摘要(英) |
Domestic violence is historically a common problem. According to past statistics, the majority of the victims of domestic violence are women. Many studies have shown that women who have suffered prolonged domestic violence are prone to multiple physical and psychological traumas. If there are children in the families, children who witness domestic violence tend to be violent as well. Domestic abuse then leads to cycles of violence. To locate high-risk families where marital violence is likely to happen, and to ensure that women and children can live free from fear, this study draws from Women’s Living Condition Survey in 2015 conducted by the Ministry of Health and Welfare, and uses logit regression model to identify possible impacts on personalities of the abused women, family conditions, environmental factors in the probabilities and types of violence, frequency of abuse, and then explores the expectations of the battered women toward government policies.
The empirical results show that new residents, mothers whose children are under 6 years old, families which receive social welfare benefits, and wives who work and whose husbands are jobless, have significant positive correlations with the probability and frequency of marital violence, while age and education have negative protective effects. Among the types of marital violence, there are significant differences between the self-variables, indicating that different reasons lie behind different types of domestic abuse. For women who work while their husbands are unemployed, that the government could strengthen the measures for promoting gender equality is of utmost importance. |
參考文獻 |
中文文獻
1. Richard J Gelles and Claire Pedrick Cornell (1996),家庭暴力,劉秀娟譯,臺北市,揚智文化。
2. 毋嫘、洪煒、任雙成、麻超(2013),「婚姻中嚴重軀體暴力行為的個人-家庭-社會因素」,中國心理衛生雜誌,27(4),294-298頁。
3. 王濟川、郭志剛(2004),logistic迴歸模型-方法及應用,臺北市,五南。
4. 吳柳嬌(2005),「婚姻暴力的成因與處遇之研究」,國立中山大學,博士論文。
5. 宋麗玉(2013),婚姻暴力受暴婦女之處遇模式與成效:華人文化與經驗,臺北市,洪葉文化。
6. 肖潔、風笑天(2014),「中國家庭的婚姻暴力及其影響因素」,社會科學,(11),90-99頁。
7. 阮棋文、梁鳳玲、伍福生、秦紀椿、郭庭輝和黃茂穗(2004),「家庭暴力防治法保護令實施成效及對受暴婦女影響之探討」,秀傳醫學雜誌,5(3-4),77-85頁。
8. 林美薰、丁雁琪、陳俐容、劉美淑、吳素秋、江季璇、高小帆、陳昭帆(2009),家庭暴力防治工作人員服務手冊,臺北市,內政部。
9. 張瑋、洪煒、崔軼、蘇英(2014),「親密伴侶暴力中的性別差異研究」,中國性科學,23(9),96-99頁。
10. 陳秋瑩、王增勇、林美薰、楊翠娟、宋鴻樟(2006),「原鄉的家庭暴力及受暴婦女求助行為之探討-比較原漢之差異」,台灣公共衛生雜誌,25(1),65-74頁。
11. 陳若璋(1992),「台灣婚姻暴力之本質、歷程與影響」,婦女與兩性學刊,第3期,117-147頁。
12. 陳若璋(1992),「台灣婚姻暴力高危險因子之探討」,國立台灣大學社會學刊,第1992-1993卷期第21期,123-160頁。
13. 陳婷蕙(1997),「婚姻暴力中受虐婦女對脫離受虐關係的因應行為之研究」,私立東海大學,碩士論文。
14. 陳惠英、鄭媛玲(2012),「談婚姻受暴婦女的特性、需求與協助者的注意要點」,家庭教育雙月刊,(35),37-47頁。
15. 曾慶玲、周麗端(1999),「父母婚姻暴力對兒童問題行為影響研究」,家政教育學報,第2期,66-89頁。
16. 楊士隆主編(2015),暴力犯罪–原因、類型與對策,臺北市,五南。
17. 楊連謙、董秀珠(2013),「收入對婚姻權力及婚姻暴力的影響」,中華輔導與諮商學報,(35),121 -146頁。
18. 葉天恭(2005),「澎湖地區婚姻暴力分析與防治之研究」,國立中山大學,碩士論文。
19. 劉功姝、史桂麗、王立明和蘭鳳榮(2003),「3025例嬰幼兒母親受暴情況及對母嬰身心健康影響分析」,中國全科醫學,6(3),226-228頁。
20. 潘淑滿、張秀鴛、潘英美(2016),「我國婦女遭受親密關係暴力之調查研究」,社區發展季刊,第156期,193-211頁。
21. 蔡德輝、楊士隆(2017),犯罪學(七版),臺北市,五南。
22. 鄭瑞隆(2004),親密暴力:成因、後果與防治,嘉義市,蜂鳥。
23. 戴世玫(2016),「臺灣婚姻暴力圖像:從父權家族系統受暴網的觀點出發」,社會政策與社會工作學刊,20(2),43-82頁。
西文文獻
1. Abeya, S.G., Afework, M.F., and Yalew, A.W., (2011), “Intimate partner violence against women in western Ethiopia: prevalence, patterns, and associated factors ” , BMC Public Health, Vol.11, pp. 913-930.
2. Abramsky, T., Watts, C.H., Garcia-Moreno, C., Devries, K., Kiss, L., Ellsberg, M., Jansen, H.A., and Heise, L., (2011), “What factors are associated with recent intimate?Findings from the WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence ” , BMC Public Health, Vol.11, pp.109-125.
3. Brownridge, D.A., (2016), “Intimate Partner Violence in Interracial Relationships ” , Journal of Family Violence, Vol.31(7), pp. 865-875.
4. Holden, G.W. and Ritchie, K.L., (1991), “Linking Extreme Marital Discord, Child Rearing, and Child Behavior Problems: Evidence from Battered Women ” , Child Development, Vol. 62, (2),pp.311-327.
5. Krebs, C., Breiding, M.J., Browne, A. and Warner, T., (2011), “The Association Between Different Types of Intimate Partner Violence Experienced by Women ” , Journal of Family Violence, Vol.26 (6), pp. 487-500. |