透過歷史的借鏡談不同組織情境下主管領導權力基礎間與組織效能的關聯性

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：52

、訪客IP：18.216.10.195

姓名

彭承祖(Cheng-Tsu Peng) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

人力資源管理研究所在職專班

論文名稱

透過歷史的借鏡談不同組織情境下主管領導權力基礎間與組織效能的關聯性

相關論文

★ 傳統食品業之轉型與品質升級策略探討-以P公司為例	★ 航空器維修訓練調整策略探討-以C公司為例
★ 企業社會責任ヽ內控內稽制度措施的探討-以T銀行為例	★ 主管管理職能評鑑與驗證-以A公司為例
★ 人力資源部門客戶服務代表角色與功能探討-以某科技公司為例	★ Ｅ公司員工品格教育與工作投入、工作壓力、員工幸福感關係之研究，知覺組織支持之中介效果
★ 工作要求、工作控制與工作生活平衡關係之研究：以主管家庭支持行為為調節變項	★ 如何打造正向的企業志工參與環境-以國內大型電子製造業為例
★ 如何塑造良好的企業志工投入與推薦-以國內大型電子製造業為例	★ 組織自尊、學習目標導向及尋求回饋行為對於員工自我學習之影響
★ 家長式領導與組織認同感之關聯性研究-以信任主管為調節變項	★ 影響在臺產業外籍移工的生活與工作適應程度：從組織及勞工本身之變數探討
★ 尋求更好的解決之道！以正向觀點探討企業進用身心障礙者之問題－以M公司身障進用經驗為例	★ 營業額意圖：組織和個人因素的影響以及企業家意圖在越南語境中的中介作用
★ 如何提升外派人員效能？知覺組織支持與配偶家庭支持對外派人員組織認同、工作投入、工作壓力之影響─以主管家庭支持行為為調節	★ 育嬰的代價?影響育嬰留職停薪復職後個人績效及勞動條件變更之因素分析

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

藉由歷史可以知興替，藉由歷史亦可以探討不同主管領導權力基礎的使用時機與情境。本研究藉由歷史文獻回顧，如三國志、資治通鑑、英雄記等等…。並針對進入職場一年以上之人員進行問卷調查，調查不同組織情境下主管領導權力基礎間能夠發揮組織效能的重要性，最終線上問卷回收量為228份，均為有效問卷。

　　研究結果發現：(1) 高競爭環境下，五種領導權力基礎中，較能讓領導者發揮組織效能的權力基礎為專家權具有正向顯著性。(2) 高競爭環境下，五種領導權力基礎中，較能讓領導者發揮組織效能的權力基礎為認同權不具有正向顯著性。(3) 當組織處於創立時期時，五種領導權力基礎中，最能夠激發組織效能，讓組織遵從正確策略前進的是專家權具有正向顯著性。(4) 當組織處於發展期時，五種領導權力基礎中，能夠讓組織飛速成長的權力基礎是專家權不具有正面顯著性。(5) 當組織處於發展期時，五種領導權力基礎中，能夠讓組織飛速成長的權力基礎是認同權不具有正面顯著性。(6) 當組織處於成熟期時，五種領導權力基礎中，能夠持續發揮組織高效能運作的權力基礎是認同權不具有正面顯著性。

摘要(英)

With history as a mirror, one can learn the rise and fall of a nation; with history as a mirror, one can look into the timing and circumstances in which powers are used by different executives. This research will be based on historical references such as Records of the Three Kingdoms, Zizhi Tongjian, Records of Heroes as well as questionnaires given to recipients who have entered the workforce more than one year. The number of final retrieved questionnaires are 228, all of which are valid.

This research discovers that (1) it is significant that, among the five bases of social power, executives with better expert power can make their organizations achieve better organizational effectiveness in a hyper-competitive environment (2) it is insignificant that, among the five bases of social power, executives with better referent power can make their organizations achieve better organizational effectiveness in a hyper-competitive environment (3) it is significant that, among the five bases of social power, executives with expert power can make their organizations achieve maximum organizational effectiveness and follow correct strategies when the organizations are in the phase of foundation (4) it is insignificant that, among the five bases of power, executives with better expert power can help their organizations develop fast when the organizations are at the development stage (5) it is insignificant that, among the five bases of power, executives with better referent power can help their organizations develop fast when the organizations are at the development stage, (6) it is significant that, among the five bases of power, executives with better referent power can make their organizations operate efficiently and steadily when the organizations are in the phase of maturity.

關鍵字(中)

★ 領導權力基礎
★ 組織情境
★ 組織效能
★ 歷史文獻
★ 專家權
★ 認同權

關鍵字(英)

論文目次

第一章緒論 1
1-1 研究動機 1
1-2 研究目的 3
1-3 研究流程 5
第二章文獻探討 7
2-1 組織生命週期理論 7
2-2 領導相關理論 10
2-3 權力相關理論 16
2-4 權力基礎與領導效能間的相關研究 22
第三章研究方法 36
3-1 研究架構 36
3-2 研究假設 37
3-3 研究變項與衡量 37
3-4 研究樣本與資料蒐集 41
3-5 資料統計分析方法 42
第四章研究結果與分析 43
4-1 敘述型統計分析 43
4-2 獨立樣本ｔ檢定 57
第五章 69
5-1 研究結論 69
5-2 管理實務建議 80
5-3 研究限制和建議 82
參考文獻 85

參考文獻

中文部分：
1.陳壽(晉)裴松之注(南朝) (2011)，三國志(魏書‧武帝記) (魏書‧文帝記) (魏書‧董二袁劉傳)(魏書‧張樂于張徐傳) (蜀書‧先主傳) (蜀書‧諸葛亮傳) (蜀書‧關張馬黃趙傳) (吳書‧孫破虜討逆傳)。臺灣商務印書館。
2.王粲(曹魏)(無日期)，漢末英雄記。取自維基文庫：https://zh.wikisource.org/zh-hant/%E6%BC%A2%E6%9C%AB%E8%8B%B1%E9%9B%84%E8%A8%98
3.佚名(孫吳)(無日期)，曹瞞傳。取自維基文庫：https://zh.wikisource.org/zh-hant/%E6%9B%B9%E7%9E%9E%E5%82%B3
4.魏收(北齊) (1974)，魏書。中華書局。
5.常璩(晉) (1987)，華陽國志校補圖注(繁體版)。上海：上海古籍出版社。
6.司馬光(宋) (1983)，資治通鑑。臺北，遠流出版社。
7.許士軍 (1993)。管理學，第十版，台北：東華書局。
8.陳瑜芬、吳明政、賴銘娟 (2006)，中華管理評論國際學報，第9卷4期，4-5。
9.廖國鋒、吳華春 (2003)。從正義知覺與關係品質的觀點探討領導者權力對員工工作投入影響之實證研究。人力資源管理學報，3(2)，1-25。
10.蔡培村 (1985)。國民中小學校長領導特質、權力基礎、學校組織結構及組織氣氛與工作滿足關係之比較。國立政治大學企業管理研究所博士論文，未出版，台北。

英文部分：
1.Barnard, C. I. (1938). The functions of the executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
2.Bass, B. M. (1990). From transactional to transformational leadership: Learning to share the vision. Organizational Dynamics, 18(3), 19-31.
3.Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond exceptions. NY; Free Press.
4.Blake, R. R., & Mouton, J. S. (1964). Breakthrough in organization development. Harvard Business Review, 42(6), 133-135.
5.Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. NY; Harper and Row.
6.Changanti, R., Radharao, C., & Mahajan, V. (1985). Life stage analysis: Planning for the small business. Handbook of Business Strategy.
7.Daft, R. L. (2004). Organization theory and design (8th Ed.). South-Western.
8.David, P. (1991). Family decline in Swedish welfare stafe. The Public Interest, 102, 65-77.
9.Emerson, R. M. (1962). Power-dependence relations. American Sociological Review, 27, 31–41.
10.Etgar, M. (1978). Selection of an effective channel control mix. Journal of Marketing, 42, 53–78.
11.Fiedler, F. E. (1967). A theory of leadership effectiveness. NY; McGraw-Hill.
12.Fincham, R. (1992). Perspectives on power: Processual, institutional and internal forms of organizational power. Journal of Management Studies, 29(6), 741-759.
13.Frazier, G. L., & Summers, J. O. (1984). Interfirm influence strategies and their application within distribution channels. Journal of Marketing, 48(3), 43-55.
14.French, J. R. P., & Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power in D. Cartwright (Ed.), studies in social power. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Institute for Social Research.
15.Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory: Action, structure and contradictions in social analysis. London; Macmillan.
16.Hanks, S. H., Watson, C. J., Jansen, E., & Chandler, G. N. (1993). Tightening the life-cycle construct: A taxonomic study of growth stage configurations in high-technology organizations. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 18(2), 5-30.
17.Harding, N., Lee, H., Ford, J., & Learmonth, M. (2011). Leadership and charisma, a desire that cannot speak its name. Human Relations, 64, 927-950.
18.Hemphill, J. K., & Coons, A. E. (1957). Development of the leader behavior description questionnaire, In Stogdill R. M. and Coons A. E. (Ed.), leader behavior: Its description and measurement. Columbus, Ohio; Bureau of Business Research, Ohio State University.
19.Hersey, P., & Blanchard, K. H. (1988). Management of organizational behavior: Utilizing human resources (5th Ed.). NJ; Prentice Hall.
20.Hinkin, T. R., & Schriesheim, C. A. (1989). Development and application of new scales to measure the French and Raven (1959) Bases of social power. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 561-567.
21.Hollander, E. P., & Julian, J. W. (1969). Contemporary trends in the analysis of the leadership process. Psychological Bulletin, 71, 387-397.
22.House, R. J. (1976). Leadership: The cutting edge, In J. G. Hunt & L. L. Larson (Ed.). Carbondale; Southern Illinois University Press.
23.Jacobs, T.O., & Jaques, E. (1990). Military rxecutive leadership, In K. E. Clark and M. B. Clark (Ed.), Measures of leadership. West Orange. NJ; Leadership Library of America.
24.Janda, K. F. (1960). Towards the explication of the concept of leadership interms of the concept of power. Human Relation, 13, 345-363.
25.Jones, G.R. (2001). Organizational theory: Text and cases (3rd Ed.). NJ; Prentice Hall.
26.Kazanjian, R. K. (1988). Relation of dominant problems to stages of growth in technology-based new ventures. The Academy of Management Journal, 31(2), 257-279.
27.Lippitt, G. L., & Schmidt, W. H. (1967). Crises in a developing organization. Harvard Business Review, (11-12), 102-112.
28.Mintzberg, H. (1983). Power in and around organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ; Prentice Hall.
29.Rauch, C. F., & Behling, O. (1984). Functionalism: Basis for an alternateapproach to the study of leadership, In J.G. Hunt, D.M. Hosking, C. A.Schriesheim, and R. Stewart (Ed.), Leaders and managers: International perspectives on managerial behavior and leadership, Elmsford. NY; Pergamon Press.
30.Richard, A. D. (1994). Hypercompetition (1st Ed.). NY; Free Press.
31.Robbins, S.P. (1990). Organization theory. NJ; Prentice-Hall.
32.Robbins, S.P. (2001). Organizational behavior (9th Ed.). NJ; Prentice-Hall.
33.Robbins, S.P., & Judge, T. (2013). Organizational behavior. NJ; Prentice-Hall.
34.Roberts, N. C. (1985). Transforming leadership: A process of collective action. Human Relations, 38(11), 1023-1046.
35.Sergiovanni, T. J., & Starratt, R. J. (1988). Supervision: Human perspectives. N Y; McGraw-Hill.
36.Smith, K. G., Mitchell, T. R., & Summer, C. E. (1985). Top level management priorities in different stages of the organizational life cycle. Academy of Management Journal, 28(4), 799-820.
37.Tannenbaum, R., Weschler, I. R., & Massarik, F. (1961). Leadership and organization. NY; McGraw-Hill.
38.Weber, M. (1947). Theory of social and economic organization. NY; The free Press.
39.White, R., & Lippert, R. (1953). Leader behavior and member reaction in three social climates, In D. Cartwright, & A. Zander (Ed.), group dynamics: Research and theory. NY; Harper＆ Row.
40.Yukl, G., & Falbe, C.M. (1991). Influence tactics and objectives in upward, downward and lateral relations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 416-423.
41.Yukl, G. (2002). Leadership in organizations (5th Ed.). NJ; Prentice-Hall.

指導教授

王群孝

審核日期

2019-6-28

推文