Web 2.0 英語學習活動之學生心流與學習動機歷程研究

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：36

、訪客IP：18.226.88.141

姓名

王品卿(Pin-ching Wang) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

網路學習科技研究所

論文名稱

Web 2.0 英語學習活動之學生心流與學習動機歷程研究
(The Evolution of Flow and Learning Motivation in Web 2.0 EFL Learning Activity)

相關論文

★ 以視覺為主的遊戲空間輔助全身性學習	★ 以數位教室環境增進同步遠距教學之臨場感
★ 以行動載具支援並分析合作式的探索活動	★ 以混合實境支援工作臺協同探究學習
★ 使用資料探勘輔助學習者探索大型資料庫—學習者經驗之研究	★ 以貢獻與聯結為基礎之社會知識創造模型—一個資源與概念合作聯結工具
★ 互動式計算桌面環境對於合作學習的優缺點	★ 以共享螢幕及群組軟體支援一對一環境下面對面的合作網路探索
★ 合作學習使用網際網路: 學習腳本在面對面網路合作探索的影響	★ 兒童使用超媒體的Web2.0創作故事平台之探究--衍生與重組
★ 以創用為基礎之合作說故事平台 - 衍生、重組、擁有感	★ 透過網路實施模擬實務社群並利用即興創作激發創意
★ 使用群組軟體與共同螢幕進行一對一合作網路探索活動	★ 以Cyber-Physical環境支援程式設計學習之探究
★ 跨領域合作設計活動之互動分析：群組軟體的支援與設計	★ 不同成就學生於模擬遊戲環境中程式學習效果之探究

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

學習者的英語能力差距過大是教學現場的問題之一，且台灣學生在學習英語時缺少適當的練習情境，造成其在英語朗讀能力上較不足。基於教學現場及台灣學生在英語學習上的問題，在本研究中提出使用Web 2.0英語學習活動，讓學生透過數位說故事及同儕合作的方式，建立一個以學生為主的英語學習環境，期望藉由此學習方式提升學生的英語學習成效及學習動機，並深入探討學生在長期的Web 2.0英語學習活動中學生心流經驗與學習動機的變化歷程。

從研究結果中發現在此學習活動後，學生的英語學習成效、學習動機皆呈現顯著提升。學生的英語詞彙及英語朗讀能力上成長，隨著活動參與次數的增加，學生對於學習活動的動機漸漸成長，推測原因為學生掌控自我的學習、學習活動中的發表及同儕的討論下，對於其英語學習成效和自信心產生影響，進而提升在各項度的動機上升。

整體而言，在長期的學習活動過程中，學生的心流主要呈現W形，從研究中可以得知學生在於科技融入學習活動初期，在控制力、專注力、好奇心及內在興趣上呈現下降的趨勢，並呈現3個階段，分別為退潮階段、嘗試復甦階段及穩定復甦階段，好奇心變動周期較長，學生的好奇心可能因初期的科技新奇效應消失。隨著活動過程中，老師及發表活動的引導與激勵下，學生的學習漸入佳境，營造出愉悅的學習環境，進而提升學生的學習感受、學習動機及學習成效。此外，在研究中發現學生在Web 2.0英語學習活動初期，其心流經驗及學習動機漸漸低落，如教學者須將科技融入教學現場時，建議教學者在於學習活動初期可以提供協助與輔助學習者學習的鷹架，使學生能在更加愉悅的學習環境中進行學習。

摘要(英)

Several situations have appeared in the classroom regarding English language learning. For instance, there is a big gap of English ability between the high achievement and low achievement students. Additionally, a lack of an appropriate learning situation leads students to have difficulties in English learning. To this end, an empirical study was conducted in the study to examine how Web 2.0 affected the students′ English learning. In other words, the Web 2.0 English learning activity was employed to create a student-centered environment, which can let the students create the story and collaborate with each other in a digital environment. By doing so, this study expected the students′ English learning performance and motivation would be improved. Furthermore, within a long-term study design, the flow and learning motivation were examined to see how Web 2.0 English learning activity would influence the students′ English learning.

The results from this study showed that the students′ learning performance and motivation were significantly improved after engaging in the Web 2.0 English learning activity. The students’ English vocabulary and English oral reading ability were enhanced. Regarding the learning motivation, it was also improved by participating in the Web 2.0 English learning activity. On the other hand, the students′ flow experience, in terms of control, attention focus, curiosity and intrinsically interesting, were decreased in the beginning of Web 2.0 English learning activity. In the long-term Web 2.0 English learning activity, students’ flow experience were divided into three stages of ebb, try to recovery and stabilized recovery by the 19 times of data collection.

However, the students′ flow experience was significantly improved in the end of Web 2.0 English learning activity. The results suggested that Web 2.0 English learning activity was beneficial to advance the students′ English learning performance, motivation and flow experience. The results from this study are used to support the further development of Web 2.0 English learning activity, which can support both instructor and students to create more joyful English learning environment. In addition, if the instructors used the technology in the class, this study suggested that the instructors can provide scaffolding to assist students on English learning.

關鍵字(中)

★ Web 2.0
★ 心流經驗
★ 學習動機
★ 英語學習

關鍵字(英)

★ Web 2.0
★ flow experience
★ learning motivation
★ English learning

論文目次

摘要 I
ABSTRACT II
目錄 V
圖目錄 VIII
表目錄 X
第一章緒論 1
1.1 研究背景與動機 1
1.2 研究目的與問題 3
1.3 名詞解釋 3
1.4 研究範圍與限制 5
1.5 論文架構 5
第二章文獻探討 6
2.1 科技融入英語學習活動 6
2.1.1 平板電腦融入英語學習 6
2.1.2 Web 2.0與學習感受 7
2.2 心流 9
2.2.1 心流的理論基礎 9
2.2.2 心流與新奇效應 10
2.2.3 心流與學習動機 11
2.3 數位說故事 13
第三章學習平台設計 15
3.1 活動設計 15
3.2 系統設計 16
3.3 學習檔案設計 17
3.4 繪本製作 19
3.3.1 繪本製作 20
3.3.2 繪本閱讀 21
3.5 繪本發表 22
第四章研究方法 24
4.1 研究對象 24
4.2 研究流程 24
4.3 實驗設計 26
4.4 研究工具 32
4.4.1 英語單字測驗 32
4.4.2 英語朗讀正確度測驗 32
4.4.3 學校英語測驗 33
4.4.4 學習動機量表 33
4.4.5 心流量表 35
4.4.6 電子繪本 36
4.5 資料收集與分析 38
4.5.1 學習學習成效差異分析 38
4.5.2 學習動機差異分析 38
4.5.3 心流歷程變化分析 38
4.5.4 事後訪談 40
第五章實驗結果與討論 41
5.1 學生作品之描述性統計 41
5.2 學生學習成效差異分析 48
5.2.1 英語單字測驗分析 48
5.2.2 英語朗讀測驗分析 48
5.2.3 學校英語測驗 49
5.3 學習動機差異分析 51
5.3.1 內在動機 53
5.3.2 外在動機 54
5.3.3 工作價值 55
5.3.4 學習的自我效能 56
5.3.5 同儕學習 57
5.4 心流變化分析 59
5.4.1 心流平均 59
5.4.2 控制力 62
5.4.3 專注力 64
5.4.4 好奇心 67
5.4.5 內在興趣 70
5.4.6 能力 74
5.4.7 挑戰 77
5.4.8 學生能力與挑戰分析 79
5.5 事後訪談 81
第六章結論與建議 87
6.1 結論 87
6.2 未來發展與建議 89
參考文獻 91
附錄A 英語單字測驗 99
附錄B 英語朗讀正確度測驗 101
附錄C 學校英語測驗 102
附錄D 學習動機量表 104
附錄E 心流量表 106
附錄F 訪談問題 107

參考文獻

呂冠賢. (2012). 導入同儕互評於數位故事創作. 中央大學網路學習科技研究所學位論文.
張武昌. (2006). 台灣的英語教育: 現況與省思. 教育資料與研究雙月刊, 69,129-144.
陳中民. (2012). 故事結構鷹架對於學童創作經驗之影響. 中央大學網路學習科技研究所學位論文.
曾國鴻. (2011). 以電子書支援親子共讀. 中央大學網路學習科技研究所學位論文, 1-85.
蕭伊茹. (2013). 基於建造主義導入數位說故事於英語學習之研究. 中央大學網路學習科技研究所學位論文.
李杰駿. (2014). Web 2.0 英文學習環境之學習成效及心流研究:男女生的比較.中央大學網路學習科技研究所學位論文.
Alcantud-Díaz, M., Vayá, A. R., & Gregori-Signes, C. (2014). ‘Share your experience’. Digital storytelling in English for tourism. Ibérica, 27, 185-204.
Armstrong, K., & Retterer, O. (2008). Blogging as L2 writing: A case study. AACE Journal, 16(3), 233-251.
Asoodar, M., Atai, M. R., Vaezi, S., & Marandi, S. S. (2014). Examining effectiveness of communities of practice in online English for academic purposes (EAP) assessment in virtual classes. Computers & Education, 70, 291-300.

August, D., & Hakuta, K. (1997). Improving schooling for language-minority children: A research agenda. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Banaszewski, T. (2002). Digital storytelling finds its place in the classroom. Multimedia schools, 9(1), 32-35.
Banaszewski, T. M. (2005). Digital storytelling: Supporting digital literacy in grades 4-12. Georgia Institute of Technology. Atlanta.
Baturay, M. H., Daloglu, A., & Yildirim, S. (2010). Language practice with multimedia supported web-based grammar revision material. ReCALL, 22(03), 313-331.
Beck, I. L., & McKeown, M. G. (1999). Comprehension: The Sine Qua Non of Reading. Teaching and Change, 6(2), 197-211.
Beschorner, B., & Hutchison, A. (2013). iPads as a Literacy Teaching Tool in Early Childhood. Online Submission, 1, 16-24.
Blake, C. (2009). Potential of Text‐Based Internet Chats for Improving Oral Fluency in a Second Language. The Modern Language Journal, 93(2), 227-240.
Bus, A. G., Van Ijzendoorn, M. H., & Pellegrini, A. D. (1995). Joint book reading makes for success in learning to read: A meta-analysis on intergenerational transmission of literacy. Review of educational research, 65(1), 1-21.
Chen, L., Zhang, R., & Liu, C. (2014). Listening strategy use and influential factors in Web‐based computer assisted language learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 30(3), 207-219.
Chiu, T.-L., Liou, H.-C., & Yeh, Y. (2007). A study of web-based oral activities enhanced by automatic speech recognition for EFL college learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20(3), 209-233.

Choi, D. H., Kim, J., & Kim, S. H. (2007). ERP training with a web-based electronic learning system: The flow theory perspective. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65(3), 223-243.
Coady, J., Huckin, T., & Haynes, M. (1993). Second language reading and vocabulary learning. Second language reading and vocabulary learning.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond Boredom and Anxiety. Josey–Bass, San Francisco.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention. HarperPerennial, New York.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., & LeFevre, J. (1989). Optimal experience in work and leisure. Journal of personality and social psychology, 56(5), 815.
Cui, Y., & Bull, S. (2005). Context and learner modelling for the mobile foreign language learner. System, 33(2), 353-367.
Ducate, L. C., Anderson, L. L., & Moreno, N. (2011). Wading through the world of wikis: An analysis of three wiki projects. Foreign Language Annals, 44(3), 495-524.
Ehri, L. C. (1995). Phases of development in learning to read words by sight. Journal of research in reading, 18(2), 116-125.
Engeser, S., & Rheinberg, F. (2008). Flow, performance and moderators of challenge-skill balance. Motivation and Emotion, 32(3), 158-172.
Engeser, S., Rheinberg, F., Vollmeyer, R., & Bischoff, J. (2005). Motivation, Flow-Erleben und Lernleistung in universitären Lernsettings. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 19(3), 159-172.

Ertmer, P. A., Newby, T. J., Liu, W., Tomory, A., Yu, J. H., & Lee, Y. M. (2011). Students’ confidence and perceived value for participating in cross-cultural wiki-based collaborations. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(2), 213-228.
Ghani, J. A. (1995). Flow in human computer interactions: Test of a model. Human factors in information systems: Emerging theoretical bases, 291-311.
Hafner, C., & Miller, L. (2011). Fostering learner autonomy in English for science: A collaborative digital video project in a technological learning environment. Language Learning and Technology, 15(3), 68-86.
Hart, B., & Risley, T. R. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children: Paul H Brookes Publishing.
Hathorn, P. P. (2005). Using digital storytelling as a literacy tool for the inner city middle school youth. The Charter Schools Resource Journal, 1(1), 32-38.
Henke, L. L., & Fontenot, G. (2011). Children and Internet use: perceptions of advertising, privacy, and functional displacement. Journal of Business & Economics Research (JBER), 5(11).
Hur, J. W., & Oh, J. (2012). Learning, engagement, and technology: Middle school students′ three-year experience in pervasive technology environments in South Korea. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 46(3), 295-312.
Hutchison, A., Beschorner, B., & Schmidt‐Crawford, D. (2012). Exploring the use of the iPad for literacy learning. The Reading Teacher, 66(1), 15-23.
Kasap, Z., & Magnenat-Thalmann, N. (2012). Building long-term relationships with virtual and robotic characters: the role of remembering. The Visual Computer, 28(1), 87-97.

Khang, H., Kim, J. K., & Kim, Y. (2013). Self-traits and motivations as antecedents of digital media flow and addiction: The Internet, mobile phones, and video games. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), 2416-2424.
Kiernan, P. J., & Aizawa, K. (2004). Cell phones in task based learning-Are cell phones useful language learning tools? ReCALL, 16(01), 71-84.
Koenig, J. M., & Zorn, C. (2002). Using storytelling as an approach to teaching and learning with diverse students. The Journal of nursing education, 41(9), 393-399.
Kucirkova, N., Messer, D., Sheehy, K., & Fernández Panadero, C. (2014). Children′s engagement with educational iPad apps: Insights from a Spanish classroom. Computers & Education, 71, 175-184.
Kucirkova, N., Messer, D., Sheehy, K., & Flewitt, R. (2013). Sharing personalised stories on iPads: a close look at one parent–child interaction. Literacy, 47(3), 115-122.
Lai, C. (2013). A framework for developing self-directed technology use for language learning. Announcements & Call for Papers, 100.
Lan, R., & Oxford, R. L. (2003). Language learning strategy profiles of elementary school students in Taiwan. IRAL, 41(4), 339-380.
Lee, S.-y. (2012). Storytelling Supported by Technology: An Alternative for EFL Children with Learning Difficulties. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(3).
Lewin, C., & Luckin, R. (2010). Technology to support parental engagement in elementary education: Lessons learned from the UK. Computers & education, 54(3), 749-758.

Liu, C. C., Chen, H. S., Shih, J. L., Huang, G. T., & Liu, B. J. (2011). An enhanced concept map approach to improving children’s storytelling ability. Computers & Education, 56(3), 873-884.
Liu, C. C., Cheng, Y. B., & Huang, C. W. (2011). The effect of simulation games on the learning of computational problem solving. Computers & Education, 57(3), 1907-1918.
Liu, K. P., & Liu, C. C. Facilitating EFL with Storytelling on Tablet PCs.
Manuguerra, M., & Petocz, P. (2011). Promoting student engagement by integrating new technology into tertiary education: The role of the iPad. Asian Social Science, 7(11), p61.
McClanahan, B., Williams, K., Kennedy, E., & Tate, S. (2012). A breakthrough for Josh: How use of an iPad facilitated reading improvement. TechTrends, 56(3), 20-28.
Mills, M. J., & Fullagar, C. J. (2008). Motivation and flow: Toward an understanding of the dynamics of the relation in architecture students. The Journal of psychology, 142(5), 533-556.
Moneta, G. B. (2012). Opportunity for creativity in the job as a moderator of the relation between trait intrinsic motivation and flow in work. Motivation and Emotion, 36(4), 491-503.
O′reilly, T. (2007). What is Web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Communications and Strategies, 65(1), 17-37.
Osmon, P. (2011). Paperless classrooms: a networked Tablet PC in front of every child. Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics, 31(2), 55-60.
Pearce, J. M., Ainley, M., & Howard, S. (2005). The ebb and flow of online learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 21(5), 745-771.
Pesola, C. A. (1991). Culture in the elementary school foreign language classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 24(4), 331-346.
Pintrich, P. R. (1991). A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ).
Sénéchal, M. (2006). Testing the home literacy model: Parent involvement in kindergarten is differentially related to grade 4 reading comprehension, fluency, spelling, and reading for pleasure. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10(1), 59-87.
Seifert, T., & Hedderson, C. (2010). Intrinsic motivation and flow in skateboarding: An ethnographic study. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11(3), 277-292.
Shinn, M. R. (1989). Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children. New York: Guilford.
Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (Eds) (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Sun, Y. C. (2010). Extensive writing in foreign‐language classrooms: A blogging approach. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 47(3), 327-339.
Trevino, L. K., & Webster, J. (1992). Flow in computer-mediated communication electronic mail and voice mail evaluation and impacts. Communication research, 19(5), 539-573.
Tsou, W., Wang, W., & Tzeng, Y. (2006). Applying a multimedia storytelling website in foreign language learning. Computers & Education, 47(1), 17-28.
Via, S. (2002). Digital storytelling evaluation rubric. Retrieved from
http://its.ksbe.edu/dst/PDFs/Rubrics/rubric.pdf
Weimann, G. (1996). Cable comes to the Holy Land: The impact of cable TV on Israeli viewers. Journal of broadcasting & electronic media, 40(2), 243-257.
Whitehurst, G. J., & Lonigan, C. J. (2001). Emergent literacy: Development from prereaders to readers. Handbook of early literacy research, 1, 11-29.
Woo, M., Chu, S., Ho, A., & Li, X. (2011). Using a wiki to scaffold primary-school students′ collaborative writing. Educational Technology and Society, 14(1), 43-54.
Yang, Y.-T., & Wu, W.-C. I. (2012). Digital storytelling for enhancing student academic achievement, critical thinking, and learning motivation: A year-long experimental study. Computers & Education, 59(2), 339-352.
Yang, S. C. (2001). Integrating computer-mediated tools into the language curriculum. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17(1), 85-93.
Yeung, S. S., Siegel, L. S., & Chan, C. K. (2012). Effects of a phonological awareness program on English reading and spelling among Hong Kong Chinese ESL children. Reading and writing, 1-24.

指導教授

劉晨鐘(Chen-Chung Liu)

審核日期

2014-7-28

推文