博碩士論文 104423020 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:34 、訪客IP:18.118.0.240
姓名 洪崇議(Chung-I Hung)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 資訊管理學系
論文名稱 探討行動網頁介面設計以及人格特質對使用者經驗之影響研究
(A Study on the effects of Mobile Web Interface Design and Personality Traits on User Experience)
相關論文
★ 以個案研究法探討機械式組織之資訊系統導入★ 製藥業的成本會計評估研究─ 一個ABC成本制度的應用
★ 銀行企業內部網路導入TCP/IP通信協定之研究★ 後金控時代臺灣地區金融服務業 薪資決策支援系統之設計研究 --以一家中型證券商為例
★ 影響數位在職訓練之學習態度及行為意向研究★ 一個保險業的資料採擷應用--業務員的薪酬制度分析
★ 農漁產品電子化交易中分類分級管理之研究★ 應用類神經網路建構壽險核保決策支援之研究
★ 台灣銀行業導入電子商務線上金流訊息標準之研究★ 國防訓儲軍士官制度評估
★ 以關係承諾角度探討組織中軟體專案開發之個案研究★ 企業導入ERP之關鍵成功因素-個案研究
★ 體外診斷醫療器材滿足CE及GMP驗證要求之個案研★ 企業工作流程再造之研究─以銀行發卡流程為例
★ 企業資訊系統委外研究-以個案銀行為例★ 以個案研究法探討B2B電子商務導入之研究—以汽車售後服務件製造商為例
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   [檢視]  [下載]
  1. 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
  2. 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
  3. 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。

摘要(中) 現今行動裝置的使用率逐年上升,網頁開發的進入門檻逐漸降低,各家企業紛紛開 始專注於開發出一個最佳的使用者經驗網頁,因此行動網頁元素的設計顯得更加重要。 本研究希望探討網頁元素在什麼樣的設計下,能在行動網頁上有最好的呈現方式,此外, 本研究加入人格特質調節變數,來分析人格是否會影響使用者對元素設計的感受,再進 一步探討整體行動網頁的使用者經驗。
本研究以「實驗室研究法」,探討行動網頁介面常使用的兩個元素:「導覽選單」與 「網格版面」,本實驗透過這兩項元素的複雜度設計,並利用任務情境,讓使用者實際 的瀏覽與操作介面。實驗結束後,以問卷量測的分析方式,探討使用者的人格特質以及 對介面的感知複雜度,並分析出最佳的使用者經驗設計模式。
本研究的受測人數共 149 人,使用 SPSS, AMOS 與 SmartPLS 3.0 進行資料分析與 模型推論。研究結果發現:(1) 網格版面這項元素對感知複雜度的影響,會受到導覽選 單的調節。(2) 本研究也發現人格特質、導覽選單、網格版面三者的交互作用會與感知 複雜度有顯著的影響。(3) 使用者對介面的感知複雜度越高,其對於網頁介面的使用者 經驗,會有負向的影響。
摘要(英) Nowadays people are spending more and more time on mobile devices for web browsing. Therefore, the issue of user experience of websites becomes important to attract sticky users. This study attempts to explore the conditions for mobile website interface design, to achieve good user experience. In addition, the moderating effects of personality traits on the effects of these design elements on user experience are also explored.
A laboratory experiment was carried out in this study. Two of the design complexity elements, namely, “Navigation levels” and “Grid Layout” were chosen as manipulated independent variables. The experiment assigned each informant with a task requiring him/her to operate a mobile web page with different interfaces. User experience, perceived complexities and user’s personally traits were measured with questionnaires after usage.
A total of 149 informants were recruited, and their responses were collected and analyzed. Analysis tools, including SPSS, AMOS and SmartPLS 3.0 were used for data analysis and inferences. Results show that: (1) navigation levels and grid layout interacts to affect perceived complexity, (2) the above effect is moderated by personality traits, and (3) perceived complexity have a negative influence on user experiences.
關鍵字(中) ★ 使用者介面
★ 使用者經驗
★ MBTI 人格特質
★ 行動網頁設計
★ 感知複雜度
關鍵字(英) ★ User Interface
★ User Experience
★ MBTI Personality Trait
★ Mobile Website Design
★ Perceived Complexity
論文目次
摘要..............................................................................................................................................i ABSTRACT............................................................................................................................... ii 目錄........................................................................................................................................... iii 圖目錄......................................................................................................................................... v 表目錄........................................................................................................................................vi
第一章 緒論...............................................................................................................................1
1.1 研究背景......................................................................................................................... 1
1.2 研究動機......................................................................................................................... 3
1.3 研究目的......................................................................................................................... 4
第二章 文獻探討.......................................................................................................................5
2.1 行動網頁介面設計......................................................................................................... 5
2.2 回應式網頁設計............................................................................................................. 5
2.3 感知複雜度..................................................................................................................... 6
2.4 使用者經驗..................................................................................................................... 8
2.5 MBTI 人格特質............................................................................................................10
第三章 研究方法.....................................................................................................................11
3.1 研究架構與假說...........................................................................................................11
3.2 實驗設計....................................................................................................................... 12
3.3 研究變數之定義操作化............................................................................................... 13
3.3.1 自變數的定義與操作化....................................................................................... 13
3.3.2 依變數的定義與操作化....................................................................................... 15
3.3.3 調節變數的定義與操作化................................................................................... 18
3.4 實驗流程....................................................................................................................... 20
3.4.1 實驗情境............................................................................................................... 21
3.4.2 正式實驗............................................................................................................... 22
第四章 資料分析.....................................................................................................................23
4.1 受測者描述性統計分析............................................................................................... 23
4.2 實驗室研究................................................................................................................... 24
4.2.1 實驗組別人數....................................................................................................... 24
4.2.2 實驗結果分析....................................................................................................... 24
4.3 研究假說結果彙整....................................................................................................... 32
iii
第五章 結論與建議.................................................................................................................34 5.1 研究發現與討論........................................................................................................... 34
5.1.1 導覽選單、網格版面與感知複雜度................................................................... 34
5.1.2 人格特質的調節效果........................................................................................... 37
5.1.3 感知複雜度與使用者經驗................................................................................... 39
5.2 研究貢獻....................................................................................................................... 39
5.3 管理意涵....................................................................................................................... 40
5.3.1 網頁元素的設計................................................................................................... 40
5.3.2 人格與感受的重要性........................................................................................... 40
5.4 研究限制與未來建議................................................................................................... 41
5.4.1 受測者的挑選....................................................................................................... 41
5.4.2 填答者的偏誤....................................................................................................... 41
5.4.3 介面設計複雜度................................................................................................... 41
參考文獻................................................................................................................................... 42 英文文獻........................................................................................................................... 42 中文文獻........................................................................................................................... 44
附錄........................................................................................................................................... 45
1. 本研究實驗介面設計-「導覽選單」 ......................................................................... 45
2. 本研究實驗介面設計-「網格版面」 ......................................................................... 47
3. 實驗問卷....................................................................................................................... 48
4. PLS 路徑分析圖..........................................................................................................52
5. PLS-Bootstrapping 分析圖..........................................................................................52
參考文獻 英文文獻
1. Attneave, F. (1957). Physical determinants of the judged complexity of shapes. Journal of experimental Psychology, 53(4), 221.
2. Benyon, D., Turner, P. & Turner, S. (2005). Designing Interactive Systems – People, Activities, Contexts, Technologies. Addison Wesley.
3. Berlyne, D. E. (1963). Complexity and incongruity variables as determinants of exploratory choice and evaluative ratings. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 17, 274.
4. Berlyne, D. E. (1971). Information, uncertainty, redundancy, aesthetics and psychobiology. New York: Meredith Corporation.
5. Chipman, S. F. (1977). Complexity and structure in visual patterns. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 106(3), 269.
6. ComScore. (2015). ComScore Reports June 2015 U.S. Smartphone Subscriber Mar ket Share. From https://www.comscore.com/Insights/Rankings/comScore-Reports-June -2015-US-Smartphone-Subscriber-Market-Share, accessed on March 2017.
7. Garrett, J.J. (2002). The Elements of User Experience. From http://www.jjg.net/elements/pdf/elements_ch02.pdf, accessed on March 2017.
8. Google. (2015). Finding more mobile-friendly search results. From https://webmasters.googleblog.com/2015/02/finding-more-mobile-friendly-search.htm, accessed on March 2017.
9. Google. (2016). Responsive Web Design. From https://developers.google.com/webm asters/mobile-sites/mobile-seo/responsive-design, accessed on March 2017.
10. Heckhausen, H. (1964). Complexity in perception: Phenomenal criteria and information theoretic calculus—A note on D. Berlynes “Complexity Effects.”
11. Hinderks, A. (2015). UEQ. From http://www.ueq-online.org/, accessed on March 2017.
12. Huizingh, E. K. (2000). The content and design of web sites: an empirical study.
Information & Management, 37(3), 123-134. 42
13. ISO-9241-210. (2010). Ergonomics of human system interaction-Part 210: Human-centred design for interactive systems. International Standardization Organization (ISO). Switzerland.
14. Laugwitz, B., Held, T., & Schrepp, M. (2008). Construction and evaluation of a user experience questionnaire. In Symposium of the Austrian HCI and Usability Engineering Group (pp. 63-76). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
15. Ling, C., Lopez, M., & Xing, J. (2007). Validating information complexity questionnaires using travel web sites. International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 901-910). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
16. Marcotte, E. (2010). Responsive Web Design. From https://alistapart.com/article/responsive-web-design, accessed on March 2017.
17. Marcus, A. (2001). Babyface Design for Mobile Devices and the Web. In Smith, Michael J., and Salvendy, Gavriel, (Eds.), Conference Proceedings, Human-Computer Interface Internet. (HCII), Vol. 2, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Orleans, LA, pp. 514-518.
18. Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological review, 63(2), 81.
19. Nielsen, J. (2009). Short-Term Memory and Web Usability. From https://www.nngroup.com/articles/short-term-memory-and-web-usability/, accessed on March 2017.
20. Shneiderman, B. (2010). Designing the user interface: strategies for effective human-computer interaction. Pearson Education India.
21. StatCounter. (2016). Mobile and tablet internet usage exceeds desktop for first time worldwide. From
http://gs.statcounter.com/press/mobile-and-tablet-internet-usage-exceeds-desktop-for-firs t-time-worldwide, accessed on March 2017.
22. Strother, L., & Kubovy, M. (2003). Perceived complexity and the grouping effect in band patterns. Acta psychologica, 114(3), 229-244.
23. Tan, F. B., Tung, L. L., & Xu, Y. (2009). A Study Of Web-designers′criteria For Effective
Business-to-consumer (b2c) Websites Using The Repertory Grid Technique. Journal of
Electronic Commerce Research, 10(3), 155. 43
24. Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila, K., & Wäljas, M. (2011). How do users find out what′s new: a study of change indicators in mobile services. In Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments (pp. 201-204). ACM.
25. Vouchercloud. (2014). eCommerce Psychology – Making the Product Look Good. From https://www.vouchercloud.com/blog/consumer-psychology-the-e-commerce-checkout/, accessed on March 2017.
26. Zeldman, J. (2011). Responsive Design. I don’t think that word means what you think it means. From http://www.zeldman.com/2011/07/06/responsive-design-i-dont- think-that-word-means-what-you-think-it-means/, accessed on March 2017.
中文文獻
1. 王任輝 (2015)。電子商務網站 RWD介面設計法則之使用者經驗及眼動行為研究。
中山大學資訊管理學系研究所學位論文,1-67。
2. 林秀瑋 (2010)。國小特殊教育教師人格特質與工作滿意度之研究。臺灣師範大學特
殊教育學系學位論文,1-120。
3. 林惠芬 (1999)。啟智教育教師人格特質之研究。特殊教育與復健學報,第7期,頁
281-296。
4. 財團法人台灣網路資訊中心 (2016)。「臺灣已有八成上網民眾採智慧手機進行連網」,
2016 年 3 月 19 日取自 http://www.twnic.net.tw/download/200307/20170109e.pdf
5. 馬于雯、鐘國應 (2008)。心理功能傾向量表與軍校生學習經驗量表之編製及其在軍
校生學校適應之運用。應用心理學,第37期,頁95-123。
6. 張仕錩 (2013)。使用者之場域傾向與介面互動模式對主觀複雜度之影響。實踐大學
工業產品設計學系碩士班碩士論文。
7. 黃堅厚 (2004)。人格心理學。臺北市:心理。
8. 楊淑晴 (1999)。麥布二氏心理類型量表 (MBTI) 之總覽。教育研究資訊,7(2), 100-110。
9. 資策會創新應用中心(2016)。「2016年台灣無線網路使用調查」,2016年4月19 日取自 https://www.twnic.net.tw/download/200307/20170109e.pdf
指導教授 范錚強、范懿文(C.K. Farn I.W. Fan) 審核日期 2017-6-20
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明