| 參考文獻 |
[1] 洪碧霞, 吳正新, & 劉妍希. (2010). 臺灣 PISA 2009 結果報告. 台灣 PISA 國家研究中心, 取自http://pisa.nutn.edu.tw/download_tw.htm.
[2] Chambliss, M. J. (1995). Text cues and strategies successful readers use to construct the gist of lengthy written arguments. Reading Research Quarterly, 778-807.
[3] Chambliss, M. J., & Murphy, P. K. (2002). Fourth and fifth graders representing the argument structure in written texts. Discourse Processes, 34(1), 91-115.
[4] Newell, G. E., Beach, R., Smith, J., & VanDerHeide, J. (2011). Teaching and learning argumentative reading and writing: A review of research. Reading Research Quarterly, 46(3), 273-304.
[5] Toulmin, S. E. (2003). The uses of argument. Cambridge University Press.
[6] Braund, M., Scholtz, Z., Sadeck, M., & Koopman, R. (2013). First steps in teaching argumentation: A South African study. International Journal of Educational Development, 33(2), 175-184.
[7] Lin, S. S., & Mintzes, J. J. (2010). Learning argumentation skills through instruction in socioscientific issues: The effect of ability level. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(6), 993-1017.
[8] Griffin, C. C., Simmons, D. C., & Kameenui, E. J. (1991). Investigating the effectiveness of graphic organizer instruction on the comprehension and recall of science content by students with learning disabilities. Reading, Writing, and Learning Disabilities, 7(4), 355-376.
[9] Guri-Rozenblit, S. (1989). Effects of a tree diagram on students′ comprehension of main ideas in an expository text with multiple themes. Reading Research Quarterly, 236-247.
[10] Merkley, D. M., & Jefferies, D. (2000). Guidelines for implementing a graphic organizer. The Reading Teacher, 350-357.
[11] Akhondi, M., Malayeri, F. A., & Samad, A. A. (2011). How to teach expository text structure to facilitate reading comprehension. The Reading Teacher, 64(5), 368-372.
[12] DeLauder, H., & Muilenburg, L. (2012, March). Improving reading comprehension through the use of graphic organizing websites. In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (Vol. 2012, No. 1, pp. 3589-3593).
[13] Gifford, M. (2014). The effects of technology-based graphic organizers to teach reading comprehension skills of students with learning disabilities (Doctoral dissertation, Rowan University).
[14] Hogan, M., Harney, O., & Broome, B. (2014). Integrating Argument Mapping with Systems Thinking Tools: Advancing Applied Systems Science. In Knowledge Cartography (pp. 401-421). Springer London.
[15] Kunsch, D. W., Schnarr, K., & van Tyle, R. (2014). The Use of Argument Mapping to Enhance Critical Thinking Skills in Business Education. Journal of Education for Business, 89(8), 403-410.
[16] van Drie, J., van Boxtel, C., Jaspers, J., & Kanselaar, G. (2005). Effects of representational guidance on domain specific reasoning in CSCL. Computers in Human behavior, 21(4), 575-602.
[17] van Amelsvoort, M., Andriessen, J., & Kanselaar, G. (2008). How students structure and relate argumentative knowledge when learning together with diagrams. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(3), 1293-1313.
[18] Aidman, E. V., & Egan, G. (1998). Academic assessment through computerized concept mapping: validating a method of implicit map reconstruction. International Journal of Instructional Media, 25(3), 277.
[19] Blunt, J. R., & Karpicke, J. D. (2014). Learning with retrieval-based concept mapping. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(3), 849.
[20] Karpicke, J. D., & Blunt, J. R. (2011). Retrieval practice produces more learning than elaborative studying with concept mapping. Science, 331(6018), 772-775.
[21] Li, L. Y. (2015). Development and evaluation of a Web-based e-book with a concept mapping system. Journal of Computers in Education, 2(2), 211-226.
[22] Redford, J. S., Thiede, K. W., Wiley, J., & Griffin, T. D. (2012). Concept mapping improves metacomprehension accuracy among 7th graders. Learning and Instruction, 22(4), 262-270.
[23] Allport, G. W. (1937). Personality (pp. 173-181). New York: Holt.
[24] Jonassen, D. H., & Grabowski, B. (1993). Individual differences and instruction. New York: Allen & Bacon.
[25] Goldman, S. R., Graesser, A. C., & van den Broek, P. (Eds.). (1999). Narrative comprehension, causality, and coherence: Essays in honor of Tom Trabasso. Routledge.
[26] Chambliss, M. J. (1995). Text cues and strategies successful readers use to construct the gist of lengthy written arguments. Reading Research Quarterly, 778-807.
[27] Chambliss, M. J., & Murphy, P. K. (2002). Fourth and fifth graders representing the argument structure in written texts. Discourse Processes, 34(1), 91-115.
[28] Grogan, M. S. (2014). Reading, argumentation, and writing: Collaboration and development of a reading comprehension intervention for struggling adolescents. UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS AT LITTLE ROCK.
[29] Kiili, C. (2013). Argument graph as a tool for promoting collaborative online reading. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(3), 248-259.
[30] Lorch Jr, R. F., & Lorch, E. P. (1996). Effects of organizational signals on free recall of expository text. Journal of educational psychology, 88(1), 38.
[31] Larson, M., Britt, M. A., & Larson, A. A. (2004). Disfluencies in comprehending argumentative texts. Reading Psychology, 25(3), 205-224.
[32] Britt, M. A., & Larson, A. A. (2003). Constructing representations of arguments. Journal of Memory and Language, 48(4), 794-810.
[33] Almasi, J. F., & Fullerton, S. K. (2012). Teaching strategic processes in reading. Guilford Press.
[34] Guri-Rozenblit, S. (1989). Effects of a tree diagram on students′ comprehension of main ideas in an expository text with multiple themes. Reading Research Quarterly, 236-247.
[35] Northup, S., & Wilson, D. (2013). Twelve years a slave (p. 188). S. L. Eakin, & J. Logsdon (Eds.). Penguin books.
[36] Zumbach, J. (2009). The role of graphical and text based argumentation tools in hypermedia learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(4), 811-817.
[37] Felton, M. K., & Herko, S. (2004). From dialogue to two-sided argument: Scaffolding adolescents′ persuasive writing. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 672-683.
[38] Gifford, M. (2014). The effects of technology-based graphic organizers to teach reading comprehension skills of students with learning disabilities (Doctoral dissertation, Rowan University).
[39] Nussbaum, E. M., & Schraw, G. (2007). Promoting argument-counterargument integration in students′ writing. The Journal of Experimental Education, 76(1), 59-92.
[40] Munneke, L., van Amelsvoort, M., & Andriessen, J. (2003). The role of diagrams in collaborative argumentation-based learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 39(1), 113-131.
[41] Liu, P. L., Chen, C. J., & Chang, Y. J. (2010). Effects of a computer-assisted concept mapping learning strategy on EFL college students’ English reading comprehension. Computers & Education, 54(2), 436-445.
[42] Ruddell, R. B., & Boyle, O. F. (1989). A study of cognitive mapping as a means to improve summarization and comprehension of expository text. Literacy Research and Instruction, 29(1), 12-22.
[43] Kintsch, W., & Van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological review, 85(5), 363.
[44] Mayer, R. E. (1996). Learning strategies for making sense out of expository text: The SOI model for guiding three cognitive processes in knowledge construction. Educational psychology review, 8(4), 357-371.
[45] Hsu, C. K., Hwang, G. J., & Chang, C. K. (2013). A personalized recommendation-based mobile learning approach to improving the reading performance of EFL students. Computers & Education, 63, 327-336.
[46] Soleimani, H., & Nabizadeh, F. (2012). The Effect of Learner Constructed, Fill in the Map Concept Map Technique, and Summarizing Strategy on Iranian Pre-university Students’ Reading Comprehension. English Language Teaching, 5(9), p78.
[47] Hwang, G. J., Kuo, F. R., Chen, N. S., & Ho, H. J. (2014). Effects of an integrated concept mapping and web-based problem-solving approach on students′ learning achievements, perceptions and cognitive loads. Computers & Education, 71, 77-86.
[48] Kalhor, M., & Shakibaei, G. (2012). Teaching reading comprehension through concept map. Life Science Journal, 9(4), 725-731.
[49] Khajavi, Y., & Ketabi, S. (2012). Influencing EFL learners’ reading comprehension and self-efficacy beliefs: The effect of concept mapping strategy.
[50] Dyer, P. A. (1985). A study of computer assisted reading the effects of pre-reading mapping on comprehension and transfer of learning. Dissertation Abstracts International, 46(9), 26-41.
[51] Liu, C. C., Chen, H. S., Shih, J. L., Huang, G. T., & Liu, B. J. (2011). An enhanced concept map approach to improving children’s storytelling ability. Computers & Education, 56(3), 873-884.
[52] Okada, A., & Shum, S. B. (2008). Evidence‐based Dialogue Maps as a research tool to investigate the quality of school pupils’ scientific argumentation. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 31(3), 291-315.
[53] Okada, A., Shum, S. B., & Sherborne, T. (Eds.). (2014). Knowledge Cartography: software tools and mapping techniques. Springer.
[54] Van Gelder, T. (2002). Argument mapping with reason! able. The American Philosophical Association Newsletter on Philosophy and Computers, 2(1), 85-90.
[55] Butchart, S., Forster, D., Gold, I., Bigelow, J., Korb, K., Oppy, G., & Serrenti, A. (2009). Improving critical thinking using web based argument mapping exercises with automated feedback. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(2).
[56] Dwyer, C. P., Hogan, M. J., & Stewart, I. (2010). The evaluation of argument mapping as a learning tool: Comparing the effects of map reading versus text reading on comprehension and recall of arguments. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 5(1), 16-22.
[57] Reed, C., Walton, D., & Macagno, F. (2007). Argument diagramming in logic, law and artificial intelligence. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 22(01), 87-109.
[58] Shum, S. B. (2003). The roots of computer supported argument visualization. In Visualizing argumentation (pp. 3-24). Springer London.
[59] Van Gelder, T. (2007). The rationale for Rationale™. Law, probability and risk, 6(1-4), 23-42.
[60] Buzan, T., & Buzan, B. (2000). The concept map book. London: BBC Worldwide Ltd.
[61] Davies, M. (2011). Concept mapping, mind mapping and argument mapping: what are the differences and do they matter?. Higher education, 62(3), 279-301.
[62] Riding, R., & Cheema, I. (1991). Cognitive styles—an overview and integration. Educational psychology, 11(3-4), 193-215.
[63] Triantafillou, E., Pomportsis, A., & Demetriadis, S. (2003). The design and the formative evaluation of an adaptive educational system based on cognitive styles. Computers & Education, 41(1), 87-103.
[64] Mayer, R. E., & Massa, L. J. (2003). Three facets of visual and verbal learners: cognitive ability, cognitive style, and learning preference. Journal of educational psychology, 95(4), 833.
[65] Jonassen, D. H., & Grabowski, B. (1993). Individual differences and instruction. New York: Allen & Bacon.
[66] Richardson, A. (1977). Verbalizer-visualizer: A cognitive style dimension. Journal of mental imagery.
[67] Salminen, T., Marttunen, M., & Laurinen, L. (2010). Visualising knowledge from chat debates in argument diagrams. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(5), 379-391. |
[Endnote RIS 格式]
[相關文章]
[文章引用]
[完整記錄]
[館藏目錄]
[檢視]
plurk
funp
live
udn
HD
myshare
netvibes
friend
youpush
delicious
baidu
Google bookmarks
del.icio.us
hemidemi
facebook
twitter
google
reddit