第四方物流業風險事件管理-評估、預防及控制

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：101

、訪客IP：18.119.121.170

姓名

陳璿文(Shen-Wen Chen) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

工業管理研究所

論文名稱

第四方物流業風險事件管理-評估、預防及控制
(Risk Event Management of 4th Party Logistic Service Provider - Evaluation, Prevention and Control)

相關論文

★ 應用MFM 與PPM 監控協同設計之執行流程	★ 應用DSM與DRFT於汽車電子之協同開發流程
★ 一協同設計專案團隊組成方法- 以安全監視器產品為例	★ 應用認知工程開發全球化光纖通訊系統
★ 羽絨產業策略規劃-應用品質機能展開分析法	★ 重電業協同專案管理績效之研究-以變電所統包工程為例
★ 以屬性導向新產品開發之流程塑模與分析– 以醫療器材產業為案例	★ 以品質機能展開法應用於主管管理職能之建構
★ 應用參考模型以及流程建模改善供應鏈績效-以投影機產業為例	★ 協同產品開發之流程管理 - 以汽車零件為例
★ 配電系統之高壓電纜接頭供應商評選	★ 應用品質機能展開於產品開發之流程分析-以刀鋒式伺服器為例
★ 實施精實六標準差改進製程良率－以機頂盒表面黏著技術為例	★ 太陽能模組產業之決策營運研究
★ 新產品開發階段導入替代料之流程建模及潛在風險分析	★ 應用實驗設計研發PET複合膜及改善厚膜翹曲問題

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

在全球運籌的環境下，如何將資源做有效的規劃及降低運輸成本顯得越來越重要。近年來，第四方物流(Fourth Party Logistics, 4PL)整合供應鏈各個環節的運輸流程和資訊系統，進而提供全面性的供應鏈解決方案，以提高客戶滿意度及供應鏈競爭力。
第四方物流業者為了將物品準確運送至目的地，需考慮運送過程中遇到的各種自然災害和意外事件，以事前預防、事後應變的方式，規劃客製化的供應鏈解決方案，降低可能造成運送延遲的風險。藉由完善的風險事件管理流程避免預期事件發生，同時在非預期事件發生時快速反應以減少損失。
本研究以一本國B2B物流公司的風險事件管理流程為例，先以整合資訊架構(Architecture of Integrated Information Systems, ARIS) 建構運輸服務流程，及過程中面臨的各項風險事件並加以歸類；從上述建構的處理流程中，對各類風險事件進行失效模式與效用分析(Failure Mode & Effect Analysis, FMEA)，找出潛在的失效原因，並利用風險評估指數(RPN)，作為後續改善方向；最後由上述找出的失效因子，針對嚴重性高的風險事件，以領結分析法(Bowtie Methodology)分析不同事件間的因果關係，使事件發生時能即時做出有效反應。

摘要(英)

Under the circumstances of global logistics, planning recourses efficiently and reducing transportation cost have become more and more important. For the purpose of increase customer satisfaction and supply chain competitive, the fourth party logistic integrates each part of supply chain and information system recently, so as to provide overall supply chain solutions.
In order to deliver goods on time, fourth logistic companies have to consider natural disasters, accidents, and other kinds of events during transportation. To prevent and deal with these kinds of incidents, fourth logistic companies provide customized supply chain solutions which can reduce the risk of delay. With perfect risk management procedure, fourth logistic companies can prevent expected events; meanwhile, reducing losses when unexpected events happened.
This study takes a local B2B logistics company’s risk management procedure as an example. First, construct the transportation procedure, also the risk events during transportation with ARIS. Second, with ARIS process models, we analysis different categories of risk events with FMEA to find out the reason why procedure may break down. Then base on RPN, this research finds the follow-up direction to reduce the failure. Finally, we use bowtie Methodology to analysis causalities between risk events. As a result, logistics company can make effective responses when different kinds of risk events happened.

關鍵字(中)

★ 第四方物流(4PL)
★ 風險管理
★ 整合資訊架構(ARIS)
★ 失效模式與效用分析(FMEA)
★ 風險評估指數(RPN)
★ 領結分析法(Bow-tie Methodology)

關鍵字(英)

論文目次

中文摘要 i
Abstract iv
致謝辭 v
Table of Contents vi
List of Figures viii
List of Tables ix
Chapter 1 Introduction 1
1.1 Background & Motivation 1
1.2 Objectives 2
1.3 Research Framework 2
Chapter 2 Literature Review 4
2.1 Logistics Outsourcing Overview 4
2.1.1 Definition of 4PL 5
2.1.2 Function of 4PL 7
2.2 Risk Management Overview 10
2.2.1 Risk Management Process 11
2.2.2 Events Management 13
Chapter 3 Methodology 19
3.1 Methodology Framework 19
3.2 ARIS 21
3.2.1 Organization View 22
3.2.2 Function View 22
3.2.3 Data View 22
3.2.4 Control(process) View 22
3.3 FMEA 23
3.3.2 RPN 24
3.4 Bow-Tie Methodology 27
Chapter 4 Application 29
4.1 The Models of Logistics Service Process 29
4.2 Analysis of Risk Events 31
4.2.1 SFMEA 31
4.2.2 Bow-tie Methodology 37
Chapter 5 Conclusion and Further Research 40
5.1 Conclusion 40
5.2 Future Research 41
Reference 42

參考文獻

1. Acfield, A. P., & Weaver, R. A., “Integrating Safety Management through the Bowtie Concept A move away from the Safety Case focus.”, Proceedings of the Australian System Safety Conference, Australian Computer Society Inc., Vol 145, pp. 3-12, 2012.
2. Afefy, I. H., “Hazard Analysis and Risk Assessments for Industrial Processes Using FMEA and Bow-Tie Methodologies.”, Industrial Engineering & Management Systems, 14(4), pp. 379-391, 2015.
3. Aqlan, F., & Ali, E. M. “Integrating lean principles and fuzzy bow-tie analysis for risk assessment in chemical industry.”, Journal of Loss Prevention in the process Industries, 29, pp. 39-48, 2014.
4. Automotive Industry Action Group, Potential Failure Mode and Effect Analysis(FMEA), 4th Edition, 2008.
5. Ben-Daya, M., & Akram, M., “Third party logistics risk management.”, Industrial Engineering and Systems Management (IESM), Proceedings of 2013 International Conference on. IEEE, pp. 1-10, 2013.
6. Bienstock, C.C., “Understanding buyer information acquisition for the purchase of logistics services”, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 32(8), pp. 636-48, 2002.
7. Chapman, R., Soosay, C., Kandampully, J., “Innovation in Logistics Services and the New Business Model: a Conceptual Framework.”, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 33(7), pp. 630-650, 2003.
8. Cheng, Q., & Yu, L., “Early warning index system for natural disasters emergency logistics risks.” Logistics Engineering and Intelligent Transportation Systems (LEITS), 2010 International Conference on. IEEE, 2010.
9. Ehlers, U. C., Ryeng, E. O., McCormack, E., Khan, F., “Assessing the safety effects of cooperative intelligent transport systems: a bowtie analysis approach.”, Accident Analysis & Prevention, 99, pp. 125-141, 2017.
10. Hoek, R.I., “The contribution of performance measurement to the expansion of third party alliances in the supply chain”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 21(1/2), pp. 15-25, 2001.
11. International organization for standardization, ISO 31000 risk management: A practical guide for SMEs, 1st Edition, 2015.
12. Ju, W. H., “Study on Fire Risk and Disaster Reducing Factors of Cotton Logistics Warehouse Based on Event and Fault Tree Analysis.”, Procedia Engineering, Vol.135, pp. 418-426, 2016.
13. Khakzad, N., Khan, F., & Amyotte, P., “Dynamic safety analysis of process systems by mapping bow-tie into Bayesian network.”, Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 91(1), pp. 46-53, 2013.
14. Kumar, V., & Viswanadham, N, “A CBR-based decision support system framework for construction supply chain risk management.” Automation Science and Engineering, IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 2007.
15. Kwesi-Buor, J., Menachof, D. A., & Talas, R., “Scenario analysis and disaster preparedness for port and maritime logistics risk management.”, Accident Analysis & Prevention, pp. 1-15, 2016.
16. Peng, Y., & Zhang, Y., “Evaluating the risks of fourth-party logistics supply chain.”, Advanced Management of Information for Globalized Enterprises, 2008. AMIGE 2008. IEEE Symposium, pp. 1-5, 2008.
17. Persson, G., & Virum, H., “Growth strategies for logistics service providers: a case study.”, The International Journal of Logistics Management, 12(1), pp. 53-64, 2001.
18. Saglietto, L., “Towards a classification of fourth party logistics (4PL).”, Universal Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 1(3), pp. 104-116, 2013.
19. Scheer, A. W., & Schneider, K., “ARIS—architecture of integrated information systems.”, Handbook on architectures of information systems, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 605-623, 1998.
20. Subramanian, N., Gunasekaran, A., Papadopoulos, A., & Nie, P., “4th party logistics service providers and industrial cluster competitiveness.”, Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(7), pp. 1303-1330, 2016.
21. Supply Chain Risk Leadership Council, “Supply chain risk management: A compilation of best practices.”, August 2011, www.scrlc.com/aticles/Supply _Chain_Risk_Management_A_Compilation_of_Best_Practices_final[1].pdf
22. Van Hoek, R. I., “UPS logistics and to move towards 4PL–or not.”, Transportation and Logistics Educators Conference, Philadelphia, PA. Vol. 182(11), 2004.
23. Vivaldini, M., Pires, S., & de Souza, F. B., “Collaboration and Competition between 4PL and 3PL: a study of a fast-food supply chain.”, Journal of Operations and Supply Chain Management, 1(2), pp. 17-29, 2008.
24. Vlachakis, G., & Apostolou, D., “An event-based framework for supply chain management.”, Information, Intelligence, Systems and Applications, IISA 2014, The 5th International Conference on IEEE, pp. 440-445, 2014.
25. Walters, D., & Rainbird, M., Strategic Operations Management: A Value Chain Approach., Palgrave Macmillian, Houndmills., 2007.
26. Win, A., “The value a 4PL provider can contribute to an organization.”, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 38(9), pp. 674-684, 2008.
27. Zhang, H., Li, X., Liu, W., Li, B., & Zhang, Z., “An application of the AHP in 3PL vendor selection of a 4PL system.”, Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 2004 IEEE International Conference on IEEE, pp. 1255-1260, 2004.

指導教授

高信培

審核日期

2017-6-26

推文