所得不均的決定因素：跨國研究

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：52

、訪客IP：3.135.220.239

姓名

黃雯楨(WEN-CHEN HUANG) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

產業經濟研究所在職專班

論文名稱

所得不均的決定因素：跨國研究

相關論文

★ 資訊科技的使用對製造業廠商生產力之影響	★ 寶島債介紹及發展前景
★ 電腦軟體與資料庫的採用與對廠商績效的影響- 台灣製造業的研究	★ 中國新高技術園區技術效率及其影響因素的研究
★ 政府管控房地產政策對不動產市場及銀行不動產授信業務之影響	★ 鶯歌捷運線對房價的影響
★ 貿易、技術與薪資溢酬	★ 聚集與生產力:台灣紡織產業的實證研究
★ 勞工派遣與正職受僱型態之實證研究－金融海嘯前後之分析比較	★ 影響政府採購效率之實證研究—以某縣市政府為例
★ 台灣民眾轉換從業身分的決策以及「不景氣-推擠」假說之檢定	★ 汽車燃油效率、反彈效果與特徵價格之研究
★ Three Essays on the Industrial Economics	★ 研究發展與技術購買-台灣製造業之實證研究
★ 合併廠商的績效表現與決策因素分析	★ 合併型態對廠商績效與股票報酬的影響

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

所得分配不均至今仍是全世界各國面臨到的重要議題，了解影響所得不均的因素有助於政府提出有效的對策。本論文利用61個國家2004年至2012年間的追蹤資料為樣本，實證估計影響國家所得不均的因素，特別是開放程度，創新與制度的影響。為獲致頑強性的估計結果，分別採用五分位差倍數與十分位差倍數衡量所得不均的程度進行估計。利用追蹤資料模型估計的結果顯示：外人直接投資及教育水準負向影響所得不均程度；國內生產毛額(GDP)與所得不均呈現倒U型的關係。此外，貪腐化程度與貿易開放程度越高，則所得不均程度越高。民主化程度僅於十分位差距倍數作為被解釋變數時與所得不均傾向於正相關，但研究發展密度與所得不均則無顯著的關係。

摘要(英)

Income inequality is a widely concerned issue in most countries. Understanding the determinants of income inequality helps government propose effective policy measures to mitigate the degree of income inequality. This thesis utilizes a panel dataset of 61 countries for the 2004-2012 period to investigate determinants of income inequality by focusing on openness, innovation and institutional factors. To obtain robust estimates, we adopt both 20/20 ratio and 10/10 ratio as indicators of income inequality to conduct empirical estimations. Results obtained from the panel data model show that FDI and education help lower income inequality; GDP exhibits an inversed U shape relationship with income inequality. Moreover, both corruption and openness are associated with a positive relationship with the degree of income inequality. However, we find no significant relation between R&D and income inequality.

關鍵字(中)

★ 所得不均
★ 研發
★ 制度因素

關鍵字(英)

★ Income inequality
★ Openness
★ R&D
★ Institutional factors

論文目次

中文摘要 I
Abstract II
致謝 III
目錄 IV
表目錄 V
圖目錄 VI
第一章、緒論 1
1-1 研究動機 1
1-2 研究目的 2
1-3 研究架構 4
第二章、世界各國所得不均趨勢分析 5
第三章、文獻回顧 13
第四章、實證模型設定，資料與估計方法 18
4-1 實證模型設定與變數說明 18
4-2 資料來源與處理 22
4-3 估計方法 24
4-3-1 相關性分析 24
4-3-2 Panel Data 模型 26
4-3-3 固定效果模型(Fixed-Effect Model) 27
4-3-4 隨機效果模型(Random-Effect Model) 27
4-3-5 Hausman Test 28
第五章、實證分析與結果 30
5-1 樣本國家五分位差距倍數實證結果 30
5-2 樣本國家十分位差距倍數實證結果 34
第六章、結論 37
6-1 結論 37
6-2 未來研究方向 37
參考文獻 38

參考文獻

Acar, S. and F. Dogruel (2012), “Sources of Inequality in Selected MENA Countries”, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 23(3), 276-285.

Bajar, S. and M. Rajeev (2016), “The Impact of Infrastructure Provisioning on Inequality in India: Does the Level of Development Matter?”, Journal of Comparative Asian Development, 15(1), 122-155.

Bulíř, A. (2001), “Income Inequality: Does Inflation Matter?”, IMF Staff Papers, 48(1), 139-159.

Castells-Quintana, D., R. Ramos, and V. Royuela (2015), “Income Inequality in European Regions: Recent Trends and Determinants”, Review of Regional Research, 35(2), 123-146.

Chong, A. and C. Calderóns (2000), “Institutional Quality and Income Distribution”, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 48(4), 761-786.

Crenshaw E. (1992), “Cross-National Determinants of Income Inequality: A Replication and Extension Using Ecological-Evolutionary Theory”, Social Forces, 71(2), 339-363.

Deininger, K. and L.Squire（1998, “New Ways of Looking at Old Issues: Inequality and Growth”, Journal of Development Economics, 57, 2, 259–287.

Jaumotte, F., S. Lall, and C. Papageorgiou (2013), “Rising Income Inequality: Technology, or Trade and Financial Globalization?”, IMF Economic Review, 61(2), 271–309.

Kaldor, N. (1957), “A Model of Economic Growth”, Economic Journal, 67(268), 591-624.

Knight, J. and L.SONG (1991), “The Determinants of Urban Income Inequality in China”, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 53(2), 123–154.

Kuznets, S. (1955), “Economic Growth and Income Inequality”, American Economic Review, 45(1), 1-28.

Koechlin, V. and G. Leon (2007), “International Remittances and Income Inequality: An Empirical Investigation”, Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 10(2), 123-141.

Lim, G.C. and P.D. McNelis (2014), “Income Inequality, Trade and Financial Openness”, Melbourne Institute Working Paper No. 7/14, 1-32.

Milanovic, B. (2005), “Can We Discern the Effect of Globalization on Income Distribution? Evidence from Household Surveys“, World Bank Economic Review, 19(1), 21-44.

Piketty, T. (2013), Capital in the Twenty-First Century, France, Éditions du Seuil Belknap Press.

Scully, G.W. (1988), “The Institutional Framework and Economic Development”, Journal of Political Economy, 96(3), 652-662.

Simpson , M. (1990), “Political Rights and Income Inequality: A Cross-National Test”, American Sociological Review, 55(5), 682-693.

指導教授

鄒孟文(MENG-WEN TSOU)

審核日期

2017-7-20

推文