 |
|
|
|
以作者查詢圖書館館藏 、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 、以作者查詢全國書目 、勘誤回報 、線上人數：44 、訪客IP：3.137.186.26
姓名 趙國安(Guo-An Chao) 查詢紙本館藏 畢業系所 財務金融學系 論文名稱 隨機優越動能策略-以台灣股票市場為例
(Construct stochastic dominance momentum strategy)相關論文 檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]
[相關文章]
[文章引用]
[完整記錄]
[館藏目錄]
[檢視]
- 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
- 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
- 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。
摘要(中) 本文藉由二階隨機優越 (Second-Degree Stochastic Dominance, SSD) 與1.5階隨機優越 (1.5-Degree Stochastic Dominance, 1.5SD) 法則篩選出SD贏家與SD輸家之股票，並且檢測買進SD贏家與賣出SD輸家的套利投資組合是否有顯著超額報酬。隨機優越不像平均數-變異數 (mean-variance)需要假設特定之報酬分配或者效用函數，僅以過去報酬率排序的方式判斷風險性資產之優越性，並且不同於動能策略，隨機優越有著理論的支持。
實證結果發現，藉由過去6個月形成期為基礎，不論利用二階隨機優越法則或1.5階隨機優越法則選出的SD贏家投資組合皆有顯著的額外報酬，並且買進SD贏家放空SD輸家之套利投資組合無論持有期為3個月、6個月、9個月或是12個月，超額報酬皆為正值。除此之外，此超額報酬使用CAPM單因子、Fama-French三因子以及Carhart四因子迴歸模型皆無法圓滿解釋。摘要(英)
In this paper, we construct SD-winner and SD-loser portfolios based on 1.5 and second degree stochastic dominance rules and examine the performance of arbitrage portfolio which by longing SD-winner stocks and short selling SD-loser stocks. Compared with the most widely accepted Mean-Variance framework, SD rules require neither a specific return distribution nor a specific utility function. SD rules just need to determine SD-winner or SD-loser on ranking previous 6-month returns.
In empirical test, we form portfolios through the previous 6-month ranking period and hold them up to 12 months.
The results show that SD-winner portfolios produce statistically, significant abnormal returns and arbitrage portfolio has positive excess return. Moreover, these returns are robust with respect to the single index CAPM, the Fama-French three-factor model, the Carhart four-factor model under various criteria of the SD investment strategy.關鍵字(中) ★ 隨機優越
★ 動能策略關鍵字(英) ★ stochastic dominance
★ momentum strategy論文目次
目次
摘要 I
ABSTRACT II
目次 III
圖目錄 IV
表目錄 V
第一章 緒論 1
第二章 隨機優越法則 4
2.1 一階隨機優越法則 (FSD) 4
2.2 二階隨機優越法則 (SSD) 5
2.3 一階隨機優越與二階隨機優越之間 5
第三章 資料與研究方法 7
第四章 實證結果與分析 10
4.1 隨機優越投資組合之報酬 10
4.2 套利投資組合超額報酬之檢定 11
4.3 穩健性測試 12
第五章 結論 13
參考文獻 22參考文獻
Babbel, D.F., & Herce, M.A., 2007. A closer look at stable value funds performance. Working
Paper, 07-21.
Clark, E., & K. Kassimatis (2014). Exploiting stochastic dominance to generate
abnormal stock returns. Journal of Financial Markets, (20), 20-38.
Carhart, M. M. (1997). On persistence in mutual fund performance. The Journal of finance,
52(1), 57-82.
Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1996). Multifactor explanations of asset pricing anomalies. The journal of finance, 51(1), 55-84.
George, T. J., Hwang, C. Y., The 52-Week High and Momentum Investing. Journal of Finance, (59)5, 2145-2176.
Hadar, J., & Russell, W. R. (1971). Stochastic dominance and diversification.
Journal of Economic Theory, 3(3), 288-305.
Hanoch, G., & Levy, H. (1969). The efficiency analysis of choices involving risk. The
Review of Economic Studies, 36(3), 335-346.
Jegadeesh, N., & Titman, S. (1993). Returns to buying winners and selling losers: Implications
for stock market efficiency. The journal of finance, 48(1), 65-91.
Levy, H., & Markowitz, H. M. (1979). Approximating expected utility by a function of mean and variance. The American Economic Review, 69(3), 308-317.
Markowitz, H. (1952). Portfolio selection. The journal of finance, 7(1), 77-91.
Markowitz, H. (1952). The utility of wealth. Journal of Political Economy, 60(2), 151-158.
Müller, A., & Scarsini, M., & Tsetlin, I., & Winkler, R. (2016). Between First- and Second
Order Stochastic Dominance, Management Science, Articles in Advance, 1-16.
Rothschild, M., & Stiglitz, J. E. (1970). Increasing risk: I. A definition. Journal of Economic theory, 2(3), 225-243.指導教授 黃瑞卿、葉錦徽(Rachel Juiching Huang Jin-Huei Yeh) 審核日期 2017-7-28 推文 plurk
funp
live
udn
HD
myshare
netvibes
friend
youpush
delicious
baidu
網路書籤 Google bookmarks
del.icio.us
hemidemi
facebook
twitter
google
reddit