參考文獻 |
英文參考文獻
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity and Innovation in Organizations.
Andriopoulos, C., &Lewis, M. W. (2009). Exploitation-Exploration Tensions and Organizational Ambidexterity : Managing Paradoxes of Innovation Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article : Exploitation-Exploration Tensions and Organizational Ambidexterity : Managing Paradoxes of In. Organization Science, 20(4), 696–717.
Bandura, A. (1965). Influence of models’ reinforcement contingencies on the acquisition of imitative responses., 1(6), 589–595. Retrieved from
Bledow, R., Frese, M., Anderson, N., Erez, M., &Farr, J. (2009). A Dialectic Perspective on Innovation: Conflicting Demands, Multiple Pathways, and Ambidexterity. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2(03), 305–337.
Borman, & Motowidlo. (1993). Expanding the Criterion Domain to Include Elements of Contextual Performance.
Cameron, K. S., &Quinn, R. E. (1999). An Introduction to changing organisational culture: Based on the competing values framework. Diagnosing and Chaning Organisational Culture, 1–12.
Campbell, J. P. (1990). Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology.
Chen, Tsui, Farh. (2002). Loyalty to supervisor vs. organizational commitment (Chen, Tsui, & Farh, 2002).pdf. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75, 339–356.
Chen, M. (2002). Transcending paradox : The Chinese & quot ; middle way & quot ; perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 20(1), 179–199. Retrieved from
DiMaggio, P. J., &Powell, W. W. (2012). THE IRON CAGE REVISITED: INSTITUTIONAL ISOMORPHISM AND COLLECTIVE RATIONALITY IN ORGANIZATIONAL FIELDS, 48(2), 147–160.
Dorfman, P. W., &Howell, J. P. (1988). Dimension of national culture and effective leadership patterns: Hofstede revisited.
Gong, Y., Huang, J., &Farh, J. (2009). Employee Learning Orientation, Transformational Leadership, and Employee Creativity: the Mediating Role of Employee Creative Self-Efficacy. Academy of Management Journal, 52(4), 765–778.
Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organisations across nations.
Hofstede, G. H. (1980). Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values.
Hu, L., &Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.
Huang, L. (2014). 在越南台商訓練模式跨文化調整之實務探討.
Janssen, O. (2001). FAIRNESS PERCEPTIONS AS A MODERATOR IN THE CURVILINEAR RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN JOB DEMANDS, AND JOB PERFORMANCE AND JOB SATISFACTION. Academy of Management Journal, 44(5), 1039–1050.
Jung, J. M., &Kellaris, J. J. (2004). Cross-national differences in proneness to scarcity effects: The moderating roles of familiarity, uncertainty avoidance, and need for cognitive closure. Psychology and Marketing, 21(9), 739–753.
Kanter, R. (1988). When a Thousand Flowers Bloom: Structural, Collective, and Social Conditions for Innovation in Organizations. In Knowledge Management and Organisational Design (Vol. 10, pp. 93–131). Elsevier.
Kleysen, R. F., &Street, C. T. (2001). Toward a multi‐dimensional measure of individual innovative behavior. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2(3), 284–296.
Miron-Spektor, E., Ingram, A., Keller, J., Smith, W. K., &Lewis, Marianne W. (2018). Microfoundations of Organizational Paradox: The Problem Is How We Think about the Problem. Academy of Management Journal, 61(1), 26–45.
Miron, E., Erez, M., &Naveh, E. (2004). Do personal characteristics and cultural values that promote innovation, quality, and efficiency compete or complement each other? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(2), 175–199.
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1978). Psychometric theory.
Poole, M. S., &Van deVen, A. H. (1989). Using Paradox to Build Management and Organization Theories. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 562–578.
Reneker, D. H., &Mazur, J. (1983). Dispirations, disclinations, dislocations, and chain twist in polyethylene crystals. Polymer, 24(11), 1387–1400.
Rosing, K., Frese, M., &Bausch, A. (2011). Explaining the heterogeneity of the leadership-innovation relationship: Ambidextrous leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 22(5), 956–974.
Schermerhorn,Hunt,&Osborn. (2000). Organizational behavior. NY: John Willy& Sons.
Schroeder, R., Van de Ven, A., Scudder, G., & Polley, D. (1989). The development of innovation ideas.
Scott, S. G., &Bruce, R. A. (1994). DETERMINANTS OF INNOVATIVE BEHAVIOR: A PATH MODEL OF INDIVIDUAL INNOVATION IN THE WORKPLACE. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580–607.
Scott Shane, S. Venkataraman, &MacMillan, I. (1995). Cultural Differences in Innovation Championing Strategies. Journal of Management, 21(5), 931–952.
Smith, W. K., &Lewis, M. W. (2011). TOWARD A THEORY OF PARADOX : A DYNAMIC EQUILIBRIUM MODEL Tecnicas de communicative. Academy of Manahement Review, 36(2), 381–403.
Swierstra, T., &Rip, A. (2007). Nano-ethics as NEST-ethics: Patterns of Moral Argumentation About New and Emerging Science and Technology. NanoEthics, 1(1), 3–20.
Thuy, N. (2016). 激勵制度、工作動機對於在台越南籍勞工-工作投入及工作績效影響之研究, (July).
Van deVen, A. H. (1986). Central Problems in the Management of Innovation. Management Science, 32(5), 590–607.
vanVianen, A. E. M., Shen, C.-T., &Chuang, A. (2011). Person-organization and person-supervisor fits: Employee commitments in a Chinese context. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(6), 906–926.
Wang, P., &Chan, P. S. (1995). Top management perception of strategic information processing in a turbulent environment. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 16(7), 33–43.
Wheaton, B. (1987). Assessment of Fit in Overidentified Models with Latent Variables. Sociological Methods & Research, 16(1), 118–154.
Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., &Griffin, R. W. (1993). Toward a Theory of Organizational Creativity. The Academy of Management Review, 18(2), 293.
Yukl, G., & Lepsinger, R. (2004). Flexible leadership: Creating value by balancing multiple challenges and choices.
Zhang, Xiaomeng, &Bartol, K. M. (2010). The influence of creative process engagement on employee creative performance and overall job performance: A curvilinear assessment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(5), 862–873.
Zhang, Y., Waldman, D. A., Han, Y., &Li, X. (2015). Paradoxical Leader Behaviors in People Management: Antecedents and Consequences. Academy of Management Journal, 58(2), 538–566.
中文參考文獻
傅馨瑩. (2018). 矛盾領導行為對部屬工作績效之影響:矛盾追隨行為的中介與調節效果探討. 國立中央大學.
劉追, 鄭倩. (2016). 不確定性規避與員工創新行為:創新自我效能感的中介作用.
李悦, 王懷勇. (2018). 双元創新行為與心理脫離:矛盾式領導風格的調節作用及其邊界條件, 39(10).
鄧伊惠. (2018). 矛盾領導行為與部屬任務性績效的關聯性 ─以部屬複雜整合力及部屬整合性思維為中介變項. |