國際運籌港區發展模式之探討: 港區與工業區結合的觀點

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：43

、訪客IP：18.221.4.52

姓名

陳琳凱(Lin-Kai Chen) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

企業管理學系

論文名稱

國際運籌港區發展模式之探討: 港區與工業區結合的觀點
(An Analysis on the Development of International Logistics Zone: An Integration of Ports and Industrial Park Perspective)

相關論文

★ 企業流程為核心的食品產業運籌體系規劃:低溫物流部份	★ 以企業流程方法規劃整體飛航後勤維修體系之研究
★ 成衣產業導入ERP運籌管理方案之個案研究	★ 光電產業試產基地之生產最佳化模式：以光投影機為例
★ TFT LCD產業獲利因素之探討	★ 科技事業進行合併/讓售之決策過程與成效之個案探討
★ 企業治理、風險及遵循解決方案導入之個案研究-以職責分離資訊系統為例	★ 品質機能展開與多準則決策於設備開發應用
★ ERP導入品質因素對IFRS轉換專案之影響	★ ERP投資金額對服務品質及導入後IT治理目標之分析
★ ERP 導入問題對專案的影響	★ IFRS轉換對員工退休金計畫影響
★ IFRS轉換問題對IFRS效益的影響	★ 電子產業新產品開發參考模式之發展
★ 應用資料科學方法提昇國防裝備可靠度之研究－以防空系統為例	★ 企業資訊方案行銷歷程之探討-以MES為例

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

國際運籌港區為一國之經貿窗口，可提供企業在附加價值創造過程中，運用港區之軟硬體設施進行儲運及產品加值等功能提升企業之營運績效。受到全球經濟的影響，港區在全球供應鏈中的角色與功能重新有了定位，並衍生出新的運籌模式，這種新的全球運籌模式連結了港區與工業區，使港區成為企業在全球供應鏈上的合作夥伴。

本研究透過實證分析方式，以港區結合工業區的觀點來探討企業進駐國際運籌港區營運所考量的因素為何。研究結果顯示，企業進駐國際運籌港區所考量之主要因素包括「港區基礎建設」、「港區周邊基礎建設」、「貨運量管理能力」、「供應鏈合作關係」、「港區策略性地位」與「港區結合工業區之加值能力」六個構面，並進一步透過單因子變異數分析法(one-way ANOVA)檢驗出不同規模的企業對於評定「貨運量管理能力」之重要性具有顯著差異。另一方面，本研究亦透過結構方程模式(Structural Equation Modeling,SEM)之建立，且利用上述之構面分析國際運籌港區之形成與發展，研究結果顯示「港區基礎建設」、「港區周邊基礎建設」、「貨運量管理能力」與「供應鏈合作關係」，將影響此港區的「港區策略性地位」，並進一步影響港區發展「港區結合工業區之加值能力」。最後，本文針對研究結果進行分析與討論，並給予港區管理者經營管理上之建議。

摘要(英)

International Logistics Zone is an entrance of economy and trade in a country. It can provide enterprises the process of adding value and make use of software and hardware facilities to proceeding transportation, storage and value-added product function to promote the operating performance. With the trends of globalization of economy, the functionality of International Logistics Zone in global supply chain has been repositioned and hence forming a new global logistics management model. The model is the integration of International Logistics Zone and Industrial park, which makes International Logistics Zone become a partner in global supply chain.
This research empirically investigates the importance of criteria for operating the business in the International Logistics Zone from an integration of International Logistics Zone and industrial park perspective. Results suggest the most important six criteria are “basic infrastructure” , “multimodal transport” , “capacity management in the International Logistics Zone” , “coordination across the supply chain” , “strategic position of the International Logistics Zone ” and “ value-added abilities of integration of International Logistics Zone and industrial park”. Moreover, the study also uses Structure Equation Modeling (SEM) to analyse the development of International Logistics Zone. The empirical results show the directions of “basic infrastructure” , “multimodal transport” , “capacity management in the International Logistics Zone” and “coordination across the supply chain” to “strategic position of the International Logistics Zone ” and “ value-added abilities of integration of International Logistics Zone and industrial park” are intensely and positively influnced.

關鍵字(中)

★ 國際運籌港區
★ 工業區
★ 單因子變異數分析
★ 結構方程模式

關鍵字(英)

★ International Logistics Zone
★ Industrial Park
★ one-way ANOVA
★ Structure Equation Modeling

論文目次

摘要 I
ABSTRACT II
目錄 III
圖目錄 V
表目錄 VI
第一章緒論 - 1 -
1.1研究背景與動機 - 1 -
1.2研究目的 - 2 -
1.3研究範圍與研究架構 - 2 -
第二章文獻回顧 - 5 -
2.1國際運籌港區演進過程 - 5 -
2.2國際運籌港區之未來發展趨勢 - 5 -
2.3企業進駐國際運籌港區選擇之因素 - 6 -
2.2.1港區基礎建設 - 8 -
2.2.2港區周邊基礎建設 - 8 -
2.2.3貨運量管理能力 - 9 -
2.2.4供應鏈合作關係 - 10 -
2.2.5港區策略性地位 - 10 -
2.2.6港區結合工業區之加值能力 - 11 -
第三章研究模型與研究方法 - 12 -
3.1研究模型與假設 - 12 -
3.2研究程序 - 17 -
3.3研究構面之操作性定義與衡量 - 17 -
3.3.1企業進駐國際運籌港區因素的定義與衡量 - 17 -
3.3.2企業統計變數之衡量 - 19 -
3.4研究方法與研究設計 20
3.4.1問卷設計及尺度衡量 21
3.4.2問卷內容 22
3.4.3問卷發放方法與資料選取 22
3.5統計分析方法 22
3.5.1敘述性統計分析(descriptive statistics) 22
3.5.2單因子變異數分析（one－way ANOVA） 23
3.5.3相關分析(correlation analysis) 23
3.5.4驗證式因素分析(confirmatory factory analysis, CFA) 23
3.5.5區別效度分析(discriminant validity analysis) 24
3.5.6結構方程模式(structural equation modeling, SEM) 24
第四章研究分析與結果 26
4.1台灣地區物流業者之基本資料分析 26
4.1.1問卷發放與回收概況 26
4.1.2填答者基本資料分析 26
4.2企業進駐國際運籌港區所考量因素之重要性分析 28
4.2.1敘述統計分析 28
4.2.2單因子變異數分析 30
4.2.3相關分析 36
4.2.4驗證式因素分析 37
4.2.5區別效度分析 39
4.3企業進駐國際運籌港區之結構方程模式分析 40
4.3.1路徑結構假設之驗證與分析 41
第五章研究討論 43
5.1企業進駐國際運籌港區之經濟與管理意涵 43
5.1.1 國際運籌港區發展關鍵因素 43
5.1.2國際運籌港區發展模式 43
5.2與謝志強(民101)之研究結果比較 45
5.3與WOO (2013)之研究結果比較 47
第六章結論與後續研究 50
6.1結論 50
6.1.1企業進駐國際運籌港區所考量之主要因素 50
6.1.2國際運籌港區之發展模式 50
6.2研究限制與後續研究建議 51
參考文獻 52

參考文獻

中文文獻
呂俊德(民95) 。從產業供應鏈觀點探討桃園航空自由貿易港區招商策略之研究。行政院經濟建設委員會。
邱皓政(民100)。結構方程模式(LISREL/SIMPLIS原理與應用，二版) 。雙葉書廊。
莊博雅(民99) 。國際運籌港區競爭優勢之探討:產業物流的觀點。國立中央大學企業管理研究所。
謝志強(民101) 。國際運籌港區發展模式之探討。國立中央大學企業管理研究所。
西文文獻
Bentler, P.M. (1989). EQS Structural Equations Program Manual. Los Angeles, CA:BMDP.
Brenes, E.R., Ruddy, V. and Castro, R. (1997a). Free zones in El Salvador, Journal of Business Research, 38(1), 57-65.
Byrne, B.M. (1994). Structural equation modeling with EQS and EQS/Windows. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Chu, C.Y. and Huang, W.C. (2005).Determining container terminal capacity on the basis of an adopted yard handling system. Journal of Transport Reviews, 25(2), 181-199.
Cooper, D.R. and Shindler. P.S. (2006). Business research method. Ninth ed. New
Doll, W., Xia, W. and Torkzadeh, G. (1994). A Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the End-User Computing Satisfaction Instrument. MIS Quarterly, 18(4), 453-461.
Feenstra, R.C. (1998). Integration of Trade and Disintegration of Production in the Global Economy. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12(4), 31-50.
Fornell, C. and Larcker, D.F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error, Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
Fransoo, J.C., Lee, C.-Y. (2013). The Critical Role of Ocean Container Transport in
Global Supply Chain Performance. Production and Operations Management Society, 22(2), 253–268.
Hair, J.F., Jr., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E. and Tatham, R.L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis(6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Hayuth, Y. (2007). Globalisation and the port-urban interface: conflicts and opportunities. Ports, Cities and Global Supply Chains, 9(1), 141–156.
Lee, H. and Yang, H.M. (2003). Strategies for a global logistics and economic hub: Incheon International Airport. Journal of Air Transport Management, 9(2), 113–121.
Lu, C.-S. and Yang, C.-C. (2006). Comparision of investment preferences for international logistics zones in Kaohsiung, Hong Kong, and Shanghi ports from a Taiwanese manufacturer’s perspective. Transportation Journal, 45(1), 30-51.
Lu, C.S., Liao, C.H. and Yang, C.-C. (2008). Segmenting manafacturing’ investment incentive preference for international logistics zones. International Journal of Operation & Production Management, 28 (2), 106-129.
MacCallum, R.C. and Hong, S. (1997). Power analysis in covariance structure modeling using GFI and AGFI. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32(2), 193–210.
Nam, H.-S. and Song, D.-W. (2011). Defining maritime logistics hub and its implication for container port. Maritime Policy and Management, 38(3), 269-292.
Nathanail, E. (2007). Developing an integrated logistics terminal network in the CADSES. Transition Studies Review, 14(1), 125-146.
Notteboom, T. and Winkelmans, W. (2001). Structural changes in logistics: how will port authorities face the challenge? Maritime. Policy and Management, 28(1), 71-89.
O’Connor, K. (2010). Global city regions and the location of logistics activity. Transport of Geography, 18(3), 354-362.
Oum, T.H. and Park, J.H. (2004). Multinational firms’ location preference for regional distribution centers:focus on the Northeast Asian region. Transportation Research PartE: Logistics and Transportation Review, 40(2), 101-21.
Robinson, R. (2002). Ports as elements in value-driven chain systems: The new paradigm. Maritime Policy and Management, 29(3), 241-255.
Song, D.W. and Yeo, K.T. (2004). A Completive Analysis of Chinese Container Ports Using the Analytic Hierarchy. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 6(1), 34-52.
Starr, J. (1994). The Mid-Atlantic Load Centre: Baltimore or Hampton Roads, Maritime Policy and Management, 21(3), 219-227.
Sung-Woo, L., Dong-Wook, S., Ducruet, C., 2008. A tale of Asia’s world ports: thespatial evolution in global hub port cities. Geoforum 39 (1), 372–385.
Tavasszy, L., Minderhoud, M., Perrin, J.F. and Notteboom, T. (2011). A strategic network choice model for global container flows: Specification,estimation and application. Journal of Transport Geography, 19(6), 1163–1172.
Thompson, B. (2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications, Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association.
Tongzon, J. and Heng, W. (2005). Port privatization, efficiency and competitiveness: Some empirical evidence from container ports (terminals). Transportation Research Part A, 39(5), 405–424.
Tongzon, J.L. (1994). Determinants of port performance and efficiency. TransportResearch Part A, 29(3), 245-252.
Tongzon, J.L. (2009). Port choice and freight forwarders. Transport Reaearch Part E, 45(1), 186-195.
Veldman, S. and Bückmann, E.H. (2003). A Model on Container Port Competition: An Application for the West European Container Hub-Ports. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 5(1), 3-22.
Wang, J. and Cheng, M.C. (2010). From a Hub Port city to a global supply chainmanagement center: a case study of Hong Kong. Journal of Transport Geography, 18(1), 104–115.
Woo, S.-H., Pettit, S.J. and Beresford, A. K. (2013). An assessment of the integration of seaports into supply chains using a Structural Equation Model. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 18(3), 235–252.
Yeo, G.T., Roe, M. and Dinwoodie, J. (2008). Evaluating the competitiveness of container ports in Korea and China. Transportation Research Part A, 42(6), 910-921.
Zhang, A. (2003). Analysis of an international air-cargo hub: the case of Hong Kong. Journal of Air Transport Management, 9(2), 123-138.

指導教授

呂俊德(Jun-Der Leu)

審核日期

2016-12-13

推文