摘要(英) |
The systematic error is hard to distinguish in small diesize wafer. In order to solve the problem, this paper analyze six kinds of symptomatic failure types among the nine kinds of systematic errors. Each of failure types have been cut into different shapes. The randomness and homogeneity test are used to enhance the detection resolution of systematic error after doing wafer partition. Then, we observe the resolution ratio in systematic error after doing partition.
After cutting into various shapes, we use the randomness and homogeneity test to test each wafer. In randomness test, the hypothesis test is used. If the alternative hypothesis is over-cluster, the null hypothesis is determined to use a one-tailed test. And, we will check whether B-Score is higher than the critical value 1.64 or not. If the alternative hypothesis is non-random, the null hypothesis is determined to use two-tailed tests. Then, check the absolute value of B-Score is higher than 1.96 or not. Finally, you can draw a gateway diagram and divide it into five blocks. In the homogeneity test, we choose the yield parameter to support us to analyze wafer. If the yield difference of wafer is higher than the threshold after doing partition, the wafer may have systematic error.
Different partition method is used to distinguish different failure types. For example, we change the radius of the donut partition wafer to detect the edge-ring failure type and the defect position. Then, the applications of randomness and homogeneity test is used for the wafer after doing partition. Finally, the results of the test are combined to enhance the systematic errors resolution, so as to improve the yield and reduce costs. |
參考文獻 |
[1]J. E. Chen, M. J. Wang, Y. S. Chang, S. C. Shyu, and Y. Y. Chen, “ Yield Improvement by Test Error Cancellation ,” Proceedings of the Fifth Asian Test Symposium (ATS′96), pp.258-262, Nov. 1996.
[2]Q. P. He and J. Wang, "Fault Detection Using the k-Nearest Neighbor Rule for Semiconductor Manufacturing Processes," in IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 345-354, Nov. 2007.
[3] M. Wu, J. R. Jang and J. Chen, "Wafer Map Failure Pattern Recognition and Similarity Ranking for Large-Scale Data Sets," in IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 1-12, Feb. 2015.
[4]R. Baly and H. Hajj, "Wafer Classification Using Support Vector Machines," in IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 373-383, Aug. 2012.
[5] C. J. Huang, C. F. Wu and C. C. Wang, "Image processing techniques for wafer defect cluster identification," in IEEE Design & Test of Computers, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 44-48, March-April 2002.
[6] M. Piao, C. H. Jin, J. Y. Lee and J. Byun, "Decision Tree Ensemble-Based Wafer Map Failure Pattern Recognition Based on Radon Transform-Based Features," in IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 250-257, May 2018.
[7] 林正田,「就隨機瑕疵源角度之晶圓圖分析」,國立中央大學,碩士論文,民國101年。
[8] 邱政文,「蝠翼:一個晶圓圖特徵化與產生的歸納模型」,國立中央大學,碩士論文,民國95年。
[9] 蕭寶威,「隨機缺陷分布之晶圓圖分析」, 國立中央大學,碩士論文,民國105年。
[10]葉昱緯,「迴力棒圖應用於真實量產晶圓圖」,國立中央大學,碩士論文,民國105 年。
[11]C. - K. Hsu, Lin, F., Cheng, K. - T. Tim, Zhang, W., Li, X., Carulli, J. M., and Butler, K. M., “Test data analytics - Exploring spatial and test-item correlations in production test data,” in IEEE International Test Conference (ITC), pp.1-10, Sep. 2013
[12]F. Lin, Hsu, C. - K., and Cheng, K. - T. Tim, “Learning from Production Test Data: Correlation Exploration and Feature Engineering,” in IEEE 23rd Asian Test Symposium, pp.236-241, Nov. 2014.
[13]F. Lin, Hsu, C. - K., and Cheng, K. - T. Tim, “Feature engineering with canonical analysis for effective statistical tests screening test escapes”, in International Test Conference(ITC), pp.1-10, Oct. 2014. |