期貨未平倉量如何預測現貨報酬和波動度?

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：63

、訪客IP：3.135.182.172

姓名

方裕翔(Fang Yu Hsiang) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

財務金融學系

論文名稱

期貨未平倉量如何預測現貨報酬和波動度?
(How Does Futures Open Interest Predict Spot Return and Volatility?)

相關論文

★ 國內股票型共同基金異常報酬之特徵研究	★ 台灣境外高收益債券型基金績效分析
★ 財富管理客戶選擇銀行之因素探討	★ 境外匯回專法實施前後境外資金解決方案比較－以個案分析為例
★ 利用隨機優勢方法探究商品指數之投資績效	★ 承銷關係是否會影響未來承銷業務?
★ 併購動能:以台灣市場為例	★ 機構法人對股票報酬與公司價值之影響
★ 投資者情緒與期貨價格關聯性	★ 避險基金指數是否能夠提供風險分散效果？- 利用均異擴張檢定
★ Model-Free隱含波動度價差之遠期資訊	★ 公開市場購回股票之研究
★ Modeling Long Run Risk with Macroeconomic Fundamentals	★ Exploration of Jumps and Cojumps in Financial Markets
★ 社會責任指數與環境、社會及公司治理之關聯性分析-以FTSE4Good系列指數為例	★ 運用檢定資產價格泡沫模型建構動態財務危機預警之驗證

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

期貨未平倉量對現貨報酬具有影響力，機構投資人能夠正確地影響同期的現貨報酬，然而散戶卻是錯誤地影響當期現貨報酬;僅外資之為平倉量對現貨報酬具有預測力，同時，散戶之未平倉量亦是錯誤地預測現貨報酬。

摘要(英)

Futures open interest are found to have impact on contemporary spot return. Institutional investors correctly affect underlying asset return while individual investors wrongly affect underlying asset return. Open interest of foreign investors have predictability on underlying asset return compare to other investors.

關鍵字(中)

★ 期貨未平倉量
★ 報酬
★ 波動度
★ 投資人類別
★ 價格發現

關鍵字(英)

★ Futures Open Interest
★ Return
★ Volatility
★ Investor Type
★ Price Discovery

論文目次

中文摘要..................................... i
ABSTRACT................................... ii
致謝........................................ iii
Contents ..................................... iv
List of Figures .................................. v
List of Tables................................... vi
1 Introduction............................. 1
1.1 Motivation.............................. 1
2 Literature Review.......................... 4
2.1 Derivatives Volume, Open Interest and Returns . . . . . . . . . 4
2.2 Derivatives Volume, Open Interest and Volatilities . . . . . . . . 5
2.3 Types of Investors, Returns and Volatilities . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
3 Methodology............................. 8
3.1 Data................................. 8
3.2 Model ................................ 9
3.2.1 ARMA∼GARCH Model ..................... 9
3.2.2 Model by Bessembinder and Seguin (1993) . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
4 Empirical Results .......................... 14
4.1 Summary Statistics ......................... 14
4.2 Results of ARMA ∼GARCH Model................ 18
4.2.1 Unsigned change of trading variables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
4.2.2 Signed change of trading variables................. 21
4.2.3 Complete model control effects of different trade positions . . . 21
4.3 Results of Two-Stage Conditional Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
4.3.1 Expected and unexpected components with different trade positions ................................. 27
4.3.2 Complete model control effects of different expected and unexpected positions........................... 32
5 Conclusion.............................. 36
References .................................... 37

參考文獻

Barber, B.M., Lee, Y.T., Liu, Y.J., Odean, T., 2008. Just how much do individual investors lose by trading? Review of Financial Studies 22, 609–632.
Berger, D., Chaboud, A., Hjalmarsson, E., 2009. What drives volatility persistence in the foreign exchange market? Journal of Financial Economics 94, 192–213.
Bessembinder, H., Seguin, P.J., 1992. Futures-trading activity and stock price volatility. Journal of Finance 47, 2015–2034.
Bessembinder, H., Seguin, P.J., 1993. Price volatility, trading volume, and market depth: Evidence from futures markets. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 28, 21–39.
Blume, L., Easley, D., O’Hara, M., 1994. Market statistics and technical analysis: The role of volume. Journal of Finance 49, 153–181.
Bollerslev, T., 1986. Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity. Jour- nal of Econometrics 31, 307–327.
Chang, E., Chou, R.Y., Nelling, E.F., 2000. Market volatility and the demand for hedging in stock index futures. Journal of Futures Markets 20, 105–125.
Chen, N.F., Cuny, C.J., Haugen, R.A., 1995. Stock volatility and the levels of the basis and open interest in futures contracts. Journal of Finance 50, 281–300.
Chen, T.F., Chuang, Y.W., Weng, P.S., Wu, M.H., 2015. The price impacts of futures volume by trader types: The study of the Taiwan index futures market. Review of Securities and Futures Markets 27, 99–123.
Clark, P.K., 1973. A subordinated stochastic process model with finite variance for speculative prices. Econometrica 41, 135–155.
Copeland, T.E., 1976. A model of asset trading under the assumption of sequential information arrival. Journal of Finance 31, 1149–1168.
37
Daigler, R.T., Wiley, M.K., 1999. The impact of trader type on the futures volatility- volume relation. Journal of Finance 54, 2297–2316.
Easley, D., O’Hara, M., Srinivas, P., 1998. Option volume and stock prices: Evidence on where informed traders trade. Journal of Finance 53, 431–465.
Epps, T.W., Epps, M.L., 1976. The stochastic dependence of security price changes and transaction volumes: Implications for the mixture-of-distributions hypothesis. Econometrica 44, 305–321.
Figleski, S., 1981. Futures trading and volatility in the GNMA market. Journal of Finance 36, 445–456.
Ge, L., Lin, T.C., Pearson, N.D., 2016. Why does the option to stock volume ratio predict stock returns. Journal of Financial Economics 120, 601–622.
Gulen, H., Mayhew, S., 2000. Stock index futures trading and volatility in interna- tional equity markets. Journal of Futures Markets 20, 661–685.
Hsieh, W.L.G., Chi, C.F., 2016. The information content of futures open interest and its relation to trading activities. NTU Management Review 26, 151–184.
Johnson, T.L., So, E.C., 2012. The option to stock volume ratio and future returns. Journal of Financial Economics 106, 262–286.
Karpoff, J.M., 1987. The relation between price changes and trading volume: A survey. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 22, 109–126.
Kuo, W., Chung, S., Chang, C., 2015. The impacts of individual and institutional trading on futures rrturns and volatility: Evidence from emerging index futures markets. Journal of Futures Markets 35, 222–244.
Martell, T.F., Wolf, A.S., 1987. Determinants of trading volume in futures markets. Journal of Futures Markets 7, 233–244.
Ni, S.X., Pan, J., Poteshman, A.M., 2008. Volatility information trading in the option market. Journal of Finance 63, 1059–1091.
Pradkhan, E., 2016. Information content of trading activity in precious metals futures markets. Journal of Futures Markets 36, 421–456.
38
Ragunathan, V., Peker, A., 1997. Price variability, trading volume and market depth: Evidence from the Australian futures market. Applied Financial Economics 7, 447–454.
Roll, R., Schwartz, E., Subrahmanyam, A., 2010. O/S: The relative trading activity in options and stock. Journal of Financial Economics 96, 1–17.
Ryu, D., 2015. The information content of trades: an analysis of KOSPI 200 index derivatives. Journal of Futures Markets 35, 201–221.
Schlag, C., Stoll, H., 2005. Price impacts of options volume. Journal of Financial Markets 8, 69–87.
Schneider, J., 2009. A rational expectations equilibrium with informative trading volume. Journal of Finance 64, 2783–2805.
Schwert, G.W., 1990. Stock volatility and the crash of ’87. Review of Financial Studies 3, 77–102.
Wang, C., 2002. The effects of net positions by type of trader on volatility in foreign currency futures markets. Journal of Futures Markets 22, 427–450.
Yen, S.M., Chen, M.H., 2010. Open interest, volume, and volatility: Evidence from Taiwan futures markets. Journal of Economics and Finance 34, 113–141.

指導教授

葉錦徽(Yeh Jin Huei)

審核日期

2017-7-5

推文