![]() |
|
以作者查詢圖書館館藏 、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 、以作者查詢全國書目 、勘誤回報 、線上人數:13 、訪客IP:3.21.247.145
姓名 周群哲(Chun-Che Chou) 查詢紙本館藏 畢業系所 經濟學系 論文名稱 全球股市流動性之關聯性分析
(Understanding the Liquidity Connectedness in Global Stock Markets)相關論文 檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]
[Bibtex 格式]
[相關文章]
[文章引用]
[完整記錄]
[館藏目錄]
[檢視]
[下載]
- 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
- 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
- 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
摘要(中) 本文使用向量自我回歸 (vector autoregressive, VAR)模型架構下的一般化預測誤差變異數分解 (forecast error variance decomposition), 來進行十二個已開發國家和八個新興國家之間, 於2001年至2015年間股市流動性關聯程度的靜態與動態分析。其中, 此方法並不會因為變數不同的排列而產生不同的結果。本文所使用的流動性資料是由各國股市的每日價格指數和每日交易金額所建構, 並使用修改過後的 Amihud不流動性指標計算而來。結果顯示, 當發生經濟衰退時, 股市流動性的關聯性似乎會變得更加緊密。而且, 已開發國家股市中的外溢效果和關聯程度, 比起新興國家都還要來得更大、更強。同時我們也發現一國的地理特徵與經濟發展是決定與他國關聯程度大小的重要因素。值得注意的是此篇文章的幾個實證結果在某種程度上與一些資產關聯性的研究結果一致。 摘要(英) Based on the generalized vector autoregressive framework in which forecast error variance decompositions are invariant to variable ordering, we provide both static (full-sample) and dynamic (rolling-sample) analyses for the liquidity connectedness in 12 developed and 8 emerging stock markets during 2001-2015 period. The liquidity data we use in this paper is constructed from daily price index and turnover and it is calculated by the revised Amihud illiquidity ratio. Our empirical results indicate that the liquidity connectedness seems to be more intensive when economic downturns happen. What’s more, stock markets in developed countries generate higher spillovers and connectedness than stock markets in emerging countries. We also prove that the geographical features and economic developments of a country are crucial factors deciding its level of connectedness to others. It is noteworthy
that some empirical outcomes in this paper is consistent with some equity
connectedness studies at a certain extent.關鍵字(中) ★ 流動性
★ 關聯性
★ 全球股市
★ 預測誤差變異數分解關鍵字(英) ★ Liquidity
★ Connectedness
★ Global stock markets
★ Forecast error variance decomposition論文目次 1 Introduction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
2 Introducing Liquidity. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2.1 Liquidity definition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . 4
2.2 Literatures about liquidity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
3 Empirical Measures of Liquidity and Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
3.1 Measures of liquidity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
3.1.1 One-dimension liquidity measures . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .11
3.1.2 Multi-dimension liquidity measures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
3.2 Liquidity data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
4 Methodology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . 18
4.1 The structure of a first-order vector autoregressive model . . . 18
4.2 Cholesky decomposition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
4.3 Generalized decomposition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
4.4 The connectedness table . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
4.5 Generalized spillover definition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .26
4.5.1 Total spillovers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .27
4.5.2 Directional spillovers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .27
4.5.3 Net spillovers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .28
4.5.4 Net pairwise spillovers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
5 Empirical results. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .30
5.1 Static (full-sample) analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .30
5.1.1 Full-sample connectedness . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
5.1.2 During the financial crisis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .36
5.1.3 Comparing developed and emerging countries . . . . . . . . . . . .36
5.1.4 Visualization of pairwise directional connectedness . . . . . . . .38
5.2 Dynamic (rolling-sample) analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .41
5.2.1 Total connectedness . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
5.2.2 Comparing developed and emerging countries . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
5.2.3Total directional connectedness . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .44
6 Conclusion. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .49
Reference. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50參考文獻 黃裕烈、 管中閔 (2014). 向量自我回歸模型: 計量方法與 R 程式, 初版, 雙葉書廊。
Amihud, Y. (2002), “Illiquidity and Stock Returns: Cross-Section and Time-Series Effects”, Journal of Financial Markets, 5, 31–56.
Bogdan, S., Bareˇsa S. and Ivanoviˇc S. (2012), “Measuring Liquidity on Stock Market: Impact on Liquidity Ratio”, Tourism and Hospitality Management, 18, 183–193.
Brunnermeir, M.K. and Pedesen, L.H. (2009), “Market Liquidity and Funding Liquidity”, Review of Financial Studies, 22(6), 2201-2238.
Choi, W.G. and Cook, D. (2005), “Stock Market Liquidity and the Macroeconomy: Evidence from Japan”, IMF Working Paper, https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2005/wp0506.pdf.
Datar, M.K., “Stock Market Liquidity: Measuring and Implications” (2000), Fourth Capital Market Conference.
Diebold F.X. and Yilmaz, K. (2009), “Measuring Financial Asset Return and Volatility Spillovers, with Application to Global Equity Markets”, The economic Journal, 119, 158–171.
Diebold F.X. and Yilmaz, K. (2012), “Better to Give than to Receive: Predictive Directional Measurement of Volatility Spillovers”, International Journal of Forecasting, 28, 57–66.
Diebold F.X. and Yilmaz, K. (2014), “On the Network Topology of Variance Decompositions: Measuring the Connectedness of Financial Firms”, Journal of econometrics, 182, 119–134.
Goyenko, R.Y, Holden, C.W and Trzcinka, C.A. (2009), “Do Liquidity Measures measure Liquidity? ”, Journal of Financial Economics, 92, 153–181.
Hameed, A., Kang, W. and Viswanathan, S. (2010), “Stock Market Declines and Liquidity”, The Journal of Finance, 65, 257–294.
Karolyi, G.A., Lee, K.-H. and Van Dijk, M.A. (2012), “Understanding Commonality in Liquidity around the World”, Journal of Financial Economics, 105, 82–112.
Koop, G., Pesaran M.H. and Potter, S.M., (1996), “Impulse Response Analysis in Nonlinear Multivariate Models”, Journal of Econometrics, 74, 119–147.
Lanne, M. and Nyberg, H. (2014), “Generalized Forecast Error Variance Decomposition for Linear and Nonlinear Multivariate Models”, CREATES Research Paper, http://econ.au.dk/fileadmin/site files/filer oekonomi/
Working Papers/CREATES/2014/rp14 17.pdf.
Næs, R., Skjeltorp, J. A. and Ødegaard, B. A. (2011), “Stock Market Liquidity and the Business Cycle”, The Journal of Finance, 66(1),139–176.
Pesaran M.H., and Shin, Y. (1998), “Generalized Impulse Response Analysis
in Linear Multivariate Models”, Economics Letters, 58, 17–29.
Wyss, R. (2004), “Measuring and Predicting Liquidity in the Stock Market”, Ph.D Dissertation, der Universität St. Gallen, Hochschule für Wirtschafts-, Rechts- und Sozialwissenschaften (HSG) zur Erlangung der Würde eines Doktors der Wirtschaftswissenschaften, http://www1.unisg.ch/www/edis.nsf/SysLkpByIdentifier/2899/$FILE/dis2899.pdf指導教授 徐之強(Chih-Chiang Hsu) 審核日期 2016-6-24 推文 plurk
funp
live
udn
HD
myshare
netvibes
friend
youpush
delicious
baidu
網路書籤 Google bookmarks
del.icio.us
hemidemi
myshare