摘要(英) |
With the coming of information age, reading becomes an indispensable ability for people to survive under the enormous shocks from masses of information and knowledge. Along with the wide-spreading network technology, students are able to participate the online discussions everywhere at all times, which increases the opportunities to engage in after-school reading activity. In the past, the researchers also pointed out that online discussion activity could raise students’ reading interests and generate positive attitude toward reading. The previous research team had developed a virtual online community named “Text-Based Reading Discussion System”, which was a book-based interactive platform. Students were able to find out people, topics and books matched their interests and then increase their expose to more books. However, according to the experimental data, the current system failed to catch attention continually due to the low interaction and reply rate.
Therefore, this study designed two mechanisms to improve students’ participation and interaction. The first one is a “broadcast mission mode”, which enhances students’ interaction in the community through the transmissibility of central node in the community. Students are able to share books and publish reflections to motivate other members to participate in. In the end, students can deliver the task to their friends so that the task can be passed continually. The second mechanism named “personal achievement mode” was designed under the traditional goal-oriented mode. Students only need to follow the instructions to reach their learning goals. In this study, the participants were three to five graders who were enrolled in the school that adapted text-based reading discussion system. The aim of this study was to explore the influence from two different mechanisms on the students’ participation to reading community.
The results showed that students participated in broadcast task mode outperformed the personal achievement mode group and the original system group. The participants mentioned in the interview that they were able to focus more on the discussion and would like to invite their friends to discuss together. Moreover, the overall activity could achieve higher participation rate by using cooperative way to finish the task. |
參考文獻 |
王順興、楊接期、何錦文、陳德懷(2001)。網路目標設定環境的建置─以教育部閱讀網站為例。全球華人計算機教育應用大會。
王熙哲、丁耀民(2008)。人際關係網路對虛擬社群使用意願的影響。資訊管理學報,5(1)。
毛慶禎(2007)導論─網路社群Introduction of Internet Community,取自http://lins.fju.edu.tw/mao/icommunity/introduction.htm
古禮權(2004)。基於目標設定理論之班級兒童閱讀學習環境建置與評量。國立中央大學資訊工程研究所碩士論文,未出版。
李銘薰、卜小蝶(2009)。電腦與數位3C專業虛擬社群知識分享之影響因素研究。教育資料與圖書館學,46(3),377-401。
李志軒(2010)。探討以Bloom認知分類法作為發問工具之設計與應用:以國小五年級學生網路閱讀討論為例。 國立嘉義大學數位學習設計與管理學系研究所碩士論文,未出版。
李家同(2015)。大量閱讀的重要性(Vol. 28)。五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
李棋芳(2015)。線上文字聊書:以書本為基礎建立閱讀社群。國立中央大學網路學習科技研究所碩士班,未出版。
杜春梅(2006)。虛擬學習社群在閱讀學習成效之研究-以苗栗縣福基國小學生網路讀書會為例。育達商業技術學院資訊管理研究所碩士論文,未出版。
林政緯(2014)。支援「文字聊書」活動之系統設計與實作 ──透過「文字聊書」建立閱讀社群。國立中央大學網路學習科技研究所碩士班,未出版。
柯華葳、詹益綾、丘嘉慧(2013)。臺灣四年級學生閱讀素養(PIRLS 2011報告)。取自http://lrn.ncu.edu.tw/Teacher%20web/hwawei/Project/PIRLS%202011%E5
%AE%8C%E6%95%B4%E5%A0%B1%E5%91%8A.pdf。
柯華葳(2006)。教出閱讀力。台北市:天下雜誌。
程炳林、毛國楠(1993)。目標層次與目標導向對大學生自我調整學習歷程之影響。教育心理學報。
陳嘉彌(2003)。利用網路學習社群策略增進學習成效之省思。隔空教育論叢,15,93-107。
陳佳音(2005)。線上閱讀討論對國小學童之閱讀理解能力與閱讀態度影響之研究。國立臺南大學教育學系課程與教學研究所碩士論文,未出版。
唐興通(2013)。社交網路裡資訊的滲透與傳播軌跡【科技新聞群組】。取自http://www.ifanr.com/256396。
徐美雲(2010)。運用自我調整學習策略於網路班級讀書會對國小五年級學童閱讀理解能力之研究。臺北市立教育大學數位學習碩士論文,未出版。
葉姵妏(2012)。結合文字探勘與社會網絡分析尋找虛擬社群中之意見領袖。中原大學資訊管理研究所學位論文,1-62。
黃儒傑(2009)。新手與資深教師成就目標導向、自我調整策略及其教學表現之研究:以台中縣市幼稚園為例。教育研究與發展期刊,5,141-174。
張基成(2004)。網路學習社群成員線上討論分享行為表現的落差與對策─兩極化與集中化現象之探討。空中教學論叢,18,43-75。
張基成(2003)。網路學習社群之經營與管理。T&D 飛訊,8,1-11。
張財銘(2003)。如何經營學習社群。T&D 飛訊,8,1-4。
張基成、傅心怡(2007)。網路學習社群成員線上討論參與之影響因素。全球華人計算機教育應用學報,4(1),15-28。
蔡至欣、賴玲玲(2011)。虛擬社群的資訊分享行為。圖書資訊學刊,9(1),161-196。
愛范兒(2014)。冰桶挑戰募款是如何點燃各界的熱情?【科技新聞群組】。取自http://technews.tw/2014/08/19/study-ice-bucket-challenge/
鄭中堅、鄭衡遠、何宜珍(2012)。淺談社群網站經營與管理─彰化縣政府人事處推動社群網站經驗分享。研習論壇,9-20。
魏雲祥、勇健(2004)。麥克利蘭的成就動機理論及其在高職教育中的應用。中國冶金教育,2,58-60。
Bandura, A. (1995). Self-efficacy in changing societies. Cambridge university press.
Hann, D. Glowacki-Dudka , M. & Conceicao-Runlee, S. (2000). 147 Practical tips for teaching online groups: Essentials education. Madison, WI: Atwood Publishing.
Hagel, J., & Armstrong, A. (1997). Net gain: Expanding markets through virtual communities. Harvard Business Press.
Jonassen, D., Peck, K., & Wilson, B. (1999). Learning with technology - A constructivist perspective. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc.
Kozinets, R. V. (1999). E-Tribalized marketing?: The strategic implications of virtual communities of consumption. European Management Journal, 17(3), 252-264.
Kearsley, G. (2000). Online education:Learning and teaching in cyberspace. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning
Locke E A., Latham G P. (1990). Work Motivation And Satisfaction:Light At The End Of The Tunnel. Psychology Science, 1(4),240-246.
Locke E A, Chah D O, Harrison D S, Lustgarten N. (1989). Seperating The Effects Of Goal Specificity From Goal Level. Organizational Behavior And Human Decision Processes, 43(2),270-287.
Locke, Edwin A. (2001). Motivation by Goal Setting. Handbook of Organizational Behavior, 43-56.
McClelland, D. C., Atkinson, J. W., Clark, R. A., & Lowell, E. L. (1976). The achievement motive. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts
Palloff, R. & Pratt, K. (1999). Building learning communities in cyberspace. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Smith, M. A., & Kollock, P. (1999). Communities in cyberspace. Psychology Press.
Rheingold, H. (1993). The virtual community: Finding commection in a computerized world. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc..
Romm, C., Plisjin, N. R. (1997). Virtual communities and society: Toward and Integrative three phase mode. International Journal of Information Management, 17(4), pp.261-270.
Talja, S., & Hansen, P. (2006). Information sharing. In New directions in human information behavior . Springer Netherlands, 113-134. |