Endowment Effect in the Taiwan Real Estate Market

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：38

、訪客IP：18.218.250.241

姓名

于立瑋(Li-Wei Yu) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

財務金融學系

論文名稱

(Endowment Effect in the Taiwan Real Estate Market)

相關論文

★ 最適指數複製法之自動化建置：以ETF50為例	★ 台灣公債市場與台幣利率交換交易市場動態關聯性之研究
★ 企業貸款債權證券化--信用增強探討	★ 停損點反向操作指標在台灣期貨市場實證
★ 投資型保單評價-富邦金吉利保本投資連結型遞延年金保險乙型(VANB5)	★ 停損點反向操作指標在台灣債券市場實證
★ 匯率風險值衡量之實證研究-以新台幣、日圓、英鎊、歐元匯率為例	★ 探討央行升息國內十年期指標公債未同步上升之原因
★ 信用風險模型評估—Merton模型之應用	★ 資產管理公司購買不動產擔保不良債權評價之研究
★ 股票除息對期貨與現貨報酬之影響	★ 主權基金的角色定位與未來影響力之研究
★ 我國公債期貨之研究分析	★ 用事件研究法探討希臘主權債信危機-以美國及德國公債為例
★ 企業避險及財務操作之實例探討	★ 台灣期貨市場之量價交易策略

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

稟賦效果意指人們常常會對於自己擁有的東西給予相較於尚未擁有前更高的評價，其一概念為Thaler (1980) 所提出。過去許多學者透過損失趨避(loss aversion)的概念來解釋稟賦效果，但隨著時間的推移，許多學者也提出以不同的想法來解釋稟賦效果。在這篇論文中，我們以參考點(reference point)的概念為主軸，並以此衡量房屋賣家是否存在稟賦效果，我們使用台灣房屋所提供的歷史交易資料來探討台灣的房地產市場是否具有稟賦效果。其結果發現不論性別與年齡都存在著稟賦效果；隨著市場的流動性增加，稟賦效果也隨其增大。稟賦效果的存在使得房屋持有者在訂定售價時偏離合理價格。

摘要(英)

Endowment effect means that individuals demand much more to give a good up than they would pay to acquire it. Based on prior relative studies, loss aversion has typically accounted for the endowment effect, but in this thesis we model endowment effects with the opinion of reference point. We examine whether endowment effects exist in the real estate market based on a unique dataset which provides the historical transactions from the largest real estate brokerages in Taiwan. Our findings suggest the endowment effects exist regardless of the gender and the experience. However, we also find that the endowment effect is going to be stronger when the liquidity increases, even residents living in different geographical regions. The existence of endowment effect leads the homeowners to rise the deviations from reasonable and actual housing values.

關鍵字(中)

★ 稟賦效果
★ 損失趨避
★ 參考點

關鍵字(英)

★ Endowment effect
★ Loss aversion
★ Reference point

論文目次

1. Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………………………1
2. Literature Review……………………………………………………………………………………5
3. The Theoretical Framework………………………………………………………………8
4. The Hypothesis Development…………………………………………………………12
4.1 Endowment Effect……………………………………………………………………………12
4.2 Gender in Endowment Effect…………………………………………………12
4.3 Experience and Endowment effect……………………………………13
4.4 Liquidity………………………………………………………………………………………………14
5. Data and Methodology…………………………………………………………………………15
　5.1 Data……………………………………………………………………………………………………………15
5.2 Variable and Methodology………………………………………………………16
5.2.1 Dependent variable…………………………………………………………16
5.2.2Variables……………………………………………………………………………………16
5.2.3 Methodology……………………………………………………………………………20
6. Empirical Results…………………………………………………………………………………21
6.1 Sample Description………………………………………………………………………21
6.2 Endowment Effect……………………………………………………………………………22
6.3 Illiquidity…………………………………………………………………………………………25
6.4 Market Condition……………………………………………………………………………26
7. Test Robustness………………………………………………………………………………………28
8. Conclusions…………………………………………………………………………………………………30
9. References……………………………………………………………………………………………………32
10. Tables……………………………………………………………………………………………………………36

參考文獻

Arkes H. R., D. Hirshleifer, D. Jiang and S. Lim (2008), “Reference point adaptation: Tests in the domain of security trading”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 105, No. 1, pp.67-81.
Asabere, P. K. and F. E. Huffman (1993), “Price Concessions, Time on the Market, and the Actual Sale Price of Homes”, Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 167-174.
Bao, H. X. H. and C. Gong (2014) “Endowment Effect and Housing Decisions”, RERC Working Papers.
Barber, B. M. and T. Odean (2001), “Boys will be Boys: Gender, Overconfidence, and Common Stock Investment”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 116, No. 1, pp. 261-292.
Baucells, M., M. Weber, and F. Welfens (2011). “Reference-point formation and updating”, Management Science, Vol. 57, No. 3, pp. 506–519.
Bokhari, S. and D. Geltner. (2011), “Loss Aversion and Anchoring in Commercial Real Estate Pricing: Empirical Evidence and Price Index Implications”, Real Estate Economics, Vol. 39, No. 4, pp. 635-670.
Boven, L. V. and D. Dunning (2000), “Egocentric Empathy Gaps between Owners and Buyers: Misperceptions of the Endowment Effect”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 79, No. 1, pp. 66-76.
Carey, B. W., S.Markoulaki, J. Hanna, K. Saha, Q. Gao, M. Mitalipova and R. Jaenischa (2009), “Reprogramming of Murine and Human Somatic Cells Using a Single Polycistronic Vector”, Proc Natl Acad Sci, Vol. 106, No. 1, pp. 157–162.
Croson, R. and U. Gneezy (2009), “Gender differences in preferences”, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 47, No. 2, pp. 1-27.

Devers, C. E. and R. M. Wiseman and R. M. Holmes (2008), “The Effect of Endowment and Loss Aversion in Managerial Stock Option Valuation”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 50, No. 1, pp. 191-208.
Dommer, S. L. and V. Swaminathan (2013) “Explaining the Endowment Effect through Ownership the Role of Identity, Gender, and Self-Threat”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 39, No. 5, pp.1034-1050.
Dubin, R. A. (1998), “Predicting House Prices Using Multiple Listings Data”, The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 35-59.
Dwyer, P. D., J. H. Gilkeson and J. A. List (2002), “Gender differences in revealed risk taking: Evidence from mutual fund investors”, Economics Letters, Vol. 76, No. 2, pp. 151-158.
Dwyer, T., J. F. Sallis, L. Bilzzard, R. Lazarus and K. Dean (2001), “Relation of Academic Performance to Physical Activity and Fitness in Children”, Pediatric Exercise Science, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 225-237.
Furche, A. and D. Johnstone (2006) “Evidence of the Endowment Effect in Stock Market Order Placement”, The Journal of Behavioral Finance, Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 145–154.
Gawronski, B., G. V. Bodenhausen and A. P. Becker (2007), “I like it because I like myself: Associative self-anchoring and post-decisional change of implicit attitudes”, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 43, No. 2, pp. 221-232.
Genesove, D. and C. Mayer (2001), “Loss Aversion and Seller Behavior: Evidence from the Housing Market”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 116, No. 4, pp. 1233-1260.
Gervais, S. and T. Odean (2001), “Learning to be overconfident”, Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 1-27.
He, Z. and Y. Asami (2013), “How Do Landowners Price their Lands during Land Expropriation and the Motives behind It: An Explanation from a WTA/WTP Experiment in Central Beijing”, Urban Studies, Vol. 51, No. 2, pp.1-16.

Hirshleifer, D (2001), “Investor Psychology and Asset Pricing”, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 56, No. 4, pp.1533-1597.
Kahneman, D. and A. Tversky (1979), “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk”, Econometrica, Vol. 47, No. 2, pp. 263-292.
Kahneman, D., J. Knetch and R. Thaler (1990), “Experimental tests of the endowment effect and the Coase theorem”, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 98, No. 6, pp. 1325–1348.
Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J.L., Thaler, R.H. (1991), “Anomalies: the endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp.193–206.
Knetch, J. (1989), “The endowment effect and evidence of nonreversible indifference curves”, American Economic Review, Vol. 79, No. 5, pp. 1277–1284.
List, J. A. (2003), “Does Market Experience Eliminate Market Anomalies”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 118, No. 1, pp. 41-71.
Markus H. R. and S. Kitayama (1991), “Culture and the Self: Implications for Cognition, Emotion, and Motivation”, Psychological review, Vol. 98, No. 2, pp. 224-253.
Pierce, J. L., T. Kostova, and K. T. Dirks (2003), “The State of Psychological Ownership: Integrating and Extending a Century of Research”, Review of General Psychology, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 84–107.
Plott, C. R. and K. Zeiler (2005),“The Willingness to Pay—Willingness to Accept Gap the Endowment Effect, Subject Misconceptions, and Experimental Procedures for Eliciting Valuations”, The American Economic Review, Vol. 95, No. 3, pp. 530-545.
Rosen, S. (1974), “Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure Competition”, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 82, No. 1, pp. 34-55.
Simonson, I. and A. Drolet (2004), “Anchoring Effects on Consumers’ Willingness-to-Pay and Willingness-to-Accept”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 31, No. 3, pp. 681-690.
Singell, L. D. and J. H. Lillydahl (1990), “An Empirical Examination of the Effect of Impact Fees on the Housing Market”, Land Economics, Vol. 66, No. 1, pp. 88-92.
Sirmans, G. S., D. A. Macpherson and E. Z. Zietz (2005), “The Composition of Hedonic Pricing Models”, Journal of Real Estate Literature, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 3-46.
Spiegler, R (2012), “Monopoly pricing when consumers are antagonized by unexpected price increases: A cover version of the Heidhues–Kőszegi–Rabin model”, Economic Theory, Vol. 51, No. 3, pp. 695–711.
Thaler, R. H. (1980), “Toward a Positive Theory of Consumer Choice”, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 39-60.
Thaler, R. H. (1985), “Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice”, Marketing Science, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 199-214.
Thaler, R. H. (1999), “Mental accounting matters”, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, Vol. 12 No. 3, pp. 183-206.
Tversky, A. and D. Kahneman (1991), “Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice: A Reference-Dependent Model”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 106, No. 4, pp. 1039-1061.
Weaver, R. and S. Frederick (2012) “A Reference Price Theory of the Endowment Effect”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 49, No. 5, pp. 696-707.

指導教授

張傳章

審核日期

2016-7-7

推文