博碩士論文 105454004 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:76 、訪客IP:3.145.84.96
姓名 張兆銘(Zhang, Zhao-Ming)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 產業經濟研究所在職專班
論文名稱 技術創新與廠商績效之研究 - 台灣電子零組件製造業
相關論文
★ 資訊科技的使用對製造業廠商生產力之影響★ 寶島債介紹及發展前景
★ 電腦軟體與資料庫的採用與對廠商績效的影響- 台灣製造業的研究★ 中國新高技術園區技術效率及其影響因素的研究
★ 政府管控房地產政策對不動產市場及 銀行不動產授信業務之影響★ 鶯歌捷運線對房價的影響
★ 貿易、技術與薪資溢酬★ 聚集與生產力:台灣紡織產業的實證研究
★ 勞工派遣與正職受僱型態之實證研究-金融海嘯前後之分析比較★ 影響政府採購效率之實證研究—以某縣市政府為例
★ 台灣民眾轉換從業身分的決策以及「不景氣-推擠」假說之檢定★ 汽車燃油效率、反彈效果與特徵價格之研究
★ Three Essays on the Industrial Economics★ 研究發展與技術購買-台灣製造業之實證研究
★ 合併廠商的績效表現與決策因素分析★ 合併型態對廠商績效與股票報酬的影響
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   [檢視]  [下載]
  1. 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
  2. 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
  3. 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。

摘要(中) 本研究試圖去估計各種類型的創新活動要素對於廠商經營績效的影響,利用民國100年台灣電子零組件製造業的廠商資料為研究樣本,在這些創新活動要素之中,主要討論的重點會放在R&D和技術購買對於廠商勞動生產力的直接影響與間接影響,過程中將先提出有關創新活動與廠商績效的文獻作為參考,用以建構出一個完整的研究框架,利用兩個隨之發生的模型進行實證分析。第一個為R&D支出決定模型,目的是要確認有哪些可能影響廠商R&D支出的因子;第二個為勞動生產力模型,除了R&D與技術購買之外,在此模型中還加入了員工教育訓練,過程中將會依照廠商的所有權結構、銷貨市場差異以及四位碼產業別將樣本觀察值進行分組,驗證創新活動與勞動生產力的關係。兩個模型都加入其他的控制變數來降低廠商或產業特性可能造成的內生性影響,第一個模型使用Tobit的估計方法,發現R&D支出費用與廠商規模之間呈現非線性的倒U關係,可能存在最適的廠商規模水準,此結果與多數文獻的結論一致,Schumpeterian hypothesis應該可以被證實,本研究也發現除了FDI之外,自有品牌、出口外銷以及技術購買對於R&D支出費用有顯著正相關。第二個模型使用OLS的估計方法,實證結果指出除了國外技術購買之外,其他的創新活動要素都與勞動生產力有顯著正相關,另外也發現R&D與國內技術購買對於勞動生產力的影響有顯著的替代效果。值得注意的是,外資廠商的R&D與技術購買皆對於勞動生產力沒有顯著相關性,而出口商則是員工教育訓練對於勞動生產力沒有顯著相關性。儘管如此,若將整個電子零組件製造業的樣本觀察值依照四位碼產業別進行分組,實證的結果可以發現不同領域的科技產業在勞動生產力的變化上,有著不一樣的創新特性與傾向。
摘要(英) This paper makes an attempt to estimate the influence of a variety of innovative activities on firm’s performance. Utilizing a rich manufacturing firm-level dataset of Taiwan electronic industry in 2011, the main objective of this paper is to investigate direct and indirect effects of in-house R&D and technology transfer on labor productivity. First of all, this paper addresses previous related literatures that are conducive to build a conceptual framework of innovations and to structure two consequential models of the study. In addition, some control variables are added into both models for mitigating potential endogenous effects that may arise from firm or industry specific characteristics. The first one is to capture the roles of relevant factors in determining R&D expenditure of a firm. Based on Tobit method, there is evidence of an inverse U-shaped relation between firm size and R&D expenditure. The optimum (satiation) point does exist, which may support Schumpeterian hypothesis. Otherwise, brand, exporting and technology transfer are positively related to R&D expenditure other than FDI. And the second model is to examine the impact of R&D, technology transfer and on-the-job training on labor productivity by classifying all observations with ownership, export activity and four-digit industry. Based on OLS method, the empirical results indicate that, except foreign technology, R&D, domestic technology and on-the-job training are found to be positively related to firm performance as measured by labor productivity, but the interactive effect of R&D and domestic technology on labor productivity is negative. For the latter, it’s interesting to ascertain if R&D really substitutes for the domestic technology. A noteworthy overcome is that R&D and technology transfer cannot facilitate labor productivity of FIEs, while on-the-job training is also unable to raise that of exporters, although FDI and export activity are generally known as important ways to acquire foreign tech-knowledge. Nevertheless, firms in various scientific sectors seem to have distinct innovative characteristics and propensity in terms of increasing labor productivity.
關鍵字(中) ★ 創新活動
★ R&D
★ 技術購買
★ 勞動生產力
★ FDI
★ 出口活動
關鍵字(英) ★ Innovative activity
★ R&D
★ Technology transfer
★ Labor productivity
★ FDI
★ Export activity
論文目次 中文摘要 ...i

Abstract ...ii

誌謝 ...iii

目錄 ...iv

圖目錄 ...vi

表目錄 ...vii

第一章 緒論 ...1

1.1 研究背景與動機 ...1

1.2 研究目的 ...4

1.3 本文架構 ...6

第二章 台灣半導體產業及研發活動概況分析 ...7

2.1 全球半導體的產業概況 ...7

2.2 台灣的研發經費與技術貿易概況 ...10

第三章 文獻回顧 ...15

3.1 廠商R&D投資的決定因素 ...15

3.2 績效指標與技術知識的來源 ...18

3.3 技術知識的效果及其跨產業之差異 ...20

3.4 技術知識來源的交互影響:互補或替代 ...22

3.5 廠商特性的差異:不同的創新效果 ...24

第四章 資料與研究方法 ...26

4.1 樣本來源與變數說明 ...26

4.2 實證模型架構 ...31

第五章 實證結果 ...37

5.1 敘述統計分析 ...37

5.1.1 全產業概況以及不同廠商規模的比較 ...37

5.1.2 不同廠商型態的比較(營運模式、所有權、出口活動) ...40

5.1.3 不同四位碼產業的比較 ...45

5.2 迴歸分析 ...46

5.2.1 R&D支出決定模型的估計結果 ...46

5.2.2 勞動生產力模型的估計結果 ...51

5.2.3 四位碼產業的估計結果 ...57

第六章 結論與研究限制 ...61

6.1 結論與意涵 ...61

6.2 研究限制與建議 ...65

參考文獻 ...69

附錄A 中華民國行業標準分類(二位碼26) ...73

附錄B R&D支出決定模型的迴歸結果(續) ...75

附錄C 勞動生產力模型的迴歸結果(續) ...76

圖2.1 2015 Worldwide IC Company Market Share by Headquarters Location ...8

圖2.2 Wafer Capacity at Dec. 2015 - by Geographic Region...8

圖2.3 我國研發經費與年增率 ...10

圖2.4 我國研發經費來源比重 ...11

圖2.5 台灣與其他國家IP智財權利金(技術交易)支出 ...13

圖4.1 R&D支出與勞動生產力之概念架構 ...32

圖5.1 四位碼產業的技術知識要素投入之分佈情況 ...46

表2.1 我國積體電路產業的產值統計 ...9

表2.2 亞洲主要國家的企業研發經費前五大產業 ...12

表4.1 實證模型的變數定義 ...27

表5.1 電子零組件製造業之敘述統計結果 ...38

表5.2 營運模式、所有權以及銷貨市場之差異的敘述統計結果 ...42

表5.3 Pearson相關係數矩陣(R&D支出決定模型) ...47

表5.4 Spearman相關係數矩陣(R&D支出決定模型) ...48

表5.5 R&D支出決定模型的迴歸結果 ...49

表5.6 Pearson相關係數矩陣(勞動生產力模型) ...52

表5.7 Spearman相關係數矩陣(勞動生產力模型) ...53

表5.8 勞動生產力模型的迴歸結果 ...55

表5.9 四位碼產業之勞動生產力模型的迴歸結果 ...59
參考文獻 Antonioli, D., M. Mazzanti, and P. Pini. 2010. “Productivity, Innovation Strategies and Industrial Relations in SMEs. Empirical Evidence for a Local Production System in Northern Italy.” International Review of Applied Economics, 24(4): 453–482.

Aw, B. Y., and G. Batra. 1998. “Technological Capability and Firm Efficiency in Taiwan (China).” The World Bank Economic Review, 12(1): 59–79.

Basant, R., and B. Fikkert. 1996. “The Effects of R&D, Foreign Technology Purchase, Domestic and International Spillovers on Productivity in Indian Firms.” The Review of Economics and Statistics, 78(2): 187–199.

Chang, P. L., C. Shin, and C. W. Hsu. 1999. “Taiwan’s Approach to Technological Change: The Case of Integrated Circuit Design.” Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 5(2): 173–177.

Cohen, W. M., and D. A. Levinthal. 1989. “Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D.” The Economic Journal, 99(397): 569–596.

Deolalikar, A. B., and R. E. Evenson. 1989. “Technology Production and Technology Purchase in Indian Industry: An Econometric Analysis.” Review of Economics and Statistics, 71(4): 687–692.

Doraszelski, U., and J. Jaumandreu. 2013. “R&D and Productivity: Estimating Endogenous Productivity.” Review of Economic Studies, 80(4): 1338–1383.

Foss, N. J. 2005. Strategy, Economic Organization, and the Knowledge Economy. The Coordination of Firms and Resources. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Gartner. 2016. “Worldwide Semiconductor Foundry Market Grew 4.4 Percent in 2015, According to Final Results by Gartner.” http://www.gartner.com/newsroom (accessed October 4, 2017).

Goldar, B. N., and V. S. Ranganathan. 1997. “Economic Reforms and R&D Expenditure in Industrial Firms in India.” National Institute of Public Finance and Policy Working Paper No.1.

Goto, A., and K. Suzuki. 1989. “R&D Capital, Rate of Return on R&D Investment and Spillover of R&D in Japanese Manufacturing Industries.” Review of Economics and Statistics, 71(4): 555–564.

Griffin, A., and A. L. Page. 1996. “PDMA Success Measurement Project: Recommended Measures for Product Development Success and Failure.” Journal of Product Innovation Management, 13(6): 478–496.

Griffith, R., E. Huergo, J. Mairesse, and B. Peters. 2006. “Innovation and Productivity across Four European Countries.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 22(4): 483–498.

Griffith, R., S. Redding and J. Van Reenen. 2004. “Mapping the Two Faces of R&D: Productivity Growth in a Panel of OECD Industries.” Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(4): 883–895.

Griliches, Z., and J. Mairesse. 1990. “R&D and Productivity Growth: Comparing Japanese and American Manufacturing Firms.” In Productivity Growth in Japan and the United States, ed. C. R. Hulten, 317–348. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Hasan, R. 2002. “The Impact of Imported and Domestic Technologies on the Productivity of Firms: Panel Data Evidence from Indian Manufacturing Firms.” Journal of Development Economics, 69(1): 23–49.

Hu, A. G. Z., G. H. Jefferson, and Q. Jinchang. 2005. “R&D and Technology Transfer: Firm-Level Evidence from Chinese Industry.” Review of Economic and Statistics, 87(4): 780–786.

Huang, C. J., and J. T. Liu. 1994. “Estimation of a Non-neutral Stochastic Frontier Production Function.” Journal of Productivity Analysis, 5(2): 171–180.

IC Insights. 2016. “Taiwan Passes South Korea to Become #1 in Total IC Wafer Fab Capacity.” http://www.icinsights.com/news/bulletins (accessed October 4, 2017).

IC Insights. 2016. “U.S. Companies Continue to Capture Bulk of IDM and Fabless IC Sales.” http://www.icinsights.com/news/bulletins (accessed October 4, 2017).

Jaffe, A. B. 1986. “Technological Opportunity and Spillovers of R&D: Evidence from Firms’ Patents, Profits, and Market Value.” American Economic Review, 76(5): 984–1001.

Keizer, J. A., L. Dijkstra, and J. Halman. 2002. “Explaining Innovative Efforts of SMEs.: An Exploratory Survey among SMEs in the Mechanical and Electrical Engineering Sector in Netherlands.” Technovation, 22(1): 1–13.

Klette, T.J., and Z. Griliches. 1996. “The Inconsistency of Common Scale Estimators when Output Prices are Unobserved and Endogenous.” Journal of Applied Econometrics, 11(4): 343-361.

Kumar, N. 1987. “Technology Imports and Local Research and Development in Indian Manufacturing.” The Developing Economies, 25(3): 220–233.

Osborne, A. 1998. “Measuring Intellectual Capital: The Real Value of Company.” Ohio CPA Journal, 57(4): 37–38.

Ray, A. S., and S. Bhaduri. 2001. “R&D and Technology Learning in Indian Industry: Econometric Estimation of the Research Production Function.” Oxford Development Studies, 29(2): 155–171.

Scherer, F. M. 1965. “Firm Size, Market Structure, Opportunity, and the Output of Patented Inventions.” The American Economic Review, 55(5): 1097–1125.

Sharma, C. 2016. “R&D, Technology Transfer and Productivity in the Indian Pharmaceutical Industry.” International Journal of Innovation Management, 20(1): 1650010 1–24.

Sher, J. S., and P. Y. Yang. 2005. “The Effects of Innovative Capabilities and R&D Clustering on Firm Performance: The Evidence of Taiwan’s Semiconductor Industry.” Technovation, 25(1): 33–43.

Stock, G. N., N. P. Greis, and W. A. Fischer. 2001. “Absorptive Capacity and New Product Development.” Journal of High Technology Management Research, 12(1): 77–91.

Tsai, K. H., and J. C. Wang. 2004. “The R&D Performance in Taiwan′s Electronics Industry: A Longitudinal Examination.” R&D Management, 34(2): 179–189.

Tseng, C. Y. 2008. “Internal R&D Effort, External Imported Technology and Economic Value Added: Empirical Study of Taiwan′s Electronic Industry.” Applied Economics, 40(8): 1073–1085.

Tsou, M. W., J. T. Liu, J. K. Hammitt, and K. H. Wang. 2008.“Exporting and Productivity Growth: Evidence from the Taiwan Electronic Plants.” Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 55(2): 190–209.

Zwick, T. 2005. “Continuing Vocational Training Form and Establishment Productivity in Germany.” German Economic Review, 6(2): 155–184.

國家實驗研究院科技政策研究與資訊中心-科技產業資訊(2014),《台灣企業IP智財權利金(技術交易)收支 2012年55.3億美金》,2017年10月5日取自於:http://iknow.stpi.narl.org.tw/post/Read.aspx?PostID=9289

廖振盛(2015),「台灣半導體產業研發活動、技術效率與規模效率之研究」,《高雄應用科技大學人文與社會科學學刊》,1(1):39–48。

楊志海與陳忠榮(2002),「研究發展,專利與生產力—台灣製造業的實證研究」,《經濟論文叢刊》,30(1):458–469。

經濟部統計處(2016),《產業經濟統計簡訊235期:104年晶圓代工產值年增9.7%,帶動積體電路業全年產值續登歷史最高峰》,台北:經濟部統計處。

經濟部統計處(2016),《產業經濟統計簡訊276期:我國研發經費突破5千億元,佔GDP比重升至3.05%》,台北:經濟部統計處。
指導教授 鄒孟文 審核日期 2018-5-8
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明