博碩士論文 102424012 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:262 、訪客IP:3.145.97.248
姓名 邱函珈(Han-Chia Chiu)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 產業經濟研究所
論文名稱 最高願付價格與最低願受補償金額實證分析:以廢冰箱回收為例
相關論文
★ 銀行授信行為之研究★ 經發會前後台股指數、期貨指數、電子指數與金融指數之關聯性
★ 台灣家庭夏天用電需求分析★ 影響台銀黃金存摺價格因素之研究
★ 國際原油投資報酬與資金行情之探討-GARCH模型★ 電子商務對企業經營績效之影響
★ 有害廢棄物之處理與再利用研究:以A公司為例★ 台灣電燈用電需求量探討--以縣市資料為例
★ 台美股價、匯率、利率之動態關聯-VECM與VECM-GARCH應用★ 台灣攤販業獲利決定因素-人力資本的影響
★ 航空客運經濟帶油決定因素之實證分析★ 台灣都會區用電需求影響因素實證分析
★ 便利商店現煮咖啡銷售之研究★ 大陸鋼鐵出口與台灣鋼鐵價格的關聯性
★ 人口結構變遷對財政教育支出之影響★ 運動鞋製業的市場結構、行為與績效分析
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   [檢視]  [下載]
  1. 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
  2. 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
  3. 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。

摘要(中) 近年來,家電產品受到新科技的影響,市面上可選擇的家電產品越來越多,再加上政府鼓勵採用節省能源的產品,民眾更換或淘汰家中老舊家電產品的意願大幅上升。故本研究旨在利用假設性市場評價法進行問卷設計,並藉由雙界二分選擇的詢價方式,探討全台都市地區的一般消費者日常回收態度、行為與個人特質對於廢四機(電視/電冰箱/洗衣機/冷暖氣機)回收的影響效果,並進一步估算消費者對於廢棄冰箱回收服務的最高願意支付金額(WTP)與最低願意接受補償金額(WTA)。
本研究中總共收集台灣大都會區(台北、桃園、新竹、台中、台南、高雄)747份有效問卷,並根據問卷設計的方式分別利用間斷選擇模型:Probit Model與Bivariate Probit Model以及連續性選擇模型:OLS Model與Tobit Model進行估計。研究估計結果顯示,在間斷型模型估計之下,消費者對於廢冰箱回收計畫的最高願意支付金額平均估計結果約介於NT$1004.66到NT$1215元間,且僅有性別變數與出價金額具有顯著效果;而最低願意接受補償金額的估計平均值約為NT$2503.7~NT$2627元間。WTA與WTP的比值約為2.16~2.51。而在連續性的模型估計之中,進一步將「不願意支付者」納入模型中估算,估計結果顯示最高願意支付金額的平均值約介於NT$886到NT$1157元之間;而最低願意接受補償金額估計平均值約為NT$595到NT$648元。
摘要(英) Due to the advanced technology development, consumers would have more and more choices in home appliance market. Furthermore, the Taiwanese government exerts great efforts in promoting energy-saving products, people are more willing to discard and recycle the old one. The main point of this paper was to use contingent valuation method (CVM) and designed a survey to analyze the effect from consumers’ behavior. In the questionnaire, we adopted double -bounded dichotomous choice scheme to investigate consumers’ attitudes toward recycling issue, their daily recycling habits, and also their personal characteristics. Then we used these information to discover if there were any effects on e-waste recycle and estimated consumers’ willingness to pay(WTP) and willingness to accept(WTA) for fridge recycling service.
Survey data was from 747 consumers in urban areas and, in this paper, discrete choice model (Probit model, Bivariate probit model) and continuous model (OLS, Tobit model) were used to analyze the causal effect. From discrete models, respondents were found WTP for recycling service was from NT$1,004 to NT$1,215 dollars, and only gender and bid price had significant effects. On the other hand, the estimated average WTA was from NT$2,503 to NT$2,627 dollars; the disparity between WTA and WTP was around 2.16~2.51. From continuous models, including protest zero observations, the results showed that the average WTP for recycling service was between NT$886 and NT$1,157 dollars; the average WTA was between NT$595 and NT$648, lower than WTP estimation.
關鍵字(中) ★ 假設性市場評價法
★ 雙界二分選擇
★ 最大願意支付價格
★ 最小願意接受補償金額
★ 電子電器產品回收
關鍵字(英)
論文目次 中文摘要 i
Abstract ii
致謝 iii
圖目錄 vi
表目錄 vii
第一章、緒論 1
1.1研究動機與目的 1
1.2研究方法 3
1.3研究架構 3
第二章、家電回收政策現況 4
2.1、家電回收現況 4
2.2各國回收體制與政策比較 6
2.2.1台灣廢棄家電回收管理政策 6
2.2.2日本廢棄家電回收管理政策 8
2.2.3德國廢棄家電回收管理政策 10
第三章、文獻回顧 13
3.1已開發國家 13
3.2開發中國家 18
3.3最小願意接受補償金額與最大願意支付價格(WTA vs. WTP ) 21
第四章、研究方法 23
4.1 問卷設計架構 23
4.2實證模型與估計方法 26
4.2.1常態機率模型(Probit Model) 27
4.2.2雙元迴歸模型(Bivariate Probit Model) 28
4.2.3 普通最小平方法( OLS model) 29
4.2.4Tobit迴歸模型(Tobit Model) 32
第五章、資料來源與摘要統計 33
5.1資料來源 33
5.2資料與統計摘要 33
5.2.1受訪者個人社經資料與摘要統計 33
5.2.2 對回收課題的看法 37
5.2.3回收行為與制度面探討 40
5.2.4 假設性市場問答 42
5.3重要變數說明 45
5.3.1指數建構 45
5.3.2 變數說明 45
第六章、實證結果與分析 48
6.1 常態機率模型(Probit Model)估計結果 48
6.1.1 最高願付價格(WTP) 48
6.1.2 最低願受補償額(WTA) 52
6.2 雙元機率迴歸模型(Bivariate Probit Model)估計結果 55
6.2.1 最高願付價格(WTP) 55
6.2.2 最低願受補償額(WTA) 58
6.3 最小平方法(OLS Model)估計結果 61
6.4 Tobit迴歸模型(Tobit Model)估計結果 62
第七章、結論與建議 65
7.1研究結論 65
7.2研究限制 66
7.3研究建議 66
附件一 68
參考文獻 76
參考文獻 (1) Aadland, David, & Caplan, Arthur J. (2006). Curbside recycling: waste resource or waste of resources? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 25(4), 855-874.
(2) Afroz, Rafia. (2011). Sustainable household waste management improvement in Dhaka city, Bangladesh. International Journal of Environment and Sustainable Development, 10(4), 433-448.
(3) Bohara, Alok K, Caplan, Arthur J, & Grijalva, Therese. (2007). The effect of experience and quantity-based pricing on the valuation of a curbside recycling program. Ecological Economics, 64(2), 433-443.
(4) Gillespie, Robert, & Bennett, Jeff. (2013). Willingness to pay for kerbside recycling in Brisbane, Australia. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 56(3), 362-377.
(5) Hagos, Dagnew, Mekonnen, Alemu, & Gebreegziabher, Zenebe. (2012). Households’ Willingness to Pay for Improved Urban Waste Management in Mekelle City, Ethiopia.
(6) Huhtala, Anni. (2010). Income effects and the inconvenience of private provision of public goods for bads: The case of recycling in Finland. Ecological Economics, 69(8), 1675-1681.
(7) Khattak, Naeem Ur Rehman, & Amin, Suleman. (2013). Willingness to Pay For the Treatment of Environmental Hazards: A Case Study of Peshawar. Asian Economic and Financial Review, 3(7), 831-842.
(8) Kipperberg, Gorm, & Larson, Douglas M. (2012). Heterogeneous preferences for community recycling programs. Environmental and Resource Economics, 53(4), 577-604.
(9) Koford, Brandon C, Blomquist, Glenn C, Hardesty, David M, & Troske, Kenneth R. (2012). Estimating consumer willingness to supply and willingness to pay for curbside recycling. Land Economics, 88(4), 745-763.
(10) Kwak*, Seung-Jun, Yoo, Seung-Hoon, & Kim, Chan-Jun. (2004). Measuring the economic benefits of recycling: the case of the waste agricultural film in Korea. Applied Economics, 36(13), 1445-1453.
(11) Moon, Wanki, Rimal, Arbindra, & Balasubramanian, Siva K. (2004). Willingness-to-accept and willingness-to-pay for GM and non-GM food: UK consumers. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Agricultural Economics Association.
(12) Tiller, Kelly H, Jakus, Paul M, & Park, William M. (1997). Household willingness to pay for dropoff recycling. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 310-320.
(13) Tuncel, Tuba, & Hammitt, James K. (2014). A new meta-analysis on the WTP/WTA disparity. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 68(1), 175-187.
(14) Wang, Zhaohua, Zhang, Bin, Yin, Jianhua, & Zhang, Xiang. (2011). Willingness and behavior towards e-waste recycling for residents in Beijing city, China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19(9), 977-984.
(15) Yin, Jianfeng, Gao, Yingnan, & Xu, He. (2014). Survey and analysis of consumers′ behaviour of waste mobile phone recycling in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 517-525.
指導教授 劉錦龍 審核日期 2015-7-7
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明