探索臉書學習活動對學生的資訊技能行為模式分析

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：9

、訪客IP：18.224.53.73

姓名

邵詩珺(Shin-chin Shao) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

資訊工程學系

論文名稱

探索臉書學習活動對學生的資訊技能行為模式分析

相關論文

★ 應用智慧分類法提升文章發佈效率於一企業之知識分享平台	★ 家庭智能管控之研究與實作
★ 開放式監控影像管理系統之搜尋機制設計及驗證	★ 資料探勘應用於呆滯料預警機制之建立
★ 探討問題解決模式下的學習行為分析	★ 資訊系統與電子簽核流程之總管理資訊系統
★ 製造執行系統應用於半導體機台停機通知分析處理	★ Apple Pay支付於iOS平台上之研究與實作
★ 應用集群分析探究學習模式對學習成效之影響	★ 應用序列探勘分析影片瀏覽模式對學習成效的影響
★ 一個以服務品質為基礎的網際服務選擇最佳化方法	★ 維基百科知識推薦系統對於使用e-Portfolio的學習者滿意度調查
★ 學生的學習動機、網路自我效能與系統滿意度之探討-以e-Portfolio為例	★ 藉由在第二人生內使用自動對話代理人來改善英文學習成效
★ 合作式資訊搜尋對於學生個人網路搜尋能力與策略之影響	★ 數位註記對學習者在線上學習環境中反思等級之影響

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

在資訊爆炸的時代下，傳統課堂常無法提供學生在充滿資訊的網路中，找出最需要的資訊、解決問題並達到有效的學習的技能，老師也不能及時掌握學生的學習行為，因此過去許多研究將六大資訊技能融入問題導向學習法(PBL)來提升學生資訊素養，讓學生能夠具備問題解決以及終身學習的能力。本研究結合學生常使用的社群網站的優勢,來做為輔助課堂的學習工具，並根據問題導向學習法在臉書網站上設計學習活動，應用於大專資訊課程。透過定量內容分析(quantitative content analysis)和滯後序列分析(lag-sequential analysis)進一步探索同學在社群平台上進行專題導向學習時，六大資訊技能的行為和資訊素養的表現。
本研究採用準實驗設計法來設計進行教學實驗，實驗對象為北部國立大學46位研究生，實驗時間為4週共4小時，並且將研究對象分以不同教學環境分為組。控制組為「傳統課程面談進行專題式導向學習活動」、第2組為實驗「使用臉書平台進行專題式導向學習活動」。實驗結果發現：控制組同學注重搜尋和彙整資訊技能，並在定義問題階段時需要幫助、搜尋策略較單一；實驗組同學則在使用和評估資訊的行為上有良好表現，建議往後對使用臉書進行專題式導向學習的同學在彙整資訊技能上給予幫助。

摘要(英)

In the era of information explosion, at traditional classroom,students often face the problem of finding needed information to solve problems and achieve effective learning skills.At the same time,teachers can not know the students′ behavior to improve the course.This study aims to investigate the students′ learning behavior and information literacy using Big6 information processing skills in project-based learning (PBL).The study combines the advantages of the use of social networking sites, and quantitative content analysis and lag-sequential analysis to further explore the students behavior and information literacy through the performance.
The 46 participating students were divided into two groups: an experimental and a control group.The research result arepresented as follow: First, the experimental group was significantly better than control group with information literacy and focus on Use of the information and Evaluation. Second, the control group,is lack of Evaluation process on works and more focus on Synthesis

關鍵字(中)

★ 專題式導向學習
★ 行為分析
★ 資訊問題解決
★ 臉書社群

關鍵字(英)

★ Behavior Analysis
★ Problem base-learning
★ Facebook

論文目次

摘要......................................................................................................................................i
ABSTRACT ..........................................................................................................................ii
誌謝......................................................................................................................................iii
目錄..................................................................................................................................iv
圖目錄.................................................................................................................................. vi
表目錄.................................................................................................................................vii
第一章緒論 ....................................................................................................................... 1
第二章文獻探討................................................................................................................ 4
2.1 專題式導向學習.................................................................................................... 4
2.2 資訊問題解決........................................................................................................ 4
2.2.1 定義問題(Task Definition) ........................................................................ 5
2.2.2 尋找策略(Information Seeking Strategies) ................................................ 5
2.2.3 取得資訊(Location and Access) ................................................................ 6
2.2.4 使用資訊（Use of Information）............................................................... 6
2.2.5 彙整資訊（Synthesis）.............................................................................. 6
2.2.6 評量（Evaluation） ................................................................................... 6
第三章系統架構................................................................................................................ 7
3.1 臉書社團環境........................................................................................................ 7
3.2 系統架構................................................................................................................ 9
第四章研究方法.......................................................................................................... 13
4.1 實驗對象.............................................................................................................. 13
4.2 實驗教材.............................................................................................................. 13
4.3 實驗流程.............................................................................................................. 17
4.3.1.控制組—傳統課堂面談........................................................................... 18
4.3.2.實驗組—使用臉書平台........................................................................... 19
4.4 量表與資料處理.................................................................................................. 20
4.4.1 編碼過程與內容 ...................................................................................... 20
4.4.2 資訊素養量表 .......................................................................................... 24
第五章研究結果.......................................................................................................... 27
5.1 控制組結果.......................................................................................................... 27
5.2 實驗組結果.......................................................................................................... 29
5.3 資訊素養評量...................................................................................................... 31
第六章討論 ................................................................................................................... 33
6.1 行為分析討論...................................................................................................... 33
6.1.1 定量內容分析(Quantitative content analysis).......................................... 33
6.1.2 滯後序列分析(Lag-sequential analysis) .................................................. 34
6.2 資訊素養討論...................................................................................................... 35
第七章結論與未來發展.................................................................................................. 39
參考文獻............................................................................................................................. 41
附錄一學生參與研究實驗同意書................................................................................... 44
附錄二控制組實驗組六大歷程細項獨立 T 檢定............................................................ 46

參考文獻

Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J.M. (1986). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press. 1st edition.
Barrows, H. S. (1986). A taxonomy of problem‐based learning methods. Medical education, 20(6), 481-486.
Brand-Gruwel, S., Wopereis, I., & Walraven, A. (2009). A descriptive model of information problem solving while using internet. Computers & Education, 53(4), 1207-1217.
Bowers, J.W.(1970),Content analysis. In Methods of Research Communication. P.Emment and W.
Dai, W. (2011). The study about the course forum as a tool of knowledge sharing.
Eisenberg, M. B., & Berkowitz, R. E. (1999). Teaching Information & Technology Skills: The Big6 [TM] in Elementary Schools. Professional Growth Series. Linworth Publishing, Inc., 480 East Wilson Bridge Rd., Suite L, Worthington, OH 43085.
Eisenberg, M. B., & Berkowitz, R. E. (1990). Information Problem Solving: The Big Six Skills Approach to Library & Information Skills Instruction. Ablex Publishing Corporation, 355 Chestnut St., Norwood, NJ 07648.
Eisenberg, N., Guthrie, I. K., Murphy, B. C., Shepard, S. A., Cumberland, A., & Carlo, G. (1999). Consistency and development of prosocial dispositions: A longitudinal study. Child development, 1360-1372.
Eisenberg, M. B., & Johnson, D. (1996). Computer Skills for Information Problem-Solving: Learning and Teaching Technology in Context. ERIC Digest.
Eisenberg, M. B., & Small, R. V. (1993). Information-based education: An investigation of the nature and role of information attributes in education. Information Processing & Management, 29(2), 263-275.
Ferguson, A., & Stokes, D. (2002). Brand Name Audit Pricing, Industry Specialization, and Leadership Premiums post‐Big 8 and Big 6 Mergers*. Contemporary accounting research, 19(1), 77-110.
Gwee, M. C. E. (2008). Globalization of problem-based learning (PBL): cross-cultural implications. The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences, 24(3), S14-S22.
Graneheim, U. H., & Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse education today, 24(2), 105-112.
Karadeniz, Ş. Integrating Big6 Information Literacy Skills in Project Based Learning: A Case Study in Higher Education. Table of, 19.
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. biometrics, 159-174.
Wang, C. J. (2010). Collaborative search and its influence on students’ information problem solving.
Lubans, J. (1998). How first year university students use and regard Internet resources: A draft commentary.
Macklin, A. S. (2008). A PBL approach for teaching complex information and communication technology (ICT) skills in higher education. Community & Junior College Libraries, 14(4), 233-249.
Messick, S. (1995). Standards of validity and the validity of standards in performance assessment. Educational measurement: Issues and practice.
Nichols, J. W., Spang, L., & Padron, K. (2005). Building a foundation for collaboration: K-20 partnerships in information literacy. Resource sharing & information networks, 18(1-2), 5-12.
Schacter, J., Chung, G. K., & Dorr, A. (1998). Children′s Internet searching on complex problems: performance and process analyses. Journal of the American society for Information Science, 49(9), 840-849.
Steffe, L. P., & Wood, T. (Eds.). (2013). Transforming children′s mathematics education: International perspectives. Routledge.
Walraven, A., Brand-Gruwel, S., & Boshuizen, H. P. (2008). Information-problem solving: A review of problems students encounter and instructional solutions. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(3), 623-648.
Wopereis, I., Brand-Gruwel, S., & Vermetten, Y. (2008). The effect of embedded instruction on solving information problems. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(3), 738-752.
Pritchard, A., & Cartwright, V. (2004). Transforming what they read: helping eleven‐year‐olds engage with Internet information. Literacy, 38(1), 26-31.
Pulipuli.(2010). Sequential Analysis Tool. Blogspot,http://pulipuli.blogspot.2010/12/sequential -analysis-tool.html
Wheatley, G. H. (1991). Constructivist perspectives on science and mathematics learning. Science education, 75(1), 9-21.
Yeh, Y. F., Hsu, Y. S., Chuang, F. T., & Hwang, F. K. (2014). Middle-school students′ online information problem solving behaviors on the information retrieval interface. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30(2).
Yuwen Chang(2010). Developing Portfolio to Assess the Information Literacy of Elementary Students. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 2010, 41(3), 521-550.

指導教授

楊鎮華(Stephen J.H. Yang)

審核日期

2015-7-14

推文