參考文獻 |
1. Aldrich, H.E. (1972). Technology and organizational structure: A reexamination of the findings of the Aston group. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(1), 26–43.
2. Blau, P. M. 1955. The dynamics of bureaucracy: A study of interpersonal relationships in two government agencies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3. Blau, P.M., Falbe, C.M., McKinley, W., & Tracy, P.K. (1976). Technology and organization in manufacturing. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(1), 20–40.
4. Carter, B., and New, C. (Eds.). 2004. Making Realism Work: Realist Social Theory and Empirical Research, London: Routledge.
5. Cousins, K.C. and Robey, D. (2005). The Social Shaping of Electronic Metals Exchanges: An institutional theory perspective, Information Technology & People 18(3): 212.
6. Currie, W.L. (2004). The Organizing Vision of Application Service Provision: A process-oriented analysis, Information and Organization 14: 237–267.
7. DeLanda, M. 2006. A New Philosophy of Society: Assemblage Theory and Social Complexity, London: Continuum.
8. DeSanctis, G. & Poole, M.S. (1994) Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: adaptive structuration theory. Organization Science, 5(2), 121–147.
9. Devereaux Jennings, P. and Greenwood, R. (2003). Constructing the Iron Cage:Institutional theory and enactment, in R. Westwood and S. Clegg (eds.)
10. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. 1983. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective
11. Fulk, J. (1993). Social construction of communication technology. Academy of Management Journal, 36(5), 921–951.
12. Fulk, J., & Boyd, B. (1991). Emerging theories of communication in organizations. Journal of Management, 17(2), 407–447.
13. Fulk, J., Schmitz, J., & Ryu, D. (1995). Cognitive elements in the social construction of technology. Management Communication Quarterly, 8(3), 259–288.
14. Fulk, J., Steinfield, C.W., Schmitz, J., & Power, G.J. (1987). A social influence model of media use in organizations. Communication Research, 14(5), 529–552.
15. Gibson, J. J. 1986. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
16. Greenwood, R., Suddaby, R. and Hinings, C.R. (2002). Theorizing Change: The role of professional associations in the transformation of institutionalized fields, Academy of Management Journal 45(1): 58–80.
17. Hedstrom, P., and Swedberg, R. 1998. “Social Mechanisms: An Introductory Essay,” in Social Mechanisms, P. Hedstrom, and R. Swedberg (eds.), Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1-31.
18. Heugens, P. P. M. A. R., & Lander, M. W. (2009). Structure! agency! (and other quarrels): A meta-analysis of institutional theories of organization. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 61-85.
19. Leonardi PM, Barley SR. (2010) What′s under construction here? Social action, materiality, and power in constructivist studies of technology and organizing. Acad. Management Ann.4(1) :1–51. CrossRef
20. Lucas, H.C. (1975). Performance and the use of an information system. Management Science, 29(8), 908–919.
21. Mark, A.L. (2007). Modernising healthcare – Is the NPfIT for purpose? Journal of Information Technology 22(3): 248–257.
22. Merton, R. K. 1940. Bureaucratic structure and personality. Social Forces, 18: 560–568.
23. Mignerat M and Rivard S (2009) Positioning the institutional perspective in information systems research. Journal of Information Technology 24(4), 369–391.
24. Norman, D. A. 1988. The Psychology of Everyday Things, New York: Basic Books.
25. Norman, D. A. 1999. “Affordance, Conventions, and Design,” Interactions (6:3), pp. 38-43.
26. Orlikowski, W.J. (1992). The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science, 3(3), 398–427.
27. Orlikowski, W.J. (2000). Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organization Science, 11(4), 404–428.
28. Orlikowski, W.J., & Gash, D.C. (1994). Technological frames: Making sense of information technology in organizations. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 12, 174–207.
29. Parsons, T. 1956. Structure and process in modern societies. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
30. Perrow, C. (1967). A framework for the comparative analysis of organizations. American Sociological Review, 32, 194–208.
31. Poole, M.S., & DeSanctis, G. (1990). Understanding the use of group decision support systems: The theory of adaptive structuration. In J. Fulk & C. Steinfield (Eds.), Organizations and communication technology (pp. 173–193). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
32. Poole, M.S., & DeSanctis, G. (1992). Microlevel structuration in computer-supported group decision making. Human Communication Research, 19(1), 5–49.
33. Ramiller, N.C. and Swanson, E.B. (2003). Organizing Visions for Information Technology and the Information Systems Executive Response, Journal of Management Information Systems 20(1): 13–50.
34. rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48: 147–160.
35. Reichers, A. E. (1987), "An Interactionist Perspective on Newcomer Socialization Rates," Academy of Management Review, 12, 2, 278-287.
36. Rice, R.E., & Aydin, C. (1991). Attitudes toward new organizational technology: Network proximity as a mechanism for social information processing. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(2), 219–244.
37. Swanson, E.B. and Ramiller, N.C. (1997). The Organizing Vision in Information Systems Innovation, Organization Science 8(5): 458–474.
38. Volkoff, O., & Strong, D. M. (2013). Critical realism and affordances: theorizing it-associated organizational change process. MIS Quarterly, 37(3), 819–834.
39. Wang, P. and Swanson, E.B. (2008). Customer Relationship Management as Advertised, Information Technology & People 21(4): 323.
40. Wang, P. Chasing the hottest IT: Effects of information technology fashion on organizations. MIS Quarterly, 34, 1 (2010), 63–85.
41. Woodward, J. (1958). Management and technology. London: HSMO.
|