博碩士論文 105429015 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:24 、訪客IP:3.139.69.46
姓名 黃亭瑋(Ting-Wei Huang)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 經濟學系
論文名稱 企業社會責任與最適污染防治研發
(Corporate Social Responsibility and Optimal Research and Development, corporate social responsibility)
相關論文
★ 存在中間財市場下的跨國廠商進入模式選擇★ 匯率與本國中間財廠商的直接投資決策
★ 網路外部性下的利潤廠商跟共營廠商競爭分析★ 寡占市場下的自動進口擴張政策分析
★ 寡占廠商成本歧異下之最適產業與貿易政策★ 雙邊貿易的最適關稅
★ 平行輸入、仿冒與服務品質★ 經濟成長、消費者信心與銀行風險
★ 網路外部性與最適民營化政策★ 經濟整合與關稅政策的福利分析
★ 最適民營化政策的相關議題分析★ 多功能產品跨業效果的經濟分析
★ 出口競爭與廠商的直接投資決策 -匯率的考量★ Drastic or Non-drastic Innovation When Encountering Rivals
★ 存在中間財下的仿冒行為分析★ 外人直接投資與政府的策略性汙染稅
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   [檢視]  [下載]
  1. 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
  2. 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
  3. 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。

摘要(中) 本文旨在探討在環保意識抬頭的社會下,廠商開始有企業社會責任 (corporate social responsibility, CSR) 的意識,在政府進行環境稅時,針對廠商重視CSR與否,探討對於廠商與社會的影響。本文假設市場上有兩家廠商,進行Cournot 競爭,針對兩家廠商皆不重視CSR、兩家廠商皆重視CSR程度相同以及兩家廠商重視CSR程度不同,三種狀況對污染防治研發、產量、廠商效用與福利進行比較。
結果發現,當單位污染量較小時,廠商越重視CSR會使廠商的最適研發量與最適產量越高,但受到單位污染量的影響也越大,因此在污染超過一範圍時,廠商越重視CSR反而會使最適研發量與最適產量越低,且越不重視環境的廠商,會有越好的最適研發量與最適產量。
藉由各述分析,在單位污染較小時,當環境稅的增加時,對越重視CSR的廠商越有利,且越多廠商重視CSR,社會福利也會越好。廠商重視CSR所帶來的力量,會與政府進行課環境稅的有類似效果,若政府能夠透過規範、完善的推廣,使得廠商願進行CSR活動的話,就能夠彌補政府課環境稅的困難。
摘要(英) In this paper, we analyze the impact of the firms and society, whether the firms pay attention to corporate social responsibility (CSR) when the government taxation for environmental. Assume there are two firms in a Cournot Competition. We use three situation to compare pollution prevention and research, output, firm effectiveness and social welfare.
We show when the unit pollution is small, the more the firm pays attention to CSR, the higher the optimal research and output, but the greater the impact on the unit pollution. Therefore, when the pollution exceeds a certain range, the more the firms pay more attention to the CSR, the lower the optimal research and output, and the less the firms who pay more attention to the environment, the better the optimal research and t output.
After generalizing this model, we found when the unit pollution is small, in the environmental tax increases, the more manufacturers pay attention to CSR, the better social welfare will be. The power that the firms attach importance to the CSR have similar effects with the government′s environmental tax. If the government can conduct the firms to CSR activities through standardization and better promotion, it will be able to make up the difficulty of government environmental tax.
關鍵字(中) ★ 污染防治
★ 最適研發量
★ 企業社會責任
關鍵字(英) ★ pollution abatement
★ optimal research and development
★ corporate social responsibility
論文目次 第一章 前言 1
第一節 研究動機與目的 1
第二節 理論模型與研究方法 3
第三節 研究架構 4
第二章 文獻回顧 5
第三章 基本模型 9
第一節 兩家廠商皆不重視CSR 10
第二節 兩家廠商皆重視CSR的程度相同 14
第三節 兩家廠商重視CSR的程度不同 18
第四章 比較分析 27
第五章 結論 36
參考文獻 38
參考文獻 Abdullah, S. and B. Morley (2014) "Environmental taxes and economic growth: Evidence from panel causality tests," Energy Economics, 42, 27-33.
Berry, M. A. and D. A. Rondinelli (1998) "Proactive corporate environmental management: A new industrial revolution," The Academy of Management Executive, 12(2), 38-50.
Besley, T. and M. Ghatak (2007) "Retailing public goods: The economics of corporate social. responsibility," Journal of Public Economics, 91(9), 1645-1663.
Bovenberg, A. L. and R. De Mooij (1994) "Environmental levies and distortionary taxation," American Economic Review, 84(4), 1085-89.
Bovenberg, A. L. and R. De Mooij (1994) "Environmental tax reform and endogenous growth," Journal of Public Economics, 63(2), 207-237.
Bovenberg, A. L. and S. Smulders (1995) "Environmental quality and pollution-augmenting technological change in a two-sector endogenous growth model," Journal of Public Economics, 57(3), 369-391.
Bruce, N. and S. J. Turnovsky (1999) "Budget balance, welfare, and the growth rate: Dynamic scoring of the long-run government budget," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 31(2), 162-186.
Deily, M. E. and W. B. Gray (1991) "Enforcement of pollution regulations in a declining industry,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2, 260-274.
Ederington, J. and J. Minier (2003) "Is environmental policy a secondary trade barrier? An empirical analysis," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d′economique, 36 (1), 137-154.
Hart, S. L. and G. Ahuja (1996). "Does it pay to be green? An empirical examination of the relationship between emission reduction and firm performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, 5(1), 30-37.
Mackey, A., T. B. Mackey and J. B. Barney (2007) "Corporate social responsibility and firm performance: Investor preferences and corporate strategies," Academy of Management Review, 32, 817-835.
Orlitzky, M., D. S. Siegel and D. Waldman (2011) "Strategic corporate social responsibility and environmental sustainability," Business and Society, 1, 28.
Poyago-Theotoky, J. (2007) "The organization of R&D and environmental policy," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 62(1), 63-75.
Tsai, T. H., K. I. Tu and J. R. Chiou (2015) "Tariffs and environmental taxes in the presence of environmental R&D," Environmental & Resource Economics, 60(3), 413-431.
Williams, C. (2002) "Environmental tax interactions when pollution affects health and productivity," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 44(2), 261-270.
Williams, M. and D. Siegel (2001) "Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm. perspective," The Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117-127.
指導教授 邱俊榮(Jiunn-Rong Chiou) 審核日期 2018-7-30
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明