影片註記輔助同儕互評： ESP取向之口語訓練

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：51

、訪客IP：18.116.80.68

姓名

洪詩婷(Shih-Ting Hong) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

網路學習科技研究所

論文名稱

影片註記輔助同儕互評： ESP取向之口語訓練
(Peer Assessment on Oral Training Supported by Video Annotation: An ESP Approach)

相關論文

★ 網路霸凌防治學習系統的設計開發與TAM評估

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

同儕互評在英語教學已行之有年，然而多數文獻皆是針對英語寫作進行研究，較少研究將同儕互評結合於英語口說中，為補足在英語口說教學之不足，本研究將針對此議題進行研究。本情境為一學期18周的英語口說課程，對象為19位即將面臨職場的大三、四生及一位碩二生。本課程將以職場英語面試為主題，每一堂課程結束後，接著進行同儕互評作業。在教學活動中採用評分表為參考國內外各種外語口說課的評分標準面向後改編，並考量本研究欲著重之處，自行開發評分標準表。
學期結束後，本研究根據18位學生的訪談逐字稿之內容進行歸類、彙整，並邀請熟悉相關領域之協同分析者協助分類編碼。研究者根據訪談文本整理資料趨向，最後再進行整合、意義解釋，藉此了解（1）學生的語言學習策略使用狀況與其使用本系統之學習成效、（2）學生的語言學習策略使用狀況與其使用本系統之同儕互評行為、（3）學生在使用系統給予同儕互評時之感受、（4）學生在使用系統觀看同儕互評時之感受、（5）對於本研究之課程設計的整體感受，以及（6）使用系統進行同儕互評的感受。研究結果顯示使用較多語言學習策略的學生在整體學習成效上也較佳；不同語言學習策略的學生在同儕互評行為上皆隨著同儕互評活動進步；由訪談可知本系統大幅增加學生給予及得到同儕回饋的機會，以及對自身口說優缺點的認知；此系統也可有效彌補課堂中練習時間有限，且避免需當面評斷他人之焦慮，達到留存紀錄、自主操控影片時間等效果；整體而言，本系統解決課堂時間限制、能清楚給予建議之問題，學生對於藉由本系統進行線上同儕互評之學習方式感到正向。

摘要(英)

Participants were 19 university students and 1 graduated student in Communication Skills for Engineers course which learning objective including writing effective CV and cover letter and succeeding in job interview. Students video-recorded their self-introduction for mock interview and shared the videos on the video annotation system. Each student then provided and received comments from 2 students randomly. Students’ oral performance in the self-recorded videos were evaluated based on the self-developed rubric.
We found that higher language learning strategy students demonstrate better oral performance in the video. The results of this study is the correlations analysis of students’ oral performance and language learning strategies have significantly correlation. The results of peer feedback contents, it showed that through this progress they can learn from peer feedback activities. It was found that students’ ability of giving peer feedback significantly improved. At the beginning of the course, students would tend to give delivery comment. However, through several peer feedback practice and discussions with the instructor, student gradually learned which aspect of oral performance they could focus and reflect on.
In the following up interviews, it showed that through the video annotation system they can give and receive peer feedback more easily. Secondly, at the beginning of the course, students would tend to give delivery comment. Students benefited from receiving and giving feedback and had developed reflective thinking of their own oral performance. Video annotation system can enhance traditional classroom. Online peer feedback can provide clear feedback and performance at the same time. Also, it can save time from traditional classroom. Overall, data indicated that students feel positive to the way of using video annotation system with peer feedback activity.

關鍵字(中)

★ 同儕互評
★ 專業英語
★ 影片註記系統
★ 語言學習策略

關鍵字(英)

★ Peer Review
★ English for specific purpose
★ Video Annotation System
★ Language Learning Strategy

論文目次

摘要 i
Abstract ii
目錄 iii
圖目錄 iv
表目錄 v
第一章緒論 1
1.1研究背景與動機 1
1.2研究目的 2
1.3研究範圍與限制 3
1.4名詞解釋 3
第二章文獻探討 5
2.1同儕互評 5
2.2影片註記系統 7
2.3後設認知策略 10
2.4結論 13
第三章研究方法 15
3.1研究流程 15
3.2研究設計 16
3.3研究對象 19
3.4研究工具 21
3.5資料蒐集與分析 32
第四章研究結果與討論 38
4.1不同語言學習策略的學生與學習成效之相關性 38
4.2不同語言學習策略的學生給予評語的內容的演進 52
4.3使用本系統給予同儕互評之感受 68
4.4使用本系統獲得同儕互評之感受 72
4.5使用本系統之整體學習感受 75
4.6使用本系統時對於系統功能之感受與經驗 78
第五章結論 81
5.1研究結論與貢獻 81
5.2研究建議 86
5.3未來研究 87
參考文獻 88
附件一、語言學習策略問卷 95

參考文獻

英文文獻
Anderson, N. J. (2002). The Role of Metacognition in Second Language Teaching and Learning. ERIC Digest. April 2002. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.
Algahtani, A.F. （2011). Evaluating the Effectiveness of the E-learning Experience in Some Universities in Saudi Arabia from Male Students′ Perceptions (Durham theses, Durham University).
Aubert, O., Prie´, Y., & Canellas, C. (2014). Leveraging video annotations in video-based e-learning. In 7th International Conference on Computer Supported Education, Barcelona, Spain. Retrieved from http:// arxiv.org/abs/1404.4607.
Arkorful, V., & Abaidoo, N. (2015). The role of e-learning, advantages and disadvantages of its adoption in higher education. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 12(1), 29-42.
Aryadoust, V. (2015). Self-and peer assessments of oral presentations by first-year university students. Educational Assessment, 20(3), 199-225.
Becker, A. (2016). Student-generated scoring rubrics: Examining their formative value for improving ESL students’ writing performance. Assessing Writing, 29, 15-24.
Bradley, L. (2014). Peer-reviewing in an intercultural wiki environment-student interaction and reflections. Computers and Composition, 34, 80-95.
Carney, T. F. (1990). Collaborative inquiry methodology. Division for Instructional Development, University of Windsor.

Chen, Y. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2009). An educational research course facilitated by online peer assessment. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46(1), 105-117.
DiPardo, A., & Freedman, S. W. (1988). Peer response groups in the writing classroom: Theoretic foundations and new directions. Review of Educational Research, 58(2), 119-149.
Dorn, L. J., & Soffos, C. (2001). Scaffolding young writers: a writers’ workshop approach. Portland: Stenhouse Publishers.
De Grez, L., Valcke, M., & Roozen, I. (2009). The impact of an innovative instructional intervention on the acquisition of oral presentation skills in higher education. Computers & Education, 53(1), 112-120.
Gardner, R. C. (1985). Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation. Arnold.
Gielen, M., & De Wever, B. (2012). Peer assessment in a wiki: Product improvement, students’ learning and perception regarding peer feedback. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 69, 585-594.
Gómez, A. R. (2014). Foreign Language Testing through Competence Assessment Rubrics and Oral Interviews in the European Higher Education Area. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141, 524-532.
Grez, D. (2010). Student response system and learning oral presentation skills. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 1786-1789.
Grez, D. (2010). Peer assessment of oral presentation skills. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 1776-1780.
Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1987). English for specific purposes. Cambridge University Press.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of educational research, 77(1), 81-112.
Harrison, C. (2010). Peer and Self-assessment. International Encyclopedia of Education (Third Edition), 231-235.
Hoogeveen, M., & van Gelderen, A. (2013). What works in writing with peer response? A review of intervention studies with children and adolescents. Educational Psychology Review, 25(4), 473-502.
Hosack, B. (2010). VideoANT: Extending online video annotation beyond content delivery. TechTrends, 54(3), 45-49.
Hulsman, R. L., & van der Vloodt, J. (2015). Self-evaluation and peer-feedback of medical students’ communication skills using a web-based video annotation system. Exploring content and specificity. Patient education and counseling, 98(3), 356-363.
International Telecommunications Union. (2017). ICT Facts and Figures 2017.
Retrieved from
https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Documents/facts/ICTFactsFigures2017.pdf
Kam, M., Wang, J., Iles, A., Tse, E., Chiu, J., Glaser, D., Tarshish, O. & Canny, J. (2005). Livenotes: a system for cooperative and augmented note-taking in lectures. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 531-540). ACM.
Kao, C. W., & Reynolds, B. L. (2017). A Study on the Relationship among Taiwanese College Students.英語教學期刊, 41(4), 31-67.
Krentler, K. A., & Willis-Flurry, L. A. (2005). Does technology enhance actual student learning? The case of online discussion boards. Journal of Education for Business, 80(6), 316-321.

Liu, E. Z. F., Lin, S. S., Chiu, C. H., & Yuan, S. M. (2001). Web-based peer review: the learner as both adapter and reviewer. IEEE Transactions on education, 44(3), 246-251.
Mendonca, C. 0., & Johnson, K. E. (1994). Peer review negotiations: revision activities in ESL writing instruction. TESOL Quarterly, 28(4), 745-769.
Mostert, M., & Snowball, J. D. (2013). Where angels fear to tread: Online peer-assessment in a large first-year class. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(6), 674–686.
Nicol, D., & Milligan, C. (2006). Rethinking technology-supported assessment practices in relation to the seven principles of good feedback practice. Innovative assessment in higher education, 64-77.
Oxford, R. L., & Burry-Stock, J. A. (1995). Assessing the use of language learning strategies worldwide with the ESL/EFL version of the Strategy Inventory for Language Learning (SILL). System, 23(1), 1-23.
Owston, R. D. (1997). Research news and Comment: The World Wide Web: A Technology to Enhance Teaching and Learning? Educational researcher, 26(2), 27-33.
Panadero, E., & Jonsson, A. (2013). The use of scoring rubrics for formative assessment purposes revisited: A review. Educational Research Review, 9, 129-144.
Paulus, T. M. (1999). The effect of peer and teacher feedback on student writing. Journal of second language writing, 8(3), 265-289.
Phye, F. D. & Andre, T. (1986). Cognitive classroom learning: Understanding, thinking, and problem solving. New York: Academic Press.
Picci, P., Calvani, A., & Bonaiuti, G. (2012). The use of digital video annotation in teacher training: The teachers’ perspectives. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 69, 600-613.
Rich, P. J., & Hannafin, M. (2009). Video annotation tools technologies to scaffold, structure, and transform teacher reflection. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1), 52-67.
Rich, P. J., & Hannafin, M. (2009). Video annotation tools technologies to scaffold, structure, and transform teacher reflection. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1), 52-67.
Shumin, K. (2002). Factors to consider: Developing adult EFL students′ speaking abilities. Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice, 12, 204-211.
Thomas, A. O., Antonenko, P. D., & Davis, R. (2016). Understanding metacomprehension accuracy within video annotation systems. Computers in Human Behavior, 58, 269-277.
Topping, K. (1998). Peer Assessment between Students in Colleges and Universities. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 249-276
Topping, K. J. (2005). Trends in peer learning. Educational psychology, 25(6), 631-645.
Topping, K. J. (2009). Peer assessment. Theory into practice, 48(1), 20-27.
Tsutsui, M. (2004). Multimedia as a means to enhance feedback. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 17(3-4), 377-402.
Tseng, S. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2007). On-line peer assessment and the role of the peer feedback: A study of high school computer course. Computers & Education, 49(4), 1161-1174.
Victori, M., & Lockhart, W. (1995). Enhancing metacognition in self-directed language learning. System, 23(2), 223-234.

Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary educational psychology, 25(1), 82-91.

中文文獻
丁雪茵、鄭伯壎、任金剛（民85）。質性研究中研究者的角色與主觀性。本土心理學研究，（6），354-376。
于富雲、鄭守杰、杜明璋、陳德懷（民82）。網路同儕互評與評量標準來源對批判思考能力之影響。南師學報，37（2），1-21。
王丹萍（民101）。評估在高等教育中使用英語為國際語做學術性口頭發表之研究（博士論文）。取自http://ir.lib.ncku.edu.tw/handle/987654321/122936
陳志盛、蔡秋桃、洪明全（民101）。幼保系學生英語學習策略之研究。華醫學報，36，101-119。
黃怡婷（民104）。運用任務式教學法提升國小六年級學生英語口語能力之行動研究（博士論文）。取自http://ntcuir.ntcu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/449
林岱嫻（民96）。科技大學應用外語系學生英語學習動機與學習策略之研究—以中部地區為例（未出版之碩士論文）。國立雲林科技大學，雲林縣。
邱連煌（民96）。成就動機：理論研究策略與應用。臺北市：文景書局。
吳雨桑、林建平（民98）。大學生英語學習環境、學習動機與學習策略的關係之研究。臺北市立教育大學學報，40（2），181-222。
陳麗芳（民96）。臺灣技術學院學生英文閱讀動機、態度、策略運用和閱讀表現之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺灣科技大學，臺北市。
蘇旻洵（譯）（民95）。語言學習策略（原作者：Oxford, R.L.）。臺北市:湯姆生（原著出版年：1990）。

指導教授

劉晨鐘黃芸茵(Chen-Chung Liu Yun-Yin Huang)

審核日期

2018-1-30

推文