未來時間觀與工作動機關聯性之探討─以適用中高齡人力資源管理措施為調節變項

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：32

、訪客IP：18.222.147.4

姓名

林碧玉(Pi-Yu Lin) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

高階主管企管碩士班

論文名稱

未來時間觀與工作動機關聯性之探討─以適用中高齡人力資源管理措施為調節變項

相關論文

★ 溝通與領導課程訓練成效之分析	★ 母國企業直線主管領導風格與國際人力資源管理措施對外派人員績效之影響
★ 豐田管理模式之人才培育對品質與成本之影響-以某汽車公司為例	★ 360 度回饋系統對企業主管行為改變意圖的影響-以跨國飲料 SC 公司為例
★ 兩岸研發人員職能發展應用研究－以M公司為例	★ 企業併購過程中的人力資源角色
★ 組織變革成功個案分析 - John P. Kotter 領導變革八大步驟之觀點	★ 社群網站經營模式分析－以『BB-BOX』網站為例
★ 觸控IC經營策略之個案研究－以Ａ公司為例	★ 科技研發單位實施接班人計畫之探討─以國內某科技研發單位為例
★ 面對數位匯流，傳統媒體代理商應對策略探討─以安吉斯集團偉視捷媒體公司為例	★ 台灣光電產業選擇產品認證外包廠商的決定因素─以發光二極體照明產品為例
★ 團隊激勵獎金與團隊績效關連性之研究	★ 晶圓代工業關鍵成功因素的探討—以台積公司為例
★ 員工潛能與績效對員工晉升的影響--以營造建築業為例	★ 建構整合性智慧健康照護網絡─以中壢天晟醫院醫療小管家為例

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

高齡化現象是二十一世紀全球人口結構的趨勢，企業組織也開始面臨勞動力人口不足的問題。要如何激勵優秀的中高齡員工繼續留任組織內貢獻其知識及經驗成為當今重要的議題之一。因此本研究奠基在社會情緒選擇理論及資源保存理論之上，並以適用中高齡人力資源管理措施作為調節變項來探討未來時間觀與工作動機之間的關聯性。

本研究針對國內各產業，包含一般製造業、高科技製造業、金融及保險業、服務業及其他等；研究對象則囊括各年齡層、職位與公司年資分兩階段發放750份，最終回收有效樣本數為527份。研究發現，未來時間觀確實與持續工作動機、追求機會動機及工作成長動機具有正向關係，並且加入適用的人力資源管理措施也會對於持續工作動機及追求機會動機產生顯著的調節效果。

摘要(英)

The aging phenomenon is the trend of global population structure in twenty-first Century, and the organization of enterprises is also facing the problem of insufficient labor force. How to motivate good middle-aged and aged employees to continue to contribute their knowledge and experience staying in the organizations has become one of the important topics of today. Therefore, the research is based on the Socioemotional selectivity theory and Theory of Conservation of Resource (COR) and the relevance of the future time perspective to the work motivation is discussed by using age-related HR practices as the moderator.

The major targeted industries of the research include general manufacturing, high-tech manufacturing, finance and insurance, service industry and others. Seven hundred and fifty questionnaires were issued in two-stage process by age, position and company′s seniority, and the final valid sample is 527. The results of the study show that the future time perspective has a positive relationship with continue to work, focus on opportunities and work growth, and the age-related human resource practices will also have a significant moderating effect between future time perspective and motivation of continue to work and focus on opportunities.

關鍵字(中)

★ 未來時間觀
★ 持續工作動機
★ 追求機會動機
★ 工作成長動機
★ 人力資源管理措施
★ 社會情緒選擇理論
★ 資源保存理論

關鍵字(英)

★ Future time perspective
★ continue to work
★ work growth
★ focus on opportunities
★ Age-Related HR practices
★ Socioemotional selectivity theory and Conservation of Resource (COR)

論文目次

一、緒論 1
二、文獻探討與假設建立 5
2-1 未來時間觀 5
2-2 工作動機 8
2-3 社會情緒選擇理論 10
2-4 資源保存理論 11
2-5 中高齡人力資源管理措拖 12
2-6 研究假設推論 16
三、研究方法 19
3-1 研究變項與架構 19
3-2 研究對象與資料蒐集 20
3-3 研究變項之測量方法 21
3-4 資料分析方法 24
四、研究結果 25
4-1 資料來源及樣本分析 25
4-2 信度分析 27
4-3 相關分析 28
4-4 階層迴歸分析 30
五、研究結論與建議 36
5-1 研究結論 36
5-2 研究貢獻與管理意涵 37
5-3 研究限制與建議 39
參考文獻 40

參考文獻

一、中文資料
〔1〕王靖惠，「中年人生命期發展內涵及其影響因素之研究」，臺灣師範大學社會教育學系學位論文，民國九十五年。
〔2〕林佳諭，「適用中高齡員工的人力資源管理措施之初探; A Preliminary Study on the Human Resource Management Practices for Middle-aged and Aged Worker」，國立中央大學，碩士論文，民國一零六年。
〔3〕張淑倫，「基層農會推廣人員之工作投入」，農業推廣學報，第12期，15-43頁，民國八十四年。
〔4〕陳侑廷，「員工未來時間觀與工作動機之關聯探討-以認知與年齡有關人力資源管理措施為調節變項」，國立中央大學，碩士論文，民國一零六年。
〔5〕彭慧純，「人力資源專業人員之專業職能，工作動機與個人績效之關係探討」，國立中央大學，碩士論文，民國一零零年。
〔6〕黃家齊，「人力資源管理活動認知與員工態度，績效之關聯性差異分析-心理契約與社會交換觀點」，管理評論，21(4)，101-127頁，民國一零一年。
〔7〕謝函融，房美玉，「工作價值觀與工作投入程度對離職傾向之研究」，國立中央大學，未出版之碩士論文，民國一零四年。
〔8〕林佳諭，「適用中高齡員工的人力資源管理措施之初探; A Preliminary Study on the Human Resource Management Practices for Middle-aged and Aged Workers」，國立中央大學，碩士論文，民國一零六年。

二、英文資料
〔1〕 Armstrong‐Stassen, M. (2008). Organisational practices and the post‐retirement employment experience of older workers. Human Resource Management Journal, 18(1), 36-53.
〔2〕 Arvey, R. D., & Neel, C. W. (1976). Motivation and obsolescence in engineers. Industrial Gerontology.
〔3〕 Ashford, J. B., & LeCroy, C. (2009). Human behavior in the social environment: A multidimensional perspective: Nelson Education.
〔4〕 Carstensen, L. L., Isaacowitz, D. M., & Charles, S. T. (1999). Taking time seriously: A theory of socioemotional selectivity. American psychologist, 54(3), 165.
〔5〕 Carstensen, L. L., & Lang, F. R. (1996). Future time perspective scale. Unpublished manuscript, Stanford University.
〔6〕 Cate, R. A., & John, O. P. (2007). Testing models of the structure and development of future time perspective: maintaining a focus on opportunities in middle age. Psychology and Aging, 22(1), 186.
〔7〕 Cross, S., & Markus, H. (1991). Possible selves across the life span. Human Development, 34(4), 230-255.
〔8〕 Delery, J. E., & Doty, D. H. (1996). Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management: Tests of universalistic, contingency, and configurational performance predictions. Academy of Management Journal, 39(4), 802-835.
〔9〕 Giniger, S., Dispenzieri, A., & Eisenberg, J. (1983). Age, experience, and performance on speed and skill jobs in an applied setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68(3), 469.
〔10〕 Hailey, V. H., Farndale, E., & Truss, C. (2005). The HR department′s role in organisational performance. Human Resource Management Journal, 15(3), 49-66.
〔11〕 Heckhausen, J., Wrosch, C., & Schulz, R. (2010). A motivational theory of life-span development. Psychological Review, 117(1), 32.
〔12〕 Heneman, H. G. (1973). Relationship between age and motivation to perform on job. Industrial Gerontology, 16, 30-36.
〔13〕 Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American psychologist, 44(3), 513.
〔14〕 Huddleston, P., Good, L., & Frazier, B. (2002). The influence of firm characteristics and demographic variables on Russian retail workers′ work motivation and job attitudes. The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 12(4), 395-421.
〔15〕 Kanfer, R., & Ackerman, P. L. (2004). Aging, adult development, and work motivation. Academy of management review, 29(3), 440-458.
〔16〕 Kooij, D. T., Bal, P. M., & Kanfer, R. (2014). Future time perspective and promotion focus as determinants of intraindividual change in work motivation. Psychology and Aging, 29(2), 319.
〔17〕 Kooij, D. T., Jansen, P. G., Dikkers, J. S., & De Lange, A. H. (2010). The influence of age on the associations between HR practices and both affective commitment and job satisfaction: A meta‐analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(8), 1111-1136.
〔18〕 Lang, F. R., & Carstensen, L. L. (2002). Time counts: Future time perspective, goals, and social relationships. Psychology and Aging, 17(1), 125.
〔19〕 Lee, R. T., & Ashforth, B. E. (1996). A meta-analytic examination of the correlates of the three dimensions of job burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(2), 123.
〔20〕 Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science.
〔21〕 Linz, S. J. (2004). Motivating Russian workers: analysis of age and gender differences. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 33(3), 261-289.
〔22〕 Lord, R. L. (2004). Empirical Evaluation of Classical Behavioral Theories with Respect to the Motivation of Older Knowledge Workers: A Dissertation. University of Alabama in Huntsville,
〔23〕 Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American psychologist, 41(9), 954.
〔24〕 Milkovich, G. T., & Boudreau, J. W. (1994). Human Resource Management ,(Burr Ridge, IL: Richard D. Irwin, 1994). Patrick M. Wright, Gary C. McMahan and Abagail McWilliams,". Human Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage: A Resource-Based Perspective", International Journal of Human Resource Management, 5(2), 302-326.
〔25〕 Rhodes, S. R. (1983). Age-related differences in work attitudes and behavior: A review and conceptual analysis. Psychological Blletin, 93(2), 328.
〔26〕 Ryff, C. D., & Baltes, P. B. (1976). Value transition and adult development in women: The instrumentality-terminality sequence hypothesis. Developmental Psychology, 12(6), 567.
〔27〕 Szinovacz, M. E., DeViney, S., & Davey, A. (2001). Influences of family obligations and relationships on retirement: Variations by gender, race, and marital status. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 56(1), S20-S27.
〔28〕 Ulrich, D. (1987). Organizational Capability as a Competitive Advantage: Human. People and Strategy, 10(4), 169.
〔29〕 Zacher, H., & Frese, M. (2009). Remaining time and opportunities at work: Relationships between age, work characteristics, and occupational future time perspective. Psychology and Aging, 24(2), 487.
〔30〕 Zacher, H., & Frese, M. (2011). Maintaining a focus on opportunities at work: The interplay between age, job complexity, and the use of selection, optimization, and compensation strategies. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(2), 291-318.

指導教授

林文政

審核日期

2018-7-10

推文