管家治理對企業績效之影響  —以人力資本與員工流動率為中介變項

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：17

、訪客IP：18.118.1.232

姓名

沈曄(Ye Shen) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

人力資源管理研究所

論文名稱

管家治理對企業績效之影響 —以人力資本與員工流動率為中介變項

相關論文

★ 業務主管領導力對部屬招募行為之影響-以S壽險公司為例	★ 人力精簡對企業績效的影響–以產業特性為調節變項
★ 經理人超額薪酬、經理人異動與公司績效之關係	★ 人口老化對企業之影響與因應對策-以傳統產業為例
★ 運用羅吉斯迴歸探討企業績效、公司治理與經理人異動之關聯性	★ 護理人員組織承諾與專業承諾對離職傾向與離業傾向的影響
★ 運用存活分析探討高科技產業招募者人格特質與離職風險之關聯性-以A公司為例	★ 金融電子化對台灣銀行業組織績效及人力彈性影響之探討
★ 人力資源部門角色與功能轉變之個案研究	★ 高階主管薪酬級距與公司績效之關聯性分析
★ 人力招募政策及主管領導風格對新進人員晉升與離職傾向之影響-以房仲業S公司為例	★ 影響台灣勞工赴海外就業的決定性因素
★ 董事會特性對企業績效之影響-以人力資本為調節變項	★ 董事會異質性之決定因素
★ 公司治理結構與就業調整	★ 總經理雙元性、股權集中度、人力資本與組織績效

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

家族企業是台灣最主要的組織型態之一，台灣董事學會指出台灣上市櫃公司中73％是家族企業，其營業額占台灣GDP的90%以上，而家族企業之領導人大多由家族內部產生，其具有管家治理傾向較高，故本研究以台灣上市企業做為研究主體，研究高階經理人具管家理論傾向的強弱對於企業績效之影響，並以人力資本及員工流動率做為管家治理與企業績效間的中介變數。
本研究之樣本取自台灣經濟新報資料庫，以AMOS統計套裝軟體進行結構方程模型（SEM）針對2016年637家上市企業進行統計分析驗證模型之配適度，並以路徑分析（Path Analysis）之標準化路徑參數估計值及顯著程度來驗證本研究之假說是否成立，最後以2014年及2015年之資料進行比對，藉以了解此模型是否具有跨年度之穩定性。研究結果顯示直接影響效果的部分管家治理程度對組織績效具有顯著之影響、管家治理程度對員工流動率具有負向影響、員工流動率對於組織績效具有負向影響、管家治理程度對於人力資本具有正向影響、人力資本對組織績效具有負向影響；間接影響的部分，人力資本及員工流動率均對於管家治理程度及組織績效間具有顯著之中介效果。

摘要(英)

Family businesses are the most prevalent organization form in Taiwan. Study of Taiwan Institute of Directors has shown about 73% of Taiwanese publicly traded companies are family businesses, whose revenue accounts for over 90% of Taiwan′s GDP. A lot of family businesses’ top managers come from within the family. They may have the tendency of stewardship. In the light of this, this study attempts to investigate the impact of the strengths and weaknesses of stewardship on organizational performance, and take turnover rate and human capital as the mediator.
In this study, collect data from Taiwan Economic Journal. Use structural equation modeling (SEM) approach to test the model fit of the listed companies at stock exchange market in Taiwan at 2016, including 637 firms. To verify the hypothesis of this study by using Path Analysis′s standardized path parameter estimates and significance levels.
Research results are summarized as follow:
1. Stewardship tendency has an obvious and positive influence on organizational performance.
2. Stewardship tendency has an obvious and negative influence on organizational turnover rate.
3. Organizational turnover rate has an obvious and negative influence on organizational performance.
4. The relationship between stewardship tendency and organizational performance is mediated by organizational turnover rate.
5. Stewardship tendency has an obvious and positive influence on human capital.
6. Human capital has an obvious and negative influence on organizational performance.
7. The relationship between stewardship tendency and organizational performance is mediated by human capital.

關鍵字(中)

★ 家族企業
★ 管家治理
★ 組織績效
★ 員工流動率
★ 人力資本

關鍵字(英)

★ Family businesses
★ Stewardship theory
★ Organizational performance
★ Organizational turnover rate
★ Human capital

論文目次

目錄
第一章緒論 1
第一節研究動機與目的 1
第二節研究整體架構 2
第二章文獻探討 3
第一節管家治理 3
第二節管家治理與企業績效 5
第三節員工流動率與管家治理及企業績效之關係 7
第四節人力資本與管家治理及企業績效之關係 10
第三章研究方法 13
第一節研究變數 13
第二節研究樣本 16
第三節研究模型架構 17
第四章實證結果分析 18
第一節樣本描述性統計資料 18
第二節實證分析 19
第五章結論與建議 23
第一節實證結果討論 23
第二節管理意涵 25
第三節研究限制與未來建議 26
參考文獻 28

參考文獻

中文文獻
李海东（2017）。组织中的管家行为研究:概念结构、影响因素与未来展望。华中农业大学学报(社会科学版)，3，140-148。

林揚舜與鍾俊文（2005）。員工分紅配股與員工流動率間的關係。貨幣觀測與信用評等，第 52 期，88-90。

冯珍、张所地（2009）。员工参与的高技术项目投资非系统性风险评价。技术经济，12。

陳美華、蔡俊佑（2008）。公司治理對於企業持有現金價值之影響。臺灣銀行季刊，4，227-243。

邱宏正（2007）。非營利組織的組織氣候、組織信任、組織績效之關聯性研究—以台灣地區國際扶輪社為例，國立台東大學區域政策與發展研究所公共事務管理在職專班碩士論文。

莊惠如（2006）。承諾導向人力資源制度、社會資本、組織承諾與知識分享行為關係之探討－跨層級分析。國立臺灣科技大學企業管理系碩士論文。

黃洵楠（2007）。心理契約滿足程度.組織信任.組織承諾與知識分享意願關聯性之研究-以經濟部水利署員工為例。國立中正大學勞工所碩士論文。

英文文獻
Adam Smith. The Wealth of Nations. London, 1776.

Albanese, R, Dacin, M.T., and Harris, I.C. (1997). Agents as stewards. Academy of Management Review, 22, 609–611.

Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99–120.

Bart, H., & Jan, A. (2004). Knowledge sharing in context: The influence of organizational commitment, communication climate and CMC use on knowledge sharing. Journal of Knowledge Management, 8(6), 117–130.

Baysinger, B. & Hoskisson, R. E. (1990). The Composition of Board of Directors and Strategic Control: Effects on Corporate Strategy. Academy of Management Review, 15, 72–87.

Becker, G. (1975). Human Capital. National Bureau of Research: New York.

Breton-Miller, I. L., & Miller, D. (2011). Stewardship of agency? A social embeddedness reconciliation of conduct and performance in public family businesses. Organization Science, 22(3), 704-721.

Bushman, R., Indjejikian, R., Smith, A. (1996). CEO Compensation: the role of individual performance evaluation. Journal of Accounting and Economics 21, 161–193.

Connors, N. (1989). Outside Board Members: A Breath of Fresh Air. CFO, 5, 48–52.

Cotton, J. L., & Tuttle, J. M. (1986). Employee Turnover: A Meta-Analysis and Review with Implications for Research. Academy of Management Review, 11(1), 55–70.

Dalton, D. R., Todor, W. D., & Krackhardt, D. M., (1982). Turnover Overstated: The Functional Taxonomy. Academy of Management Review, 7, 117–123

Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D. & L. Donaldson. (1997). Toward a Stewardship Theory of Management. Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 20–47.

Donald, H. (2003). Linking human resource management and knowledge management via commitment: A review and research agenda. Employee Relations, 25(2), 182–202

Fama, E. F. (1980). Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm. Journal of Political Economy, 88, 134–145.

Fitz-enz, J. & Davison, B. (2002). How to Measure Human Resources Management. Singapore: McGraw-Hill.

Ford J. K., Quinones, M. A., Sego, D. J. & Sorra, J. S., (1992). Factors Affecting the Opportunity to Perform Trained Tasks on the Job, Personnel Psychology, 45(3), 511–527.

Glebbeek, A. C. and Bax, E. H., (2004). Is high employee turnover really harmful? An empirical test using company records, Academy of Management Journal, 47, No. 2, 277-286.

Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1975). Development of the Job Diagnostic Survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 159-170.

Hernandez, M. (2012). Toward an understanding of the psychology of stewardship. Academy of Management Review, 37(2), 172-193.

Herndon Jr, N C., J. P. Fraedrich, and Quey-Jen Yeh. (2001). An investigation of moral values and the ethical content of the corporate culture: Taiwanese versus U. S. sales people. Journal of Business Ethics, 30, 73-85.

Hitt, M. A., R. E. Hoskission and H. Kim. (1997).International diversification: Effects on innovation and firm performance in product-diversified firms. Academy of Management Journal 40(4), 767-798

Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture′s consequences: international differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage Publications.

Holmstrom, B. (1989). Agency costs and innovation. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. 12, 305-327.

Huselid, Mark & Jackson, Susan & Schuler, Randall. (1997). Technical and Strategic Human Resource Management Effectiveness as Determinants of Firm Performance. Academy of Management Journal. 40.

James H. Davis, F. D. S., Lex Donaldson. (1997). Toward A Stewardship Theory Of Management. Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 20-47.

Jensen, M. C. & W. H. Meckling. (1976). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 3(4), 305-360.

Katz, R. (1982) The Effects of Group Longevity on Project Communication and Performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27, 548-570.

Knight, D.J., (1999). Performance Measures for Increasing Intellectual Capital. Strategy & Leadership, 27(12), 22-27.

Kristen Joie Madison, “Agency Theory and Stewardship Theory Integrated, Expanded, and Bounded by Context: An Empirical Investigation of Structure, Behavior, and Performance within Family Firms”. University of Tennessee, Knoxville., 2014.
La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F. & A. Shleifer. (1999). Corporate Ownership around the World. Journal of Finance, 54(2), 471-517.

Le Breton-Miller, I., & Miller, D. (2006). Why do some family businesses outcompete? Governance, long-term orientations, and sustainable capability.
Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(6), 731-746.

Lee, P. M., and H. M. O’Neill. (2003). Ownership structures and R&D investments of U.S. and Japanese firms: Agency and stewardship perspectives. The Academy of Management Journal 46 (April), 212-225.

MacDuffie, J.P. (1995). Human resource bundles and manufacturing performance: Organizational logic and flexible production systems in the world auto industry. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 48, 197-221.

Mallette, P. & Fowler, K.L. (1992). Effects of board composition and stock ownership on the adoption of "poison pills". Academy of Management Journal, 35, 1010-1035.

Martin, J., & Siehl, C. (1983, Autumn). Organizational culture and counterculture: An uneasy symbiosis. Organizational Dynamic, 52-63.

Maslow, A. H. (1943). Conflict, frustration, and the theory of threat. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 38(1), 81-86.

McEvoy, G.M. & Cascio, W.F. (1987). Do good or poor performers leave? A meta-analysis of the relationship between performance and turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 30, 744-762.

Messersmith, J. G., & Rutherford, M. W. (2010). Managing Human Resources To Achieve New Firm Growth: A Stewardship Perspective. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 30(17), 16.

Mobley, W. H. (1977). Intermediate linkages in the relationship between job satisfaction and employee turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 237-240.

Nkomo, S. N. (1987), Human resource planning and organization performance：An exploratory analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 8 July/Aug., 387-392.

Pakes, A. (1985). On Patents, R&D, and the stock market rate of return. Journal of Political Economy 93(2), 390-419.

Patchen, M. (1970). Participation, achievement, and involvement on the job. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Pettman, B. D.(1973). Some factors influencing labor turnover: A review of the literature. Industrial Relations Journal, 4, 43-61.

Price, J.L. (1977) The Study of Turnover. Iowa State University Press, Ames.

Robbins, S. P. (2001). Organizational Behavior 9th ed., NJ：Prentice Hall.

Rousseau, D. M., Tijoriwala, S. A. (1998). Assessing psychological contracts: Issues, alternatives and measures. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 679–695.

Tett, R.P. and Meyer, J.P. (1993) Job Satisfaction, Organizational Commitment, Turnover Intention, and Turnover: Path Analyses Based on Meta-Analytic Findings. Personnel Psychology, 46, 259-293.

Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

Schultz, T. W. (1961). Investment in Human Capital. American Economic Review, 51(March), 1-17.

Snell, S. A., & Dean J. R. 1992. Integrated Manufacturing and Human Resource Management: A Human Capital Perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 35(3), 467-504.

Staw, Barry M.(1980). The consequence of turnover. Journal of Occupational Behavior 1, 253-273.

Szilagyi, A. D. and Wallar, M. J. (1980). Organizational Behavior and Performance, 2nd ed., California：Good-Year,.

Wagner, W. G., Pfeffer, J., & O′Reilly, C. A. (1984). Organizational demography and turnover in top-management groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(1), 74-92.

Wright, P.M. & Snell, S.A. (1991). Toward an integrative view of strategic human resource management. Human Resource Management Review, 1(3), 203-225.

Venkatraman, N. and Ramanujam, V. (1986) Measurement of Business Performance in Strategy Research: A Comparison of Approaches. Academy of Management Review, 11(4), 801-814.

指導教授

陳明園(Ming-Yuan Chen)

審核日期

2018-6-14

推文