參考文獻 |
Bibliography
Aleamoni, L. M. (1999). Student rating myths versus research facts from 1924 to 1998. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 13, 153–166.
Anderson, R. C., L. Shirey, P. T. Wilson, and L. G. Fielding. (1987). Interestingness of Children′s Reading Material. In Aptitude, Learning, and Instruction. Vol. 3: Conative and Affective Process Analyses, edited by R. Snow and M. Farr. Hillsdale, N. J.: Erlbaum.
Awodeyi, A. F., Akpan, E. T & Udo, I .J (2014). Enhancing Teaching and Learning of Mathematics: Adoption of Blended Learning pedagogy in University of Uyo. International Journal of Science and Research, 3(11), 40-45.
Baepler, P., Walker, J. D., & Driessen, M. (2014). It′s not about seat time: Blending, flipping, and efficiency in active learning classrooms. Computers & Education, 78, 227-236.
Beleche, T., Fairris, D., & Marks, M. (2012). Do course evaluations truly reflect student learning? Evidence from an objectively graded post-test. Economics of Education Review, 31(5), 709-719.
Benigno, V., & Trentin, G. (2000). The evaluation of online courses. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 16(3), 259-270.
Bergin, D. A. (1999). Influences on classroom interest. Educational Psychologist, 34(2), 87-98.
Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip Your Classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education.
Bishop, J. L., & Verleger, M. A. (2013). The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. In ASEE National Conference Proceedings, Atlanta, GA.
Buccheri, G., Gürber, N. A., & Brühwiler, C. (2011). The impact of gender on interest in science topics and the choice of scientific and technical vocations. International journal of science education, 33(1), 159-178.
Butt, A. (2014). Student views on the use of a flipped classroom approach: evidence from Australia. Business Education & Accreditation, 6(1), 33-44.
Chang, S., & Smith, R. (2008). Effectiveness of personal interaction in a learner-centered paradigm distance education class based on student satisfaction. Journal of Research On Technology In Education, 40(4), 407-426.
Chua, J. S. M., & Lateef, F. A. (2014). The Flipped Classroom: Viewpoints in Asian Universities. Education in Medicine Journal, 6(4). 20- 26.
Chen, Y., Wang, Y., & Chen, N. S. (2014). Is FLIP enough? Or should we use the FLIPPED model instead?. Computers & Education, 79, 16-27.
Chen, A., & Darst, P. W. (2002). Individual and situational interest: The role of gender and skill. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27(2), 250-269.
Clayson, D. E. (2009). Student evaluations of teaching: Are they related to what students learn? A meta-analysis and review of the literature. Journal of Marketing Education, 31(1), 16–30.
Davies, R. S., Dean, D. L., & Ball, N. (2013). Flipping the classroom and instructional technology integration in a college-level information systems spreadsheet course. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61(4), 563-580.
Delone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. Journal of management information systems, 19(4), 9-30.
Devey, J. (1913). Interest and effort in education. Cambridge, MA: Riverside Press.
Fischer, F., Schult, J., & Hell, B. (2012). Sex differences in secondary school success: why female students perform better. European Journal of Psychology Education, 28(2), 529-543.
Flumerfelt, S., & Green, G. (2013). Using lean in the flipped classroom for at risk students. Educational Technology and Society, 16(1), 356-366.
Forsey, M., Low, M., & Glance, D. (2013). Flipping the sociology classroom: Towards a practice of online pedagogy. Journal of Sociology, 49(4), 471-485.
Frenzel, A. C., Goetz, T., Pekrun, R., & Watt, H. M. G. (2010). Development of Mathematics Interest in Adolescence: Influences of Gender, Family, and School Context. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 20(2), 507-537.
Frenzel, A. C., Pekrun, R., & Goetz, T. (2007a). Girls and mathematics—A “hopeless” issue? A control-value approach to gender differences in emotions towards mathematics. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 22(4), 497-514.
Frenzel, A. C., Pekrun, R., & Goetz, T. (2007b). Perceived learning environment and students′ emotional experiences: A multilevel analysis of mathematics classrooms. Learning and Instruction, 17(5), 478-493.
Fulton, K. (2012). Upside Down and Inside Out: Flip Your Classroom to Improve Student Learning. Learning & Leading with Technology, 39(8), 12–17.
Gonzalez-Gomez, F., Guardiola, J., Martín Rodríguez, Ó., & Montero Alonso, M. Á. (2012). Gender differences in e-learning satisfaction. Computers & Education, 58(1), 283-290.
Gulbahar, Y., & Madran, R. O. (2009). Communication and Collaboration, Satisfaction, Equity, and Autonomy in Blended Learning Environments: A Case from Turkey. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(2), 1-18.
Hair, J. F. (1995). Multivariate data analysis with readings (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
Hair, J., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education International.
Hamdan, N., McKnight, P.E., McKnight, K., & Arfstrom, K.M.(2013). The flipped learning model: A Review of Flipped Learning, Flipped Learning Network, 2-20.
Hidi, S., & Baird, W. (1986). Interestingness—A Neglected Variable in Discourse Processing. Cognitive Science, 10(2), 179-194.
Hidi, S., & Ann Renninger, K. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111-127.
Heinze, A., Reiss, K & Franziska, R. (2005). Mathematics achievement and interest in mathematics from a differential perspective. ZDM, 37(3), 212-220.
Hidi, S., and Harackiewicz, J. (2000). Motivating the academically unmotivated: A critical issue for the 21st century. Education & Educational Research. 70(2), 151–179.
Hidi, S.(2001). Interest, Reading, and Learning: Theoretical and Practical Considerations, Educational Psychology Review, 13(3),191-209.
Huang, W., Hood, D., & Yoo, S. (2013). Gender divide and acceptance of collaborative Web 2.0 applications for learning in higher education. Internet & Higher Education, 16, 57-65.
Huang, H. M., Rauch, U., & Liaw, S. S. (2010). Investigating learners′ attitudes toward virtual reality learning environments: Based on a constructivist approach. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1171-1182.
Huffman, A., Whetten, J., & Huffman, W. (2013). Using technology in higher education: The influence of gender roles on technology self-efficacy. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1779-1786.
Hughes, H. (2012). Introduction to Flipping the College Classroom. In T. Amiel & B. Wilson (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, 1, 2434-2438.
Kazua, I. Y., & Demirkolb, M. (2014). Effect of blended learning environment model on high school students’academic achivement. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 13(1). 78-87.
Kim, M.K., Kim, S. M., Khera, O., & Getman J (2014). The experience of three flipped classrooms in an urban university: an exploration of design principles. Internet and High Education, 22, 37–50.
Kiran, D., & Sungur, S. (2012). Middle school students’ science self-efficacy and its sources: examination of gender difference. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(5), 619-630.
Koohang, A., Behling, R & Behling, S. (2008). Adding a new dimension to education: students′ perceptions toward hybrid/blended course delivery. International Association for Computer Information Systems, 11(1), 1-5.
Kong, S. C. (2014). Developing information literacy and critical thinking skills through domain knowledge learning in digital classrooms: An experience of practicing flipped classroom strategy. Computers & Education, 78, 160-173.
Kunter, M., Baumert, J., & Köller, O. (2007). Effective classroom management and the development of subject-related interest. Learning and Instruction, 17(5), 494-509.
Lage, M. J., & Platt, G. (2000). The Internet and the Inverted Classroom. The Journal of Economic Education, 31(1), 11-11.
Lage, M. J., Platt, G. J., & Treglia, M. (2000). Inverting the Classroom: A Gateway to Creating an Inclusive Learning Environment. The Journal of Economic Education, 31(1), 30-43.
Liao, P. W., & Hsieh, J. Y. (2011). What influences internet-based learning? Social Behavior and Personality, 39(7), 887-896.
Lindberg, S. M., Hyde, J. S., Petersen, J. L., & Linn, M. C. (2010). New Trends in Gender and Mathematics Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136(6), 1123-1135.
Greene, J., & Caracelli, V. (1997). Defining and describing the paradigm issue in mixed-method evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, 74, 5–17.
Gillham, B. (2000). Developing a questionnaire. New York: Continuum.
Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Durik, A. M., Conley, A. M. M., Barron, K. E., Tauer, J. M., Karabenick, S. A., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2010). Measuring situational interest in academic domains. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70(4), 647-671.
López-Pérez, M., Pérez-López, M. C., & Rodríguez-Ariza, L. (2011). Blended learning in higher education: Students’ perceptions and their relation to outcomes. Computers & Education, 56(3), 818-826.
Love, B., Hodge, A., Grandgenett, N., & Swift, A. W. (2014). Student learning and perceptions in a flipped linear algebra course. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 45(3), 317-324.
Lu, H. P., & Chiou, M. J. (2010). The impact of individual differences on e‐learning system satisfaction: A contingency approach. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(2), 307-323.
Mason, G. S., Shuman, T. R., & Cook, K. E. (2013). Comparing the effectiveness of an inverted classroom to a traditional classroom in an upper-division engineering course. IEEE Transactions on Education, 56(4), 430-435.
McKeachie, W. J. (1979) Student ratings of faculty: A reprise. Academe, 65, 384-397.
Missildine, K., Fountain, R., Summers, L., & Gosselin, K. (2013). Flipping the classroom to improve student performance and satisfaction. Journal of Nursing Education, 52(10), 597-599.
Mitchell, M. (1993). Situational Interest: Its Multifaceted Structure in the Secondary School Mathematics Classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(3), 424-436.
Missildine, K., Fountain, R., Summers, L., & Gosselin, K. (2013). Flipping the classroom to improve student performance and satisfaction. Journal of Nursing Education, 52(10), 597-599.
Naaj, M., Nachouki, M., & Ankit, A. (2012). Evaluating student satisfaction with blended learning in a gender-segregated environment. Journal of Information Technology Education Research, 11(1), 185-200.
O′Flaherty, J., & Phillips, C. (2015). The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review. The Internet and Higher Education, 25, 85-95.
Pierce, R., & Fox, J. (2012). Vodcasts and active-learning exercises in a “flipped classroom” model of a renal pharmacotherapy module. American journal of pharmaceutical education, 76(10).
Pulkka, A. T., & Niemivirta, M. (2013). Predictive relationships between adult students′ achievement goal orientations, course evaluations, and performance. International Journal of Educational Research, 61, 26-37.
Ross, D. N., & Rosenbloom, A. (2011). Reflections on building and teaching an undergraduate strategic management course in a blended format. Journal of Management Education, 35(3), 351-376.
Rotgans, J. I., & Schmidt, H. G. (2011a). Situational interest and academic achievement in the active-learning classroom. Learning and Instruction, 21(1), 58-67.
Rotgans, J. I., & Schmidt, H. G. (2011b). The role of teachers in facilitating situational interest in an active-learning classroom. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 37-42.
Samuelsson, J. (2010). The impact of teaching approaches on students’ mathematical proficiency in Sweden. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 5(2), 61-78.
So, H. J., & Brush, T. A. (2008). Student perceptions of collaborative learning, social presence and satisfaction in a blended learning environment: Relationships and critical factors. Computers & Education, 51(1), 318-336.
Shen, B., Chen, A., Scrabis, K. A., & Toller, H. (2003). Gender and interest-based motivation in learning dance. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 22, 396-410.
Shin, N., Sutherland, L. M., Norris, C. A., & Soloway, E. (2012). Effects of game technology on elementary student learning in mathematics. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(4), 540-560.
Swan, K., Matthews, D., Bogle, L., Boles, E., & Day, S. (2012). Linking online course design and implementation to learning outcomes: A design experiment. Internet and Higher Education, 15(2), 81-88.
Schraw, G., & Lehman, S. (2001). Situational Interest: A Review of the Literature and Directions for Future Research. Educational Psychology Review, 13(1), 23-52.
Strayer, J. F. (2012). How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation. Learning Environments Research, 15(2), 171-193.
Smit, R., & Humpert, W. (2012). Differentiated instruction in small schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(8), 1152-1162.
Sun, J. C. Y., & Rueda, R. (2012). Situational interest, computer self-efficacy and self-regulation: Their impact on student engagement in distance education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(2), 191-204.
Tomlinson, C. A., Brighton, C., Hertberg, H., Callahan, C. M., Moon, T. R., Brimijoin, K. & Reynolds, T. (2003). Differentiating instruction in response to student readiness, interest, and learning profile in academically diverse classrooms: A review of literature. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 27(2-3), 119-145.
Thompson, M. M. (1998). Distance learners in higher education. In C. C. Gibson (Ed.), Distance learners in higher education: Institutional responses for quality outcomes (pp. 9–24). Madison, WI: Atwood Publishing.
Trautwein, U., Ludtke, O., Köller, O., Marsh, H. W., & Baumert, J. (2006). Tracking, grading, and student motivation: Using group composition and status to predict self-concept and interest in ninth-grade mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(4), 788-806.
Vandecandelaere, M., Speybroeck, S., Vanlaar, G., De Fraine, B., & Van Damme, J. (2012). Learning environment and students′ mathematics attitude. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 38(3-4), 107-120.
Wehrwein, E. A., Lujan, H. L. & DiCarlo, S. E. (2007). Gender differences in learning style preferences among undergraduate physiology students. Advances in Physiology Education, 31(2), 153–157.
Winheller, S., Hattie, J. A., & Brown, G. T. (2013). Factors influencing early adolescents’ mathematics achievement: High-quality teaching rather than relationships. Learning Environments Research, 16(1), 49-69.
Xiong, J. M., Gong, S. Y., & Frenzel, A. C. (2011). The Relationship among Senior High School students′ academic emotions in mathematics, learning strategies and mathematics achievement. Educational Research and Experiment, 6, 89-92.
Yarbro, J., Arfstrom, K. M., McKnight, K & McKnight, P. (2014). Extension of a review of flipped learning, Flipped Learning Network, 1-21.
Yau, H. K., & Cheng, A. L. F. (2012). Gender difference of confidence in using technology for learning. Journal of Technology Studies, 38(2), 74-79.
Yukselturk, E., & Bulut, S. (2009). Gender differences in self-regulated online learning environment. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 12(3), 12-22.
|