人力資本投資與個人職涯選擇之關聯─以自我效能為中介變項

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：51

、訪客IP：52.15.59.163

姓名

陳麗帆(Li-fan Chen) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

人力資源管理研究所

論文名稱

人力資本投資與個人職涯選擇之關聯─以自我效能為中介變項
(The Relationship between Human Capital Investment and Individual Career Choice: The Mediating Effect of Self-efficacy)

相關論文

★ 空服員之工作特性、工作壓力源與個人壓力反應	★ 人力資源管理活動對員工離職意願之影響- 以工作滿意度為中介變項
★ 直線主管之管理訓練與其參與人力資源管理活動之關聯	★ 直線經理參與人力資源管理活動之影響因素探討
★ 員工風險承擔對個人持股意願之影響	★ 人力資本投資、知識分享與組織績效之關聯
★ 人力資源部門跨界活動對企業採行高績效人力資源管理實務之影響	★ 賦權感知、工作滿意、組織承諾與服務行為之相關性研究―以某連鎖便利商店為例
★ 業務代表人格特質與核心職能對績效影響的探討 —以某藥廠為例	★ 實施利益分享制度對心理賦權感及工作滿意之影響
★ 員工股票獎酬對員工心理所有權之影響---以內外控人格特質為干擾變項	★ 組織氣候感知、組織承諾與組織公民行為之關聯
★ 人力資源高績效工作實務、創新氣候與組織績效之關聯－以IC設計產業為例	★ 高績效工作實務對員工知識分享行為之影響 -
★ 人格特質與工作績效之關係研究─以航空服務業空服人員為例	★ 員工對功能彈性氣候的感知對工作滿意度的影響以工作自主與工作要求為中介變項

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

本研究旨在探討人力資本投資對個人的職涯選擇意念的影響，而人力資本投資可分為一般性人力資本投資及產業特定性人力資本投資，職涯選擇意念亦分為轉職、轉業與往海外發展；本文以自我效能作為中介變數，自我效能分為任務技能性自我效能和組織關聯性自我效能，進而探討人力資本投資是否會透過中介變項影響個人職涯選擇的意念。
資料源自中央研究院調查研究專題中心學術調查研究資料庫(SRDA)中之政府調查資料─2010年勞工生活及就業狀況調查，為一次級資料，樣本數共4,138。研究結果顯示，一般性人力資本投資對個人轉職有正向影響；產業特定性人力資本投資對個人轉職有正向影響，而對個人轉業則有負向影響；一般性人力資本投資對任務技能性自我效能與組織關聯性自我效能皆有正向影響；產業特定性人力資本投資對任務技能性自我效能與組織關聯性自我效能皆有正向影響；任務技能性自我效能對個人往海外發展有正向影響、組織關聯性自我效能對個人轉職與個人轉業皆有負向影響。而自我效能，在產業特定性人力資本投資對個人轉業的影響中，具有中介的效用。
就實務上的意義而言，本研究發現組織在進行員工之人力資本投資時，可多於產業特定性人力資本投資著手；身為協助角色的管理者，則須辨認組織策略與人力資本缺口，讓企業得以進行適當的人力資本投資；而員工須先確認自己的興趣，在作人力資本投資的訓練選擇。

摘要(英)

The purpose of the study is to examine the effect of human capital investment to individual career choice. Human capital investment can be divided into two dimension, both “general human capital investment” and “sector-specific human capital investment”; and the individual career choice includes “job change in the current corporation”, “leaving to different corporation” and “going abroad.” We take the self-efficacy as the mediator in our study, and discuss whether the human capital investment will affects the individual career choice through the mediator.
The source of the questionnaire is “2010 labor life and employment status research” in SRDA. Total of 4,138 samples are secondary data. According to our result, we found that both general human capital investment and sector-specific human capital investment impact on parts of the individual career choice; and both general human capital investment and sector-specific human capital investment impact on self-efficacy; besides, some of the self-efficacy
Impact on parts of the individual career choice. However, self-efficacy only be a complete mediation between sector-specific human capital investment and the individual career choice-leaving to different corporation.
In practice, our research found that organizations can invest in sector-specific human capital more; at the same time managers should help organizations to identify the gaps between organizational goals and the human capital, to make the organizations have the true training decisions. Also, employees have to identity their interests before they invest in their human capital.

關鍵字(中)

★ 一般性人力資本投資
★ 產業特定性人力資本投資
★ 自我效能

關鍵字(英)

★ General Human Capital Investment
★ Sector-specific Human Capital Investment
★ Self-efficacy

論文目次

中文摘要............................................i
英文摘要...........................................ii
誌謝..............................................iii
目錄...............................................iv
圖目錄...............................................v
表目錄...............................................v
第一章緒論 ......................................... 1
第一節研究背景與動機.................................. 1
第二節研究目的 ...................................... 3
第二章文獻探討 ...................................... 4
第一節人力資本投資 ................................... 4
第二節自我效能 ....................................... 5
第三節人力資本投資對個人職涯選擇之影響 .................. 6
第四節人力資本投資與自我效能之關聯 ...................... 8
第五節自我效能對個人職涯選擇之影響 ..................... 10
第三章研究方法 ....................................... 13
第一節研究架構 ....................................... 13
第二節樣本資料 ....................................... 15
第三節研究工具 ....................................... 15
第四節資料分析方法 ................................... 20
第四章研究結果 ..................................... 21
第一節樣本特性分析 ................................... 21
第二節相關分析 ...................................... 23
第三節迴歸分析 ...................................... 29
第五章結論與建議 .................................... 51
第一節結論 .......................................... 51
第二節管理意涵 ...................................... 58
第三節研究限制 ...................................... 60
第四節未來研究建議 .................................... 61
參考文獻 ............................................. 62

參考文獻

一、中文文獻
1. 紀雪雲、張榮珍、王惠珠、陳毓璟、周素珍、戴桂英，「衛生企劃人員之教育訓練對自我效能的影響及其相關因素之探討」，經國管理暨健康學院、中國文化大學、行政院衛生署企劃處。
2.吳淑鈴，2010，「有效的職涯規劃與管理」，T&D飛訊，第109期。
3.陸洛，2012，「海外派遣與全球職涯發展之新挑戰」，T&D飛訊，第144期。

二、英文文獻
1. Ammentorp J， Sabroe S， Kofoed PE & Mainz J. 2007. The effect of training in communication skills on medical doctors’ and nurses’ self-efficacy. Patient Education and Counseling， 66(3):270-277.
2. Nørgaard B， Ammentorp J， Ohm Kyvik K， Kofoed PE. 2012. Communication skills training increased the self-efficacy of doctors， nurses， nursing assistants， and medical secretaries in relation to communication with both patients and colleagues. The Journal of continuing education in the health professions， 32(2):90-97.
3.Ammentorp J， Kofoed PE. 2010. Coach training can improve the selfefficacy of neonatal nurses: a pilot study. Patient Education and Counseling， 79(2):258-261.
4. Betz， Nancy E.; Hackett， Gail 1981. The relationship of careerrelated self-efficacy expectations to perceived career options in college women and men. Journal of Counseling Psychology， 28(5):399-410.
5.Mark Blaug 1976. The empirical status of human capital theory: a slightly jaundiced survey. Journal of Economic Literature， 14(3):827-855.
6. Deborah L. Feltz & Cathy D. Lirgg 2001. Self-efficacy beliefs of athletes， teams， and coaches. In R. N. Singer， H. A. Hausenblas， & C. Janelle (Eds.)， Handbook of Sport Psychology， 2nd ed.: 340-361. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
7. Andries De Grip， Hans Heijke & ED Willems 1991. Training and Mobility:pp.78-98.
8. Bartel A.P. 1992. Training， Wage Growth and Job Performance: Evidence from a company database. NBER Working paper No.4027.
9.Canice Prendergast 1993. The role of promotion in inducing specific human capital acquisition. The Quarterly Journal of Economics， 108(2):523-534.
10. Lisa M. Lynch 1992. Differential Effects of Post-School Training on Early Career Mobility. NBER Working Paper No. 4034.
11. Becker， Gary S. 1962. Investment in Human Capital: A Theoretical Analysis. Journal of Political Economy， 70(5):9-49.
12. Mark A. Loewenstein & James R. Spletzer. 1999. General and Specific Training Evidence and Implications. The Journal of Human Resources， 34(4):710-733.
13. Lynch， Lisa M. Friedman 1991. The Role of Off-the-Job vs. On-the-Job Training for the Mobility of Women Workers. American Economic Review， 81(2):151-156.
14. Bandura， A. 1994. Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.)， Encyclopedia of human behavior : 4:71-81. New York: Academic Press.
15. Nachum Sicherman & Oded Galor 1990. A Theory of Career Mobility. Journal of Political Economy， 98(1):169-192.
16. Tannenbaum， Scott I.; Mathieu， John E.; Salas， Eduardo; Cannon-Bowers， Janis A. 1991. The influence of training fulfillment on the development of commitment， self-efficacy， and motivation. Journal of Applied Psychology， 76(6):759-769.
17. Gholamreza Torkzadeh ， Thomas P Van Dyke 2002. Effects of training on Internet self-efficacy and computer user attitudes. Computers in Human Behavior， 18(5):479-494.
18. Frayne， Colette A.; Latham， Gary P. 1987. Application of social learning theory to employee self-management of attendance. Journal of Applied Psychology， 72(3):387-392.
19. Latham， Gary P.; Frayne， Colette A. 1989. Self-management training for increasing job attendance: A follow-up and a replication. Journal of Applied Psychology， Vol 74(3):411-416.
20. Gist， Marilyn E.; Schwoerer， Catherine; Rosen， Benson 1989. Effects of alternative training methods on self-efficacy and performance in computer software training. Journal of Applied Psychology， 74(6):884-891.
21. CYNTHIA KAY STEVENS & MARILYN E. GIST 1997. EFFECTS OF SELF-EFFICACY and GOAL-ORIENTATION TRAINING ON NEGOTIATION SKILL MAINTENANCE: WHAT ARE THE MECHANISMS?. Personnel Psychology， 50(4):955-978.
22. Sieben， I. & De Grip， A. 2004. Training and expectations on job mobility in the call centres sector. Journal of European Industrial Training， 28(2/3/4):257-271.
23. Nancy E. Betz and Gail Hackett 1986. Applications of Self-Efficacy Theory to Understanding Career Choice Behavior. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology， 4:279-289.
24.Karen M Taylor & Nancy E Betz 1983. Applications of self-efficacy theory to the understanding and treatment of career indecision. Journal of Vocational Behavior， 22(1):63-81.
25. Gail Hackett & Nancy E Betz 1981. A self-efficacy approach to the career development of women. Journal of Vocational Behavior， 18(3)326-339.
26. Betz， Nancy E. & Hackett， Gail 1981.The relationship of career-related self-efficacy expectations to perceived career options in college women and men. Journal of Counseling Psychology， 28(5): 399-410.
27. Robert W Lent & Gail Hackett 1987. Career self-efficacy: Empirical status and future directions. Journal of Vocational Behavior， 30(3):347-382.
28. Bandura， Albert 1977. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review， 84(2):191-215.
29. Alan M. Saks 1995. Longitudinal Field Investigation of the Moderating and Mediating Effects of Self-Efficacy on the Relationship Between Training and Newcomer Adjustment. Journal of Applied Psychology， 80(2):211-225.

指導教授

劉念琪(Nien-chi Liu)

審核日期

2015-7-7

推文