結合思考架構圖及思考流程之範文閱讀電子書

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：38

、訪客IP：18.224.73.55

姓名

簡筱倫(Hsiao-Lun Chien) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

資訊工程學系

論文名稱

結合思考架構圖及思考流程之範文閱讀電子書
(A Text Reading Interface with Visible Thinking Process Using Thinking Maps)

相關論文

★ 學習馬賽克-以教科書內容置入平板之合作式情境學習遊樂場	★ 為使用知識而設計的電子書- 以參考手冊為模式的電子書設計
★ 為使用知識而設計的電子書- 將紙本書籍以及電子書提供社群共建的機制	★ 高互動低資源損耗之課堂學習系統設計與實際教學環境導入接受度探討
★ 依學生偏好及學習狀態建構之學習輔助者與知識協尋系統	★ 網路資訊與學習系統之中文全文探勘工具
★ 支援使用者觀點之線上分析系統	★ 由網站行為歷程以貝式學習建立學習者模式之引導系統
★ 網路合作學習系統與小組互動觀察工具	★ 依作品集評量方式並支援學習狀況分析與監控之網路學習系統
★ 網路學習歷程之知識探索：學習效能評鑑之工具	★ 網路學習系統之手機端學習輔助系統
★ 以網站行為的歷程建立具時間性學習者模式	★ 行動學習資訊系統-學生端網路學習伺服器與個人數位助理端之學習系統
★ 應用貝式學習及決策樹之群組溝通網路監控系統	★ 以網路群組作品及活動依角色分析之群組合作監控系統

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

現今電子書的設計上，大多延續了紙本書上的設計與安排，因此在閱讀的模式上仍與紙本書相同，讀者無法從中看到文章的思考展現。在學習時，學生不容易由使用情境與思考架構來理解與記憶文章中的思考架構進而學到或碰到的字詞佳句事例。電子書在設計時如kindle只是將字典作為查詢單字之用，並沒有考量學生在往後的如何經由閱讀使用這些語彙與知識與相關知識的擴展。
本論文裡，我們設計了一個方法（1）建置於電子書內容上（2）根據架構於思考地圖的學習者語彙與知識的建構網。在電子書內容上建構一個寫作者在思考內容時的可用的思考圖（thinking map),而根據內容知識需要的觀念語彙，字詞,佳句事例於思考圖架構下呈現。學習者可在閱讀時看到寫作者依據思考圖時所蒐集整理的觀念語彙，字詞,佳句事例的解釋，並且看到在思考圖與其架構下相關的內容。我們認為這樣的安排學習者較容易記得與再使用這些內容並且在觀看其他書上內容時可以擴增相關的語彙內容。
經由61位大學生與校外人士參與實驗，本研究的成果顯示：電子化的閱讀能夠同步展示文章與呈現文章的思考架構，讓閱讀者能夠看到原寫作者的思考，經由程序型的知識閱讀，有效的習得寫作者在文章中使用語彙。

摘要(英)

Nowadays, most of the eBooks still continued the same design and arrangement of the paper, as the result, the reading model still like reading on the book. The reader cannot see the thinking of the context. Therefore, students are unable to understand and remember those metaknowledge through the context and the thinking modules while learning. For example, the dictionary in the e-book like Kindle are just designed to lookup the word and did not consider the situation how students use these words, knowledge and the expansion of related knowledge after reading.
As a result, in this paper, we propose a method (1) building on the e-book content (2) constructing the map of users ’words and knowledge base on the thinking map. Build a thinking map in the e-book for writers to think the content while writing, and the word and the idiom needed in the content knowledge are display in thinking map. Therefore, user will see the meaning of the word and the idiom collected from the writers’ thinking map while reading. Our point is that, with this arrangement, user can remember and reuse the content easily and they can grab and extend the relative words while reading other books.
Sixty-one college students and other participators participated in the experiment, out evaluation indicate that the content and the thinking structure can be synchronized display on the e-book and the reader can see the authors’ think more clearly. In consequence, through procedural reading with thinking map, user can learn the words effectively in the article.

關鍵字(中)

★ 電子書
★ 思考地圖
★ 思考看得見

關鍵字(英)

★ Ebook
★ Thinking Maps
★ Visible Thinking

論文目次

中文摘要 i
Abstract ii
誌謝 iii
目錄 iv
圖目錄 vi
表目錄 vii
一、緒論 1
1-1. 研究背景 1
1-2. 研究動機 1
1-3. 研究目標 2
1-4. 研究問題與對策 2
1-5. 論文架構 3
二、相關研究 5
2-1. 電子書 5
2-2. Making Thinking Visible 6
2-3. Thinking Maps 7
三、系統設計與實作 15
3-1. 系統模組 16
3-2. 系統架構 17
3-3. 系統流程與介面 18
四、實驗與結果分析 30
4-1. 實驗 30
4-2. 實驗結果與討論 33
五、結論與未來研究 43
5-1. 結論 43
5-2. 未來研究 43
參考文獻 45
附錄一、實驗背景問卷 49
附錄二、實驗後測問卷-實驗組 50
附錄三、實驗後測問卷-對照組 51
附錄四、實驗後測題目 52
附錄五、實驗文章一 53
附錄六、實驗文章二 54
附錄七、實驗文章三 55
附錄八、第一篇文章反思問答 56
附錄九、第二篇文章反思問答 58
附錄十、第三篇文章反思問答 60
附錄十一、實驗組後測填答情形 62
附錄十二、對照組後測填答情形 63

參考文獻

〔1〕 Chesser, W.D., The e-textbook revolution. Library technology reports, 2011. 47(8): p. 28-40.
〔2〕 Lundblom, E.E.G. and J.J. Woods, Working in the Classroom: Improving Idiom Comprehension Through Classwide Peer Tutoring. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 2012. 33(4): p. 202-219.
〔3〕 Levorato, M.C., M. Roch, and B. Nesi, A longitudinal study of idiom and text comprehension. Journal of Child Language, 2007. 34(03): p. 473.
〔4〕 Ritchhart, R., M. Church, and K. Morrison, Making thinking visible: How to promote engagement, understanding, and independence for all learners. 2011: John Wiley & Sons.
〔5〕 Hyerle, D.N. and L. Alper, Student successes with thinking maps®: school-based research, results, and models for achievement using visual tools. 2011: Corwin Press.
〔6〕 Perkins, D., Smart schools: From training memories to educating minds. 2008: Simon and Schuster.
〔7〕 Graves, D., Forward: Mosaic of thought. 1997: Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
〔8〕 Li, L.-Y., G.-D. Chen, and S.-J. Yang, Construction of cognitive maps to improve e-book reading and navigation. Computers & Education, 2013. 60(1): p. 32-39.
〔9〕 Lee, Y.-H., G.-D. Chen, L.-Y. Li, C.-Y. Fan, and K.-H. Chiang. The effect of utilizing the learning skill of highlighting and constructing a map in a networked hyperlink condition on learning performance. in Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), 2012 IEEE 12th International Conference on. 2012. IEEE.
〔10〕 Li, L.-Y., C.-Y. Fan, D.-W. Huang, and G.-D. Chen, The effects of the e-book system with the reading guidance and the annotation map on the reading performance of college students. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 2014. 17(1): p. 320-331.
〔11〕陳永哲, [論點─ 理由─ 證據] 模式之議論文閱讀素養學習系統; A Tutoring System with “Claim-Reason-Evidence” Teaching Model to Foster Argumentation Reading Competence. 2013.
〔12〕 Stull, A.T. and R.E. Mayer, Learning by doing versus learning by viewing: Three experimental comparisons of learner-generated versus author-provided graphic organizers. Journal of educational psychology, 2007. 99(4): p. 808.
〔13〕 Ponce, H.R. and R.E. Mayer, Qualitatively different cognitive processing during online reading primed by different study activities. Computers in Human Behavior, 2014. 30: p. 121-130.
〔14〕 Baker, J.R., Is multiple-column online text better? it depends. Usability News, 2005. 7: p. 2.
〔15〕 Chan, A. and P. Lee, Effect of display factors on Chinese reading times, comprehension scores and preferences. Behaviour & Information Technology, 2005. 24(2): p. 81-91.
〔16〕 Braganza, C., K. Marriott, P. Moulder, M. Wybrow, and T. Dwyer. Scrolling behaviour with single-and multi-column layout. in Proceedings of the 18th international conference on World wide web. 2009. ACM.
〔17〕 Mayer, R.E., Principles for reducing extraneous processing in multimedia learning: Coherence, signaling, redundancy, spatial contiguity, and temporal contiguity principles. The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning, 2005: p. 183-200.
〔18〕 Mayer, R.E., Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). 2009.
〔19〕 Liu, Z., Paper to digital: Documents in the information age. 2008: ABC-CLIO.
〔20〕 Salmon, A.K., Young English language learners making thinking and language visible. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 2008(10): p. 126-141.
〔21〕 Salmon, A.K. and T. Lucas, Exploring young children′s conceptions about thinking. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 2011. 25(4): p. 364-375.
〔22〕 Strangman, N., T. Hall, and A. Meyer, Graphic organizers and implications for universal design for learning: curriculum enhancement report. National Center on Accessing the General Curriculum, 2014.
〔23〕陳聖謨, 讓思考看得見：簡介「思考圖」在教學上的應用. 國教之友, 1998. 49（4，56-62。）.
〔24〕 Hyerle, D. and K. Williams, Bifocal assessment in the cognitive age: Thinking maps for assessing content learning and cognitive processes. The New Hampshire Journal of Education, XII, 2010: p. 32-28.
〔25〕 Hyerle, D., Thinking maps: Visual tools for activating habits of mind. Activating and engaging habits of mind, 2000: p. 46-58.
〔26〕 Hyerle, D., Thinking Maps®: A Visual Language for Learning, in Knowledge Cartography. 2008, Springer. p. 73-88.
〔27〕 Hyerle, D., Visual Tools for Constructing Knowledge. 1996: ERIC.
〔28〕程嬇玲, 思考地圖運用於生活故事寫作之研究. 2009. 國立新竹教育大學.
〔29〕 Thinking Maps. [cited 2015 4 Jun]; Available from: http://thinkingmaps.com/.
〔30〕 Armbruster, B.B., F. Lehr, J. Osborn, R. O’Rourke, I. Beck, D. Carnine, and D. Simmons, Put reading first. Center for the Improvement of Early Reading Achievement (CIERA), 2003.
〔31〕 Gallagher, M.L., Using thinking maps to facilitate research writing in upper level undergraduates classes. Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences Education, 2011. 29(2): p. 53-56.
〔32〕 Al-naqa, S.A. and M.F. Abu-Owda, The effect of using thinking maps strategy to improve science processes in science course on female students of the ninth grade. Science, 2014. 2(2): p. 44-49.
〔33〕 COOKS, J. and A. SUNSERI, Leveling the Playing Field: The Efficacy of Thinking Maps on English Language Learner Students’ Writing. CATESOL Journal, 2014. 25(2013): p. 2013.
〔34〕楊璧華, 心智繪圖應用於文章構思的研究── 以國小六年級學童為例(未出版之碩士論文). 國立新竹教育大學中國語文學系語文教師碩士在職專班碩士論文, 2014: p. 1-130.
〔35〕何秀芬, 運用思考地圖提升學童繪本(未出版之碩士論文). 國立新竹教育大學課程與教學碩士學位在職進修專班碩士論文, 2014: p. 1-213.
〔36〕潘儀軒, 思考地圖融入閱讀教學對國小學習障礙學生閱讀理解成效之探究. 國立新竹教育大學中國語文學系語文教學碩士班碩士論文, 2014: p. 1-161.
〔37〕謝雅筑, 思考地圖融入國語科教學對國小四年級學生閱讀理解成效的影響. 國立新竹教育大學語文教學碩士班碩士論文, 2014.
〔38〕何鈺淇, 思考地圖融入課文為本之敘事寫作教學研究-國小三年級為例. 國立新竹教育大學語文教學碩士班碩士論文, 2014: p. 1-130.
〔39〕 Davies, M., Concept mapping, mind mapping and argument mapping: what are the differences and do they matter? Higher education, 2011. 62(3): p. 279-301.
〔40〕 Merchie, E. and H. Van Keer, Spontaneous Mind Map Use and Learning from Texts: The Role of Instruction and Student Characteristics. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2012. 69: p. 1387-1394.
〔41〕 Chang, K.-E., Y.-T. Sung, and I.-D. Chen, The effect of concept mapping to enhance text comprehension and summarization. The Journal of Experimental Education, 2002. 71(1): p. 5-23.
〔42〕唐鳳. 萌典. [cited 2015 7 JUN]; Available from: https://www.moedict.tw/.

指導教授

陳國棟(Gwo-Dong Chen)

審核日期

2015-8-4

推文