快時尚、環保材質與產品耐久性

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：17

、訪客IP：18.189.170.17

姓名

邱誼文(Yi-Wen Chiu) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

經濟學系

論文名稱

快時尚、環保材質與產品耐久性

相關論文

★ 存在中間財市場下的跨國廠商進入模式選擇	★ 匯率與本國中間財廠商的直接投資決策
★ 網路外部性下的利潤廠商跟共營廠商競爭分析	★ 寡占市場下的自動進口擴張政策分析
★ 寡占廠商成本歧異下之最適產業與貿易政策	★ 雙邊貿易的最適關稅
★ 平行輸入、仿冒與服務品質	★ 經濟成長、消費者信心與銀行風險
★ 網路外部性與最適民營化政策	★ 經濟整合與關稅政策的福利分析
★ 最適民營化政策的相關議題分析	★ 多功能產品跨業效果的經濟分析
★ 出口競爭與廠商的直接投資決策－匯率的考量	★ Drastic or Non-drastic Innovation When Encountering Rivals
★ 存在中間財下的仿冒行為分析	★ 外人直接投資與政府的策略性汙染稅

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

近年紡織產業中快時尚模式面臨永續議題的壓力，出現利用低汙染與可生物分解的纖維製成的服飾或是回收廢棄物再利用的技術。本研究利用兩期耐久財寡占模型，來捕捉循環經濟下的紡織產業廠商行為與社會福利。假設市場上存在一間傳統的既有廠商，第二期時進入一家生產環保產品的新廠商。我們發現環保產品的進入並不一定能增加社會福利。此外我們比較快時尚市場與擁有耐久性產品的市場後，發現當消費者對產品願付溢價高時，會使得廠商生產產品壽命更低的產品，而使計畫性廢棄的問題更嚴重，當願付溢價足夠高時，會趨於快時尚廠商。也發現快時尚市場的社會福利較有產品耐久性市場的社會福利來的低。

摘要(英)

In recent years, the textile industry is under the pressure from sustainability issues, and there are new technologies that make fibers more non-toxic, less polluting and biodegradable, or technologies that recycle waste. This study uses two-period durability oligopoly model to capture the firm’s behavior and social welfare of textile industry under the circular economy. We suppose that a single traditional firm in the initial period and depending on the ?rm’s chosen product durability, a firm which manufacturing environmentally friendly products joins the market in period two. We find that the entry of environmentally friendly products does not necessarily increase social welfare. In addition, we analyzed the fast fashion market and the market with durable products. We find that when consumers are willing to pay a high premium for products, firm prefer to produces products with lower product life, and the problem of planning waste will be more serious. When the premium is high enough, it will tend to be the firm under fast fashion market. It has also been found that the social welfare of the fast fashion market is lower than the social welfare of the product durability market.

關鍵字(中)

★ 快時尚
★ 環保
★ 兩期耐久財寡占模型

關鍵字(英)

論文目次

第一章前言...1
1.1節研究動機與目的...1
1.2節研究方法...4
1.3研究流程與架構...5
第二章文獻回顧...6
2.1 耐久財模型...6
2.2 快時尚與廠商行為...8
第三章基本模型...10
3.1 具有傳統製程的新廠商與既有廠商的最適決策...11
3.2 具有新技術的新廠商與既有廠商的最適決策...13
3.3 社會福利...15
第四章延伸模型...20
4.1 具有傳統製程的新廠商與既有廠商的最適決策...20
4.2 具有新技術的新廠商與既有廠商的最適決策...22
4.3 社會福利...25
4.4 跨章節比較...27
第五章結論...31
參考文獻...32

參考文獻

1.Bulow, J. (1982), “Durable Goods Monopolists,” Journal of Political Economy, 90, 314-332.
2.Bulow, J. (1986), “An Economic Theory of Planned Obsolescence,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 101, 729-749.
3.Butz, D. A. (1990), “Durable Good Monopoly and Best-Price Provisions,” American Economic Review, 80, 1062-1076.
4.Cachon, G. P. and R. Swinney (2011), “The Value of Fast Fashion: Quick Response, Enhanced Design, and Strategic Consumer Behavior,” Management Science, 57(4), 778-795.
5.Caro, F. and V. Martinez-de-Albeniz (2010), “The Impact of Quick Response in Inventory-Based Competition,” Manufacturing Service Operations Management, 12(3), 409-429.
6.Coase, R. (1972), “Durability and Monopoly,” Journal of Law and Economics, 15, 143-149.
7.Fisher, M. and A. Raman (1996), “Reducing the Cost of Demand Uncertainty through Accurate Response to Early Sales,” Operations Research, 44(1), 87-99.
8.Gam, H. J. (2011), “Are Fashion-Conscious Consumers More Likely to Adopt Eco-friendly Clothing?” Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 15(2), 178-193.
9.Goering, G. E. (1991), “Oligopolies and Product Durability,” International Journal of Industrial Organization, 10 (1992), 55-63.
10.Goering, G. E. (1992), “Innovation, Product Durability, and Market Structure,” Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 699-723.
11.Goering, G.E. and J. R. Boyce (1999), “Emissions Taxation in Durable Goods Oligopoly,” Journal of Industrial Economics, 47(1), 125-143.
12.Goering, G. E. (2010), “Durability Choice and the Piracy for Profit of Goods,” Metroeconomica, 61(2), 282-301.
13.Goering, G. E and M. K. Pippenger (2000), “International Trade and Commercial Policy for Durable Goods,” Review of International Economics, 8(2), 275-294.
14.Liu, Q. and G. J. van Ryzin (2008), “Strategic Capacity Rationing to Induce Early Purchases,” Management Science, 54(6), 1115-1131.
15.Netemeyer, R.G., B. Krishnan, C. Pullig, G. Wang, M. Yagci, D. Dean, J. Ricks, and F. Wirth
(2004), “Developing and Validating Measures of Facets of Customer-Based Brand Equity,” Journal of Business Research, 57(2), 209-224.
16.Nimon, W. and J. Beghin (1999), “Are Eco-Labels Valuable? Evidence from the Apparel Industry,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 81(4), 801-811.
17.Richardson, J. (1996), “Vertical Integration and Rapid Response in Fashion Apparel,” Organization Science, 7(4), 400-412.
18.Sieper, E. and P. Swan. (1973), “Monopoly and Competition in the Market for Durable Goods,” Review of Economic Studies, 40, 333-351.
19.Swan, P. (1970), “Durability of Consumption Goods,” American Economic Review, 60, 884-894.
20.Swan, P. (1971), “The Durability of Goods and the Regulation of Monopoly,” Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 2, 347-357.
21.Wu, C., and S. S Hsing (2006), “Less is More: How Scarcity Influences Consumers’ Value Perceptions and Purchase Intents through Mediating Variables,” Journal of American Academy of Business, 9(2), 125-132.
22.Yin, R., Y. Aviv, A. Pazgal and C. S. Tang (2009), “Optimal Markdown Pricing: Implications of Inventory Display Formats in the Presence of Strategic Customers,” Management Science, 55(8), 1391-1408.

指導教授

邱俊榮

審核日期

2018-7-30

推文