博碩士論文 981404001 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:31 、訪客IP:3.17.79.60
姓名 張育銘(Yu-Ming Chang)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 哲學研究所
論文名稱 城市環境倫理學之理論與實踐
(The theory and practice of environmental ethics in urban)
相關論文
★ 《道德經》「無為而治」意蘊之探析★ 《莊子》苦樂觀的現代詮釋
★ 安心之道探究--以《大乘起信論》為依據的哲學詮釋★ 論《維摩詰經》之入世精神-以現代「人間佛教」思想為說明
★ 韓非法思想研究★ 從羅蘭.巴特符號學觀點論普普藝術︰以安迪.沃荷作品為例
★ 儒學文化精神溯原 以《論語》之「孝道」、「學★ 牟宗三對「美善衝突」的解決
★ 從《精神現象學》主奴之爭一節中看欲望詮釋的可能性★ 《莊子》主體觀探究— — 「復性」與「氣化」為核心的存有論詮釋
★ 對非人類物種的倫理反思:從價值理論探討人類應有的態度★ 探究Hans Küng之「全球倫理」的 「可普遍性」與「可實踐性」
★ 論海德格對技術本質之反思 ——對技術本質之派生關係與其本源現象之溯源作一種詮釋之嘗試★ 對當代西方倫理學中代理孕母爭議的一個「性別倫理」之省思
★ 鄰避現象之環境倫理涵義:以效益主義環境正義考察為例示★ 動物的道德地位:Singer的效益主義進路動物的道德地位考察
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   [檢視]  [下載]
  1. 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
  2. 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
  3. 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。

摘要(中) 城市化(urbanization)是現代社會發展的趨勢,但在城市化的過程中,隨著城市中基礎設施的建造、人口不斷增加、消費社會的型態,都會導致許多環境污染問題。城市化是一把雙刃劍,它一方面促進了城市社會、經濟的發展,提高了人們的生活水準,但另一方面,由於城市人口、建築、工業的過分集中,又帶來諸如環境污染、生態惡化、交通擁堵、住宅短缺、城市失業率升高等問題。

本論文試圖提出一種「城市環境倫理」(urban environmental ethics),以便在城市化的社會發展歷程中試圖減少和避免環境污染、生態破壞,創造適合民眾生活的宜居城市。本論文從城市治理政策、社會參與實踐和城市美學實作三個部分切入。在治理政策的部分,透過生態安全論來分析城市環境治理與環境保護政策對於城市環境倫理學開展的重要性。而在社會參與的部分,則由城市居民在經濟領域中透過評估商業公司與其營利模式是否具有企業社會責任(social responsibility),以便選擇優良的營利或非營利企業來共同幫助環保事業和生態保育的推動。另一方面,則透過「環境教育」(environmental education)提昇城市居民的環境保育意識,以便讓城市倫理學中的綠色公民參與成為可能。最後在城市美學的部分,則透過「生態城市化」(ecological urbanization)做為主要的實踐方式,而其背後的理論奠基是藉由「環境教育」和「環境美學」(environmental aesthetics)的結合,透過城市生態規劃與社區營造,打造環境教育場域(environmental education fields)以便讓住在城市中的居民可以擁有環保意識和生態整全意識(ecological holistic awareness)。
摘要(英) Urbanization is the tendency of modern society. There are many environmental problems in the progress of urbanization due to infrastructure, population and consumer society. Urbanization is double-edged sword. On the one hand it increases the social and economic development in urban to improve the living standard of citizen, but on the other hand it brings out the social problems such as environmental pollution, ecological deterioration, traffic congestion, housing shortage, unemployment rate.

The thesis tries to offer a theory named “urban environmental ethics” to avoid environmental pollution and ecological deterioration, and also to create livable city for citizen. The thesis will be divided into three parts: governance and policies in urban, social engagement and urban aesthetics.

In the chapter of governance and policies in urban, I will use the theory of ecological security to analyze the importance of environmental governance and policies for urban environmental ethics. In the chapter of social engagement, I will use the theory of social responsibility and environmental education to help citizens to learn green citizen engagement and choose good enterprise for improving the environmental protection. In the chapter of urban aesthetics, I will use the theory of ecological urbanization to combine environmental education and environmental aesthetics. Through the concept of ecological urbanization, citizens can have ecological holistic awareness and the willing to environmental protection.
關鍵字(中) ★ 城市環境倫理
★ 生態城市化
★ 環境教育
★ 環境美學
關鍵字(英) ★ urban environmental ethics
★ ecological urbanization
★ environmental education
★ environmental aesthetics
論文目次 導論 1
第一節 研究動機與目的 1
第二節 問題意識與研究取向 2
第三節 現有學術研究成果回顧與參考系 5
第四節 內容大要與研究方法 8
第五節 預期成果與研究貢獻 8
第一章 城市化與環境問題 9
前言 9
第一節 城市化的歷史發展 9
第二節 城市化與經濟發展 11
第三節 城市化的優劣分析 12
第四節 城市化與環境問題 13
結語 15
第二章 城市環境治理:如何打造對環境友善的政策 17
前言 17
第一節 城市環境倫理學與生態安全論 17
生態安全論 17
城市發展理論與定位 18
第二節 城市環境治理與環境保護政策 19
環境政策推動失敗的原因 19
如何制定合理且有效的環境政策與法規 20
第三? 區域環境治理 26
聯合國環境署UNEP 26
歐盟的環境治理 27
氣候全球環境治理 28
第四節 案例分析:以台灣的能源政策為例 29
全球暖化是真是假 30
空氣污染與PM2.5 31
能源政策中的能源種類分析 32
台灣能源結構與備載容量 34
反核運動 35
結語 36
他山之石可以攻錯 37
第三章 城市環境參與:永續發展與企業社會責任 39
前言 39
第一節 永續發展理論 39
第二節 市場機制與企業社會責任 42
第三節 企業社會責任之案例分析:電動車與循環經濟 45
電動車 45
市場機制與環境保護結合的實例:循環經濟 49
結語 50
第四章 城市環境參與:環境教育與公民參與 51
前言 51
第一節 城市環境倫理與社會資本 51
社會合作與尊重差異包容異己 53
第二節 環境教育與環境公民參與 54
環境教育 54
第三節 環境公民參與的實踐之案例分析:動物權利與動保團體 59
第五章 環境美學實踐:增加城市內的生態保育 63
前言 63
第一節 美學與環境美學的探討 63
第二節 城市美學與自然美學 65
第三節 城市美學與城市規劃 68
第四節 城鄉互補與城市生態化 71
社區營造與城市生態化 73
城市公共空間的生態化 74
第五節 案例分析:垂直農場與森林城市 76
結語 77
結論 78
參考書目 80
參考文獻 中文資料:
Annie Leonard,范穎譯,2014,《東西的故事》,浙江:浙江人民出版社。
Carson, Rachel,1962,Silent Spring《寂靜的春天》李文昭譯,1996,台中:晨星出版社。
DesJardins, Joseph R.,2001,Environmental Ethics: An Introduction to Environmental Philosophy《環境倫理學:環境哲學導論》林官明、楊愛民譯,2002,北京:北京大學出版社。
Frankena, William K.,1973,Ethics《倫理學》黃慶明譯,1982,台北:雙葉書店。
Graham, Gordon,1988,Contemporary Social Philosophy《當代社會哲學》黃藿譯,1995,台北:桂冠圖書公司。
Hare, R.M.,1981,Moral Thinking《道德思維》黃慧英、方子華譯,1991,台北市 : 遠流出版社。
Hume, David,1999,An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals《道德原理探究》王淑芹譯,北京:中國社會科學出版社。
Hussen, Ahmed M.,2001)Principles of Environmental Economics, Ecology and Public Policy《環境經濟學原理:經濟學、生態學與公共政策》陳凱俐譯,台北:揚智文化公司。
Kymlicka, Will ,2002,Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Introduction《當代政治哲學導論》劉莘譯,2003,台北:聯經出版社。
Nash, Roderick ,1990,The Rights of Nature : A History of Environmental Ethics《大自然的權利:環境倫理學史》楊通進譯,1999,青島:青島出版社。
Rawls, John,1999,A Theory of Justice《正義論》李少軍譯,2003,台北:桂冠圖書公司。
Sandel, Michael J.,1998,Liberalism and the Limits of Justice《自由主義與正義的局限》萬俊人等譯,2001,南京:譯林出版社。
Sen, Amartya,2001,Development as Freedom《以自由看待發展》任賾、于真譯,2002,上海:中國人民大學出版社。
Holmes Rolston III,2000,楊通進譯,《環境倫理學》,北京:中國社科院出版社。
Charles Harpe著,肖晨陽譯,1998,《環境與社會:環境問題中的人文視野》,天津:天津人民出版社。
Clare Cooper Marcus and Carolyn Francis著,俞孔堅譯,2017,《人性場所:城市開放空間設計導則》,北京:北京科學技術出版社。
Clive Pontine著,2002,王毅、張學廣譯,《綠色世界史:環境與偉大文明的衰落》,上海人民出版社。
David Harvey著,2017,董慧譯,《資本的城市化:資本主義城市化的歷史與理論研究》,蘇州:蘇州大學出版社。
James O′Connor著,2000,唐正東、臧佩洪譯,《自然的理由──生態馬克思主義研究》,南京:南京大學出版社。
Jane Jacobs著,梁永安譯,2016,《城市經濟學》,台北:早安財經文化有限公司。
Mike Hodson and Simon Marvin著,俞孔堅等譯,2014,〈宏大的生態城市還是城市生態安全?〉,《生態都市主義》,江蘇科學技術出版社。
Richard A. Muller著,顏誠廷譯,2014,《給未來總統的能源課》,臺北:漫遊者文化出版。
王俊秀,1999,《全球變遷與變遷全球:環境社會學的視野》,台北:巨流出版社。
王俊秀,2001,《環境社會學的想像》,台北:巨流出版社。
甘紹平,2002,《應用倫理學前沿問題研究》,南昌:江西人民出版社。
石元康,1989,《洛爾斯》,台北:東大圖書公司。
朱建民,2000,〈由儒家觀點論西方環境倫理學人類中心主義與自然中心主義的對立〉《鵝湖學誌》第25卷,台北:文津書局,頁1-40。
江宜樺,2001,《自由民主的理路》,台北:聯經出版社。
余謀昌,2000,《生態哲學》,西安:陜西人民教育出版社。
王朝聞(編),1981,《美學概論》,北京:人民出版社。
史作檉,2008,《水墨十講--哲學觀畫》,台北:典藏藝術家庭。
史作檉,2006,《中國哲學精神溯源》,台北:理得出版公司。
朱光潛,1993,《談美》,台北:萬卷樓圖書,三刷。
伍蠡甫(編),1987,《山水與美學》論文集,台北:丹青圖書公司。
李玲珠,2004,《魏晉新文化運動--自然思潮》,台北:文津出版社。
李培超,2001,《自然的倫理尊嚴》,南昌:江西人民出版社。
李 強,1998,《自由主義》,北京:中國社會科學出版社。
李瑞全,1999,《儒家生命倫理學》,台北:鵝湖出版社。
何信全,1996,〈《無政府、國家與烏托邦》導讀〉,收錄於《無政府、國家與烏托邦》王建凱譯,台北:時報出版公司。
侯文蕙,2000,〈20世紀90年代的美國環境保護運動和環境保護主義〉《世界歷史》第6期。
高全喜,2004,《休謨的政治哲學》,北京:北京大學出版社。
紀駿傑,1996,〈環境社會學的規範性關懷〉《第一屆環境價值與環境教育學術研討會論文集》,台南:成功大學,頁72-93。
李澤厚,1981,《美的歷程》,北京:文物出版社。
李澤厚,1986,《美的歷程》,台北:蒲公英出版社。
李澤厚,2001,《李澤厚論集》,台北:三民書局。
李澤厚、劉綱紀(主編),1987,《中國美學史(第一卷)》北京:中國社會科學出版社。
吳薇編,2014,《中外建築史》,北京:北京大學出版社。
周儒,2001,〈尋找一個環境教育的實踐場域─「環境學習中心」的需求與概念〉,論文發表於國立臺灣師範大學舉辦之2001 年環境教育國際學術研討會論文。
郇慶治,2007,《環境政治國際比較》,山東:山東大學出版社。
郇慶治著,2007,《環境政治國際比較》,山東:山東大學出版社。
郇慶治編,2015,《當代西方生態資本主義理論》,北京:北京大學。
郇慶治編,2015,《當代西方生態資本主義理論》,北京:北京大學出版社。
宗白華,1981,《美學散步》,上海:人民出版社。
宗白華,2001,《美從何處尋》,台北:駱駝出版社。
柯蒂斯.卡特(Curtis Carter)著,楊一博譯,2013,〈花園、城市、自然──環境美學理論的實踐性應用〉,《鄭州大學學報:哲學社會科學版》,2013年第4期。
紀駿傑、王俊秀,1995,《環境正義:原住民與國家公園衝突的分析》收錄於《台灣社會研究的回顧與前瞻論文集》林松齡、王振寰主編,,台中:東海大學社會系,頁257-287。
張四明,2001,〈成本效益分析在政府決策上的應用與限制〉《行政暨政策學報》第三期,頁45-80。
張 帆,2000,《環境與自然資源經濟學》,台北市:五南出版社。
郭昱瑩,2005,〈決策幫手:成本效益分析之概念與實務〉《T&D飛訊》第三十期,頁1-4。
陳秀容,1997,〈近代人權觀念的轉變:一個社會生態觀點的分析〉《人文及社會科學集刊》第9卷第2期,台北:中央研究院中山人文社會科學研究所。
黃瑞祺、黃之棟,2007,〈環境正義理論的問題點〉《臺灣民主季刊》第四卷,第二期, 頁113-40。
黃 藿,1996,《理性、德行與幸福:亞里斯多德倫理學研究》,台北:台灣學生書局。
雷 毅,2000,《生態倫理學》,西安:陜西人民教育出版社。
劉阿榮、石慧瑩〈永續發展的五個正義向度〉《應用倫理研究通訊》第10期,中壢:中央大學哲學研究所,1999。
錢永祥、戴華主編,1995,《哲學與公共規範》,台北:中央研究院。
蔣國保,2004,〈羅爾斯對休謨正義觀的繼承與發展〉《韶關學院學報》4月第25卷第4期,頁46-49。
鐘丁茂,1999,《環境倫理思想評析》,台北:皇家圖書。
蕭代基、鄭蕙燕、吳珮瑛、錢玉蘭、溫麗琪合著,2002,《環境保護之成本效益分析:理論、方法與應用》,台北:俊傑書局股份有限公司。
莊慶信,2002,《中西環境哲學:一個整合的進路》,台北:五南圖書。
徐復觀,1998,《中國藝術精神》,台北:學生書局。
郭岱宜,1999,《生態旅遊--21世紀旅遊新主張》,台北:揚智文化。
陳明,2006,《審美意識價值論》,安徽:安徽大學出版社。
陳慈美,2006,〈台灣環境倫理的建構:從林茂生、蔣渭水、原住民、李奧波談起〉,台北:《當代雜誌》,226期。
陳慈美,2008,〈生命教育的深度逆轉--環境倫理全民通識教運動〉,台北:《看守台灣》第10 卷3 期,秋季號,頁4-11。
陳慈美,2001,〈研討會之外--柯倍德教授側寫(之一)「生態文史踏查之旅7-1」〉,台北:《生態神學通訊》第64 期,頁2-4。
陳望衡,2007,〈環境美學的興起〉,鄭州:《鄭州大學學報》第3期,頁80-83。彭鋒,2001,〈自然全美及其科學證明--評卡爾松的肯定美學〉,《陝西師範大學學報》第30卷第4期,陝西:陝西師範大學,頁46-54。
彭鋒,2005,〈環境美學的興起與自然美的難題〉,《哲學動態》第6 期,北京:北京大學哲學系,頁26-30。
彭鋒,2006,〈環境美學審美模式分析〉,鄭州:《鄭州大學學報》第6期第39卷,頁1-5。
葉海煙,2006,〈道家的環境素養論與休閒美學觀--以莊子的觀點為例〉,台北:《哲學與文化》第33 卷7 期,頁81-94。蕭振邦,2000,〈大地美學:其議題探究與可能開展〉,台北:《鵝湖學誌》第25期,頁101-144。
蕭振邦,2009,〈放下的美學:倫理美學新展望〉,中壢:《應用倫理評論》第47期,頁161-191。
蕭振邦,2009,〈「美學是倫理學之母」涵義探究〉,中壢:《應用倫理評論》第46 期,頁1-16。
蕭振邦,2009,〈環境美感、環境倫理與人類優質生活〉,發表於「永續發展與優質生活」學術研討會,中壢:中央大學哲學研究所主辦,頁2-4。
蕭振邦,2010,〈生態旅遊:一種發生在人內部的活動〉,中壢:《應用倫理研究通訊》第25期,頁10-27。
蕭振邦,2010,〈美.美學.環境美學〉,中壢:《應用倫理評論》第49期,頁1-25。
蕭振邦,2013,〈重構儒家美學觀--以「美善和一論」商榷為進路〉,台北:《鵝湖論壇》第451期,頁5-21。
蕭振邦,2012,〈臺灣環境生活品質之幸福指標理念探究--以主觀幸福理論為進路〉,中壢:《應用倫理評論》,第52 期,頁153-171。
陳錚、蘇宏田、王寧,2017,〈透視台灣大停電〉,中國能源報,2017年第008版。
張斌著,2014,《環境正義論》,河南:河南出版社。
彭鋒,2009,《回歸:當代美學的11個問題》,北京:北京大學出版社。
彭鋒,2005,《完美的自然--當代環境美學的哲學基礎》,北京:北京大學出版社。
黃光曉,2013,〈臺灣中長期電力供求矛盾與電力結構演化分析〉,臺灣經濟研究期刊,2013年第四期。
黃育徵,2017。《循環經濟》,台北:天下雜誌。
葉朗,1996《中國美學史》,台北:文津出版。
曾祖蔭,1987,《中國古代美學範疇》,台北:丹青圖書公司。
黃錦鋐,1986,《新譯莊子讀本》,台北:三民書局,六版。
張光福,1986,《中國美術史》,台北:華正書局,初版。
楊沛儒,2010,《生態城市主義:尺度、流動與設計》,北京:中國建築工業出版社。
楊沛儒,2011,〈從「台北生態城市規劃」到「第三生態」命題及其設計方法〉,《國立台灣大學建築與城鄉研究學報》,第十八期,頁1-18。
楊忠斌,2012,〈H. Rolston的環境美學及其在環境教育上的意涵〉,教育研究集刊,60期。
劉昌元,1992,《西方美學導論》,台北:聯經出版社。
蕭振邦,1990,《從後設美學論先秦至魏晉的美學規模》,台北:文化大學哲學研究所博士論文。
蕭振邦,2009,〈「美學是倫理學之母」〉涵義探究〉,《應用倫理評論》,第46期。
蕭振邦,2009,《深層自然主義:《莊子》思想的現代詮釋》,台北:東方人文學術研究基金會。
尤煌傑,2011,〈王微《敘畫》之美學理論分析〉,台北:《哲學與文化月刊》第38卷,第06期,頁125-139。
王從恕,2001,〈西方環境倫理概要〉,《科教育月刊》第241 期,台北:國立臺灣師範大學科學教育中心,頁26-33。


英文資料:
Agar, N., 2001. Life’s Intrinsic Value, New York: Columbia University Press.
Aiken, W., 1984. “Ethical Issues in Agriculture”, in T. Regan (ed) Earthbound: New Introductory Essays in Environmental Ethics, New York: Random House, pp. 274–88.
Andrew Light, 2001, “The Urban Blind Spot in Environmental Ethics,” Environmental Politics, Vol. 10, No.1. pp. 7-35.
Appleton, J., 1975a, The Experience of Landscape, London: John Wiley and Sons.
Arnold Berleant, 1978, “Aesthetic Paradigms for an Urban Ecology,” Diogenes, 103, pp. 1-28.
Arnold Berleant, 1984, “Aesthetic Participation and the Urban Environment,” Urban Resources, 1, pp. 37-42.
Arnold Berleant, 1986, “Cultivating an Urban Aesthetic,” Diogenes, 136, pp. 1-18.
Arnold Berleant, 1988, “Environment as an Aesthetic Paradigm,” Dialectics and Humanism, 15,pp. 95-106.
Arnold Berleant, 1991, Art and Engagement, Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Arnold Berleant,1997,Living in the Landscape: Toward an Aesthetics of Environment, Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
Arntzen, S. and Brady E., (ed.), 2008, Humans in the Land: The Ethics and Aesthetics of the Cultural Landscape, Oslo: Oslo Academic Press.
Bannon, B. E., 2011, “Re-Envisioning Nature: The Role of Aesthetics in Environmental Ethics,” Environmental Ethics, 33: 415–436.
Barry, J., 1999. Rethinking Green Politics, London: Sage.
Beardsley, M. C., 1958, Aesthetics: Problems in the Philosophy of Criticism, New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
Beckerman, W., 1994. “Sustainable Development: Is It a Useful Concept?”, Environmental Values, 3: 191–209.
Bell, S., 1999, Landscape: Pattern, Perception and Process, London: Routledge.
Bentham, J., 1789. Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1948.
Benton, Ted, 1993. Natural Relations: Ecology, Animal Rights and Social Justice, London: Verso.
Berleant, A. 1978, “Aesthetic Paradigms for an Urban Ecology,” Diogenes, 103: l–28.
Berleant, A. and Carlson, A., (ed.), 2007, The Aesthetics of Human Environments, Peterborough: Broadview Press.
Berleant, A., 1984, “Aesthetic Participation and the Urban Environment,” Urban Resources, 1: 37–42.
Berleant, A., 1985, “Toward a Phenomenological Aesthetics of Environment,” in Descriptions, H. Silverman and D. Idhe (ed.), Albany: SUNY Press.
Berleant, A., 1986, “Cultivating an Urban Aesthetic,” Diogenes, 136: 1–18.
Berleant, A., 1988, “Environment as an Aesthetic Paradigm,” Dialectics and Humanism, 15: 95–106.
Berleant, A., 1991, Art and Engagement, Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Berleant, A., 1992, The Aesthetics of Environment, Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Berleant, A., 1997, Living in the Landscape: Toward an Aesthetics of Environment, Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
Berleant, A., 2004, Re-thinking Aesthetics: Rogue Essays on Aesthetics and the Arts, Aldershot: Ashgate.
Berleant, A., 2005, Aesthetics and Environment: Variations on a Theme, Aldershot: Ashgate.
Berleant, A., 2010, Sensibility and Sense: The Aesthetic Transformation of the Human World, Exeter: Imprint Academic.
Berleant, A., 2012, Aesthetics Beyond the Arts: New and Recent Essays, Aldershot: Ashgate.
Berleant, A., 2013, “What is Aesthetic Engagement?” Contemporary Aesthetics, 11.
Biese, A., 1905, The Development of the Feeling for Nature in the Middle Ages and Modern Times, New York: Burt Franklin.
Blanc, N., 2012, “From Environmental Aesthetics to Narratives of Change,” Contemporary Aesthetics, 10.
Blanc, N., 2013, “Aesthetic Engagement in the City,” Contemporary Aesthetics, 11.
Bookchin, M., 1980. Toward an Ecological Society, Montreal: Black Rose Books.
Bourassa, S. C., 1991, The Aesthetics of Landscape, London: Belhaven.
Bradley, B., 2006. ‘Two Concepts of Intrinsic Value’, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 9: 111–30
Brady, E. 2014‘Aesthetic Value, Ethics and Climate Change’, Environmental Values, 23: 551–70
Brady, E., 1998, “Imagination and the Aesthetic Appreciation of Nature,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 56: 139–147.
Brady, E., 2014, “Aesthetic Value and Wild Animals,” in Environmental Aesthetics: Crossing Divides and Breaking Ground, M. Drenthen and J. Keulartz, (ed.), New York: Fordham University Press.
Brook, I., 2007, “Aesthetic Aspects of Unauthorised Environmental Interventions,” Ethics, Place and Environment, 10: 307–318.
Budd, M., 2002, The Aesthetic Appreciation of Nature, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Callicott, J. B., 1994, “The Land Aesthetic,” in Ecological Prospects: Scientific, Religious, and Aesthetic Perspectives, C. K. Chapple (ed.), Albany: SUNY Press.
Callicott, J.B., 1980. “Animal Liberation, A Triangular Affair”, reprinted in Callicott 1989, pp. 15–38.
Callicott, J.B., 1989. In Defense of the Land Ethic: Essays in Environmental Philosophy, Albany: SUNY Press.
Callicott, J.B., 2013. Thinking Like a Planet: The Land Ethic and Earth Ethic, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Carroll, N., 1993, “On Being Moved By Nature: Between Religion and Natural History,” in Landscape, Natural Beauty and the Arts, S. Kemal and I. Gaskell (ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carson, R., 1963. Silent Spring, London: Hamish Hamilton.
Chen, W., 2015, Chinese Environmental Aesthetics, F. Su (trans.), G. Cipriani (ed.), London: Routledge.
Cheng, X., 2013, “Environmental Aesthetics and Ecological Aesthetics: Connections and Differences,” in X. Cheng, A., Berleant, P. Gobster, and X. Wang, Ecological Aesthetics and Ecological Assessment and Planning, Zhengzhou: Henan People’s Press.
Clark, S.R.L., 1977. The Moral Status of Animals, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cooper, D., 2006, A Philosophy of Gardens, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Crawford, D., 1983, “Nature and Art: Some Dialectical Relationships,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 62: 49–58.
David DeGrazia, 1996, Taking Animals Seriously: Mental Life and Moral Status, New York: The Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.
David DeGrazia, 2002, Animal Rights: A Very Short Introduction, New York: Oxford University Press.
Devall, B., and Sessions, G., 1985. Deep Ecology: Living as if Nature Mattered, Salt Lake City: Peregrine Smith.
Dickie, G., 1974, Art and the Aesthetic: An Institutional Analysis, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Dobson, A., 1990. Green Political Thought, London: Harper Collins.
Dowling, C., 2010, “The Aesthetics of Daily Life,” British Journal of Aesthetics, 50: 225–242.
Drenthen, M. and Keulartz, J., (ed.), 2014, Environmental Aesthetics: Crossing Divides and Breaking Ground, New York: Fordham University Press.
Dryzek, J.S., 1997. The Politics of the Earth: Environmental Discourses, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Eckersley, R., 1992. Environmentalism and Political Theory, London: UCL Press.
Ehrlich, P.R., 1968. The Population Bomb, New York: Ballantine Books.
Elliot, R. and Gare, A. (eds), 1983. Environmental Philosophy: A Collection of Readings, Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Feinberg, J., 1974. “The Rights of Animals and Unborn Generations”, in W. T. Blackstone (ed.), Philosophy and Environmental Crisis, Athens: University of Georgia Press, pp. 43–68.
Firth, D., 2008, “The Role of Aesthetic Considerations in a Narrative Based Approach to Nature Conservation,” Ethics and the Environment, 13: 77–100.
Fisher, J. A., 1998, “What the Hills Are Alive With: In Defense of the Sounds of Nature,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 56: 167–179.
Fox, W., 1984. “Deep Ecology: A New Philosophy of Our Time?” The Ecologist, 14: 194–200.
Gobster, P. H., 1995, “Aldo Leopold’s Ecological Esthetic: Integrating Esthetic and Biodiversity Values,” Journal of Forestry, 93: 6–10.
Godlovitch, S., 1994, “Icebreakers: Environmentalism and Natural Aesthetics,” Journal of Applied Philosophy, 11: 15–30.
Goodin, R.E., 1992. Green Political Theory, Oxford: Blackwell.
Greeley, A.M., 1993. “Religion and attitudes toward the environment”, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 32: 19–28.
Green, K., 1994. “Freud, Wollstonecraft and Ecofeminism”, Environmental Ethics, 16: 117–34.
Grey, W., 1993. “Anthropocentrism and Deep Ecology”, Australialasian Journal of Philosophy, 71: 463–75.
Haapala, A., (ed.), 1998, The City as Cultural Metaphor: Studies in Urban Aesthetics, Lahti: International Institute of Applied Aesthetics.
Haapala, A., 2005, “On the Aesthetics of the Everyday: Familiarity, Strangeness, and the Meaning of Place,” in The Aesthetics of Everyday Life, A. Light and J. M. Smith (ed.), New York: Columbia University Press.
Hardin, G., 1968. “The Tragedy of the Commons”, Science, 162: 1243–48.
Herrington, S., 2009, On Landscapes, London: Routledge.
Hettinger, N., 2005, “Carlson’s Environmental Aesthetics and the Protection of the Environment,” Environmental Ethics, 27: 57–76.
Heyd, T., 2001, “Aesthetic Appreciation and the Many Stories about Nature,” British Journal of Aesthetics, 41: 125–137.
Hill, D. and Daniel, T. C., 2008, “Foundations for an Ecological Aesthetic: Can Information Alter Landscape Preferences?” Society and Natural Resources, 21: 34–49.
Hume, D., 1751. An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals, ed. T.L. Beauchamp, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.
Irvin, S., 2008a, “The Pervasiveness of the Aesthetic in Everyday Experience,” British Journal of Aesthetics, 48: 486–500.
Jamieson, D., 1996. ‘Intentional Climate Change’, Climatic Change, 33: 326–36.
Jamieson, D., 1998. ‘Animal Liberation is an Environmental Ethic’, Environmental Values, 7: 41–57.
Jamieson, D., 2001. A Companion to Environmental Philosophy, Oxford: Blackwell 2001.
Karliner, J., 1997. The Corporate Planet, San Francisco: Sierra Club Books
Katz, E., 1991. “Restoration and Redesign: The Ethical Significance of Human Intervention in Nature”, Restoration and Management Notes, 9: 90–6.
Kheel, M., 1985. “The Liberation of Nature: A Circular Affair”, Environmental Ethics, 7: 135–49
King, R., 2000. “Environmental Ethics and the Built Environment”, Environmental Ethics, 22: 115–31
Koh, J., 1988, “An Ecological Aesthetic,” Landscape Journal, 7: 177–191.
Korsmeyer, C., 1999, Making Sense of Taste: Food and Philosophy, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Lee, W. L., 2006, “On Ecology and Aesthetic Experience: A Feminist Theory of Value and Praxis,” Ethics and the Environment, 11: 21–41.
Leopold, A., 1949. A Sand County Almanac, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Light, A. and Katz, E., 1996. Environmental Pragmatism, London: Routledge.
Light, A. and Smith, J. M., (ed.), 2005, The Aesthetics of Everyday Life, New York: Columbia University Press.
Light, Andrew and Rolston, Holmes (eds.), 2003. Environmental Ethics: An Anthology , Oxford: Blackwell.
Loftis, R. J., 2003, “Three Problems for the Aesthetic Foundations of Environmental Ethics,” Philosophy in the Contemporary World, 10: 41–50.
Macauley, D., 2007, “Walking the City,” in The Aesthetics of Human Environments, A. Berleant and A. Carlson (ed.), Peterborough: Broadview Press.
Mandoki, K., 2007, Everyday Aesthetics: Prosaics, the Play of Culture and Social Identities, Aldershot: Ashgate.
Mannison, D., 1980, “A Prolegomenon to a Human Chauvinistic Aesthetic,” in Environmental Philosophy, D. Mannison, M. McRobbie, and R. Routley (ed.), Canberra: Australian National University.
Marsh, G. P., 1865, Man and Nature; or Physical Geography as Modified by Human Action, New York: Charles Scribner.
Matthews, P., 2002, “Scientific Knowledge and the Aesthetic Appreciation of Nature,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 60: 37–48.
Meeker, J., 1972, “Notes Toward an Ecological Esthetic,” Canadian Fiction Magazine, 2: 4–15.
Melchionne, K., 1998, “Living in Glass Houses: Domesticity, Interior Decoration, and Environmental Aesthetics,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 56: 191–200.
Michael E. Zimmerman, J. Baird Callicott, George Sessions, Karen J. Warren, and John Clark, eds., 1998. Environmental Philosophy: From Animal Rights to Radical Ecology, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Miller, M., 1993, The Garden As Art, Albany: SUNY Press.
Moore, R., 1999, “Appreciating Natural Beauty as Natural,” Journal of Aesthetic Education, 33: 42–59.
Morton, T., 2007. Ecology without Nature: Rethinking Environmental Aesthetics,Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
Nasar, J. L., (ed.), 1988, Environmental Aesthetics: Theory, Research, and Applications, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nash, R., 1989. The Rights of Nature: A History of Environmental Ethics , Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
Nathalie Blanc, 2012, “From Environmental Aesthetics to Narratives of Change,” Contemporary Aesthetics, 10.
Nathalie Blanc, 2013, “Aesthetic Engagement in the City,” Contemporary Aesthetics, 11.
Norton, B.G. (ed.), 1986. The Preservation of Species, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Paden, R., Harmon, L. K., and Milling, C. R., 2012, “Ecology, Evolution, and Aesthetics: Towards an Evolutionary Aesthetics of Nature,” British Journal of Aesthetics, 52: 124–139.
Paetzold, H., 2013, “The Aesthetics of City Strolling,” Contemporary Aesthetics, 11
Parsons, G., 2002, “Nature Appreciation, Science, and Positive Aesthetics,” British Journal of Aesthetics, 42: 279–295.
Peter Singer,1993, Practical Ethics,2nd, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Rolston, H., 1975. “Is There an Ecological Ethic?”, Ethics, 85: 93–109.
Rolston, H., 1988. Environmental Ethics: Duties to and Values in the Natural World, Indiana: Temple University Press.
Rolston, H., 1989. Philosophy Gone Wild, New York: Prometheus Books.
Ross, S., 1993, “Gardens, Earthworks, and Environmental Art,” in Landscape, Natural Beauty and the Arts, S. Kemal and I. Gaskell (ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Saarinen, T. F., Seamon, D., and Sell, J. L., (ed.), 1984, Environmental Perception and Behavior: An Inventory and Prospect, Chicago: Department of Geography, University of Chicago.
Sagoff, M., 1974, “On Preserving the Natural Environment,” Yale Law Journal, 84: 205–267.
Tafalla, M., 2011, “Rehabilitating the Aesthetics of Nature: Hepburn and Adorno,” Environmental Ethics, 33: 45–56.
Thompson, J., 1995, “Aesthetics and the Value of Nature,” Environmental Ethics, 17: 291–305.
Toadvine, T., 2010, “Ecological Aesthetics,” in Handbook of Phenomenological Aesthetics, H. R. Sepp and L. Embree (ed.), New York/Heidelberg: Springer.
Tom Regan, 2004, The Case for Animal Rights, California :University of California Press.
WCED 1987. Our Common Future, United Nations General Assembly, Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development.
White, L., 1967. “The Historical Roots of Our Ecological Crisis”, Science, 155: 1203–7; reprinted in Schmidtz and Willott 2002.
Wilson, E.O., 1992. The Diversity of Life, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Zangwill, N., 2001, “Formal Natural Beauty,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 101: 209–224.
Ziff, P., 1979, “Anything Viewed,” in Essays in Honour of Jaakko Hintikka On the Occasion of His Fiftieth Birthday on January 12, 1979, E. Saarinen, R. Hilpinen, I. Niiniluoto, and M. Hintikka (ed.), Dordrecht: Reidel.
Zimmerman, M., 1994. Contesting Earth’s Future: Radical Ecology and Postmodernity, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
指導教授 蕭振邦 審核日期 2018-7-25
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明