摘要(英) |
This study is to investigate the surface failure behavior and the underlying soil mechanics mechanism in the vicinity of normal fault. Near the fault can be observed in the vicinity of the fault caused by a large number of soil deformation, but the mechanical changes under the surface can not be seen with the naked eye
In this study, PFC2D was used to simulate, because PFC (Particle flow code) was simulated by particle flow, and the mechanical behavior was more close to the experimental sandbox. The measure circle was discussed in the upper and lower sides of the normal fault Mechanical Behavior and Microstructure Variation of Soil Near the Shear Zone in Faults.
For the change in porosity during dislocation, it can be seen that most porosity values did not change in the lower panel. For areas near the shear zone, the porosity increases significantly in the upper plate area (shallow soil location). The porosity increases slightly in the bottom area near the shear zone (deeper in the soil).
For the change of the stress path and the rotation angle, the stress path is compressed in the lateral direction and then decompressed in the vicinity of the initial value. The change value is within 20 kPa and the rotation angle changes in the positive and negative 5 ° or less, on behalf of away from the shear zone of the stress change is not significant. However, the stress path in the vicinity of the crack zone is axially decompressed after axial compression, especially in the area above the shear zone, and its stress path is more complicated. |
參考文獻 |
1. 林郁鈞,「以離散元素法進行具鍵結顆粒材料之直剪試驗模擬」,國立中央大學土木工程研究所論文,桃園 (2014)。
2. 張有毅,「以離心模型試驗及個別元素法評估正斷層和逆斷層錯動地表及地下變形」,博士論文,國立中央大學土木工程所,桃園(2013)。
3. 宋丘言,「使用離散元素法進行乾砂直剪試驗模擬」,國立中央大學土木工程研究所碩士論文,桃園 (2012)。
4. 紀宗吉、邱禎龍、李元希、劉桓吉 (2000),「車籠埔地震斷層沿線地表變形致災案例探討」,經濟部中央地質特刊,第12號,第235-254頁。
5. Anastasopoulos, I., G. Gazetas, M. Bransby, M. Davies and A. El Nahas., “Fault Rupture Propagation through Sand: Finite-Element Analysis and Validation through Centrifuge Experiments,”Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 133, No. 8, pp.943-958 (2007).
6. Cundall, P. A. and Strack. O. D. L., “A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies,”Géotechnique, Vol. 29, pp. 47-65 (1979).
7. El Nahas, A., Bransby, M. F., and Davies, M. C. R., “Centrifuge modeling of the interaction between normal fault rupture and rigid,strong raft foundations,” Physical Modeling in Geotechnics, Hong Kong, pp. 337-342 (2006).
8. Huang, W.-J. and A. M. Johnson., “Quantitative description and analysis of earthquake-induced deformation zones along strike-slip and dip-slip faults,”Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, Vol. 115, No.B3, pp. 1-21 (2010).
9. Itasca Consulting Group Inc., PFC2D, Version4.0 Manual, Minneapolis, MN: ICG (2008).
10. Kramer, S.L., Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering, Prentice Hall, pp.35-37 (1996).
11. Lambe, T. W., “The stress-path method, ”Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 93, pp. 309-331 (1967).
12. Oettle, N. and Bray, J., “Fault Rupture Propagation through Previously Ruptured Soil,” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 139, No. 5, pp. 1637-1647 (2013).
13. Wang, J., and Gutierrez, M., “Discrete element simulations of direct shear specimen scale effects,” Geotechnique, Vol. 60(5), pp 395-409 (2010).
14. Anaatasopoulos, I., Kourkoulis, R., Gazetas, G., & Tsatsis, A., “Interaction of piled foundation with a rupturing normal fault.” Géotechnique, ICE, Vol. 63, Issue 12, pp. 1042-1059 (2013). |