博碩士論文 105421018 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:72 、訪客IP:3.128.172.185
姓名 陳乃榮(Nai-Rong Chen)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 企業管理學系
論文名稱 鄰近度、友誼氛圍與虛擬團隊創新關係之探討
(Exploring Proximity and Friendship Climate on Virtual Team Innovation)
相關論文
★ 二氧化鈦技術生命週期之研究★ 整體後勤業參與同步工程於產品開發績效關係之研究—以中科院為例
★ 筆記型電腦之IFA/PIFA天線技術生命週期分析★ 國籍航空公司經營績效分析-以資料包絡分析方法分析
★ 從專利分析看3D IC技術與市場發展★ 影響企業導入電子發票系統成效之因素探討
★ 影響企業導入數位學習成功因素之探討-以個案公司為例★ 產品生命週期管理系統導入成功要素之探討--以S科技公司為例--
★ 組織創新能力影響因素研究★ 製 造 業 閒 置 資 產 轉 售 平 台 製造業閒置資產轉售平台-以廣達電腦股份有限公司為例
★ 供應商先行者優勢探討-以宸鴻科技為例★ 團隊領導者創新特質與開放式創新專案關係之研究
★ 從商業生態系統談樞紐者策略-以Apple 與Nokia 為例★ 個人電腦的競爭與發展策略-以台灣電子產業為例
★ 應用兩階段資料包絡分析法評估高級職業學校之經營績效★ ERP導入的促進因素:使用者觀點
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)
摘要(中) 隨著全球化的趨勢以及資通訊科技的進步,越來越多企業透過網路連結不同區域的人才組成虛擬團隊協助企業執行專案。虛擬團隊具有團隊成員地理鄰近度低的特性,並且成員間較難形成友誼關係,為探討鄰近度與友誼氛圍對虛擬團隊的影響,本研究透過鄰近度理論與友誼氛圍進行實證與討論。本研究透過問卷調查的方式,以有虛擬團隊工作經驗的工作者作為研究對象作為研究對象,共回收159份問卷,其中有效問卷達143份,有效問卷率為89.93%。本研究透過偏最小平方法進行數據分析與模型驗證,實證結果顯示,從鄰近度的角度來看,組織鄰近度對虛擬團隊知識分享有正向顯著關係;認知鄰近度以及制度鄰近度對虛擬團隊知識分享沒有顯著關係;認知鄰近度與組織鄰近度對虛擬團隊吸收能力有正向顯著關係;制度鄰近度對虛擬團隊吸收能力沒有顯著關係。而從友誼氛圍的觀點中,可以了解信任、互助與尊重對虛擬團隊知識分享;信任與互助對虛擬團隊吸收能力有正向顯著關係,而尊重對虛擬團隊吸收能力則沒有正向顯著關係。最後,虛擬團隊的知識分享與吸收能力對科技創新有正向顯著的關係,對非科技創新則沒有顯著關係。
摘要(英) With the progress of information technology, enterprises start to connect their team members by virtual task team. However, team members are difficult to share or absorb knowledge among the virtual task team because its team members do not have similar background or enough familiarity. Therefore, this study develops an explanatory model to explain how proximity and friendship climate affect innovation of virtual teams mediated by knowledge sharing and absorptive capacity. This study collects 159 samples by internet questionnaires; however, only 143 (89.33%) samples are valid. In this study, the partial least squares was used to verify the results. The empirical results show that organizational proximity has significant positive effect on knowledge sharing, while cognitive proximity and institutional proximity do not have significant effect on knowledge sharing. Cognitive proximity and organizational proximity have significant positive effect on absorptive capacity, while institutional proximity does not have significant effect on absorptive capacity. Trust, reciprocity and respect have significant positive effect on knowledge sharing. Trust and reciprocity significant positive effect on absorptive capacity, while respect does not have significant effect on absorptive capacity. Finally, knowledge sharing and absorptive capacity have significant positive effect on technical innovation, but no significant effect on non-technical innovation.
關鍵字(中) ★ 虛擬團隊
★ 鄰近度
★ 友誼氛圍
★ 知識分享
★ 吸收能力
★ 創新
關鍵字(英)
論文目次 摘要 I
Abstract II
致謝 III
圖目錄 VI
表目錄 VII
第一章 緒論 1
1-1研究背景與動機 1
1-2 研究目的 3
1-3 研究流程 4
第二章 文獻探討 5
2-1 虛擬團隊 5
2-2 鄰近度 8
2-3 友誼氛圍 10
2-4 知識分享 12
2-5 吸收能力 14
2-6 創新 16
第三章 研究方法 18
3-1 研究架構 18
3-2 研究假設 19
3-3 問項設計及研究變數操作型定義 28
3-4 研究對象與資料來源 34
3-5 統計分析方法 34
3-5-1樣本資料分析 35
3-5-2信度檢定 35
3-5-3效度檢定 35
3-5-4假設驗證 36
第四章 資料分析與研究驗證 38
4-1 樣本基本資料分析 38
4-2 研究構面敘述性統計分析 41
4-3 測量模型之信效度分析 44
4-3-1 信度分析 44
4-3-2 效度分析 45
4-4 結構模型路徑分析 48
4-4-1 研究模型與模型配適度檢定 48
4-4-2 路徑分析結果 50
4-4-3 研究假設驗證結果 52
第五章 結論與建議 53
5-1 研究討論 53
5-2 管理意涵 58
5-3 研究限制與後續研究建議 61
參考文獻 62
附錄一 問卷 73
參考文獻 中文文獻
吳盛、林東清與林杏子(2006)。以社會交換理論觀點探討影響虛擬團隊成員知識分享行為因素。資訊管理學報,第13卷,第1期,193-219頁。DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.6382/JIM.200601.019
張友生(2009)。虛擬項目管理:虛擬項目的特徵。TechTarget中國。https://searchvirtual.techtarget.com.cn/10-15769/
酆玲玲、蘇文凱、劉彩娥與李明輝(2013)。護理人員知覺幸福感氛圍與職場友誼關係之研究團體成員交換關係品質之中介效果。人文暨社會科學期刊,第9卷,第1期,1-10頁。

英文文獻
Agrawal, A., Kapur, D., & McHale, J. (2008). How do spatial and social proximity influence knowledge flows? Evidence from patent data. Journal of urban economics, 64(2), 258-269.
Alsharo, M., Gregg, D., & Ramirez, R. (2017). Virtual team effectiveness: The role of knowledge sharing and trust. Information & Management, 54(4), 479-490.
Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in -organizations. Research in organizational behavior, 10(1), 123-167.
Andersen, T. J., & Foss, N. J. (2005). Strategic opportunity and economic performance in multinational enterprises: The role and effects of information and communication technology. Journal of International Management, 11(2), 293-310.
Baruch, Y., & Lin, C. P. (2012). All for one, one for all: Coopetition and virtual team performance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(6), 1155-1168.
Batarseh, F. S., Usher, J. M., & Daspit, J. J. (2017). Absorptive capacity in virtual teams: examining the influence on diversity and innovation. Journal of Knowledge Management, 21(6), 1342-1361.
Bengtsson, M., & Kock, S. (2000). ” Coopetition” in business Networks—to cooperate and compete simultaneously. Industrial marketing management, 29(5), 411-426.
Bishop, K., D’Este, P., & Neely, A. (2011). Gaining from interactions with universities: Multiple methods for nurturing absorptive capacity. Research Policy, 40(1), 30-40.
Black, L. W., Welser, H. T., Cosley, D., & DeGroot, J. M. (2011). Self-governance through group discussion in Wikipedia: Measuring deliberation in online groups. Small Group Research, 42(5), 595-634.
Blackburn, R., Furst, S., & Rosen, B. (2003). Building a winning virtual team. Virtual teams that work: Creating conditions for virtual team effectiveness, 95-120.
Boateng, H., Adam, D. R., Okoe, A. F., & Anning-Dorson, T. (2016). Assessing the determinants of internet banking adoption intentions: A social cognitive theory perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 65, 468-478.
Bock, G. W., Zmud, R. W., Kim, Y. G., & Lee, J. N. (2005). Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: Examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological forces, and organizational climate. MIS quarterly, 29(1) 87-111.
Boschma, R. (2005). Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment. Regional studies, 39(1), 61-74.
Boschma, R., & Frenken, K. (2010). The spatial evolution of innovation networks. A proximity perspective. The handbook of evolutionary economic geography, 120-135.
Broekel, T., & Boschma, R. (2011). Knowledge networks in the Dutch aviation industry: the proximity paradox. Journal of Economic Geography, 12(2), 409-433.
Buckley, P. J., & Carter, M. J. (2004). A formal analysis of knowledge combination in multinational enterprises. Journal of international business studies, 35(5), 371-384.
Caloghirou, Y., Kastelli, I., & Tsakanikas, A. (2004). Internal capabilities and external knowledge sources: complements or substitutes for innovative performance?. Technovation, 24(1), 29-39.
Camelo-Ordaz, C., Garcia-Cruz, J., Sousa-Ginel, E., & Valle-Cabrera, R. (2011). The influence of human resource management on knowledge sharing and innovation in Spain: the mediating role of affective commitment. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(07), 1442-1463.
Carmeli, A., Dutton, J. E., & Hardin, A. E. (2015). Respect as an engine for new ideas: Linking respectful engagement, relational information processing and creativity among employees and teams. Human Relations, 68(6), 1021-1047.
Carley, K. (1991). A theory of group stability. American sociological review, 331-354.
Chang, H. H., & Chuang, S. S. (2011). Social capital and individual motivations on knowledge sharing: Participant involvement as a moderator. Information & management, 48(1), 9-18.
Chua, R. Y. J., Ingram, P., & Morris, M. W. (2008). From the head and the heart: Locating cognition-and affect-based trust in managers′ professional networks. Academy of Management journal, 51(3), 436-452.
Clarke, N., & Mahadi, N. (2017). Mutual recognition respect between leaders and followers: Its relationship to follower job performance and well-being. Journal of business ethics, 141(1), 163-178.
CN Wee, J., & YK Chua, A. (2013). The peculiarities of knowledge management processes in SMEs: the case of Singapore. Journal of Knowledge Management, 17(6), 958-972.
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (2000). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1),128-152.
Connelly, C. E., & Turel, O. (2016). Effects of team emotional authenticity on virtual team performance. Frontiers in psychology, 7, 1336.
Cramton, C. D. (2001). The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences for dispersed collaboration. Organization science, 12(3), 346-371.
Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of management, 31(6), 874-900.
Dangelico, R. M., Garavelli, A. C., & Petruzzelli, A. M. (2010). A system dynamics model to analyze technology districts’ evolution in a knowledge-based perspective. Technovation, 30(2), 142-153.
Dayan, M., & Di Benedetto, C. A. (2010). The impact of structural and contextual factors on trust formation in product development teams. Industrial Marketing Management, 39(4), 691-703.
De Clercq, D., Dimov, D., & Thongpapanl, N. T. (2013). Organizational social capital, formalization, and internal knowledge sharing in entrepreneurial orientation formation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(3), 505-537.
De Cremer, D., & Mulder, L. B. (2007). A passion for respect: On understanding the role of human needs and morality. Gruppe. Interaktion. Organisation. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Organisationspsychologie (GIO), 38(4), 439-449.
De Jong, B. A., & Elfring, T. (2010). How does trust affect the performance of ongoing teams? The mediating role of reflexivity, monitoring, and effort. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 535-549.
De Jong, J. P., & Freel, M. (2010). Absorptive capacity and the reach of collaboration in high technology small firms. research policy, 39(1), 47-54.
Dhanaraj, C., Lyles, M. A., Steensma, H. K., & Tihanyi, L. (2004). Managing tacit and explicit knowledge transfer in IJVs: the role of relational embeddedness and the impact on performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(5), 428-442.
Donati, S., Zappalà, S., & González-Romá, V. (2016). The influence of friendship and communication network density on individual innovative behaviours: a multilevel study. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 25(4), 583-596.
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: what are they?. Strategic management journal, 21(10), 1105-1121.
Ellemers, N., Sleebos, E., Stam, D., & Gilder, D. (2013). Feeling included and valued: How perceived respect affects positive team identity and willingness to invest in the team. British Journal of Management, 24(1), 21-37.
Fong, P. S., Men, C., Luo, J., & Jia, R. (2018). Knowledge hiding and team creativity: the contingent role of task interdependence. Management Decision, 56(2), 329-343.
Fritsch, M., & Kauffeld-Monz, M. (2010). The impact of network structure on knowledge transfer: an application of social network analysis in the context of regional innovation networks. The Annals of Regional Science, 44(1), 21-38.
Gao, W., Liu, Y., & Qian, L. (2016). The personal touch of business relationship: A study of the determinants and impact of business friendship. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 33(2), 469-498.
Garcia, R., & Calantone, R. (2002). A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: a literature review. Journal of product innovation management, 19(2), 110-132.
Geister, S., Konradt, U., & Hertel, G. (2006). Effects of process feedback on motivation, satisfaction, and performance in virtual teams. Small group research, 37(5), 459-489.
Geldes, C., Felzensztein, C., Turkina, E., & Durand, A. (2015). How does proximity affect interfirm marketing cooperation? A study of an agribusiness cluster. Journal of Business Research, 68(2), 263-272.
Geldes, C., Heredia, J., Felzensztein, C., & Mora, M. (2017). Proximity as determinant of business cooperation for technological and non-technological innovations: a study of an agribusiness cluster. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 32(1), 167-178.
Ghisetti, C., Marzucchi, A., & Montresor, S. (2015). The open eco-innovation mode. An empirical investigation of eleven European countries. Research Policy, 44(5), 1080-1093.
Gilly, J. P., & Torre, A. (2000). Proximity relations. Elements for an analytical framework. Industrial networks and proximity, 1-16.
Gilson, L. L., Maynard, M. T., Jones Young, N. C., Vartiainen, M., & Hakonen, M. (2015). Virtual teams research: 10 years, 10 themes, and 10 opportunities. Journal of Management, 41(5), 1313-1337.
Greenhalgh, T., Robert, G., Macfarlane, F., Bate, P., & Kyriakidou, O. (2004). Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. The Milbank Quarterly, 82(4), 581-629.
Griffith, T. L., Sawyer, J. E., & Neale, M. A. (2003). Virtualness and knowledge in teams: Managing the love triangle of organizations, individuals, and information technology. MIS quarterly, 265-287.
Gronum, S., Verreynne, M. L., & Kastelle, T. (2012). The role of networks in small and medium‐sized enterprise innovation and firm performance. Journal of Small Business Management, 50(2), 257-282.
Grover, S. L. (2014). Unraveling respect in organization studies. Human relations, 67(1), 27-51.
Gunday, G., Ulusoy, G., Kilic, K., & Alpkan, L. (2011). Effects of innovation types on firm performance. International Journal of production economics, 133(2), 662-676.
Hall, P. V., & Jacobs, W. (2010). Shifting proximities: The maritime ports sector in an era of global supply chains. Regional Studies, 44(9), 1103-1115.
Hassan, M. U., Shaukat, S., Nawaz, M. S., & Naz, S. (2013). Effects of innovation types on firm performance: an empirical study on Pakistan’s manufacturing sector. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences, 7(2), 243-262.
Herman, H. M., Dasborough, M. T., & Ashkanasy, N. M. (2008). A multi-level analysis of team climate and interpersonal exchange relationships at work. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(2), 195-211.
Hinds, P. J., & Weisband, S. P. (2003). Knowledge sharing and shared understanding in virtual teams. Virtual teams that work: Creating conditions for virtual team effectiveness, 21-36.
Hoegl, M., & Proserpio, L. (2004). Team member proximity and teamwork in innovative projects. Research policy, 33(8), 1153-1165.
Hoegl, M., Ernst, H., & Proserpio, L. (2007). How teamwork matters more as team member dispersion increases. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 24(2), 156-165.
Hsu, J. S. C., Chu, T. H., Lin, T. C., & Lo, C. F. (2014). Coping knowledge boundaries between information system and business disciplines: An intellectual capital perspective. Information & Management, 51(2), 283-295.
Huang, G. Q., Lee, S. W., & Mak, K. L. (2003). Collaborative product definition on the Internet: a case study. Journal of materials processing technology, 139(1-3), 51-57.
Huang, Q., Davison, R. M., & Gu, J. (2008). Impact of personal and cultural factors on knowledge sharing in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 25(3), 451-471.
Huizingh, E. K. (2011). Open innovation: State of the art and future perspectives. Technovation, 31(1), 2-9.
Huo, Y. J., & Binning, K. R. (2008). Why the psychological experience of respect matters in group life: An integrative account. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(4), 1570-1585.
Hoch, J. E., & Kozlowski, S. W. (2014). Leading virtual teams: Hierarchical leadership, structural supports, and shared team leadership. Journal of applied psychology, 99(3), 390-403.
Hung, C. L. (2017). Social networks, technology ties, and gatekeeper functionality: Implications for the performance management of R&D projects. Research Policy, 46(1), 305-315.
Hung, S. Y., Lai, H. M., Yen, D. C., & Chen, C. Y. (2017). Exploring the Effects of Team Collaborative Norms and Team Identification on the Quality of Individuals′ Knowledge Contribution in Teams. ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems, 48(4), 80-106.
Ingham, A. G., Levinger, G., Graves, J., & Peckham, V. (1974). The Ringelmann effect: Studies of group size and group performance. Journal of experimental social psychology, 10(4), 371-384.
Inkpen, A. C. (2000). Learning through joint ventures: a framework of knowledge acquisition. Journal of management studies, 37(7), 1019-1044.
Ireland, R. D., Hitt, M. A., & Vaidyanath, D. (2002). Alliance management as a source of competitive advantage. Journal of management, 28(3), 413-446.
Jansen, J. J., Van Den Bosch, F. A., & Volberda, H. W. (2005). Managing potential and realized absorptive capacity: how do organizational antecedents matter?. Academy of management journal, 48(6), 999-1015.
Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Leidner, D. E. (1999). Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organization science, 10(6), 791-815.
Jiang, Y., & Chen, C. C. (2018). Integrating knowledge activities for team innovation: effects of transformational leadership. Journal of Management, 44(5), 1819-1847.
Jimenez, A., Boehe, D. M., Taras, V., & Caprar, D. V. (2017). Working Across Boundaries: Current and Future Perspectives on Global Virtual Teams. Journal of International Management, 23(4), 341-349.
Kankanhalli, A., Tan, B. C., & Wei, K. K. (2005). Contributing knowledge to electronic knowledge repositories: an empirical investigation. MIS quarterly, 29(1), 113-143.
Karabulut, A. T. (2015). Effects of innovation types on performance of manufacturing firms in Turkey. Procedia-Soci Nurmi al and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 1355-1364.
Kayworth, T., & Leidner, D. (2000). The global virtual manager: A prescription for success. European Management Journal, 18(2), 183-194.
Kijek, T. (2013). An empirical analysis of the relationship between technological and marketing innovations: a case of Polish manufacturing firms. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum. Oeconomia, 12(2), 15-25.
Kirkman, B. L., Rosen, B., Tesluk, P. E., & Gibson, C. B. (2004). The impact of team empowerment on virtual team performance: The moderating role of face-to-face interaction. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 175-192.
Kirkman, B. L., Gibson, C. B., & Kim, K. (2012). Across borders and technologies: Advancements in virtual teams research. In The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Psychology, 1. 789-858.
Knoben, J., & Oerlemans, L. A. (2006). Proximity and inter‐organizational collaboration: A literature review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 8(2), 71-89.
Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization science, 3(3), 383-397.
Konovsky, M. A., & Pugh, S. D. (1994). Citizenship behavior and social exchange. Academy of management journal, 37(3), 656-669.
Krackhardt, D., & Stern, R. N. (1988). Informal networks and organizational crises: An experimental simulation. Social psychology quarterly, 51(2), 123-140.
Kuo, Y. K., Kuo, T. H., & Ho, L. A. (2014). Enabling innovative ability: knowledge sharing as a mediator. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 114(5), 696-710.
Lane, P. J., & Lubatkin, M. (1998). Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strategic management journal, 461-477.
Lane, P. J., Koka, B. R., & Pathak, S. (2006). The reification of absorptive capacity: A critical review and rejuvenation of the construct. Academy of management review, 31(4), 833-863.
Lane, P. J., Salk, J. E., & Lyles, M. A. (2001). Absorptive capacity, learning, and performance in international joint ventures. Strategic management journal, 22(12), 1139-1161.
Lazzeretti, L., & Capone, F. (2016). How proximity matters in innovation networks dynamics along the cluster evolution. A study of the high technology applied to cultural goods. Journal of Business Research, 69(12), 5855-5865.
Lee, S., Hong, J. Y., & Suh, E. (2016). Measuring the change in knowledge sharing efficiency of virtual communities of practice: a case study. International Journal of Technology Management, 70(1), 58-75.
Leenders, R. T. A., Van Engelen, J. M., & Kratzer, J. (2003). Virtuality, communication, and new product team creativity: a social network perspective. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 20(1-2), 69-92.
Liao, S. H., Fei, W. C., & Chen, C. C. (2007). Knowledge sharing, absorptive capacity, and innovation capability: an empirical study of Taiwan′s knowledge-intensive industries. Journal of information science, 33(3), 340-359.
Lipnack, J., & Stamps, J. (1997). Virtual teams: Reaching across space, time, and organizational boundaries. John Wiley, 8, 709-734.
Lurey, J. S., & Raisinghani, M. S. (2001). An empirical study of best practices in virtual teams. Information & Management, 38(8), 523-544.
Malhotra, A., Majchrzak, A., Carman, R., & Lott, V. (2001). Radical innovation without collocation: A case study at Boeing-Rocketdyne. MIS quarterly, 229-249.
Marabelli, M., & Newell, S. (2014). Knowing, power and materiality: A critical review and reconceptualization of absorptive capacity. International Journal of Management Reviews, 16(4), 479-499.
Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2001). A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of management review, 26(3), 356-376.
Martins, L. L., Gilson, L. L., & Maynard, M. T. (2004). Virtual teams: What do we know and where do we go from here?. Journal of management, 30(6), 805-835.
Mattarelli, E., Tagliaventi, M. R., Carli, G., & Gupta, A. (2017). The role of brokers and social identities in the development of capabilities in global virtual teams. Journal of International Management, 23(4), 382-398.
Maznevski, M. L., & Chudoba, K. M. (2000). Bridging space over time: Global virtual team dynamics and effectiveness. Organization science, 11(5), 473-492.
McDonough III, E. F., Kahn, K. B., & Barczak, G. (2001). An investigation of the use of global, virtual, and colocated new product development teams. Journal of product innovation management, 18(2), 110-120.
Meeker, B. F. (1971). Decisions and exchange. American Sociological Review, 36(3), 485-495.
Minbaeva, D., Pedersen, T., Björkman, I., Fey, C. F., & Park, H. J. (2003). MNC knowledge transfer, subsidiary absorptive capacity, and HRM. Journal of international business studies, 34(6), 586-599.
Molina‐Morales, F. X., & Martínez‐Fernández, M. T. (2010). Social networks: effects of social capital on firm innovation. Journal of Small Business Management, 48(2), 258-279.
Monteiro, L. F., Arvidsson, N., & Birkinshaw, J. (2008). Knowledge flows within multinational corporations: Explaining subsidiary isolation and its performance implications. Organization Science, 19(1), 90-107.
Montoya-Weiss, M. M., Massey, A. P., & Song, M. (2001). Getting it together: Temporal coordination and conflict management in global virtual teams. Academy of management Journal, 44(6), 1251-1262.
Nilsson, M., & Mattes, J.(2015). The spatiality of trust: Factors influencing the creation of trust and the role of face-to-face contacts. European Management Journal, 33(4), 230-244.
Nurmi, N., & Hinds, P. J.(2016). Job complexity and learning opportunities: A silver lining in the design of global virtual work. Journal of International Business Studies, 47(6), 631-654.
OECD (2005) Oslo Manual: Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data. Paris
Okoe, A. F., Boateng, H., Narteh, B., & Boakye, R. O. (2018). Examining human resource practice outcomes and service innovation. The Service Industries Journal, 38(7-8), 431-445.
Oliveira, M., Curado, C. M., Maçada, A. C., & Nodari, F. (2015). Using alternative scales to measure knowledge sharing behavior: Are there any differences?. Computers in Human Behavior, 44, 132-140.
Owen-Smith, J., & Powell, W. W. (2004). Knowledge networks as channels and conduits: The effects of spillovers in the Boston biotechnology community. Organization science, 15(1), 5-21.
Park, J. G., & Lee, J. (2014). Knowledge sharing in information systems development projects: Explicating the role of dependence and trust. International Journal of Project Management, 32(1), 153-165.
Pinjani, P., & Palvia, P. (2013). Trust and knowledge sharing in diverse global virtual teams. Information & Management, 50(4), 144-153.
Powell, A., Piccoli, G., & Ives, B. (2004). Virtual teams: a review of current literature and directions for future research. ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems, 35(1), 6-36.
Puga-Gonzalez, I., Hoscheid, A., & Hemelrijk, C. K. (2015). Friendship, reciprocation, and interchange in an individual-based model. Behavioral ecology and sociobiology, 69(3), 383-394.
Quigley, N. R., Tesluk, P. E., Locke, E. A., & Bartol, K. M. (2007). A multilevel investigation of the motivational mechanisms underlying knowledge sharing and performance. Organization science, 18(1), 71-88.
Riopelle, K., Gluesing, J. C., Alcordo, T. C., Baba, M., Britt, D., McKether, W., ... & Wagner, K. H. (2003). Context, task, and the evolution of technology use in global virtual teams. Virtual teams that work: Creating conditions for virtual team effectiveness, 239-264.
Rogers, K. M., & Ashforth, B. E. (2017). Respect in organizations: Feeling valued as “We” and “Me”. Journal of Management, 43(5), 1578-1608.
Rosenkopf, L., & Almeida, P. (2003). Overcoming local search through alliances and mobility. Management science, 49(6), 751-766.
Rothwell, G. R., & Baldwin, J. N. (2007). Ethical climate theory, whistle-blowing, and the code of silence in police agencies in the state of Georgia. Journal of Business Ethics, 70(4), 341-361.
RW3 CultureWizard(2016). Virtual teams survey report - Trends in Global Virtual Teams.
Salvato, C., Reuer, J. J., & Battigalli, P. (2017). Cooperation across disciplines: A multilevel perspective on cooperative behavior in governing interfirm relations. Academy of Management Annals, 11(2), 960-1004.
Sapir, A., Drori, I., & Ellis, S. (2016). The Practices of Knowledge Creation: Collaboration Between Peripheral and Core Occupational Communities. European Management Review, 13(1), 19-36.
Sarker, S., Ahuja, M., & Sarker, S. (2018). Work–Life Conflict of Globally Distributed Software Development Personnel: An Empirical Investigation Using Border Theory. Information Systems Research, 29(1), 103-126.
Schulz, M. (2003). Pathways of relevance: Exploring inflows of knowledge into subunits of multinational corporations. Organization Science, 14(4), 440-459.
Selman, R. L. (1980). Growth of interpersonal understanding. Academic Press.
Shaw, A. T., & Gilly, J. P. (2000). On the analytical dimension of proximity dynamics. Regional studies, 34(2), 169-180.
Song, G., Min, S., Lee, S., & Seo, Y. (2017). The effects of network reliance on opportunity recognition: A moderated mediation model of knowledge acquisition and entrepreneurial orientation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 117, 98-107.
Suh, A., Shin, K. S., Ahuja, M., & Kim, M. S. (2011). The influence of virtuality on social networks within and across work groups: A multilevel approach. Journal of Management Information Systems, 28(1), 351-386.
Sun, Y., Wei, K. K., Fan, C., Lu, Y., & Gupta, S. (2016). Does social climate matter? On friendship groups in social commerce. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 18, 37-47.
Tsai, W., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academy of management Journal, 41(4), 464-476.
Tsai, W. (2001). Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Academy of management journal, 44(5), 996-1004.
Torre, A., & Rallet, A. (2005). Proximity and localization. Regional studies, 39(1), 47-59.
Van Den Bosch, F. A., Volberda, H. W., & De Boer, M. (1999). Coevolution of firm absorptive capacity and knowledge environment: Organizational forms and combinative capabilities. Organization science, 10(5), 551-568.
Van den Hooff, B., & de Leeuw van Weenen, F. (2004). Committed to share: commitment and CMC use as antecedents of knowledge sharing. Knowledge and process management, 11(1), 13-24.
Van Dijk, A., Hendriks, P., & Romo-Leroux, I. (2016). Knowledge sharing and social capital in globally distributed execution. Journal of Knowledge Management, 20(2), 327-343.
Volberda, H. W., Foss, N. J., & Lyles, M. A. (2010). Perspective—Absorbing the concept of absorptive capacity: How to realize its potential in the organization field. Organization science, 21(4), 931-951.
Wang, J., Yang, J., & Xue, Y. (2017). Subjective well-being, knowledge sharing and individual innovation behavior: The moderating role of absorptive capacity. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 38(8), 1110-1127.
Wang, S., & Noe, R. A. (2010). Knowledge sharing: A review and directions for future research. Human resource management review, 20(2), 115-131.
Wright, P. H. (1978). Toward a theory of friendship based on a conception of self. Human Communication Research, 4(3), 196-207.
Zagenczyk, T. J., Purvis, R. L., Shoss, M. K., Scott, K. L., & Cruz, K. S. (2015). Social influence and leader perceptions: Multiplex social network ties and similarity in leader–member exchange. Journal of Business and Psychology, 30(1), 105-117.
Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of management review, 27(2), 185-203.
Zeng, S. X., Xie, X. M., & Tam, C. M. (2010). Relationship between cooperation networks and innovation performance of SMEs. Technovation, 30(3), 181-194.
Zhang, H., Shu, C., Jiang, X., & Malter, A. J. (2010). Managing knowledge for innovation: the role of cooperation, competition, and alliance nationality. Journal of International Marketing, 18(4), 74-94.
指導教授 洪秀婉 審核日期 2018-7-16
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明