博碩士論文 974408005 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:48 、訪客IP:18.119.255.183
姓名 趙慶祥(Ching-Hsiang Chao)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 財務金融學系
論文名稱
(Two Essays on Real Estate Investment Behaviors: Anchoring Bias and Disposition Effect)
相關論文
★ 最適指數複製法之自動化建置:以ETF50為例★ 台灣公債市場與台幣利率交換交易市場動態關聯性之研究
★ 企業貸款債權證券化--信用增強探討★ 停損點反向操作指標在台灣期貨市場實證
★ 投資型保單評價-富邦金吉利保本投資連結型遞延年金保險乙型(VANB5)★ 停損點反向操作指標在台灣債券市場實證
★ 匯率風險值衡量之實證研究-以新台幣、日圓、英鎊、歐元匯率為例★ 探討央行升息國內十年期指標公債未同步上升之原因
★ 信用風險模型評估—Merton模型之應用★ 資產管理公司購買不動產擔保不良債權評價之研究
★ 股票除息對期貨與現貨報酬之影響★ 主權基金的角色定位與未來影響力之研究
★ 我國公債期貨之研究分析★ 國內股票型共同基金異常報酬之特徵研究
★ 用事件研究法探討希臘主權債信危機-以美國及德國公債為例★ 企業避險及財務操作之實例探討
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   [檢視]  [下載]
  1. 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
  2. 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
  3. 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。

摘要(中) 本論文由兩篇關於不動產行為財務的研究所構成。

第一篇文章旨在驗證不動產市場中,買方購屋決策是否存在定錨行為與其對房價所造成的影響。受惠於首度取得台灣不動產市場中完整的實際交易資料,我們發現不分『性別』,定錨偏誤普遍存在於購屋決策中。此外,在比較不同的購屋者型態後,發現跨區購屋者與系統性不確定下的購屋者較容易受定錨偏誤影響;投資者願付價格之捷思偏誤會造成合理房價之偏離。

第二篇則在探討不動產投資者是否存在急售獲利,惜售損失的處分效果。透過彙整重覆交易的不動產成交資料,我們發現不分『性別』,處分效果普遍存在於投資者的賣屋決策中。此外,在比較不同的房屋擁有者型態與交易特徵後,發現富有經驗的售屋者較能夠不受處分效果的影響;另一方面,總價較高的不動產出售則存在顯著的處分偏誤。
摘要(英) This dissertation contains two essays on the behavioral research in real estate: anchoring bias and disposition effect.


First Essay:
Anchoring Bias from the Buy-side in the Real Estate Market

We examine the existence and potential influences of anchoring bias within the real estate market by evaluating evidence and a priori arguments on the effects of investor sentiment on willingness to pay among homebuyers. Based upon a unique dataset which provides the complete histories of transactions in the real estate market, we investigate whether market participants can see through the bias; that is, we examine whether such homebuyers are actually likely to fall into the anchoring trap. Our findings reveal that the anchoring phenomenon prevails regardless of homebuyer′s gender. Whilst a comparison between different kinds of homebuyers and geographical regions also reveals that homebuyers faced with higher systemic uncertainty and out-of-state housing transactions exhibit higher levels of anchoring; the heuristic thinking biased willingness to pay on the part of investors gives rise to the deviations from reasonable and actual housing values.

Second Essay:
The Comprehensive Disposition Effect: Evidence from the Real Estate Market

This paper examines whether real estate investors exhibit the “disposition effect” to ride long on losses and realize gains too soon. Based upon a unique dataset which provides complete histories of repeat transactions in the real estate market, we document the existence of disposition effect among homeowners regardless of their gender. Further comparing with different kinds of homeowners and transaction characteristics reveal that while sophisticated homeowners are less susceptible to the disposition effect, those who dealt with smaller property sizes exhibit significantly stronger disposition effect.
關鍵字(中) ★ 不動產市場
★ 定錨偏誤
★ 願付價格
★ 處分效果
★ 房屋擁有者
關鍵字(英) ★ Real estate markets
★ Anchoring bias
★ Willingness to pay
★ The disposition effect
★ Homeowner
論文目次 Chinese Abstract.........................................Ⅰ
English Abstract.........................................Ⅱ
Contents.................................................Ⅳ
List of Figures..........................................Ⅶ
List of Tables...........................................Ⅷ
First Essay Anchoring Bias from the Buy-side in the Real Estate Market
1. Introduction..........................................1
2. Theoretical Search Model for Buyer Anchoring..........5
3. Literature Review and Hypothesis Development..........9
3.1 Prior Anchoring Research.............................9
3.2 Hypothesis Development...............................12
3.2.1 Anchoring to the Reference Price...................12
3.2.2 Gender in Anchoring................................13
3.2.3 Experience and Anchoring...........................13
3.2.4 Increased Uncertainty..............................13
4. Data and Methodology..................................15
4.1 Data.................................................15
4.2 Variables............................................16
4.3 Methology............................................18
5. Empirical Results.....................................20
5.1 Sample Description...................................20
5.2 Anchoring Effect.....................................22
5.3 Financial Crisis.....................................24
5.4 Out-of-State Buyers..................................25
6. Robustness Analysis...................................27
6.1 Listing Price as An Alternative Reference Price......27
6.2 Robustness on Different House Types..................28
6.3 On the Fourth Floor..................................28
7. Conclusions...........................................29
References...............................................32
Appendix: Derivations of Marginal Effects under Assumed Log-normal Distribution......................................37

Second Essay The Comprehensive Disposition Effect: Evidence from the Real Estate Market
1. Introduction..........................................67
2. Literature Review and Hypothesis Development..........71
2.1 Prior Research on Disposition Effect.................71
2.2 Hypothesis Development...............................73
2.2.1 The True Disposition Effect........................73
2.2.2 Pricing Issue in Disposition Effect................74
2.2.3 In The Face of Greater Uncertainty.................74
2.2.4 Gender Issue in Disposition Effect.................76
2.2.5 Experience and Disposition Effect..................77
3. Data and Methodology..................................78
3.1 A Unique Data Set....................................78
3.2 Variables............................................79
3.3 Methological Steup...................................81
4. Empirical Results.....................................83
4.1 Sample Description...................................83
4.2 Disposition Effect...................................84
4.3 Pricing Issue in Disposition Effect..................86
4.4 In Face of Greater Uncertainty.......................87
4.5 Gender Issue in Disposition Effect...................88
4.6 Age, Experience and Disposition Effect...............89
5. Robustness Analysis...................................91
5.1 House Type and Disposition Effect....................91
5.2 Liquidity and Disposition Effect.....................92
6. Conclusions...........................................93
References...............................................96

List of Figures
First Essay Anchoring Bias from the Buy-side in the Real Estate Market

Figure 1 The Composition of the Different Property Categories...............................................66
Figure 2 The Composition of the Different Male Groups...................................................66
Figure 3 The Composition of the Different Female Groups...................................................66

Second Essay The Comprehensive Disposition Effect: Evidence from the Real Estate Market
Figure 1 Proportion of Different Return Range Categories..............................................120

List of Tables
First Essay Anchoring Bias from the Buy-side in the Real Estate Market

Table 1 Variable Definitions............................44
Table 2 Descriptive Statistics..........................47
Table 3 Correlation Matrix..............................48
Table 4 Regression Results on a Hedonic Price Model with the Inclusion of Anchoring Effect.......................50
Table 5 Regression Results on a Hedonic Price Model with Different Gender Samples................................52
Table 6 Regression Results on a Hedonic Price Model with Heckman (1979) Correction...............................54
Table 7 Regression Results on a Hedonic Price Model with Information-rich Samples................................56
Table 8 Hedonic Price Model Estimation Results with the Inclusion of Listing Price..............................58
Table 9 Semi-log Regression Model Estimation Results for Different Housing Categories............................60
Table 10 Box-Cox Regression Model Estimation Results for Different Housing Categories............................62
Table 11 Hedonic Price Model Regression Results on F4 Samples.................................................64

Second Essay The Comprehensive Disposition Effect: Evidence from the Real Estate Market
Table 1 Variable Definitions............................101
Table 2 Descriptive Statistics..........................104
Table 3 Correlation Matrix..............................105
Table 4 Duration for Trades: Gain Compared to Loss by Owner′s Types...........................................107
Table 5 Regression Results on a Hedonic Price Model with Heckman (1979) Correction...............................108
Table 6 Regression Results on a Hedonic Price Model with Different Gender Samples................................110
Table 7 Regression Results for a Hedonic Price Model in Different Investor Level................................111
Table 8 Regression Results for a Hedonic Price Model in Different Investor Group Samples........................113
Table 9 Duration for Trades: Gain Compared to Loss by Housing Categories......................................115
Table 10 Semi-log Regression Model Estimation Results for Different Housing Categories............................116
Table 11 Regression Results on a Hedonic Price Model in Hot and Cold Markets........................................118
參考文獻 First Essay:
Anchoring Bias from the Buy-side in the Real Estate Market

References
Akerlof, G. and W. Dickens (1982), “The Economic Consequences of Cognitive Dissonance”, American Economic Review, Vol. 72 No. 3, pp. 307-319.
Anglin, P. M. and R. Wiebe (2013), “Pricing in an illiquid real estate market”, Journal of Real Estate Research, Vol. 35 No. 1, pp. 83-102.
Ariely, D., G. Loewenstein, and D. Prelec (2003), “Coherent Arbitrariness: Stable Demand Curves without Stable Preferences”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 118 No. 1, pp. 73-105.
Asabere, P. K. and F. E. Huffman (1993), “Price Concessions, Time-on-the-Market, and the Actual Sale Price of Homes”, Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Vol. 6 No. 2, pp. 167-174.
Barber, B. M. and T. Odean (2001), “Boys Will Be Boys: Gender, Overconfidence, and Common Stock Investment”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 116 No. 1, pp. 261-292.
Barber, B. M., Y. T. Lee, Y. J. Liu and T. Odean (2007), “Is the Aggregate Investor Reluctant to Realize Losses? Evidence from Taiwan”, European Financial Management, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 423-447.
Baker, M., X. Pan and J. Wurgler (2012), “The Effect of Reference Point Prices on Mergers and Acquisitions”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 106 No. 1, pp. 49-71.
Beggs, Alan and Kathryn Graddy (2009), “Anchoring Effects: Evidence from Art Auctions”, American Economic Review, Vol. 99 No. 3, pp. 1027-1039.
Beyer, S. (1990), “Gender Differences in the Accuracy of Self-Evaluations of Performance”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 59 No. 5, pp. 960-970.
Bengtsson, C., M. Persson and P. Willenhag (2005), “Gender and Overconfidence”, Economics Letters, Vol. 86 No. 2, pp. 199-203.
Benjamin, J. D. and P. T. Chinloy (2000), “Pricing, Exposure and Residential Listing Strategies”, Journal of Real Estate Research, Vol. 20 No. 1, pp. 61-73.
Box, G. E. P and D. R. Cox (1964), “An Analysis of Transformations”, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Vol. 26 No. 1, pp. 211-252.
Bokhari, S. and D. Geltner (2011), “Loss Aversion and Anchoring in Commercial Real Estate Pricing: Empirical Evidence and Price Index Implications.” Real Estate Economics, Vol. 39 No.4, pp. 635-670.
Cronin, F. J. (1982), “The Efficiency of Housing Search”, Southern Economic Journal, Vol. 48 No. 4, pp. 1016-1030.
Colwell, P., H. Munneke and J. Trefzger (1998), “Chicago’s Office Market: Price Indices, Location, and Time”, Real Estate Economics, Vol. 26 No. 1, pp. 83-106.
Deaux, K. and E. Farris (1977), “Attributing Causes for One’s Own Performance: The Effects of Sex, Norms, and Outcome”, Journal of Research in Personality, Vol. 11 No. 1, pp. 59-72.
Dermisi, S. and J. McDonald (2010), “Selling Prices/sq. ft. of Office Buildings in Downtown Chicago – How Much Is It Worth to Be an Old But Class A Building? ”, Journal of Real Estate Research, Vol. 32 No. 1, pp. 1-22.
Dhar, R. and N. Zhu (2006), “Up close and personal: an individual level analysis of the disposition effect,” Management Science, Vol. 52, No. 5, pp.726-740.
Diaz III, J.(1997), “An Investigation into the Impact of Previous Expert Value Estimates on Appraisal Judgment”, Journal of Real Estate Research, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 49-58.
Diaz III, J. and M. Wolverton(1998), “A Longitudinal Examination of the Appraisal Smoothing Hypothesis”, Real Estate Economics, Vol. 26 No. 2, pp. 349-358.
Estes, R. and J. Hosseini (1988), “The Gender Gap on Wall Street: An Empirical Analysis of Confidence in Investment Decision making”, The Journal of Psychology, Vol. 122 No. 6, pp. 577-590.
Epley, N. and T. Gilovich (2006), “The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic-Why the Adjustments Are Insufficient”, Psychological Science, Vol. 17 No. 4, pp. 311-318.
Ferreira, F., J. Gyourko and J. Tracy (2008), “Housing Busts and Household Mobility”, Journal of Urban Economics, Vol. 68 No. 1, pp. 34-35.
Flavin, M. and T. Yamashita (2009), “Owner-Occupied Housing: The Effect of the Collateral Constraint on the Household Portfolio”, Working Paper, University of California, San Diego.
Firoozi, F., D. Hollas, R. Rutherford and T. Thomson (2006), “Property assessments and information asymmetry in residential real estate”, Journal of Real Estate Research, Vol.28 No. 3, pp. 275-291.
Fisher, J., D. Geltner and H. Pollakowski (2006), “A Quarterly Transactions-Based Index (TBl) of Institutional Real Estate Investment Performance and Movements in Supply and Demand”, MIT Center for Real Estate.
Fowler, R. (1987), “Power and robustness in product-moment correlation”, Applied Psychological Measurement, Vol.11 No. 4, pp. 419-428.
Garmaise, M. J. and T. J. Moskowitz (2004), “Confronting information asymmetries: evidence from real estate markets”, Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 17 No. 2, pp.405-437.
Genesove, D. and C. Mayer (2001), “Loss aversion and selling behavior: evidence from the housing market,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol.116, No. 4, pp.1233-1260.
Green, D., K. Jacowitz, D. Kahneman and D. McFadden (1998), “Referendum Contingent Valuation, Anchoring, and Willingness to Pay for Public Goods”, Resource and Energy Economics, Vol. 20 No. 2, pp. 85-116.
Grinblatt, M. and M. Keloharju (2001), “What makes investors trade?”, Journal of Finance, Vol. 56, No. 2, pp. 589-616.
Guttery, R. (2002), “The Effects of Subdivision Design on Housing Values: The Case of Alleyways”, Journal of Real Estate Research, Vol. 23 No. 3, pp. 265-74.
Harding, J. P., J. R. Knight and C. F. Sirmans (2003), “Estimating Bargaining Effects in Hedonic Models: Evidence from the Housing Market”, Real Estate Economics, Vol. 31 No. 4, pp. 601-622.
Heckman, J. (1979), “Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error”, Econometrica, Vol. 47 No. 1, pp. 153-161.
Hirshleifer, D. (2001), “Investor Psychology and Asset Pricing”, Journal of Finance, Vol. 56, No. 4, pp. 1533-1597.
Kahneman, D. and A. Tversky (1979), “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk”, Econometrica, Vol. 47 No. 2, pp. 263-292.
Kaustia, M., E. Alho and Puttonen (2008), “How much does expertise reduce behavioral biases? The case of anchoring effects in stock return estimates”, Financial Management, Vol. 37 No. 2, pp. 391-411.
Kearl, J. R. and F. S. Mishkin (1977), “Illiquidity, the Demand for Residential Housing, and Monetary Policy”, Journal of Finance, Vol. 37 No. 5, pp. 1571-1586.
Knight, J. R. (2002), “Listing Price, Time on Market, and Ultimate Selling Price: Causes and Effects of Listing Price Changes,” Real Estate Economics, Vol. 30 No. 2, pp. 213-237.
Kutner, M. H., C. J. Nachtsheim and J. Neter (2004), “Applied linear regression models, fourth edition”, New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Lambson,V. E., G. R. McQueen and B. A. Slade (2004), “Do Out-of-State Buyers Pay More for Real Estate? An Examination of Anchoring-Induced Bias and Search Costs”, Real Estate Economics, Vol. 32 No. 1 pp. 85-126.
Li, J. and J. Yu (2012), “Investor attention, psychological anchors, and stock return predictability”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 104 No. 2, pp. 401-419
Lin, Z. and K. Vandell (2007), “Illiquidity and Pricing Biases in the Real Estate Market,” Real Estate Economics, Vol. 35 No.3, pp. 291-330
Lundeberg, M. A., P. W. Fox and J. Punccohar (1994), “Highly Confident but Wrong: Gender Differences and Similarities in Confidence Judgments”, Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 86 No. 1, pp. 114-121.
Madrian, B. C. and D. F. Shea (2001), “The power of suggestion: Inertia in 401(k) participation and savings behavior”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 116 No. 4, pp. 1149-1187.
Malpezzi, S. (2003), “Hedonic Pricing Models: A Selective and Applied Review. In: T. O’Sullivan and K. Gibb, eds”, Housing Economics & Public Policy. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Man, J. (1995), “The incidence of differential commercial property taxes: Empirical evidence”, National Tax Journal, Vol. 48 No. 4, pp. 479-496.
Meehan, A. M. and W. F. Overton (1986) “Gender Differences in Expectancies for Success and Performance on Piagetian Spatial Tasks,” Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, Vol. 32 No. 4, pp. 427-441.
Monroe, K. B. (2003), “Pricing: Making Profitable Decisions (3th ed)”, New York: McGraw-Hill
Northcraft, G. and M. Neale (1987), “Expert, Amateurs, and Real Estate: An Anchoring-and-Adjustment Perspective on Property Pricing Decisions”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 39 No. 1, pp. 84-97.
Russo, J. and P. Shoemaker (1989), “Decision Traps: Ten Barriers to Brilliant Decision Making and How to Overcome Them”, New York: Simon & Schuster.
Rosen, S.(1974), “Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure Competition”, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 82 No. 1, pp. 34-55.
Simonson, I. and A. Drolet (2004), “Anchoring Effects on Consumers’ Willingness-to-Pay and Willingness-to-Accept,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 31 No. 3, pp. 681-690.
Slovic, P. and S. Lichtenstein (1971), “Comparison of Bayesian and Regression Approaches to the Study of Information Processing in Judgment”, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, Vol. 6 No. 6, pp. 649-744.
Strack, F. and T. Mussweiler (1997), “Explaining the enigmatic anchoring effect: Mechanisms of selective accessibility”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 73 No. 3, pp. 437-446.
Sirmans, G. S., D. A. Macpherson and E. N. Zietz (2005), “The Composition of Hedonic Pricing Models”, Journal of Real Estate Literature, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 3-46.
Springer, T. M. (1996), “Single-Family Housing Transactions: Seller Motivations, Price, and Marketing Time”, Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 237-254.
Thaler, R. E. (1985), “Mental accounting and consumer choice”, Marketing science, Vol. 4 No. 3, pp. 199-214.
Tversky, A. and D. Kahneman, (1974), “Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases”, Science, Vol. 185 No. 4157, pp. 1124-1131.
Turnbull, G. and C. F. Sirmans (1993), “Information, Search, and House Prices”, Regional Science and Urban Economics, Vol. 23 No. 4, pp. 545-557.
Turnbull, G., C.F. Sirmans and J. Benjamin (1990), “Do Corporations Sell Houses for Less: A Test of Housing Market Efficiency”, Applied Economics, Vol. 22 No. 10, pp. 1389-1399.
Wheaton, W. (1990), “Vacancy, Search, and Prices in a Housing Market Matching Model”, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 98 No. 6 pp. 1270-1292.
Wilson, T. D, C. E. Houston, K. M. Etling and N. Brekke (1996), “A New Look at Anchoring Effects: Basic Anchoring and Its Antecedents”, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, Vol. 125 No. 4, pp. 387-402
Wong, S. K., C. Y. Yiu and K. W. Chau (2012), “Liquidity and Information Asymmetry in the Real Estate Market”, Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Vol. 45 No. 1, pp. 49-62.
Yavas, A. and S. Yang (1995), “The strategic role of listing price in marketing real estate: theory and evidence”, Real Estate Economics, Vol. 23 No. 3, pp. 347-368.

Second Essay The Comprehensive Disposition Effect: Evidence from the Real Estate Market

References
Anglin, P. M. and R. Wiebe. 2013. Pricing in an illiquid real estate market. Journal of Real Estate Research 35 (1), 83–102.
Asabere, P. K. and F. E. Huffman. 1993. Price Concessions, Time-on-the-Market, and the Actual Sale Price of Homes. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 6 (2), 167–174.
Barber, B. M., Y. T. Lee, Y. J. Liu and T. Odean. 2007. Is the Aggregate Investor Reluctant to Realize Losses? Evidence from Taiwan. European Financial Management 13 (3), 423–447.
Barber, B. M., Y. T. Lee, Y. J. Liu and T. Odean. 2009. Just How Much Do Individual Investors Lose by Trading. Review of Financial Studies 22 (2), 609–632
Barber, B. M. and T. Odean. 2000. Trading is hazardous to your wealth: the common stock investment performance of individual investors. Journal of Finance 55 (2), 773–806.
Barber, B. M. and T. Odean. 2001. Boys Will Be boys: Gender, Overconfidence, and Common Stock Investment. Quarterly Journal of Economics 116 (1), 261–292.
Barber, B. M. and T. Odean. 2002. Online Investors: Do the Slow Die First? Review of Financial Studies 15 (2), 455–487.
Beggs, Alan, and Kathryn Graddy. 2009. Anchoring Effects: Evidence from Art Auctions. American Economic Review 99 (3), 1027–1039.
Benjamin, J. D. and P. T. Chinloy. 2000. Pricing, Exposure and Residential Listing Strategies. Journal of Real Estate Research 20 (1), 61–73.
Bokhari, S. and D. Geltner. 2011. Loss Aversion and Anchoring in Commercial Real Estate Pricing: Empirical Evidence and Price Index Implications. Real Estate Economics 39 (4), 635–670.
Chang, C. C., C. H. Chao and J. H. Yeh. 2016. The Role of Anchoring Bias in the Real Market: Evidence from Taiwan Market. Working paper, National Central University.
Chen, G., K. A. Kim, J. R. Nofsinger and O. M. Rui. 2007. Trading Performance, Disposition Effect, Overconfidence, Representativeness Bias, and Experience of Emerging Market Investors. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 20 (4), 425–451.
Chen, J., H. Hong, M. Huang and J. D. Kubik. 2004. Does Fund Size Erode Mutual Fund Performance? The Role of Liquidity and Organization. American Economic Review 94 (5), 1276–1302.
Choe, H. and Y. Eom. 2009. The disposition effect and investment performance in the futures market. Journal of Futures Markets 29 (6), 496–522.
Colwell, P., H. Munneke and J. Trefzger. 1998. Chicago’s Office Market: Price Indices, Location, and Time. Real Estate Economics 26 (1), 83–106.
Coval, J. D. and T. Shumway. 2005. Do Behavioral Biases Affect Prices? Journal of Finance 60 (1), 1–34.
Crane, A. and J. Hartzell. 2011. Is there a Disposition Effect in Corporate Investment Decisions? Evidence from Real Estate Investment Trusts. Working Paper, The University of Texas at Austin.
Da Costa, N., M. Goulart, C. Cupertino, J. Macedo and S. Da Silva. 2013. The disposition effect and investor experience. Journal of Banking and Finance 37 (5), 1669–1675.
Dermisi S. and J. McDonald. 2010. Selling Prices/sq. ft. of Office Buildings in Downtown Chicago - How Much Is It Worth to Be an Old But Class A Building? Journal of Real Estate Research 32 (1), 1–22.
Dhar, R. and N. Zhu. 2006. Up close and personal: an individual level analysis of the disposition effect. Management Science 52 (5), 726–740
Ferreira, F., J. Gyourko and J. Tracy 2008. Housing Busts and Household Mobility. Journal of Urban Economics 68 (1), 34–35.
Feng, L. and M. Seasholes. 2005. Do Investor Sophistication and Trading Experience Eliminate Behavioral Biases in Finance Markets? Review of Finance 9 (3), 305–351.
Einio, M., M. Kaustia and V. Puttonen. 2008. Price setting and the reluctance to realize losses in apartment markets. Journal of Economic Psychology 29 (1), 19–34.
Fisher, J., D. Geltner and H. Pollakowski. 2006. A Quarterly Transactions-Based Index (TBl) of Institutional Real Estate Investment Performance and Movements in Supply and Demand. MIT Center for Real Estate.
Firoozi, F., D. Hollas, R. Rutherford and T. Thomson. 2006. Property assessments and information asymmetry in residential real estate. Journal of Real Estate Research 28 (3), 275–291.
Frazzini, A. 2006. The Disposition Effect and Underreaction to News. Journal of Finance 61 (4), 2017–2046.
Frino, A., G. Lepone and D. Wright. 2015. Investor characteristics and the disposition effect. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 31 (1), 1–12.
Garmaise, M. J. and T. J. Moskowitz. 2004. Confronting information asymmetries: evidence from real estate markets. Review of Financial Studies 17 (2), 405–437.
Garvey, R. and A. Murphy. 2004. Are professional traders too slow to realize their losses? Financial Analysts Journal 60 (4), 35–43.
Genesove, D. and C. Mayer. 2001. Nominal loss aversion and seller behavior: Evidence from the housing market. Quarterly Journal of Economics 116 (4), 1233–1260.
Grinblatt, M. and M. Keloharju. 2001. What makes investors trade? Journal of Finance 56 (2), 589–616.
Guttery, R. 2002. The Effects of Subdivision Design on Housing Values: The Case of Alleyways. Journal of Real Estate Research 23 (3), 265–74.
Harris, L. 1988. Predicting Contemporary Volume with Historic Volume at Differential Price Levels: Evidence Supporting the Disposition Effect: Discussion. Journal of Finance 43 (3), 698–699.
Heckman, J. 1979. Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error. Econometrica 47 (1), 153–161.
Hirshleifer, D. 2001. Investor Psychology and Asset Pricing. Journal of Finance 56 (4), 1533–1597.
Huang, J., and DJ, Kisgen. 2013. Gender and corporate finance: Are male executives overconfident relative to female executives? Journal of Financial Economics 108 (3), 822–839.
Kahneman, D. and A. Tversky. 1979. Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47 (2), 263–292.
Kearl, J. R. and F. S. Mishkin. 1977. Illiquidity, the Demand for Residential Housing, and Monetary Policy. Journal of Finance 32 (5), 1571–1586.
Knight, J. R. 2002. Listing Price, Time on Market, and Ultimate Selling Price: Causes and Effects of Listing Price Changes. Real Estate Economics 30 (2), 213–237.
Lambson, V.E., G.R. McQueen and B.A. Slade. 2004. Do Out-of-State Buyers Pay More for Real Estate? An Examination of Anchoring-Induced Bias and Search Costs. Real Estate Economics 32 (1), 85–126.
LeRoy, S. F. and R. D. Porter. 1981. The Present Value Relation: Tests Based on Variance Bounds. Econometrica 49 (3), 555–577.
Lin, Z. and K. Vandell. 2007. Illiquidity and Pricing Biases in the Real Estate Market. Real Estate Economics 35 (3), 291–330
Locke, P. R. and S. C. Mann. 2005. Professional trader discipline and trade disposition. Journal of Financial Economics 76 (2), 401–444.
Locke, P. R. and Z. Onayev. 2005. Trade duration: Information and Trade Disposition. Financial Review 40 (1), 113–29.
Malpezzi, S. 2003. Hedonic Pricing Models: A Selective and Applied Review. In: T. O’Sullivan and K. Gibb, eds. Housing Economics & Public Policy. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Man, J. 1995. The incidence of differential commercial property taxes: Empirical evidence. National Tax Journal 48 (4), 479–496.
Odean, T. 1998. Are investors reluctant to realize their losses? Journal of Finance 53 (5), 1775–1798.
Shu ,P.G., Y.H. Yeh, S.B. Chiu, and H.C. Chen. 2005. Are Taiwanese individual investors reluctant to realize their losses? Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 13 (2), 201-223
Ritter, J. R. 2003. Behavioral Finance. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 11 (4), 429–437.
Rosen, S. 1974. Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure Competition Journal of Political Economy 82 (1), 34–55
Saiz, A. 2010. The Geographic Determinants of Housing Supply. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 125 (3), 1253-1296.
Schlarbaum, G.G., W.G. Lewellen and R.C. Lease. 1978. The common-stock-portfolio performance record of individual investors: 1964–70. Journal of Finance 33(2), 429–41.
Shafir, E., P. Diamond and A. Tversky. 1997. Money Illusion. Quarterly Journal of Economics 112 (2), 341–374.
Shapira, Z. and I. Venezia. 2001. Patterns of behaviour of professionally managed and independent investors. Journal of Banking and Finance 25 (8), 1573–1587.
Shefrin, H. and M. Statman. 1985. The disposition to sell winners too early and ride losers too long: theory and evidence. Journal of Finance 40 (3), 777–790.
Shiller, R. J. 1981. Do Stock Prices Move Too Much to Be Justified by Subsequent Changes in Dividends? American Economic Review 71 (3), 421–436.
Sirmans, G. S., D. A. Macpherson and E. N. Zietz. 2005. The Composition of Hedonic Pricing Models. Journal of Real Estate Literature 13 (1), 3–46.
Springer, T. M. 1996. Single-Family Housing Transactions: Seller Motivations, Price, and Marketing Time. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 13 (3), 237–254.
Thaler, R. H. 1985. Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice. Marketing Science 4 (3), 199–214.
Wong, S. K., C. Y. Yiu and K. W. Chau. 2012. Liquidity and Information Asymmetry in the Real Estate Market. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 45 (1), 49–62.
Yavas, A. and S. Yang. 1995. The strategic role of listing price in marketing real estate: theory and evidence. Real Estate Economics 23 (3), 347–368.
Ye, P. 2014. Does the disposition effect matter in corporate takeovers? evidence from institutional investors of target companies. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 49 (1), 221–248.
Weber, M., Camerer, C.F., 1998. The disposition effects in securities trading: An experimental analysis. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 33 (2), 167–184.
指導教授 張傳章、葉錦徽(Chuang-Chang Chang Jin-Huei Yeh) 審核日期 2016-7-11
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明