員工雇用穩定度之成因與其對公司績效之影響

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：143

、訪客IP：18.216.233.58

姓名

廖玉婷(YU-TING LIAO) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

人力資源管理研究所在職專班

論文名稱

員工雇用穩定度之成因與其對公司績效之影響

相關論文

★ 業務主管領導力對部屬招募行為之影響-以S壽險公司為例	★ 人力精簡對企業績效的影響–以產業特性為調節變項
★ 經理人超額薪酬、經理人異動與公司績效之關係	★ 人口老化對企業之影響與因應對策-以傳統產業為例
★ 運用羅吉斯迴歸探討企業績效、公司治理與經理人異動之關聯性	★ 護理人員組織承諾與專業承諾對離職傾向與離業傾向的影響
★ 運用存活分析探討高科技產業招募者人格特質與離職風險之關聯性-以A公司為例	★ 金融電子化對台灣銀行業組織績效及人力彈性影響之探討
★ 人力資源部門角色與功能轉變之個案研究	★ 高階主管薪酬級距與公司績效之關聯性分析
★ 人力招募政策及主管領導風格對新進人員晉升與離職傾向之影響-以房仲業S公司為例	★ 影響台灣勞工赴海外就業的決定性因素
★ 董事會特性對企業績效之影響-以人力資本為調節變項	★ 董事會異質性之決定因素
★ 公司治理結構與就業調整	★ 總經理雙元性、股權集中度、人力資本與組織績效

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

本研究旨在探討公司員工雇用穩定度之成因與其對績效之影響，以2009年至2013年我國728家上市公司資料進行實證觀察。從文獻探討中先釐清員工雇用穩定度的決定因素，分別為資產總額、廠齡、董事會規模、負債資產比率、董事會控制席次、現金流量偏離率、總經理兼任董事長、家族企業；接著再分析雇用穩定度對公司績效的影響。雇用穩定度是一種人事結構調整策略的表徵，其背後代表意義是一個企業之員工雇用策略的實施結果。當企業在進行員工雇用決策略時，他們會考慮自己公司的屬性和條件，這個過程是內生和自我選擇的，取決於「組織結構惰性」、「公司財務狀況」、與「管家治理模式」三個面向。實證結果顯示組織結構惰性與員工雇用穩定度呈現正相關；公司財務狀況與員工雇用穩定度呈現正相關；管家治理模式的程度與員工雇用穩定度間呈現正相關；符合理論預期的員工雇用穩定度與組織經營績效呈現正相關。

關鍵字：雇用穩定度、結構惰性、管家治理、組織績效

摘要(英)

The purpose of this study is to examine the factors of employment stability and its influence on performance, using 728 companies listed on Taiwan Stock Exchange from 2009 to 2013 as selected data to do the regressions and observations. From the literature, the factors of employment stability are regarded as the total assets, company age, board size, debt assets ratio, board control rights, cash flow deviation rate, hold both the chairman and general manager positions, family corporation. Then, examine the influence of employment stability on performance. Employment stability is a characterization of employment adjustment strategy, which implies the results of its employment hiring strategy implementation. The attributes and conditions of its own company will be considered while making the decision of employment adjustment strategy. This process is endogenous and self-selected, depending on three dimensions of "Organizational structural inertia", "Company financial result", and "Stewardship governance model". The empirical results show that the organizational structure inertia and employment stability are positive correlation. The company financial result and employment stability are positive correlation. The stewardship governance model and employment stability are positive correlation. The expected employment stability and its influence on performance are positive correlation.

Keywords: employment stability, structural inertia, stewardship, organizational performance

關鍵字(中)

★ 雇用穩定度
★ 結構惰性
★ 管家治理
★ 組織績效

關鍵字(英)

論文目次

目錄

中文摘要 I
英文摘要 II
目錄 III
表目錄 IV
圖目錄 V
第一章緒論 1
1.1 研究動機與目的 1
1.2 本文架構 2
第二章文獻探討 4
2.1 員工雇用穩定度之成因 4
2.1.1 組織結構惰性與公司財務狀況 4
2.1.2 CMS與管家治理模式 5
2.2 員工雇用穩定度與公司績效 7
第三章研究方法 8
3.1 研究架構 8
3.2 研究假說 9
3.3 樣本篩選與資料來源 9
3.4 變項的定義與衡量 10
3.5 實證模型與統計分析方法 10
第四章實證結果分析 14
4.1 敘述性統計量 14
4.2 迴歸分析 14
4.2.1 雇用穩定度的決定因素 15
4.2.2 雇用穩定度與組織績效關聯性（員工雇用變異係數未拆解前） 17
4.2.3 雇用穩定度與績效關聯性（員工雇用變異係數拆解後） 18
第五章結論與建議 20
5.1 研究結論與管理意涵 20
5.2 研究限制與建議 21
參考文獻 22
附錄一 27
附錄二 28

參考文獻

一、英文文獻：
(1) Abe, M., “Corporate Governance Structure and Employment Adjustment in Japan: An Empirical Analysis Using Corporate Finance Data”, Industrial Relations 41, 683–702, 2002.
(2) Abe, N. and S. Shimizutani, “Employment Policy and Corporate Governance—An Empirical Comparison of the Stakeholder and the Profit-Maximization Model”, Journal of Comparative Economics 35, 346–368, 2007.
(3) Appelbaum, S.H., Simpson, R. and Shapiro, B.T., Downsizing: the ultimate human resource strategy, Business Quarterly,Vol. 52 No. 2, pp. 52-60, 1987a.
(4) Appelbaum, S.H., Simpson, R. and Shapiro, B.T., The tough test of downsizing, Organizational Dynamics, Vol. 16 No. 2,pp. 68-79, 1987b.
(5) Baumol, W. J., A. Blinder, and E. Wolff, Downsizing in America: Reality, Causes, and Consequences, Russell Sage Foundation, New York, 2003.
(6) Bebchuk, L. A., R. Kraakman, and G. Triantis, “Stock Pyramids, Cross-ownership, and Dual Class Equity–The Mechanisms and Agency Costs of Separating Control from Cash-flow Rights”, in M. Randall , ed., Concentrated Corporate Ownership, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL 295–318, 2000.
(7) Cameron, K.S., Strategies for successful organizational downsizing, Human Resource Management, 33(2): 189-211, 1994.
(8) Cappelli, P., The New Deal at Work: Managing the Market-Driven Workforce, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA, 1999.
(9) Carter, E. E., The behavioral theory of the firm and top-level corporate decisions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 16, 413-429, 1971.
(10) Cascio, W.F. ,”Downsizing: What do we know? What have we learned? “, Academy of Management Executive, 7 (1): 95-106, 1993.
(11) Chuma, A. H., “Employment Adjustments in Japanese Firms during the Current Crisis”, Industrial Relations 41, 653–682, 2002.
(12) Datta, D. K., J. P. Guthrie, D. Basuil, and A. Pandey, “Causes and Effects of Employee Downsizing: A Review and Synthesis”, Journal of Management 36, 281–348, 2010.
(13) Davis, J. H., F. D. Schoorman, and L. Donaldson, “Toward a Stewardship Theory of Management”, Academy of Management Review 22, 20–47, 1997.
(14) Delery, J. E. and D. H. Doty, “Modes of Theorizing in Strategic Human Resource Management: Test of Universalistic, Contingency, and Configurational Performance Predictions”, Academy of Management Journal 39, 802–835, 1996.
(15) DeMeuse, K. P., P. A. Vanderheiden, and T. J. Bergmann, “Announced Layoffs: TheirEffect on Corporate Financial Performance”, Human Resource Management 33, 509–530, 1994.
(16) DeWitt, R., Firm, Industry, and Strategy Influences on Choice of Downsizing Approach, Strategic Management Journal 19, 59–80, 1998.
(17) Fisher S. R., & White M. A., Downsizing in a learning organization：Are there hidden cost, Academy of Management Review, 25(1): 224~251, 2000.
(18) Freeman, S. J. and K. S. Cameron, “Organizational Downsizing: A Convergence and Reorientation Framework”, Organization Science 4, 10–29, 1993.
(19) Gospel, H., and A. Pendleton, “Finance, Corporate Governance and the Management of Labour: A Conceptual and Comparative Analysis”, British Journal of Industrial Relations 41, 557–582, 2003.
(20) Grossman, W., “The Influence of Board Monitoring, Executive Incentives, and Corporate Strategy on Employment Stability”, Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal 22, 45–64, 2010.
(21) Guthrie, J. P. and D. K. Datta, “Dumb and Dumber: The Impact of Downsizing on Firm Performance as Moderated by Industry Conditions”, Organization Science 19, 108–123, 2008.
(22) Hannan, M.T., and J. Freeman, Structural inertia and organizational change. American Sociological Review, 49, 149-164, 1984.
(23) Jacoby, S. M., E. M. Nason, and K. Saguchi, “The Role of the Senior HR Executive in Japan and the United States: Employment Relations, Corporate Governance, and Values”, Industrial Relations 44, 207–241, 2005.
(24) Kiel, G. C. and G. J.Nicholson,“Board Compositiona and Corporate Performance: How the Australian Experience Informs Contrasting Theories of Corporate Governance.”Corporate Governance, 11, pp.189-205, 2003.
(25) Matsumoto, A., H. Hara, and K. Nawata, “An Analysis of the Employment Adjustment Behavior of Japanese Firms in the 1990s Using Financial Data”, Working paper, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, 2011.
(26) Matusik, S. F. and C. W. L. Hill, “The Utilization of Contingent Work, Knowledge Creation, and Competitive Advantage”, Academy of Management Review 23, 680–697, 1998.
(27) McKinley, W., J. Zhao, and K. G. Rust, “A Sociocognitive Interpretation of Downsizing”, Academy of Management Review 25, 227–243, 2000.
(28) O’Reilly III, C. A. and J. Pfeffer, Hidden Value: How Great Companies Achieve Extraordinary Results with Ordinary People, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA, 2000.
(29) Okamoto, H. and T. Matsuura, “The Influence of Corporate Governance on Long-term Employment: A Study Using Data on Japanese Listed Firms”, Munich Personal RePEc Archive paper No. 64561, Munich, 2015.
(30) Pfeffer, J., The Human Equation: Building Profits by Putting People First, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA, 1998.
(31) Pfeffer, J., and J. F. Veiga, “Putting People First for Organizational Success”, Academy of Management Executive. 13, 37–49, 1999.
(32) Sheaffer, Z., A. Carmeli, M. Steiner-Revivo, and S. Zionit, “Downsizing Strategies and Organizational Performance: A Longitudinal Study”, Management Decision 47, 950–974, 2009.
(33) Shleifer, A., and R. W. Vishny, “A Survey of Corporate Governance”, Journal of Finance 52, 737–783, 1997.
(34) Walton, R. E., (1980). Establishing and maintaining high-commitment work systems. In J. R. Kimberly, R. H. Miles, & Associates (Eds.), The organizational life cycle: Issues in the creation, transformation, and decline of organizations: 208-290. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
(35) Wayhan, V. B., and S. Werner, “The Impact of Workforce Reductions on Financial Performance: A Longitudinal Perspective”, Journal of Management 26, 341–363, 2000.
(36) Zatzick, C. D. and R. D. Iverson, “High Involvement Management and Workforce Reduction: Competitive Advantage or Disadvantage”, Academy of Management Journal 49, 999–1015, 2006.
二、中文文獻：
(1) 丁碧慧、陳寧馨、蔡婉貞，「控制股東股權結構、董事會組成與總經理離職關係─以本國銀行業為例」，臺灣銀行季刊第六十一卷第三期，41~60頁，民國99年9月。
(2) 王玉慧，「高階經理團隊多元性與企業績效之關聯─以公司治理模式為調節變項」，國立中央大學，人力資源管理研究所碩士論文，民國101年。
(3) 行政院主計處，人力資源調查提要分析-民國105年，民國106年。
(4) 李馨蘋、莊宗憲，「公司治理機制與公司績效之實證研究」，東吳經紀商學學報，第五十七期，1~27頁，民國96年6月。
(5) 林黎華，「世界各國所有權結構分析之探視」，證券暨期貨月刊第二十三卷第一期，53~61頁，民國94年1月。
(6) 黃于珊，「公司治理與企業績效對董監薪酬之影響」，大葉大學會計系學系碩士論文，民國101年。
(7) 劉芳君，「組織人力精簡對留任員工之態度和行為及組織績效關係之研究」，國立中山大學，人力資源管理研究所碩士論文，民國93年。

指導教授

陳明園(Ming-yuan Chen)

審核日期

2017-7-10

推文