員工雇用穩定度對生產效率之影響－隨機生產邊界模型

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：79

、訪客IP：3.129.67.32

姓名

賴政維(Cheng-Wei Lai) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

人力資源管理研究所

論文名稱

員工雇用穩定度對生產效率之影響－隨機生產邊界模型
(The impact of employment stability on production efficiency:A stochastic frontier approach)

相關論文

★ 業務主管領導力對部屬招募行為之影響-以S壽險公司為例	★ 人力精簡對企業績效的影響–以產業特性為調節變項
★ 經理人超額薪酬、經理人異動與公司績效之關係	★ 人口老化對企業之影響與因應對策-以傳統產業為例
★ 運用羅吉斯迴歸探討企業績效、公司治理與經理人異動之關聯性	★ 護理人員組織承諾與專業承諾對離職傾向與離業傾向的影響
★ 運用存活分析探討高科技產業招募者人格特質與離職風險之關聯性-以A公司為例	★ 金融電子化對台灣銀行業組織績效及人力彈性影響之探討
★ 人力資源部門角色與功能轉變之個案研究	★ 高階主管薪酬級距與公司績效之關聯性分析
★ 人力招募政策及主管領導風格對新進人員晉升與離職傾向之影響-以房仲業S公司為例	★ 影響台灣勞工赴海外就業的決定性因素
★ 董事會特性對企業績效之影響-以人力資本為調節變項	★ 董事會異質性之決定因素
★ 公司治理結構與就業調整	★ 總經理雙元性、股權集中度、人力資本與組織績效

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

本研究主要探討全球金融風暴後，台灣上市企業之員工雇用穩定度對企業生產效率之影響，並將雇用穩定度依橫斷面與縱橫資料型態分為「雇用穩定變異係數」與「員工流動率」進行分析，研究樣本為2009年至2016年574家台灣上市公司資料為實證樣本，其中衡量雇用穩定變異係數的橫斷面資料共574筆，衡量員工流動率的縱橫資料共4158筆。採用的研究方法為隨機生產邊界模型，研究之迴歸式中，產出結果為營業收入淨額，主要投入項目為固定資產投入、勞動投入以及生產成本投入；在技術無效率項中，解釋變項分別以「雇用穩定變異係數」與「員工流動率」來衡量，其他控制變項分別為資產總額、負債資產比、員工平均年資、員工平均年齡、最高學歷為高中職及碩博士之員工比例。
實證結果發現，雇用穩定變異係數對企業生產效率無顯著影響，而員工流動率愈高，對生產效率則有負向影響；此外，結果也發現固定資產投入越高，與產出結果呈正向關係，而企業資產總額與負債資產比愈高，對生產效率有正向影響。然而，勞動投入增加則可能不利於產出結果，最高學歷為高中職與最高學歷為碩博士之員工比例越高，對生產效率則會帶來負面影響。

摘要(英)

The purpose of this study is to investigate the influence of employment stability on Taiwanese company’s production efficiency after Global Financial Storm, using 574 companies listed on Taiwan Stock Exchange from 2009 to 2016 as selected sample to conduct the regressions and observations. The employment stability in this study is divided into "coefficient of variation of employment stability" and "employee turnover rate" according to cross-sectional and panel data types. Among them, 574 cross-sectional data were used to measure the coefficient of variation of employment stability, and 4158 panel data were used to measure employee turnover.

We apply stochastic frontier approach as our research methods. In the regression of the study, the net operating income is shown as the output, and the main input projects are fixed asset investment, number of workers, and production cost. In the technical inefficiencies, the explanatory variables are measured by the "coefficient of variation of employment stability" and the "employee turnover rate", respectively. Other control variables are the ratio of total assets, debt to assets, average seniority of employees, average age of employees, the proportion of employees with high school degree and the proportion of employees with master or doctoral degree.

The result noted that coefficient of variation of employment stability has no significant effect on company production efficiency, but the higher turnover rate of employees has an even more negative effect on productivity. In addition, higher investment in fixed assets would contribute to the output results. Higher total corporate assets and debt-to-asset ratio has a positive impact on production efficiency. However, an increase in labor input may cause a negative impact on output. With the respect of human capital, more employees with high school degree and master or doctoral degree would have a negative impact on productivity.

關鍵字(中)

★ 雇用穩定度
★ 生產效率
★ 隨機生產邊界模型

關鍵字(英)

★ stochastic frontier
★ production efficiency
★ employment stability

論文目次

第一章緒論........................................................1
第一節研究背景與動機..........................................1
第二節研究目的................................................3
第二章文獻探討....................................................4
第一節員工雇用穩定度..........................................4
第二節員工流動的定義..........................................4
第三節員工雇用穩定度與組織之關聯..............................5
第四節隨機生產邊界理論基礎....................................7
第三章研究方法...................................................14
第一節研究對象與資料來源.....................................14
第二節實證函數...............................................14
第三節實證模型...............................................14
第四章實證結果分析...............................................19
第一節研究變數之基本統計量...................................19
第二節實證模型估計結果.......................................22
第五章結論......................................................27
第一節實證結果討論...........................................27
第二節管理意涵...............................................29
第三節研究限制...............................................30

圖目錄
圖2-1：等量曲線之生產效率圖示.......................................9

表目錄
表2-1：員工流動對組織所產生的成本...................................6
表3-1：實證模型之產出與投入要素內容說明............................15
表3-2：橫斷面資料模型技術無效率項之變數說明........................16
表3-3：縱橫資料模型技術無效率項之變數說明..........................18
表4-1：橫斷面資料模型變數之基本統計量..............................20
表4-2：縱橫資料模型變數之基本統計量................................21
表4-3：隨機生產無效率模型之投入變項估計結果(模型一)................23
表4-4：無效率項之估計結果(模型一)..................................23
表4-5：隨機生產無效率模型之投入變項估計結果(模型二)................25
表4-6：無效率項之估計結果(模型二)..................................26

參考文獻

中文文獻
行政院主計處（2017），人力資源調查提要分析，行政院主計處。

林揚舜、鍾俊文（2005）。員工分紅配股與員工流動率間之關係。貨幣觀測與信用評等，52。88-98。

張景亮 (1994)，「企業精簡與負性工作行為之關係研究」，碩士論文，中國文化大學商學院國際企業管理研究所。

黃旭男(1993)，「資料包絡分析法使用程序之研究及其在非營利組織效率評估上之應用」，國立交通大學管理科學研究所博士論文。

劉芳君(2003)，「組織人力精簡對留任員工之態度和行為及組織績效關係之研究」，國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。

蕭凱倫(2006)，「應用隨機邊界法探討台灣國際航空公司之技術效率—以亞洲地區定期直飛客運航線為例」，國立暨南國際大學土木工程學系碩士論文。

蘇慧玲(2002)。服務業建教合作支持系統對員工組織承諾與離職傾向影響之研究。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。

英文文獻
Abbasi, S. M., & Hollman, K. W. (2000). Turnover: The real bottom line. Personnel Administration, 29(3), 333-342.

Abe, M. (2002). Corporate governance structure and employment adjustment in Japan: An empirical analysis using corporate finance data. Industrial Relations, 41(4), 683-702.

Aigner, D., Lovell, C. K., & Schmidt, P. (1977). Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. Journal of econometrics, 6(1), 21-37.

Alexander, J. A., Bloom, J. R., & Nuchols, B. A. (1994). Nursing turnover and hospital efficiency: an organization‐level analysis. Industrial relations: a journal of economy and society, 33(4), 505-520.

Arnold, H. J., & Feldman, D. C. (1982). A multivariate analysis of the determinants of job turnover. Journal of applied psychology, 67(3), 350.

Baldwin, J. R., & Lafrance, A. (2014). Firm turnover and productivity growth in Canadian manufacturing and services industries, 2000 to 2007. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 14(2), 173-205.

Battese, G. E., & Coelli, T. J. (1992). Frontier production functions, technical efficiency and panel data: with application to paddy farmers in India. In International applications of productivity and efficiency analysis (pp. 149-165). Springer Netherlands.

Battese, G. E., & Coelli, T. J. (1995). A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data. Empirical economics, 20(2), 325-332.

Bothma, F. C., & Roodt, G. (2012). Work-based identity and work engagement as potential antecedents of task performance and turnover intention: Unravelling a complex relationship. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 38(1), 27-44.

Campion, M. A. (1991). Meaning and measurement of turnover: Comparison of alternative measures and recommendations for research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(2), 199.

Christensen, L. R., Jorgenson, D. W., & Lau, L. J. (1973). Transcendental logarithmic production frontiers. The review of economics and statistics, 28-45.

Coelli, T. J., Rao, D. S. P., O′Donnell, C. J., & Battese, G. E. (2005). An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis. Springer Science & Business Media.

Dalton, D. R., Todor, W. D., & Krackhardt, D. M. (1982). Turnover overstated: The functional taxonomy. Academy of management Review, 7(1), 117-123.

Dias, L. P. (2012). Beginning Management of Human Resourcesv. 1.0. Unnamed Publisher.

Denny, M. and M. Fuss (1977) "The use of approximation analysis to test for separability and the existence of consistent aggregates", American Economic Review, 67:404-418.

Edvinsson, L., & Malone, M. S. (1999). Intellectual capital: Realizing your company′s true value by finding its hidden roots. New York: Harper Business.

Farrell, M. J. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), 120(3), 253-290.

Ferguson, G. H., & Ferguson, W. F. (1986). Distinguishing voluntary from involuntary nurse turnover. Nursing management, 17(12), 43.

Førsund, F. R., Lovell, C. K., & Schmidt, P. (1980). A survey of frontier production functions and of their relationship to efficiency measurement. Journal of econometrics, 13(1), 5-25.

Gandolfi, F. (2008). Cost reductions, downsizing-related layoffs, and HR practices. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 73(3), 52.

Glebbeek, A. C., & Bax, E. H. (2004). Is high employee turnover really harmful? An empirical test using company records. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 277-286.

Griffeth, R. W., & Hom, P. W. (1995). The employee turnover process. Research in personnel and human resources management, 13(3), 245-293.

Griliches, Z. (1979). Issues in assessing the contribution of research and development to productivity growth. The bell journal of economics, 92-116.

Kellough, J. E., & Osuna, W. (1995). Cross-agency comparisons of quit rates in the federal service: Another look at the evidence. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 15(4), 58-68.

Knight, D. J. (1999), "Performance Measures for Increasing Intellectual Capital." Strategy & Leadership, 27(2), 22-27.

Koopmans, T. C. (1951). Efficient allocation of resources. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 455-465.

Kowske, B., Lundby, K., Rasch, R., Harris, C., & Lucas, D. (2009). Turning′survive′into′thrive′: Managing survivor engagement in a downsized organization. People and Strategy, 32(4), 48.

Liu, T., & Spector, L. C. (2005). Dynamic employment adjustments over business cycles. Empirical Economics, 30(1), 151-169.

McElroy, J. C., Morrow, P. C., & Rude, S. N. (2001). Turnover and organizational performance: a comparative analysis of the effects of voluntary, involuntary, and reduction-in-force turnover. Journal of applied Psychology, 86(6), 1294.

Meeusen, W., & van Den Broeck, J. (1977). Efficiency estimation from Cobb-Douglas production functions with composed error. International economic review, 435-444.

Mobley, W. H., Griffeth, R. W., Hand, H. H., & Meglino, B. M. (1979). Review and conceptual analysis of the employee turnover process. Psychological bulletin, 86(3), 493.

Morrell, K. M., Loan-Clarke, J., & Wilkinson, A. J. (2004). Organisational change and employee turnover. Personnel Review, 33(2), 161-173.

Pitt, M. M., & Lee, L. F. (1981). The measurement and sources of technical inefficiency in the Indonesian weaving industry. Journal of development economics, 9(1), 43-64.

Price, J. L., & Mueller, C. W. (1981). A causal model of turnover for nurses. Academy of management journal, 24(3), 543-565.

Schmidt, P., & Sickles, R. C. (1984). Production frontiers and panel data. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 2(4), 367-374.

Smith, F., Wright, A., & Huo, Y. P. (2008). SCAPEGOATING ONLY WORKS IF THE HERD IS BIG: DOWNSIZING, MANAGEMENT TURNOVER, AND COMPANY TURNAROUND. Journal of International Business Strategy, 8(3).
Sparrow, P., & Cooper, C. L. (1998). New organizational forms: The strategic relevance of future psychological contract scenarios. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 15(4), 356.

Stoner, C. R., & Hartman, R. I. (1997). Organizational therapy: Building survivor health and competitiveness. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 62(3), 25.

Tomasko, R. M. (1990). Downsizing: Reshaping the organization for the future. New York: Amacom.

指導教授

陳明園(Ming-Yuan Chen)

審核日期

2018-6-26

推文