The Comparison Study of Various Surface Maintenance Alternatives in Taiwan Freeway

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：52

、訪客IP：18.226.93.22

姓名

李妍霏(Fita Ariyanti) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

土木工程學系

論文名稱

(The Comparison Study of Various Surface Maintenance Alternatives in Taiwan Freeway)

相關論文

★ 公共工程統包模式執行專案成員間問題之研究	★ 水泥製程於資源再利用之研究
★ 防水毯的生管與品管之探討	★ 建置生命紀念園區營運階段管理模式之研究以新北市某民間公共紀念園區為例
★ 軍用機場跑道鋪面維護管理暨搶修作業機制之研究	★ TAF 檢驗機構認證申請之研究- 以混凝土後置式化學錨栓檢驗為例
★ 利用UML建構實驗室資訊管理平台-以合約審查為例	★ 營建施工管理導入即時性資訊傳遞工具功能需求之研究
★ 鋪面養護決策支援分析模式之研究	★ 營建材料實驗室量測系統評估及誤差分析
★ 以績效為基礎的公路養護組織與機制之研究	★ 智慧型鋪面檢測車平坦度量測驗證與應用
★ 公路設施養護管理程序建立及成本分析之研究-以IDEF方法建立鋪面養護作業程序	★ 利用花崗岩及玻璃回收料製造功能性人造石材之研究
★ 自動化鋪面平整度量測分析與破壞影像偵測系統之研究	★ 鋪面缺陷影像辨識系統應用於路網檢測之研究

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

高速公路是台灣的一個重要途徑，將繼續逐年增長。規範高速公路的管理應在維護和修復（M＆R）被視為監視路面狀況。正確的M＆R 是考慮成本和性能需求進行評估。壽命週期成本分析（LCCA）是一種經濟工具相比，路面M＆R 項目，包括維護和修復項目的最佳替代選項。本研究通過利用廣西段為例高速公路3 號評估路面台灣高速公路基於全壽命成本的最佳厚度層這項研究創造了6 種替代和參數包括一個固定的摩擦層的厚度，三名康復厚度和2 康復週期。每一個替代指標是基於RealCost 軟件和國際平整度指數（IRI）值的基礎上的關係確定性分析的總成本。通過使用5 年，7 年，5 厘米，8 厘米和厚度層為10 厘米的康復週期給影響到它通過測量IRI 年M＆R 的成本和路面狀況。直到16％至7年的康復週期與5 厘米厚度的作為比較基礎5 年10 厘米厚度層的康復週期是提高了IRI。然而，基於視年度M＆R 成本點，這種替代是53％更昂貴相比的比較基數。對於M＆R最低的機構和用戶的成本是7 年間重修週期與5 厘米的表面來實現，而EUAC（相當於統一年費）這個選擇是新台幣1.62 億，並得到了IRI 值是2，結果顯示更昂貴的年度M＆R成本是指示更好的路面狀況的路面下IRI 性能。而作為本研究中提到的結論是用5 厘米的表面具有7 年生命週期分析是最佳可行的解決方案，值得台灣的高速公路被採用，尤其是在廣西科。

摘要(英)

Freeway is an important pathway in Taiwan that will continue to increase every year.
Management of regulating freeway should be considered in maintenance and rehabilitation (M&R) to monitor the pavement condition. Proper M&R that considers the cost and performance have to be assessed. Life Cycle Cost Analysis (LCCA) is an economic tool to compare the best
alternative option for the pavement of M&R project, including the maintenance and rehabilitation projects. This study evaluates the optimum thickness layer for pavement in Taiwan Freeway based on LCCA by taking a case study of Guanxi Section in Freeway No. 3. This study
created six types of alternative and the parameter include one fixed friction layer thickness, three
rehabitation thickness and two rehabitation cycles. The indicators for each alternative are the total cost based on the deterministic analysis by RealCost software and International Roughness Index (IRI) value based on the relationship. By using 5 years and 7 years of rehabilitation cycle with 5 cm, 8 cm, and 10 cm of thickness layer gave the influenced of annual M&R cost and pavement condition which measured by IRI. 5 years of rehabilitation cycle with 10 cm of thickness layer was improved the IRI until 16% compared to 7 years of rehabilitation cycle with 5 cm of thickness as a comparative base. However, based on the annual M&R cost point of view, this alternative is 53% more expensive opposed to the comparative base. The lowest agency and
user cost for M&R were achieved by 7 years of rehabilitation cycle, with 5 cm of the surface,
and the EUAC (equivalent uniform annual cost) for this alternative, is NTD 162 million and got the IRI value is 2. The results show that more expensive the annual M&R cost, the lower IRI performance for the pavement that indicates better pavement condition. And as mentioned by
this study conclude that by using 5 cm of the surface with 7 years of life cycle analysis is the best feasible solution and worthy to be adopted in Taiwan freeway, especially in Guanxi Section.

關鍵字(中)

★ 高速公路
★ 壽命週期成本分析（LCCA）
★ IRI

關鍵字(英)

★ Freeway
★ Life Cycle Cost Analysis
★ IRI

論文目次

ABSTRACT i
摘要 ii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT iii
CONTENTS iv
List of Figures vi
List of Tables vii
1 INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Research Background 1
1.2 Research Objectives 2
1.3 Research Scope 2
1.4 Study Skeleton 4
2 LITERATURE REVIEW 5
2.1 Freeway System in Taiwan 5
2.2 Taiwan Freeway No. 3 6
2.3 Pavement Structure in Taiwan Freeway 7
2.4 M&R of Road Pavement 8
2.5 International Roughness Index (IRI) 9
2.6 Budgeting and Taiwan Economic Growth 9
2.7 Traffic 10
2.7.1 Annual Average Daily Traffic 10
2.7.2 Traffic Annual Growth 10
2.8 Life Cycle Cost Analysis 11
2.8.1 Economic Analysis Components 13
2.8.2 Cost Factors 15
3 STUDY PLAN 18
3.1 Data Collection and Pavement Performance Condition 18
3.1.1 Network Data 18
3.1.2 Traffic Data 21
3.2 Pavement M&R 24
3.2.1 Material Requirements 25
3.2.2 Material Costs 26
3.2.3 Time 27
3.3 Cost Analysis by RealCost 27
3.4 Limitation on Realcost 30
4 RESULT ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION 33
4.1 Current Condition of Road Section 33
4.2 Material Requirements 33
4.3 Estimated Time Schedule and Cost 35
4.4 Agency and User Cost from RealCost Software 41
4.5 M&R budget and International Roughness Index Relationship 50
4.6 Discussion 53
4.6.1 The Comparison of estimated workdays 53
4.6.2 IRI prediction of various alternatives 54
5 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION 58
5.1 Conclusion 58
5.2 Recommendation 58
REFERENCES 59
APPENDIX : Life Cycle Cost Analysis Steps using RealCost 62

參考文獻

[1] C.-T. Chiu, "Current Pavement Technologies in Taiwan," 2008.
[2] C.-T. H. J.-D. L. Jia-Ruey Chang, "Application of Advanced Computation on Flexible
Pavement Maintenance Management System in Taiwan," International Road Federation,
2005.
[3] FHWA, "Life-Cycle Cost Analysis Primer," United States, U.S. Departement of Transportation Office of Asset Management, 2002.
[4] F. H. Association, Life Cycle Cost Analysis - Real Cost User Manual, Washington D.C: Office of Asset Management, 2004.
[5] C. K. a. J. T. H. Eul-Bum (E.B.) Lee, "Pavement Type Selection for Highway Rehabilitation Based on Life-Cycle Cost Analysis: Validation of California Interstate 710 Priject (Phase 1)," Tansportation Research Board, 2011.
[6] FHWA, Life Cycle Cost Analysis Realcost Manual, Washington D.C: Office of Management Asset, 2004.
[7] Annex II, "Basic guidlines for road classification and standads on trans-african highways".
[8] M. D. o. Transportation, "MDOT," Michigan Department of Transportation, 2015. [Online]. Available: http://www.michigan.gov/mdot/0,4616,7-151-9623_11154_39107-131251--,00.html. [Accessed 30 December 2015].
[9] E. T. S. Council, "PIN programme," ETSC, 2014. [Online]. Available: http://etsc.eu/projects/pin/. [Accessed 26 11 2015].
[10] T. A. N. F. Bureau, "Taiwan Area National Freeway Bureau, MOTC R.O.C," Taiwan Area National Freeway Bureau, MOTC R.O.C, [Online]. Available:
http://www.freeway.gov.tw/english/Default.aspx. [Accessed 2015].
[11] T. A. N. Bureau, "Taiwan Area National Bureau, MOTC., R.O.C," Taiwan Area National
Bureau, MOTC., R.O.C, 2013. [Online]. Available:
http://www.freeway.gov.tw/english/Default.aspx. [Accessed November 2015].
[12] Wikipedia, "Wikipedia," 31 August 2015. [Online]. Available: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freeway_3_(Taiwan).[Accessed November 2015].
[13] Ching-Tsung Hung, Shih-Huang Chen, Chia-Chen Wu, "The Influence of porous aphalt
pavement based on DEMATEL," Applied Mechanics and Materials, Vols. 178-181, pp.
1333-1337, 2012.
[14] Jian-Shih Chen, Shih-Fan Chen, Min-Chih Liao, "Laboratory and Field Evaluation of
Poroush Asphalt Concrete," Asian Transport Studies, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 298-311, 2015.
[15] Cooley, L.A., Brumfield, J.W., Mallick, R.B., Mogawer, W.S., Partl, M., Poulikakos, L.,
Hicks, G., "Construction and maintenance practices for permeable friction courses," in
Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C, 2009.
[16] R. M. a. O. J. B. Morosiuk G., "Modelling road deterioration and works effects," Highway development and management series, vol. 6, 2004.
[17] Kyungwon Park, Natacha E. Thomas, and K. Wayne Lee, "Applicability of the International Roughness Index as a Predictor of Asphalt Pavement Condition," Journal of Transportation Engineering (ASCE), vol. 133, no. 12, pp. 706-709, 2007.
[18] A. a. S. E. Y. Directorate-General of Budget, "Taiwan Government Budget Forcast," Executive Yuan, Taiwan, 1988-2015.
[19] J.-S. O. Jung-Ah Ha, "Estimating Annual Average Daily Traffic Usig Daily Adjustment
Factor," Juornal of Emerging Trends in Computing and Information Sciences, vol. 5, no. 7, pp. 580-587, 2014.
[20] "Wikipedia," Wikipedia, 9 December 2015. [Online]. Available:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Annual_average_daily_traffic. [Accessed 28 February 2016].
[21] G.F. Koorey, T.J. Mitchell, "Traffic Growth Prediction," Transfund New Zealand , New Zealand, 2000.
[22] X. G. F. N. a. R. G. Bin Yu, "Milti-objective optimization for asphalt pavement
maintenance plas at project level: Integrating peformance, cost, and environment," Elsevier,
vol. D 41, pp. 64-74, 2015.
[23] C. D. o. T. (Caltrans), "Life-Cycle Cost Analysis," Office of Pavement Engineering, 2007.
[Online]. Available: http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/esc/Translab/index.htm. [Accessed 26 August 2015].
[24] J. W. I. a. M. R. Smith, Life cycle cost analysis in pavement design - Interm Technical Bulletin, Washington, DC: US. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, 1998.
[25] VDOT, Life Cycle Cost Analysis, Material Divion, Virginia: Virginia Department of Transportation, 2011.
[26] Charlottesville, Life Cycle Cost Analysis Pavement Option, Virginia: Virginia Transportation Researh Council, 2002.
[27] A. G. Scheving, "Life Cycle Cost Analysis of Asphalt and Concrete Pavements," Reykjavik University, Iceland, 2011.
[28] Prasada Rao Rangaraju, Serji Amirkhanian, Zeynep Guven, "Life Cycle Cost Analysis for Pavement Type Selection," Clemson, Clemson, South Carolina, 2008.
[29] Tien F. Fwa and Kumares, C. Sinha, "Pavement Performance and Life-Cycle Cos Analysis," Journal Transportation Engineering, vol. 117, no. I, pp. 33-46, 1991.
[30] J. M. a. J. Neves, "Work Zone Planning in Pavement Rehabilitation: Integrating Cost, Duration, and User Effects," Journal Construction Engineering Management, vol. 140, no. 11, 2014.
[31] F. O. o. Operations, "Work Zone Road User Costs - Concepts and Applications," Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), 21 October 2015. [Online]. Available:
http://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/wz/resources/publications/fhwahop12005/sec2.htm. [Accessed 8 December 2015].

指導教授

陳世晃、林志棟(Shih-Huang Chen Jyh-Dong Lin)

審核日期

2016-4-7

推文