聚類組態系綜分析蛋白質摺疊模擬的動力學及熱力學

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：143

、訪客IP：18.222.108.185

姓名

游竣評(Chun-Ping YU) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

物理學系

論文名稱

聚類組態系綜分析蛋白質摺疊模擬的動力學及熱力學
(Kinetics and thermodynamics of protein-folding simulations by clustering conformational ensemble)

相關論文

★ 人類陰道滴蟲之Myb2蛋白質動態性質研究	★ 分析原核生物基因體複製起點與終點的反向對偶對稱現象
★ 分析基因體拷貝數變異所使用的兩種方法比較：隱藏馬可夫模型與成對高斯合併法	★ 使用兩種方法偵測基因體拷貝數變異：成對高斯合併法與隱藏馬可夫模型
★ 以整體晶片數據為母體應用於分析基因差異表達的z檢定方法	★ GSLHC －運用基因組及層次類聚以生物功能群將有生物活性的複合物定性的方法
★ 一個檢定測量微晶片基因表達數據靈敏度的全統計計算法	★ 運用嶄新抗體固著策略發展及驗證新式抗體微晶片平台
★ Drug-resistant colon cancer cells produce high carcinoembryonic antigen and might not be cancer-initiating cells	★ 創傷性關節炎軟骨之退化進程－大鼠模型基因體圖譜研究
★ 基因體功能統合分析在阿茲海默症和大腦老化－近年阿茲海默症研發藥物失敗的理論問題探討	★ 以Z曲線分析法探索人類基因體之辨識
★ 以個人電腦叢集平行運算模擬蛋白質結構	★ 各類演算法對DNA序列的辨讀與ORF之搜尋
★ 細菌基因體隨機性的統計分析	★ DNA序列的不同相位上辨識與搜尋基因

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

使用AMBER 2003的力場和內含水的模型研究Trp-cage和protein G在全原子的動力學性質。複本交換的方法提升摺疊組態空間的採樣。摺疊模擬是由24個複本，溫度從276K到508K開始。對Trp-cage開始的結構是個完全延展開的結構而protein G是從自然狀態開始。分子模擬的組態系綜經由聚類方法OPTICS分析。結果顯示，對兩個蛋白質的摺疊組態空間是階層示的。對Trp-cage而言，代表中心聚類結構的平均結構與實驗的結構相較有1.2A的骨架方均根偏差，而protein G則是1.4 A。回歸樹分析對OPTICS產生的聚類序作的映射顯示，摺疊組態空間可以階層示的界定成四個形式：為摺疊型態，二節結構形成，三級結構形成，以及原生型態。三個特徵的因子支配Trp-cage的摺疊空間Pro12-Ψ雙面角, Leu2-Ψ雙面角和總能；protein G有四個因子：Lys4-Ψ，Thr18-Ψ， Glu42-Ψ和Asp22-Ψ.

摘要(英)

The kinetics of the folding of the Trp-cage and protein G were studied in all-atomic molecular dynamics simulations using the AMBER 2003 force-field in implicit solvent. Replica exchange method (REM) was used to enhance sampling of folding conformational space. Folding simulations of twenty-four replicas of Trp-cage and protein G were run from extended state and native state, respectively, ranging from 276 K to 508 K. The conformational ensemble of molecular simulations was clustering by OPTICS. The results showed that the folding conformational spaces for both proteins are hierarchical. The average conformation representing centroid clustering structure for Trp-cage has a backbone root mean square deviation of 1.2 A relative to experimental structure, and 1.4 A for protein G. After regression tree analyze for mapping cluster ordering generated by OPTICS, the folding conformational space can demarcate four hierarchical regimes: unfolded state, formation of secondary structure, formation of tertiary structure, and native state. Three characterized factors for Trp-cage, Pro12-Ψ angle, Leu2-Ψ angle, and total energy, dominated folding space; and four factors for protein G: Lys4-Ψ, Thr18-Ψ, Glu42-Ψ, and Asp22-Ψ.

關鍵字(中)

★ 分子模擬
★ 聚類分析
★ 蛋白質摺疊

關鍵字(英)

★ modlecular dynamics
★ cluster analysis
★ protein folding

論文目次

中文摘要 i
ABSTRACT ii
誌謝 iii
CONTENTS iv
LIST OF FIGURES vi
LIST OF TABLES viii
CHAPTER
1. PROTEIN STRUCTURE AND FOLDING 1
1.1 Introduction 1
1.2 Hierarchical Structure of Proteins 1
1.2.1 Primary Structure 1
1.2.2 Secondary Structure 2
1.2.3 Tertiary Structure and Quaternary Structure 4
2. METHODS AND MATERIALS 5
2.1 Modeling System 5
2.1.1 Molecular Dynamics Algorithm 5
2.1.2 Force Fields 6
2.1.2.1 Non-bonded Interactions 7
2.1.2.2 Bonded Interactions 8
2.1.3 Replica-exchange method 9
2.2 Machine Learning 12
2.2.1 Cluster Analysis 12
2.2.1.1 K-Means Clustering 12
2.2.1.2 Hierarchical Clustering 13
2.2.1.3 Density-based Clustering 15
2.2.2 Decision Tree 17
2.3 Supervised Learning after Cluster Analysis 20
2.4 Materials 21
2.4.1 Trp-cage 21
2.4.2 Protein G 23
3. RESULTS 25
3.1 Trp-Cage 25
3.1.1 Characteristic Structures 25
3.1.2 Feature Selection 28
3.2 Protein G 29
3.2.1 Characteristic Structures 29
3.2.2 Feature Selection 31
4. DISCUSSION 33
4.1 Trp-cage 33
4.2 Protein G 34
5. CONCULSIONS 36
APPENDICES
A. CLUSTERING CONFORMATIONAL SPACE OF TRP-CAGE FOR VARIOUS TEMPERATURES 37
B. CLUSTERING CONFORMATIONAL SPACE OF PROTEIN G FOR VARIOUS TEMPERATURES 39
BIBLIOGRAPHY 41

參考文獻

1. Berman, H.M., et al., The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res, 2000. 28(1): p. 235-42.
2. Kabsch, W. and C. Sander, Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers, 1983. 22(12): p. 2577-637.
3. Duan, Y. and P.A. Kollman, Pathways to a protein folding intermediate observed in a 1-microsecond simulation in aqueous solution. Science, 1998. 282(5389): p. 740-4.
4. Snow, C.D., et al., Absolute comparison of simulated and experimental protein-folding dynamics. Nature, 2002. 420(6911): p. 102-6.
5. Ryckaert, J.-P.C., Giovanni; Berendsen, Herman J. C., Numerical Integration of the Carte-sian Equations of Motion of a System with Constraints: Molecular Dynamics of n-Alkanes. Journal of Computational Physics, 1977. 23: p. 327.
6. Berk Hess, H.B., Herman J. C. Berendsen, Johannes G. E. M. Fraaije,, LINCS: A linear con-straint solver for molecular simulations. Journal of Computational Chemistry, 1997. 18(12): p. 1463-1472.
7. D.A. Case, T.A.D., T.E. Cheatham, III, C.L. Simmerling, J. Wang, R.E. Duke, R. Luo, K.M. Merz, B. Wang, D.A. Pearlman, M. Crowley, S. Brozell, V. Tsui, H. Gohlke, J. Mongan, V. Hornak, G. Cui, P. Beroza, C. Schafmeister, J.W. Caldwell, W.S. Ross, P.A. Kollman, AMBER 8. 2004.
8. Still, W.C., et al., Semianalytical Treatment of Solvation for Molecular Mechanics and Dynamics. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 1990. 112(16): p. 6127-6129.
9. Tseng, C.Y., C.P. Yu, and H.C. Lee, Integrity of H1 helix in prion protein revealed by molecular dynamic simulations to be especially vulnerable to changes in the relative orientation of H1 and its S1 flank. Eur Biophys J, 2009. 38(5): p. 601-11.
10. Sugita, Y. and Y. Okamoto, Replica-exchange molecular dynamics method for protein folding. Chemical Physics Letters, 1999. 314(1-2): p. 141-151.
11. Mitsutake, A., Y. Sugita, and Y. Okamoto, Generalized-ensemble algorithms for molecular simulations of biopolymers. Biopolymers, 2001. 60(2): p. 96-123.
12. Hukushima, K. and K. Nemoto, Exchange Monte Carlo Method and Application to Spin Glass Simulations. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, 1996. 65(6): p. 1604.
13. Okamoto, Y., Generalized-ensemble algorithms: enhanced sampling techniques for Monte Carlo and molecular dynamics simulations. J Mol Graph Model, 2004. 22(5): p. 425-39.
14. Predescu, C., M. Predescu, and C.V. Ciobanu, On the efficiency of exchange in parallel tempering monte carlo simulations. J Phys Chem B, 2005. 109(9): p. 4189-96.
15. Ester, M., et al., A Density-Based Algorithm for Discovering Clusters in Large Spatial Da-tabases with Noise. Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Knowledge Discov-ery and Data Mining (KDD-96), 1996: p. 226-231.
16. Ankerst, M., et al., OPTICS: ordering points to identify the clustering structure, in Proceedings of the 1999 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data. 1999, ACM: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States. p. 49-60.
17. Neidigh, J.W., R.M. Fesinmeyer, and N.H. Andersen, Designing a 20-residue protein. Na-ture Structural Biology, 2002. 9(6): p. 425-430.
18. Qiu, L.L., et al., Smaller and faster: The 20-residue Trp-cage protein folds in 4 mu s. Jour-nal of the American Chemical Society, 2002. 124(44): p. 12952-12953.
19. Snow, C.D., B. Zagrovic, and V.S. Pande, The Trp cage: folding kinetics and unfolded state topology via molecular dynamics simulations. J Am Chem Soc, 2002. 124(49): p. 14548-9.
20. Simmerling, C., B. Strockbine, and A.E. Roitberg, All-atom structure prediction and folding simulations of a stable protein. J Am Chem Soc, 2002. 124(38): p. 11258-9.
21. Pitera, J.W. and W. Swope, Understanding folding and design: replica-exchange simula-tions of "Trp-cage" miniproteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2003. 100(13): p. 7587-92.
22. Chowdhury, S., et al., Ab initio folding simulation of the Trp-cage mini-protein approaches NMR resolution. J Mol Biol, 2003. 327(3): p. 711-7.
23. Zhou, R., Trp-cage: folding free energy landscape in explicit water. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2003. 100(23): p. 13280-5.
24. Juraszek, J. and P.G. Bolhuis, Sampling the multiple folding mechanisms of Trp-cage in explicit solvent. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2006. 103(43): p. 15859-64.
25. Mok, K.H., et al., A pre-existing hydrophobic collapse in the unfolded state of an ultrafast folding protein. Nature, 2007. 447(7140): p. 106-9.
26. Yong Duan, C.W., Shibasish Chowdhury, Mathew C. Lee, Guoming Xiong, Wei Zhang, Rong Yang, Piotr Cieplak, Ray Luo, Taisung Lee, James Caldwell, Junmei Wang, Peter Kollman,, A point-charge force field for molecular mechanics simulations of proteins based on con-densed-phase quantum mechanical calculations. Journal of Computational Chemistry, 2003. 24(16): p. 1999-2012.
27. Onufriev, A., D. Bashford, and D.A. Case, Exploring protein native states and large-scale conformational changes with a modified generalized born model. Proteins-Structure Function and Bioinformatics, 2004. 55(2): p. 383-394.
28. Gronenborn, A.M., et al., A novel, highly stable fold of the immunoglobulin binding do-main of streptococcal protein G. Science, 1991. 253(5020): p. 657-61.
29. Shirts, M.R. and V.S. Pande, Mathematical analysis of coupled parallel simulations. Phys Rev Lett, 2001. 86(22): p. 4983-7.
30. Shakhnovich, E.I., Theoretical studies of protein-folding thermodynamics and kinetics. Curr Opin Struct Biol, 1997. 7(1): p. 29-40.
31. Shimada, J., E.L. Kussell, and E.I. Shakhnovich, The folding thermodynamics and kinetics of crambin using an all-atom Monte Carlo simulation. J Mol Biol, 2001. 308(1): p. 79-95.
32. Kussell, E., J. Shimada, and E.I. Shakhnovich, A structure-based method for derivation of all-atom potentials for protein folding. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2002. 99(8): p. 5343-8.
33. Shimada, J. and E.I. Shakhnovich, The ensemble folding kinetics of protein G from an all-atom Monte Carlo simulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2002. 99(17): p. 11175-80.

指導教授

李弘謙(Hoong-chien Lee)

審核日期

2009-7-26

推文