博碩士論文 101421048 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:38 、訪客IP:18.119.131.178
姓名 陳奕嘉(I-CHIA CHEN)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 企業管理學系
論文名稱 ERP供應商與顧問服務品質滿意程度對ERP風險管理與組織績效之影響
(The impact of ERP Service Quality on ERP Risk management and organizational performance)
相關論文
★ 台灣與大陸在ERP專案管理、專案成員向心力與離心力的不同之處★ ERP專案成員離心力與向心力對代理問題之影響
★ 事業策略、人力資源管理與組織績效之實證研究★ 商用飛機維修成本控制之研究-以某國籍航空公司為例
★ ERP系統更換關鍵成功因素研究-以Oracle系統導入為例★ 中小企業自行開發ERP 系統關鍵成功因素研究- 以高科技產業為例
★ 文化創意產業產品策略選擇之影響因素-以國片為例★ 專案管理風險對ERP專案成功之影響
★ 品質機能展開與多準則決策於設備開發應用★ ERP導入品質因素對IFRS轉換專案之影響
★ ERP投資金額對服務品質及導入後IT治理目標之分析★ ERP 導入問題對專案的影響
★ IFRS轉換對員工退休金計畫影響★ IFRS轉換對企業績效評估的影響
★ IFRS轉換問題對IFRS效益的影響★ ERP環境下企業集團自行編製合併報表能力對XBRL資訊透明度之研究
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)
摘要(中) 中文摘要
企業資源規劃系統(ERP)是一套整合性的商業應用套裝軟體,可提供即時資訊整合功能,被企業界視為提升營運效能並減少傳統作業流程的浪費的最佳良方,因此在90年代興起一股導入ERP的熱潮。導入ERP系統時,通常最關鍵的就是ERP系統供應商的選擇以及外部顧問協助企業導入的服務是否到位,然而導入ERP系統之後,往往會忽略可能對公司IT治理的影響,進而而使企業未必能達到導入ERP系統前的預期成效或者對組織績效的正面影響。
因此本研究使用問卷調查法,希望藉由分析ERP系統供應商跟ERP導入顧問的服務品質滿意程度對於導入後的風險管理達成程度和組織績效的相關程度來找出那些ERP導入前的前置作業能夠確實對導入後的績效以及風險管理產生正面幫助。
本研究發現(1)提升ERP系統供應商或ERP導入顧問的服務品質滿意程度均能夠對導入後風險管理有正向影響。(2)提升ERP系統供應商與外部顧問的整體服務品質滿意程度能夠使組織績效產生正向影響。(3)ERP導入後的風險管理達成程度越高也能使組織績效產生正向影響。
摘要(英) Abstract
Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system is an integrated business suite application that provides real-time information integration. It’s regarded as the best solution to improve operational efficiency and reduce cost of traditional operation processes. As a result, lots of enterprises headed to implement ERP system in 1990s.
As we know, the choice of ERP system vendors as well as the external consultants assistance are critical factors when implementing ERP system; however, after implementing ERP system, managers tends to ignore the possible impact on IT governance. In that way, companies may not achieve their desired results or positive impact on organizational performance after implementing ERP system
Thus, this study use questionnaires sent to 4,276 sample companies in Taiwan. We hope to find out the relationship between ERP system vendors as well as the external consultants service quality satisfaction before implementing ERP and the risks management achievement, organizational performance after implementing ERP by analyzing questionnaires data to identify which factors could have positive help.
This study results show as below:
(1)Either ERP system vendors or external consultants service quality satisfaction are able to have positive impact on risks management achievement.
(2) ERP system vendors and external consultants entirely service quality satisfaction have positive impact on organizational performance after implementing ERP system.
(3)The higher risks management achievement can lead to better organizationalperformance
關鍵字(中) ★ 企業資源規劃(ERP)
★ 風險管理
★ ERP績效
關鍵字(英) ★ ERP system
★ Risks management
★ ERP performance
論文目次 目錄      

中文摘要 ……………………………………………………………… i
Abstratct ……………………………………………………………… ii
目錄 ……………………………………………………………… iii
表目錄 ……………………………………………………………… v
圖目錄 ……………………………………………………………… vi

一、 緒論………………………………………………………… 1
1-1 研究背景與動機…………………………………………… 1
1-2 研究目的…………………………………………………… 2
1-3 論文結構與研究流程……………………………………… 2
1-3-1 論文結構…………………………………………………… 2
1-3-2 研究流程…………………………………………………… 3
二、 文獻探討…………………………………………………… 5
2-1 企業資源規劃(ERP)的定義……………………………… 5
2-2 企業資源規劃系統演進歷程與未來……………………… 6
2-3 企業資源規劃與IT治理之風險管理……………………… 8
2-4 ERP導入後組織績效衡量…………………………………… 10
三、 研究方法……………………………………………………… 12
3-1 研究架構……………………………………………………… 12
3-2 研究對象與問卷設計………………………………………… 14
3-3 問卷發放與回收情況………………………………………… 15
3-4 問卷樣本描述………………………………………………… 15
3-5 研究工具……………………………………………………… 16
3-6 ERP系統績效衡量與變數衡量方式說明…………………… 19
3-6-1 ERP供應商與顧問服務品質滿意程度之構面評估………… 19
3-6-2 企業資源規劃(ERP)系統導入後風險管理之評估………… 20
3-6-3 企業資源規劃系統導入後績效衡量構面評估……………… 20
3-6-4 變數衡量公式 21
四、 研究結果與數據……………………………………………… 24
4-1 ERP供應商服務品質與風險管理變數關係……………… 24
4-2 ERP顧問服務品質與風險管理變數關係………………… 25
4-3 ERP顧問與供應商整體服務品質與風險管理變數關係… 27
4-4 風險管理與組織績效關係…………………………………… 28
4-5 ERP顧問與供應商整體服務品質與組織績效關係………… 30
五、 結論與建議…………………………………………………… 31
5-1 研究結論……………………………………………………… 31
5-2 研究限制與未來研究建議………………………………… 33
參考文獻 ……………………………………………………………… 34
表目錄

表1 研究樣本敘述統計表……………………………………… 16
表2 各變數間信度統計量……………………………………… 18
表3 各變數之項目統計量……………………………………… 18
表4 各變項相關係數表………………………………………… 18
表5 研究假設H1敘述性統計…………………………………… 24
表6 研究假設H1各項係數……………………………………… 25
表7 研究假設H2敘述性統計…………………………………… 26
表8 研究假設H2各項係數……………………………………… 26
表9 研究假設H3敘述性統計…………………………………… 27
表10 研究假設H3各項係數……………………………………… 28
表11 研究假設H4敘述性統計…………………………………… 29
表12 研究假設H4各項係數……………………………………… 29
表13 研究假設H5敘述性統計…………………………………… 30
表14 研究假設H5各項係數……………………………………… 30

圖目錄

圖1 研究流程…………………………………………………… 4
圖2 ERP系統發展歷史………………………………………… 7
圖3 ERP整合性功能…………………………………………… 8
圖4 Delone and McLean的 IS success model……………… 11
圖5 平衡計分卡Balanced Scorecard (BSC) ………………… 12
圖6 研究架構圖………………………………………………… 13
參考文獻 一、 中文部分
﹝1﹞國立中央大學管理學院 ERP中心,企業資源規劃導論,第四版,旗標出版股份有限公司,臺北市,2011年12月。

二、 英文部分
﹝1﹞ Al-Mashari, M., Al-Mudimigh, A., Zairi, M., 2003. Enterprise resource planning: A taxonomyof critical factors, European Journal of Operational Research, 146(2), 352–364.
﹝2﹞ Aloini, D., Dulmin, R. and Mininno, V., 2007, Risk management in ERP project introduction: Review of the literature, Information & Management, 44(6), 547–567
﹝3﹞ Bourdariat, J., 2001, Corporate governance and ICT: a marriage of reason, Information Systems Control Journal, 23-25.
﹝4﹞ Bancroft, N., Seip, H. and Sprengel, A., 1998, Implementing SAP R/3 (2nd edn), Greenwich:Manning Publications.
﹝5﹞ Davenport, T.H. “Mission Critical: Realizing the Promise of Enterprise Systems”, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA, USA, 2000
﹝6﹞ Davenport, T. H., 1998, Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system, Harvard Business Review, 76 (4), 121–131.
﹝7﹞ Delone, W. H., McLean, E. R., 1992, Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable, Information Systems Research 3, 60–95.
﹝8﹞ Ehie, I. C. and Madsen, M., 2005, Identifying critical issues in enterprise resource planning (ERP) implementation, Computers in Industry, 56(6), 545-557
﹝9﹞ Hallikainen, P.,、Kivijärvi, H., and Tuominen, M., 2009, Supporting the module sequencing decision in the ERP implementation process—An application of the ANP method, International Journal of Production Economics, 119(2), 259–270
﹝10﹞ Jacobs. J. R. and ‘Ted’ Weston Jr, F. C., 2007, Enterprise resource planning (ERP)—A brief history, Journal of Operations Management, 25(2), 357-363
﹝11﹞ Laudon, K. C., and Laudon, J. P., 2012, Management Information Systems, Prentice Hall.
﹝12﹞ Laughlin, 1999S.P. Laughlin“An ERP Game Plan”,Journal of Business Strategy, 20 (1) (1999), pp. 32–37
﹝13﹞ Madapusi, A. and D′Souza, D., 2011, The influence of ERP system implementation on the operational performance of an organization, International Journal of Information Management, 32(1), 24–34.
﹝14﹞ May, J., Dhillon, G. and Caldeira, M., “Defining value-based objectives for ERP systems planning”, Decision Support Systems, Vol. 55 No. 1, pp. 98-109, 2012.
﹝15﹞ Markus, M. L. and Tanis C., 2000, The enterprise systems experience—from adoption to success, in: R.W. Zmud (Ed.) , Framing the Domains of IT Research: Glimpsing the Future Through the Past, Pinna flex Educational Resources, Cincinnati, OH, 173 – 207
﹝16﹞ Maber, V.A., A. Soni, and Venkataramanan,M.A., “Enterprise resource planning survey of U.S. manufacturing firms”, Production and Inventory Management Journal, Vol. 41, pp. 52-58, 2000
﹝17﹞ Mabert ,V.A., Soni A., and Venkataramanan, M.A., “Enterprise resource planning: Managing the implementation process”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 146, pp. 302-314, 2003.
﹝18﹞ P. Weill and J.W. Ross, 2006, IT governance: how top performers manage IT decision rights for superior results, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
﹝19﹞ Steven De Haes & Wim Van Grembergen “An Exploratory Study into IT GovernanceImplementations and its Impact on Business/ITAlignment”,Information Systems Management, 26: 123–137
﹝20﹞ Rajagopal, P., 2002, An innovation-diffusion view of implementation of enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems and development of a research model, Information & Management, Volume, 40(2), 87-114
﹝21﹞ R.S. Kaplan, D.P. Norton, The balanced scorecard—measures that drive performance,Harvard Business School Press, Boston, 1992.
﹝22﹞ White, E.M., Anderson, J.C., Schroeder, R.G., Tupy, S.E., 1982, A studyof the MRP implementation process, Journal of Operations Management, 2, 145–153.
﹝23﹞ White, O.W., 1984, Manufacturing Resource Planning (MRPII): Unlocking America’s Productivity Potential, revised ed.Oliver Wight Limited Publications, Essex
﹝24﹞ Wang, E. T.G., Lin, C. C. L., Jiang, J. J. and Klein, G., 2007, Improving enterprise resource planning (ERP) fit to organizational process through knowledge transfer, International Journal of Information Management, 27(3), 200–212
﹝25﹞ Wang, E. T.G.,Jessica H.F. Chen,Effects of internal support and consultant quality on the consulting process and ERP system quality,Decision Support Systems,Volume 42, Issue 2, November 2006, Pages 1029–1041
﹝26﹞ Wen-Hsien Tsai, “An empirical investigation of the impacts of internal/external facilitators on the project success of ERP: A structural equation model”, Decision Support Systems, Volume 50, Issue 2, January 2011, Pages 480–490
﹝27﹞ Yusuf, Y., Gunasekaran, A., and M.S. Abthorpe, “Enterprise information systems project implementation: A case study of ERP in Rolls-Royce”, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 87, pp. 251-266, 2004.
指導教授 蔡文賢 審核日期 2015-1-22
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明