營建工地人為錯誤分析之認知因子辨識與涵義

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：88

、訪客IP：18.118.254.83

姓名

米琳(Emmanuel Christine Milhim) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

營建管理研究所

論文名稱

營建工地人為錯誤分析之認知因子辨識與涵義
(Identification and implication of cognitive factors for on site human error analysis)

相關論文

★ 政府部門導入資訊安全管理系統之分析	★ 建立以層級分析法為基礎的洪災計畫評估模型- 以印尼雅加達為例
★ 臺北市污水下水道用戶接管開口契約內容及執行案例之研究	★ 應用知識本體技術協助建築專案單價分析作業之研究
★ 以貝式信念網路為基礎之工作危害分析與風險評估方法	★ 危險性工作場所審查機制之研究
★ 國內建築工程規劃設計及監造為同一廠商辦理現況問題之研究	★ 台灣家族企業接班佈局之個案研究-以中國砂輪公司為例
★ 以安全氣候評估國內營造業分包制度與勞工安全之研究-以台灣北部營造業為例	★ 專案層級河川工程永續營建評估指標系統建立之研究
★ 綠建築與房地產投資影響因子關聯性之探討	★ 營造業職業安全衛生管理執行工具及方法之研究
★ 軌道施工品質管理改善方案之研究	★ BIM輔助消防安全設備審查流程
★ 國內推動國際鐵路行業標準(IRIS)品質管理體系認證之研究	★ 臺灣建築業執行透過設計預防工程危害之可行性研究

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

自從有營造業以來，勞工安全一直被視為一個重大挑戰。許多研究皆證明了由於營造業在工地現場具有最多的職業災害傷亡人數，使得營造業為最具危險性的產業，而勞工在工地發生的人為錯誤被認為是意外增加的主要原因。有數個勞工安全計畫在探討勞工的人為錯誤的問題，這些計畫是從考量與工作環境與工人行為相關的外部因素來切入。然而，僅著重在非人類認知概念的層面是不夠的，而如何去評估與找出導致工地意外的因素是急迫且必要的。因以，本研究的目的是要辨識認知因素及其在工地意外事件上所具備的意含。本研究使用認知心理學做為辨識認知因素的工具，而所辨識出的因子則是透過問卷調查的方式加以驗證。研究結果顯示，與工地現場的意外事故相關的認知因素包括：記憶、注意力、決策、語言和認知。未來研究可以進一步根據這些認知因素提出新的管理方法，以透過安全行為的強化來提升營造業的現地安全。

摘要(英)

Since the construction industry exists, safety has been considered as a challenge. Many studies have proven that the construction industry stands among the most dangerous industries to work in as it carries the greatest number of fatalities registered in the workplace. Human errors performed by workers on site are considered as the main reason of increases of accidents. Several safety programs studied this issue by considering external factors related to both working environment and worker’s behaviors on site. However, focusing on the non-cognitive concept is insufficient. Therefore, the urgency to evaluate and search for some responsible factors leading to accidents on-site becomes necessary. Thus the objective of this research is to identify the cognitive factors and their implication on accidents on site. Cognitive psychology is used as a tool for the identification of the factors and a survey is conducted to validate the factors identified. Results show that accidents on-site are narrowly linked to cognitive factors that are: memory, attention, decision-making, language, and perception. New management approach based on these cognitive factors can be proposed by future studies in order to promote construction site safety through the reinforcement of safe behaviors.

關鍵字(中)

★ 營造工程
★ 安全
★ 意外
★ 認知
★ 人為錯誤

關鍵字(英)

★ Construction
★ Safety
★ Accidents
★ Cognition
★ Human errors

論文目次

ABSTRACT I
摘要 II
TABLE OF CONTENT III
AKNOWLEDGEMENTS V
LIST OF FIGURES VI
LIST OF TABLES VII
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 BACKGROUND 1
1.2- PROBLEM STATEMENT 2
1.3 GOALS OF THE STUDY 3
1.4 RESEARCH SCOPE AND LIMITATIONS 3
1.5 RESEARCH FLOWCHART 4
1.6 THESIS ORGANIZATION 5
CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW 6
2.1 CONCEPT OF ACCIDENT ON SITE 6
2.2 TYPES OF ACCIDENTS MOSTLY TO OCCUR ON SITE 6
2.3 THE IMPACT OF ACCIDENTS ON CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 8
2.4 ROOTS OR CAUSES OF ACCIDENTS ON SITE 8
2.4.1: Human error overview 12
2.4.2 Definition of human error 13
2.4.3: Causes of human errors on site 14
2.4.4 Cognitive factors mentioned through the literature as causes of human errors 18
2.5: ATTEMPT TO ACHIEVE SAFETY 20
2.5.1 Theories related 21
2.5.2 Safety programs 25
3.1 LINK ACCIDENTS ON SITE AND COGNITION 28
3.2 THE COGNITIVE MODEL 30
3.3 MAIN FACTORS OF COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY 32
3.4 COGNITIVE FACTORS AND HUMAN ERROR 34
3.5 COGNITIVE FACTORS FOR HUMAN ERRORS ON CONSTRUCTION SITE 36
3.6 RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE COGNITIVE FACTORS AND THE ACCIDENTS (CASE STUDIES) 43
50
50
3.7 PRESENTATION OF THE QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY 50
CHAPTER 4: RESULTS AND DATA ANALYSIS 53
4.1 DEMOGRAPHICS 53
4.2 VALIDITY TEST 54
4.3 DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS 55
4.4 DATA ANALYSIS FROM ALL THE PARTICIPANTS 55
4.5 COMPARISON BETWEEN HAITI AND TAIWAN RESPONDENTS 59
4.6 TAIWANESE RESPONDENTS RESULTS ANALYSIS 61
4.7 HAITIAN RESPONDENTS RESULTS ANALYSIS 61
4.8 PRACTICAL EXPLANATION OF THE RESULTS 62
CHAPTER 5: CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTIONS 64
REFERENCES 66

參考文獻

1 Chi, S., S. Han, and D.Y. Kim, Relationship between Unsafe Working Conditions and Workers’ Behavior and Impact of Working Conditions on Injury Severity in US Construction Industry. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2012. 139(7): p. 826-838.
2. Hinze, J., C. Pedersen, and J. Fredley, Identifying root causes of construction injuries. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 1998. 124(1): p. 67-71.
3. Garrett, J. and J. Teizer, Human factors analysis classification system relating to human error awareness taxonomy in construction safety. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2009. 135(8): p. 754-763.
4. Hale, A. and D. Borys, Working to rule, or working safely? Part 1: A state of the art review. Safety science, 2013. 55: p. 207-221.
5. Goh, Y.M. and N.F. Binte Sa’adon, Cognitive Factors Influencing Safety Behavior at Height: A Multimethod Exploratory Study. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2015. 141(6): p. 04015003.
6. Hagen, E. and G. Mays, Human factors engineering in the US nuclear arena. Nucl. Saf.;(United States), 1981. 22(3).
7. Reason, J., Human error. Cambridge University Press, 1990.
8. Quinn, M.M., et al., Sharps injuries and other blood and body fluid exposures among home health care nurses and aides. American Journal of Public Health, 2009. 99(S3): p. S710-S717.
9. Perlman, A., R. Sacks, and R. Barak, Hazard recognition and risk perception in construction. Safety science, 2014. 64: p. 22-31.
10. Grant, A. and J. Hinze, Construction worker fatalities related to trusses: An analysis of the OSHA fatality and catastrophic incident database. Safety science, 2014. 65: p. 54-62.
11. M.Ranasinghe, W.A.A.a., Study on the impact of accidents on construction projects. 6th international conference on structural engineering and construction management 2015, 2015.
12. Gibb, A., et al., Construction accident causality: learning from different countries and differing consequences. Construction Management and Economics, 2014. 32(5): p. 446-459.
13. Chong, H.Y. and T.S. Low, Accidents in Malaysian construction industry: statistical data and court cases. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 2014. 20(3): p. 503-513.
14. Khosravi, Y., et al., Factors influencing unsafe behaviors and accidents on construction sites: a review. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 2014. 20(1): p. 111-125.
15. Atkinson, A., Human error in the management of building projects. Construction Management & Economics, 1998. 16(3): p. 339-349.
16. Ganapathi Bhat manchi, S.G., Jaideep Singh Hanspal, Study on cognitive approach to human error and its application to reduce the accidents at workplace. International journal of engineering and advanced technology (IJEAT), 2013.
17. D. Wantanakorn, M.J.M.W.H.A., Management errors in construction. Engineering construction and architectural management, 1999.
18. Sawacha, E., S. Naoum, and D. Fong, Factors affecting safety performance on construction sites. International journal of project management, 1999. 17(5): p. 309-315.
19. Suraji, A., A.R. Duff, and S.J. Peckitt, Development of causal model of construction accident causation. Journal of construction engineering and management, 2001. 127(4): p. 337-344.
20. Huang, X. and J. Hinze, Analysis of construction worker fall accidents. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2003. 129(3): p. 262-271.
21. Hinze, J., X. Huang, and L. Terry, The nature of struck-by accidents. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2005. 131(2): p. 262-268.
22. Teo, E.A.L., F.Y.Y. Ling, and A.F.W. Chong, Framework for project managers to manage construction safety. International Journal of project management, 2005. 23(4): p. 329-341.
23. Aksorn, T. and B. Hadikusumo, Critical success factors influencing safety program performance in Thai construction projects. Safety Science, 2008. 46(4): p. 709-727.
24. Choudhry, R.M. and D. Fang, Why operatives engage in unsafe work behavior: Investigating factors on construction sites. Safety science, 2008. 46(4): p. 566-584.
25. Chi, C.-F., C.-C. Yang, and Z.-L. Chen, In-depth accident analysis of electrical fatalities in the construction industry. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 2009. 39(4): p. 635-644.
26. Mitropoulos, P., G. Cupido, and M. Namboodiri, Cognitive approach to construction safety: Task demand-capability model. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2009. 135(9): p. 881-889.
27. Cheng, C.-W., et al., Characteristic analysis of occupational accidents at small construction enterprises. Safety Science, 2010. 48(6): p. 698-707.
28. Ismail, Z., S. Doostdar, and Z. Harun, Factors influencing the implementation of a safety management system for construction sites. Safety Science, 2012. 50(3): p. 418-423.
29. Kim, Y.A., et al., Major Accident Factors for Effective Safety Management of Highway Construction Projects. Journal Of Construction Engineering And Management, 2012. 139(6): p. 628-640.
30. Zhang, M. and D. Fang, A cognitive analysis of why Chinese scaffolders do not use safety harnesses in construction. Construction Management and Economics, 2013. 31(3): p. 207-222.
31. Glasscock, D.J., et al., Psychosocial factors and safety behaviour as predictors of accidental work injuries in farming. Work & Stress, 2006. 20(2): p. 173-189.
32. Mitropoulos, P. and B. Memarian, Team processes and safety of workers: Cognitive, affective, and behavioral processes of construction crews. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2012. 138(10): p. 1181-1191.
33. Ajzen, I., constructing a tpb questionnaire: conceptual and methodological considerations. 2002.
34. Zhang, M. and D. Fang, A continuous Behavior-Based Safety strategy for persistent safety improvement in construction industry. Automation in Construction, 2013. 34: p. 101-107.
35. Sabet, P., et al., Application of domino theory to justify and prevent accident occurence in constructionsite. IOSR J. Mech. Civil Eng, 2013. 6(2): p. 72-76.
36. Zubir, A., Implementing OSHA in the construction industry: a review. 2009.
37. Unsworth, N., et al., Everyday attention failures: An individual differences investigation. Journal of experimental psychology: learning, memory, and cognition, 2012. 38(6): p. 1765.
38. Anderson, J.R., in Cognitive psychology and its implications.
39. Lunenburg, F.C., The decision making process. National forum of educational administration and supervision journal, 2010. 27.
40. Nishigaki, S., et al., Humanware, human error, and hiyari-hat: A template of unsafe symptoms. Journal of construction engineering and management, 1994. 120(2): p. 421-442.
41. Observatorio migrantes del caribe, Haitian construction workers, a exploratory study on indicators of forced labor. ICF international, 2012

指導教授

王翰翔(Han- Hsiang Wang)

審核日期

2016-7-27

推文