摘要(英) |
This thesis measures quantitatively burning velocities of high-temperature, high-pressure premixed laminar and turbulent flames of iso-octane/air. We mainly explore the effects of thermodiffusive instability and pressure at constant turbulent Reynolds number (ReT,flow = u′LI/v) and constant r.m.s. turbulent fluctuation velocity (u′) on turbulent burning velocities ST, where LI and v are the integral length scale of turbulence and the kinematic viscosity of reactants respectively. Experiments were conducted in a high-pressure, high-pressure, double-chamber, cruciform fan-stirred premixed turbulent explosion facility, capable of generating a near-isotropic turbulence for conducting combustion experiments at fixed temperature (T), pressure (p), and u′ or ReT,flow conditions. We apply the liquid fuel (iso-octane) as a fuel which is first injected into a pre-vacuumed heating cylinder to make sure it is fully vaporized. Then we inject the pre-vaporized iso-octane into the cruciform fan-stirred burner by using the partial pressure method. The pre-vaporized iso-octane and are at T = 358K are well-mixed before a run. A run begins by centrally-igniting the combustible mixtures. The timing diagram of spherical expanding flames radii are recorded by the high-speed Schilieren imaging technique. Three equivalence ratios (phi = 0.9, 1.0, 1.25) with different Lewis numbers (Le ≈ 2.94, 1.43, and 0.93). Comparing the flames of phi = 0.9(Le > 1) and 1.25(Le < 1) are measured under the same ranges of experimental conditions i.e. T = 358K, p = 1 ~ 5atm, and u′ = 1.4 ~ 2.8m/s or ReT,flow = 6700, then the phi = 1.0 is measured more ranges of turbulent conditions i.e. u′ = 1.0, 1.4, 2.8m/s and ReT,flow = 6700, 9100, 11600 in order to further investigate the ReT,flow effect. Results show that when u′ is fixed, values of ST increase with increasing p, which is mainly due to increase of ReT,flow with increasing p. On the contrary, when ReT,flow is fixed, we find that values ST actually decrease with increasing p. Such decreasing trend of ST ~ p-0.36 is similar to laminar burning velocities (SL), showing a global response of burning velocities to the increase of pressure. When p is fixed, values of ST increase with increasing ReT,flow. In addition, it is found that the effect of Le plays an important role on ST. Le < 1 flame (phi = 1.25, Le ≈ 0.93) clearly have higher values of ST than that of Le > 1 flames (phi = 0.9, Le ≈ 2.94), both with the same SL ≈ 0.4m/s and u′ = 1.4 ~ 2.8m/s. This is because Le < 1 flames experience additional thermodiffusive instablility.
This thesis also apply that commonly used correlation of Damköhler number in the laboratory, ST,c = 0.5/u′ = A1(Da)B1, and two correlations proposed by Kobayashi et al. and Chaudhuri et al. respectively, ST,c=0.5/SL = A2(u′/SL)(p/p0)B2 and [(1/SLb)(d/dt)] = A3(ReT,flame)B3 to analyze present data with three different Le, where the subscript c is the mean progress variable, Damköhler number Da = (LI/u′)(SL/L), L is laminar flame thickness, p0 = 1atm, A1 ~ A3 and B1 ~ B3 are experimental coefficients, SLb is laminar burning velocity of product, and turbulent flame Reynolds number ReT,flame = (u′/SL)(/L). We discover that when using the Le-1 correction, all scattering ST data with different values of u′, p and phi can be collapsed onto a single curve, i.e. ST,c = 0.5/u′ = 0.087(DaLe-1)0.5, ST,c=0.5/SL = 3.5[(u′/SL)(p/p0)Le-1]0.24 and [(1/SLb)(d/dt)] = 0.35(ReT,flameLe-1)0.33. Unfortunately, the power constants of B2 = 0.24 and B3 = 0.33 are less than values (B2 = 0.38 and B3 = 0.5) of previous methane fuel and only B1 = 0.5 is close to the previous methane fuel (B1 = 0.53). We compare the only iso-octane ST data in previous literature (measured by the Leeds Prof. Lawes team) by the relationship of ST,c = 0.5/u′ vs. (DaLe-1)0.5 and get quite consistent results showing the relationship of ST,c = 0.5/u′ ~ (DaLe-1)0.5 is a better general correlation. These results are useful for the application of high-pressure, high-temperature premixed turbulent combustion such as in auto and aviation engines. |
參考文獻 |
[1] 經濟部能源局,“中華民國105年能源統計手冊”,2016年。
[2] 彭明偉,“中央引燃往外傳播預混火焰在高壓條件下之層流和紊流燃燒速度量測”,國立中央大學機械工程研究所,碩士論文,2010年。
[3] 董益銍,“淨煤氣化合成氣貧油可燃極限與燃燒速度量測:壓力和紊流效應”,國立中央大學機械工程研究所,碩士論文,2012年。
[4] 黃信閔,“預混紊流球狀火焰速率與自我相似傳播之量測分析”,國立中央大學機械工程研究所,碩士論文,2013年。
[5] 陳立龍,“高壓預混紊流球狀擴張火焰之自我加速性和其火焰速率於不同Lewis數(Le < 1, Le ≈ 1, Le > 1)”,國立中央大學機械工程研究所,碩士論文,2014年。
[6] 李文義,“實驗研究密度比效應對紊流火焰速率之影響”,國立中央大學能源工程研究所,碩士論文,2015年。
[7] 陳聖鶴,“高壓貧油預混氫氣紊流燃燒速度量測和正規化及其與不同碳氫燃料之比較”,國立中央大學機械工程研究所,碩士論文,2016年。
[8] C. C. Liu, S. S. Shy, M. W. Peng, C. W. Chiu, Y. C. Dong, “High-pressure burning velocities measurements for centrally-ignited premixed methane/air flames interacting with intense near-isotropic turbulence at constant Reynolds numbers”, Combustion and Flame, Vol. 159, pp. 2608-2619, 2012.
[9] C. W. Chiu, Y. C. Dong, S. S. Shy, “High-pressure hydrogen/carbon mono-xide syngas turbulent burning velocities measured at constant turbulent Reynolds numbers”, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Vol. 37, pp. 10935-10946, 2012.
[10] D. Bradley, T. M. Cresswell, J. S. Puttock, “Flame acceleration due to flame-induced instabilities in large-scale explosions”, Combustion and Flame, Vol. 124, pp. 551-559, 2001.
[11] W. K. Kim, T. Mogi, K. Kuwana, R. Dobashi, “Self-similar propagation of expanding spherical flames in large scale gas explosions”, Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, Vol. 35, pp. 2051-2058, 2015.
[12] T. Kitagawa, T. Ogawa, Y. Nagano, “The effects of pressure on unstretched laminar burning velocity, Markstein length and cellularity of spherically propagating laminar flames”, COMODIA, August 2-5, Japan, 2004.
[13] H. Kido, M. Nakahara, “A model of turbulent burning velocity taking the preferential diffusion effect into consideration”, JSME International Journal. Ser. B, Fluids and Thermal Engineering, Vol. 41(3), pp. 666-673, 1998.
[14] C. C. Liu, S. S. Shy, H. C. Chen, M. W. Peng, “On interaction of centrally-ignited, outwardly-propagating premixed flames with fully-developed isotropic turbulence at elevated pressure”, Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, Vol. 33, pp. 1293-1299, 2011.
[15] S. Chaudhuri, F. Wu, D. Zhu, C. K. Law, “Flame speed and self-similar propagation of expanding turbulent premixed flames”, Physical Review Letters, Vol. 108, pp. 044503-1-5, 2012.
[16] G. H. Markstein, Nonsteady Flame Propagation, Pergamon, 1964.
[17] K. N. C. Bray, “Turbulent flows with premixed reactants”, Turbulent Reacting Flows, P. A. Libby & F. A. Williams Eds., pp. 115-183, New York, Springer-Verlag, 1980.
[18] R. Borghi,” On the structure and morphology of turbulent premixed flames,” C. Casci Ed., pp. 117-138, New York, Plenum, 1985.
[19] N. Peters, “Laminar flamelet concepts in turbulent combustion”, Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, Vol. 21, pp. 1231-1250, 1986.
[20] F. A. Williams, Combustion Theory, Second Ed., Addison-Wesley, Redwood City, 1985.
[21] D. Bradley, M. Lawes, M. S. Mansour, “Correlation of turbulent burning velocities of ethanol–air, measured in a fan-stirred bomb up to 1.2 MPa”, Combustion and Flame, Vol. 158, pp. 123-138, 2011.
[22] G. Darrieus, “Propagation d′un front de flamme”, La Technique Moderne, Paris, 1938.
[23] L. D. Landau, “On the theory of slow combustion”, Acta Physicochim URSS, Vol. 19, pp. 77-85, 1944.
[24] C. K. Law, Combustion Physics, Cambridge, New York City, 2006.
[25] I. Glassman, Combustion, Third Ed., Academic Press, San Diego City, 1996.
[26]O. C. Kwon, G. Rozenchan, C. K. Law, “Cellular instabilities and self-acceleration of outwardly propagation spherical flames”, Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, Vol. 29, pp. 1775-1783, 2002.
[27] M. Lawes, M. P. Ormsby, C. G. W. Sheppard, R. Woolley, “The turbulent burning velocity of iso-octane/air mixtures”, Combustion and Flame, Vol. 159, pp. 1949-1959, 2012.
[28]H. Kobayashi, Y. Kawabata, K. Maruta, “Experimental study on general correlation of turbulent burning velocity at high pressure”, Symposium (International) on Combustion, Vol. 27, pp. 941-948, 1998.
[29]H. Kobayashi, T. Tamura, K. Maruta, T. Niioka, “Burning Velocity of Turbulent Premixed Flames in a High-pressure Environment”, Symposium (International) on Combustion, Vol. 26, pp. 389-396, 1996.
[30]L.J. Jiang, S.S. Shy, W.Y. Li, H.M. Huang, M.T. Nguyen, “High-temperature, high-pressure burning velocities of expanding turbulent premixed flames and their comparison with Bunsen-type flames”, Combustion and Flame, Vol. 172, pp. 173-182, 2016.
[31]S. S. Shy, W. J. Lin, K. Z. Peng, “High-intensity turbulent premixed combustion: General correlations of turbulent burning velocities in a new cruciform burner”, Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, Vol. 28, pp. 561-568, 2000.
[32]S. S. Shy, W. J. Lin, J. C. Wei, “An Experimental Correlation of Turbulent Burning Velocities for Premixed Turbulent Methane-Air Combustion”, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A, Vol. 456, pp. 1997-2019, 2000.
[33]S. S. Shy, W. K. I, M. L. Lin, “A new cruciform burner and its turbulence measurements for premixed turbulent combustion study”, Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, Vol. 20, pp. 105-114, 2000.
[34]T. S. Yang, S. S. Shy, Y. P. Chyou, “Spatiotemporal Intermittency Measurements in a Gas-Phase Near-Isotropic Turbulence Using High-Speed DPIV and Wavelet Analysis”, J. Mech., Vol. 21, pp. 157-169, 2005.
[35]T. S. Yang, S. S. Shy, “Two-Way Interaction between Solid Particles and Homogeneous Air Turbulence: Particle Settling Rate and Turbulence Modification Measurements”, J. Fluid Mech., Vol. 526, pp. 171-216, 2005.
[36] D. R. Lide, Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 73rd Ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton City, 1992-1993.
[37]P. Dirrenberger, P. A. Glaude, R. Bounaceur, H. Le Gall, A. Pires da Cruz, A. A. Konnov, F. Battin-Leclerc, “Laminar burning velocity of gasolines with addition of ethanol”, Fuel, Vol. 115, pp. 162−169, 2014.
[38]L. Sileghem, V. A. Alekseev, J. Vancoillie, K. M. Van Geem, E. J. K. Nilsson, S. Verhelst, A. A. Konnov, “Laminar burning velocity of gasoline and the gasoline surrogate components iso-octane, n-heptane and toluene”, Fuel, Vol. 112, pp. 355−365, 2013. |