垂直市場、技術移轉與外人直接投資

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：25

、訪客IP：3.15.190.144

姓名

張博涵(Bo-Han Chang) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

經濟學系

論文名稱

垂直市場、技術移轉與外人直接投資

相關論文

★ 存在中間財市場下的跨國廠商進入模式選擇	★ 匯率與本國中間財廠商的直接投資決策
★ 網路外部性下的利潤廠商跟共營廠商競爭分析	★ 寡占市場下的自動進口擴張政策分析
★ 寡占廠商成本歧異下之最適產業與貿易政策	★ 雙邊貿易的最適關稅
★ 平行輸入、仿冒與服務品質	★ 經濟成長、消費者信心與銀行風險
★ 網路外部性與最適民營化政策	★ 經濟整合與關稅政策的福利分析
★ 最適民營化政策的相關議題分析	★ 多功能產品跨業效果的經濟分析
★ 出口競爭與廠商的直接投資決策－匯率的考量	★ Drastic or Non-drastic Innovation When Encountering Rivals
★ 存在中間財下的仿冒行為分析	★ 外人直接投資與政府的策略性汙染稅

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

本文旨在討論國外下游廠商將垂直技術移轉納入考慮後，國外廠商進入垂
直市場對社會福利的影響，並進一步放寬下游市場自由進出的假設，探討是否會
對外國廠商的最適技術移轉量有影響，以及地主國下游廠商家數、效率程度等參
數變化時，如何影響社會福利。
本文建立一個垂直相關模型，上游為獨占中間財廠商，提供原料給多家下游最終財廠商，此上游廠商採取單一訂價，下游廠商則將自上游購得之原料投入生產最終財，並在最終財市場上進行數量競爭。此外，有一國外下游廠商具備可以降低原料生產成本之專利技術，並能將技術垂直移轉給本國上游廠商，此外國廠商與上游獨占廠商購買原料後，在最終財市場與本國下游廠商進行數量競爭。本文結果如下，當下游市場無法自由進出時，若外國廠商無技術移轉，則在下游廠商家數少的時候，地主國社會福利會因外國廠商進入而提高，反之，則會使地主國社會福利降低；而當下游市場無法自由進出時，若外國廠商採取最適的技術移轉決策，則外國廠商的進入會使地主國社會福利提高；最後，本文放寬下游市場自由進出的假設，則外國廠商的最適技術移轉量為零，且其進入不會影響地主國的社會福利。

摘要(英)

We hypothesize that multinational firms transfer technology to local suppliers to increase their productivity and to lower input prices. As a result, not just the foreign-owned firm, but all downstream firms of that supply market obtain lower prices. The purpose of this paper is to discuss the impact of foreign manufacturers entering the vertical market on social welfare when the vertical technology transfer is considering. Further relaxes the assumption that the downstream market is free to come in and out to explore whether it will affect the optimal technology transfer decision. As well as the number of the local downstream firm and the degree of efficiency changes how to affect social welfare.
Our model is a three stage game in vertical related market with endogenous vertical technology transfer (VTT). Further, the technology transfer generates an externality that benefits buyers in other sectors downstream from the supply sector as well. This externality may provide a justification for policy intervention to encourage foreign investment. We show that, even though the technology transfer is costly to the multinational firm, the optimal technology transfer decision is positive. When the multinational firm transfer optimal technology to the local supplier, although the local downstream firm faces stronger competition, it obtains the social welfare at better terms. Finally, this article relaxes the hypothesis that the downstream market is free to move in and out, this resulting in the optimal technology transfer decision of foreign firms becomes zero, and its entry does not affect the social welfare of the host country.

關鍵字(中)

★ 垂直市場
★ 技術移轉
★ 外人直接投資

關鍵字(英)

論文目次

第一章研究動機與目的 1
第二章文獻回顧 3
第三章基本模型 7
3.1 封閉經濟體內，地主國某一產業的市場情況 7
3.2外國廠商進入 9
3.3外國廠商進入，且可進行垂直技術移轉的情況 12
3.4 對地主國社會福利之分析 15
第四章放寬下游廠商家數外生的假設 18
4.1 封閉經濟體下，放寬下游廠商家數外生的假設 18
4.2外國廠商進入 21
4.3外國廠商進入，且可進行垂直技術移轉的情況 24
4.4 對地主國社會福利之分析 27
第五章結論 28

參考文獻

De La Potterie, B. V. P. & Lichtenberg, F. (2001), Does foreign direct investment transfer technology across borders?, the Review of Economics and Statistics, 83(3), 490-497.
Branstetter, L. (2006), Is foreign direct investment a channel of knowledge spillovers? Evidence from Japan′s FDI in the United States, Journal of International economics, 68(2), 325-344.
Blalock, G. & Gertler, P. J. (2008), Welfare gains from foreign direct investment through technology transfer to local suppliers, Journal of International Economics, 74(2), 402-421.
Blalock, G. & Gertler, P. J. (2009), How firm capabilities affect who benefits from foreign technology, Journal of Development Economics, 90(2), 192-199.
Balsvik, R. (2010), Multinationals′ mode of entry in the presence of upstream spillovers, Economica, 77(306), 334-351.
Caves, R. E. (1971), International corporations: The industrial economics of foreign investment, Economica, 38(149), 1-27.
Carluccio, J. & Fally, T. (2013), Foreign entry and spillovers with technological incompatibilities in the supply chain, Journal of International Economics, 90(1), 123-135.
Desai, M. A., Foley, C. F. & Hines Jr, J. R. (2005), Foreign direct investment and domestic economic activity, National Bureau of Economic Research.
Eicher, T. & Kang, J. W. (2005), Trade, foreign direct investment or acquisition: Optimal entry modes for multinationals, Journal of Development Economics, 77(1), 207-228.
Goh, A. T. (2005), Knowledge diffusion, input supplier′s technological effort and technology transfer via vertical relationships, Journal of International Economics, 66(2), 527-540.
Glass, A. J. & Saggi, K. (2002), Licensing versus direct investment: Implications for economic growth, Journal of International Economics, 56(1), 131-153.
Hymer, S. H. (1976), The international operation of national firms: A study of foreign direct investment, Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press Google Scholar.
Jabbour, L. & Mucchielli, J. L. (2007), Technology transfer through vertical linkages: The case of the Spanish manufacturing industry, Journal of Applied Economics, 10(1), 115.
Krugman, P. R. (1982), The new theories of international trade and the multinational corporation, The Multinational Corporation in the 1980s, The MIT Press, Cambridge y Londres.
Lin, P. & Saggi, K. (2007), Multinational firms, exclusivity, and backward linkages, Journal of International Economics, 71(1), 206-220.
Lileeva, A. (2010), The benefits to domestically owned plants from inward direct investment: the role of vertical linkages, Canadian Journal of Economics, 43(2), 574-603.
Lin, P. & Saggi, K. (2011), Foreign direct investment in a two‐tier oligopoly: coordination, vertical integration, and welfare, International Economic Review, 52(4), 1271-1290.
Ma, J. (2013), Market size, local sourcing and policy competition for foreign direct investment, Review of International Economics, 21(5), 984-995.
Milliou, C. (2014), Location for foreign direct investment in vertically related markets, Review of International Economics, 22(2), 326-341.
Pack, H. & Saggi, K. (2001), Vertical technology transfer via international outsourcing, Journal of Development Economics, 65(2), 389-415.
Rob, R. & Vettas, N. (2003), Foreign direct investment and exports with growing demand, The Review of Economic Studies, 70(3), 629-648.
Saggi, K. (1996), Entry into a foreign market: Foreign direct investment versus licensing, Review of International Economics, 4(1), 99-104.
Saggi, K. (1999), Foreign direct investment, licensing, and incentives for innovation, Review of International Economics, 7(4), 699-714.
Smarzynska, J. B. (2004), Does foreign direct investment increase the productivity of domestic firms? In search of spillovers through backward linkages, The American Economic Review, 94(3), 605-627.
Stähler, F. (2006), Market entry and foreign direct investment, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 24(2), 335-347.
Tang, M. J. & Yu, C. M. J. (1990), Foreign market entry: Production-related strategies, Management Science, 36(4), 476-489.
Vernon, R. (1966), International investment and international trade in the product cycle, The quarterly journal of economics, 190-207.

指導教授

邱俊榮(Jiunn-Rong Chiou)

審核日期

2017-7-31

推文