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 24(1): 127-42.
Kaplan, S. N. and D. Reishus .1990. Outside directorships and corporate performance. Journal of Financial Economics 27(2): 389-411.
Klein, A. 2002. Audit committee, board of director characteristics, and earnings management. Journal of Accounting and Economics 33(3): 375-400.
Lafond, R., and S. Roychowdhury. 2008. Managerial ownership and accounting conservatism. Journal of Accounting Research 46(1): 101-135.
Lang, L. H., Stulz, R., and Walkling, R. A. 1991. A test of the free cash flow hypothesis: The case of bidder returns. Journal of Financial Economics 29(2): 315-335.
Lang, L., R. Stulz, and R. Walking. 1991. A test of the free cash flow hypothesis: The case of bidder returns. Journal of Financial Economics 29(2): 315-55.
Lang, Larry HP, and Robert H. Litzenberger. 1989.Dividend announcements: cash flow signalling vs. free cash flow hypothesis? Journal of Financial Economics 24(1): 181-191.
Larcker, D., S. Richardson, and I. Tuna .2007. Corporate governance, accounting outcomes, and organizational performance. The Accounting Review 82(4): 963-1008.
Lev, B., and T. Sougiannis. 1996. The capitalization, amortization, and value-relevance of R&D. Journal of Accounting and Economics 21(1): 107-38
Machlup, F. 1967. A Social Appraisal of Differential Pricing: Discussion. Journal of Marketing 6 (4): 184-190.
Masulis, R. W., C. Wang, and F. Xie. 2007. Corporate governance and acquirer returns. The Journal of Finance 62(4): 1851-89.
Morck, R., A. Shleifer, and R. W. Vishny .1988. Management ownership and market valuation: An empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics 20: 293-315.
Noreen, E. and N. Soderstrom. 1997. The accuracy of proportional cost models: evidence from hospital sevice departments. Review of Accounting Studies 2: 89-114
Perry, T., and A. Shivdasani. 2005. Do boards affect performance? Evidence from corporate restructuring. Journal of Business 78 (4): 1403-31
Pound, J. 1988. Proxy Contests and the Efficiency of Shareholder Oversight. Journal of Financial Economics 20:237-266.
Richardson, S. 2006. Over-investment of free cash flow. Review of Accounting Studies 1(2-3): 159-89.
Sengupta, P. 1998. Corporate disclosure quality and the cost of debt. Accounting Review 73: 459-474.
Shleifer, A., and R. Vishny. 1986. Large shareholders and corporate control. Journal of Political Economy 94(3): 461-48.
Shleifer, A., and R. Vishny. 1997. A survey of corporate governance. The Journal of Finance 52(2): 737-83
Singh, J. V. 1986. Performance, slack and risk-taking in organizational decision making. Academy of Management Journal 29(3): 562-85.
Stulz, R. 1990. Managerial discretion and optimal financing policies. Journal of Financial Economics 26(1): 3-27.
Subramaniam, C., and Marcia L.Weidenmier.2003. Additional Evidence on the Sticky behavior of costs. Working Paper, Texas Christian University
Titman, S., K.C. Wei, and F. Xie. 2004. Capital investments and stock returns. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 39(4): 677-700.
Walsh, James P., and James K. Seward. 1990.On the efficiency of internal and external corporate control mechanisms. Academy of Management Review 15(3): 421-458.
Weisbach, M. S. 1988. Outside directors and CEO turnover. Journal of Financial Economics 20: 431-60.
White, T., and E. Dieckman. 2005. Seizing control of SG&A. Financial Executive 21(2): 20-23.
Williamson, O. E. 1963. Managerial discretion and business behavior. American Economic Review 53(5): 1032-57.
Yermack, D. 1996. Higher valuation of companies with a small board of directors. Journal of Financial Economics 40(2): 185-212.

指導教授

陳建中

審核日期

2014-7-9

推文