應用數位筆系統與合作學習理論提升學生的學習成效、動機和態度：以國小數學為例

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：25

、訪客IP：18.191.62.114

姓名

簡婉竹(Wan-Chu Chien) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

資訊工程學系

論文名稱

應用數位筆系統與合作學習理論提升學生的學習成效、動機和態度：以國小數學為例
(Applying Digital Pen-based Collaborative Learning Approach to Improve Student’s Learning Performance, Attitude, and Motivation: An Example of Mathematics.)

相關論文

★ 應用智慧分類法提升文章發佈效率於一企業之知識分享平台	★ 家庭智能管控之研究與實作
★ 開放式監控影像管理系統之搜尋機制設計及驗證	★ 資料探勘應用於呆滯料預警機制之建立
★ 探討問題解決模式下的學習行為分析	★ 資訊系統與電子簽核流程之總管理資訊系統
★ 製造執行系統應用於半導體機台停機通知分析處理	★ Apple Pay支付於iOS平台上之研究與實作
★ 應用集群分析探究學習模式對學習成效之影響	★ 應用序列探勘分析影片瀏覽模式對學習成效的影響
★ 一個以服務品質為基礎的網際服務選擇最佳化方法	★ 維基百科知識推薦系統對於使用e-Portfolio的學習者滿意度調查
★ 學生的學習動機、網路自我效能與系統滿意度之探討-以e-Portfolio為例	★ 藉由在第二人生內使用自動對話代理人來改善英文學習成效
★ 合作式資訊搜尋對於學生個人網路搜尋能力與策略之影響	★ 數位註記對學習者在線上學習環境中反思等級之影響

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

現今的國小數學教育仍然以傳統的講述教學法為主，教師透過敘述或演講的方式，將知識傳遞給學生，單向式的教學易造成學生消極的學習態度。所以有學者指出在傳統的數學學習環境導入合作式教學法。然而，在傳統學習環境進行合作學習會遭遇幾項困難，1：教師不了解合作學習如何設計及進行，2：擔心教學時間不足會影響進度，3：教師難以即時掌握小組討論狀況。因此，本研究提出數位筆系統搭配合作學習教學法的學習模式，用以改善傳統數學學習環境實現合作式學習會遇到的問題，更進一步探討此種學習模式對於學生的學習成效、學習動機和學習態度之影響。本研究採用準實驗設計法來設計進行教學實驗，實驗對象為64位國小3年級學生，實驗時間為4週共8小時，並且將研究對象分以不同教學模式分為3組。第1組為實驗組「使用數位筆系統搭配合作學習教學法」、第2組為控制組A「使用數位筆系統配合講述教學法」為、第3組為控制組B「使用傳統紙筆配合講述教學法」。實驗結果發現：1、在學習成效上，實驗組顯著優於控制組A和控制組B；2、在學習動機上，實驗組、控制組A和控制組B均無顯著差異；3、在學習態度上，實驗組、控制組A和控制組B均無顯著差異。

摘要(英)

Didactic Teaching is usually taught mathematics course in elementary school. Some researches have indicated that using cooperative learning in traditional learning environment for mathematics course. However, there are some problems that used cooperative learning method in traditional learning environment for mathematics course, such as teachers may concern about the completion degree of learning progress and hard to handle discussion process of student immediately. Therefore, this study presents the novel learning approach that used digital pens system with cooperative learning strategy. This study use quasi-experimental design for experiment. The 64 participating students were divided into three groups: an experimental and two control groups. The research result are presented as follow: First, regarding the learning performance, the experimental group was significantly better than control group A and control group B. Second, regarding the learning motivation, the experimental group, control group A and group B were no significant differences. Third, regarding the learning attitude, the experimental group, control group A and group B were no significant differences.

關鍵字(中)

★ 數位筆系統
★ 合作學習教學法
★ 學習成效
★ 學習動機
★ 學習態度

關鍵字(英)

★ Digital pens system
★ cooperative learning
★ learning performance
★ learning motivation
★ learning attitude

論文目次

摘　　要 i
Abstract ii
目　　錄 iii
圖目錄 v
表目錄 vii
第一章　緒論 1
第二章　文獻探討 3
2.1數位筆技術 3
2.2合作學習 5
第三章　系統介紹 9
3.1 系統架構 9
3.2 硬體 10
3.3 軟體 11
第四章實驗設計 15
4.1 實驗對象 15
4.2 實驗教材 16
4.3 實驗流程 16
4.4 研究工具 26
第五章結果與討論 28
5.1學習成效 28
5.2學習動機 30
5.3學習態度 36
第六章結論與建議 39
6.1結論 39
6.2建議 40
參考文獻 41
英文部分 41
中文部分 46
附錄一、研究實驗同意書 47
附錄二、教學實驗學習單 48
附錄三、學習成效前測 49
附錄四、學習成效後測 51
附錄五、學習動機與態度問卷 53

參考文獻

Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. E. (2001). Research commentary: Technology-mediated learning—A call for greater depth and breadth of research. Information Systems Research, 12(1), 1-10.
Alvarez, C., Salavati, S., Nussbaum, M., & Milrad, M. (2013). Collboard: Fostering new media literacies in the classroom through collaborative problem solving supported by digital pens and interactive whiteboards. Computers & Education, 63, 368-379.
Aronson, E., Blaney, N., Stephan, C., Sikes, J., & Snapp, M. (1978). The jigsaw classroom. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Behr, M. J., Lesh, R., Post, T. R., & Silver, E. A. (1983). Rational number concepts. Acquisition of mathematics concepts and processes, 91-126.
Berque, D. (2006). An evaluation of a broad deployment of DyKnow software to support note taking and interaction using pen-based computers. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 21(6), 204-216.
Block, F., Haller, M., Gellersen, H., Gutwin, C., & Billinghurst, M. (2007). Voodoosketch: Physical interface palettes and sketched controls alongside augmented work surfaces. In Proceedings of UbiComp (Vol. 7).
Brandl, P., Haller, M., Hurnaus, M., Lugmayr, V., Oberngruber, J., Oster, C., ... & Billinghurst, M. (2007, November). An adaptable rear-projection screen using digital pens and hand gestures. In Artificial Reality and Telexistence, 17th International Conference on (pp. 49-54). IEEE.
Chapman, C. N., Lahav, M., & Burgess, S. (2009, January). Digital pen: Four rounds of ethnographic and field research. In System Sciences, 2009. HICSS′09. 42nd Hawaii International Conference on (pp. 1-10). IEEE.
Cohen, E. G. (1994). Designing groupwork: Strategies for the heterogeneous classroom.
Cole, E., Pisano, E. D., Clary, G. J., Zeng, D., Koomen, M., Kuzmiak, C. M., ... & Pavic, D. (2006). A comparative study of mobile electronic data entry systems for clinical trials data collection. International journal of medical informatics, 75(10), 722-729.
Despont-Gros, C., Cohen, G., Rutschmann, O. T., Geissbuhler, A., & Lovis, C. (2009). Revealing triage behaviour patterns in ER using a new technology for handwritten data acquisition. international journal of medical informatics, 78(9), 579-587.
DeVries, D. L. (1974). Teams-Games-Tournament in the Social Studies Classroom: Effects on Academic Achievement, Student Attitudes, Cognitive Beliefs, and Classroom Climate. Report Number 173.
Everitt, K. M., Morris, M. R., Brush, A. B., & Wilson, A. D. (2008, October). Docudesk: An interactive surface for creating and rehydrating many-to-many linkages among paper and digital documents. In Horizontal Interactive Human Computer Systems, 2008. TABLETOP 2008. 3rd IEEE International Workshop on (pp. 25-28). IEEE.
Furukawa, N., Ikeda, H., Kato, Y., & Sako, H. (2004, October). D-pen: A digital pen system for public and business enterprises. In Frontiers in Handwriting Recognition, 2004. IWFHR-9 2004. Ninth International Workshop on (pp. 269-274). IEEE.
Hwang, G. J., & Chang, H. F. (2011). A formative assessment-based mobile learning approach to improving the learning attitudes and achievements of students. Computers & Education, 56(4), 1023-1031.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1994). Leading the cooperative school. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1999). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning.
Kagan, S. (1985). Co-op Co-op (pp. 437-452). Springer US.
Klein, M. S., & Rutherford, F. J. (1985). Science education in global perspective: lessons from five countries (Vol. 100). Advancement of Science.
Kuo, F. R., Hwang, G. J., & Lee, C. C. (2012). A hybrid approach to promoting students’ web-based problem-solving competence and learning attitude.Computers & Education, 58(1), 351-364.
Lauer, T., Trahasch, S., & Zupancic, B. (2005, October). Anchored discussions of multimedia lecture recordings. In Frontiers in Education, 2005. FIE′05. Proceedings 35th Annual Conference (pp. T2H-12). IEEE.
Liao, C., Guimbretière, F., Hinckley, K., & Hollan, J. (2008). Papiercraft: A gesture-based command system for interactive paper. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 14(4), 18.
Liao, C., Guimbretière, F., Hinckley, K., & Hollan, J. (2008). Papiercraft: A gesture-based command system for interactive paper. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 14(4), 18.
Lind, L., & Karlsson, D. (2004). A system for symptom assessment in advanced palliative home healthcare using digital pens. Informatics for Health and Social Care, 29(3-4), 199-210.
Lind, L., Karlsson, D., & Fridlund, B. (2007). Digital pens and pain diaries in palliative home health care: professional caregivers′ experiences. Informatics for Health and Social Care, 32(4), 287-296.
Lipponen, L. (2002, January). Exploring foundations for computer-supported collaborative learning. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: Foundations for a CSCL Community (pp. 72-81). International Society of the Learning Sciences.
Lou, Y., Abrami, P. C., Spence, J. C., Poulsen, C., Chambers, B., & d’Apollonia, S. (1996). Within-class grouping: A meta-analysis. Review of educational research, 66(4), 423-458.
Malik, M. I., Ahmed, S., Dengel, A., & Liwicki, M. (2012, March). A signature verification framework for digital pen applications. In Document Analysis Systems (DAS), 2012 10th IAPR International Workshop on (pp. 419-423). IEEE.
Mistry, P., & Maes, P. (2008, January). Intelligent sticky notes that can be searched, located and can send reminders and messages. In Proceedings of the 13th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces (pp. 425-426). ACM.
Miura, M., Kunifuji, S., & Sakamoto, Y. (2007, January). Practical environment for realizing augmented classroom with wireless digital pens. In Knowledge-Based Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems (pp. 777-785). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Nattiv, A. (1994). Helping behaviors and math achievement gain of students using cooperative learning. The Elementary School Journal, 285-297.
O′Hara, K., & Sellen, A. (1997, March). A comparison of reading paper and on-line documents. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 335-342). ACM.
Oviatt, S., Arthur, A., & Cohen, J. (2006, October). Quiet interfaces that help students think. In Proceedings of the 19th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology (pp. 191-200). ACM.
Palmer, D. J., & Goetz, E. T. (1988). Selection and use of study strategies: The role of the studier′s beliefs about self and strategies.
Parker, D. B. (1985). Learning logic.
Price, M. N., Golovchinsky, G., & Schilit, B. N. (1998, May). Linking by inking: trailblazing in a paper-like hypertext. In Proceedings of the ninth ACM conference on Hypertext and hypermedia: links, objects, time and space---structure in hypermedia systems: links, objects, time and space---structure in hypermedia systems (pp. 30-39). ACM.
Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. Oxford University Press.
Schellens, T., & Valcke, M. (2005). Collaborative learning in asynchronous discussion groups: What about the impact on cognitive processing?.Computers in Human Behavior, 21(6), 957-975.
Schilit, B. N., Golovchinsky, G., & Price, M. N. (1998, January). Beyond paper: supporting active reading with free form digital ink annotations. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 249-256). ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co..
Sellen, A. J., & Harper, R. H. (2003). The myth of the paperless office. MIT press.
Sharan, S., & Sharan, Y. (1976). Small-Group Teaching.
Signer, B., & Norrie, M. C. (2007, February). PaperPoint: a paper-based presentation and interactive paper prototyping tool. In Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Tangible and embedded interaction (pp. 57-64). ACM.
Slavin, R. E. (1980). Effects of Student Teams and Peer Tutoring on Academic Achievement and Time On-Task. Journal of experimental education, 48(4), 253-57.
Slavin, R. E. (1985). Cooperative learning: Applying contact theory in desegregated schools. Journal of Social Issues, 41(3), 45-62.
Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice (Vol. 2). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Stahl, R. J. (1994). Cooperative learning in social studies: A handbook for teachers. Addison-Wesley.
Steimle, J., Brdiczka, O., & Muhlhauser, M. (2008, July). Coscribe: Using paper for collaborative annotations in lectures. In Advanced Learning Technologies, 2008. ICALT′08. Eighth IEEE International Conference on (pp. 306-310). IEEE.
Steimle, J., Gurevych, I., & Mühlhäuser, M. (2007). Notetaking in University Courses and its Implications for eLearning Systems. In DeLFI (Vol. 5, pp. 45-56).
Stevens, R. J., Madden, N. A., Slavin, R. E., & Farnish, A. M. (1987). Cooperative integrated reading and composition: Two field experiments. Reading Research Quarterly.
Sugihara, T., Miura, T., Miura, M., & Kunifuji, S. (2010, July). Examining the Effects of the Simultaneous Display of Students′ Responses Using a Digital Pen System on Class Activity-A Case Study of an Early Elementary School in Japan. In Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), 2010 IEEE 10th International Conference on (pp. 294-296). IEEE.
Tuan*, H. L., Chin, C. C., & Shieh, S. H. (2005). The development of a questionnaire to measure students′ motivation towards science learning.International Journal of Science Education, 27(6), 639-654.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society. The Development of Higher Psychological Processes.
Weibel, N., Ispas, A., Signer, B., & Norrie, M. C. (2008, April). Paperproof: a paper-digital proof-editing system. In CHI′08 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2349-2354). ACM.
Weinstein, C. E., & Mayer, R. E. (1986). The teaching of learning strategies.Handbook of research on teaching, 3, 315-327.
Wellner, P. (1993). Interacting with paper on the DigitalDesk. Communications of the ACM, 36(7), 87-96.
丁惠琪（2000）。合作學習應用於國小數學教學之探究。國立台北師範學院課程與教學研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
林益平（2007）。電子筆結合紙本投影片來增進教室內互動的學習輔助系統。中央大學資訊與工程研究所碩士論文，未發表，中壢市。
紀安珍（2005）。合作學習在一年級生活課程教學的行動研究。國立新竹教育大學應用科學系教學碩士班，未出版，新竹市。
張世忠（1998）。社會建構教學與科學概念。教育資料與研究，24，30-36。
黃雅貴（2011）。互動式電子白板容物注音符號教學對國小一年級學生學習成效影響之行動研究。台南大學教育學系科技發展與傳播研究所碩士論文，未發表，台南市。
楊易霖（2011）。互動式電子白板應用於國小六年級社會領域學生學習動機與成效之研究。台南大學教育學系課程與教學研究所碩士論文，未發表，台南市。

指導教授

楊鎮華(Stephen J.H. Yang)

審核日期

2014-7-15

推文