在高可靠度叢集上的使用者定義多層保護機制

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：19

、訪客IP：18.188.185.65

姓名

辛塔雅(Shinta Nuraisya Arizky) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

資訊工程學系

論文名稱

在高可靠度叢集上的使用者定義多層保護機制
(User Defined Multi-Layer Protection on High Availability Cluster)

相關論文

★ 在TLS交握過程中使用SNI辨識影音串流平台服務

★ 基於 Altman Ratio和 Beneish M-Score 的財務困境預測中使用Stacking Ensemble Learning

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

高可用性(HA)雲端計算平台為計算節點提供高可用性的保護，系統中至少包含兩個計算節點。每個節點通常涉及主機和虛擬機（ VM）保護。在我們之前的研究中， HA 系統能在建立 HA 叢集後提供主機和虛擬機器(VM)保護。我們的 HA系統有 7 層保護：主機服務，主機操作系統，主機網絡，用於主機保護和 VM 網絡的主機電源， VM OS，用於 VM 保護的 VM 電源。如果高可用性叢集中發生任何故障，系統將循序診斷來檢測故障。但是，在某些環境中，某些階層可能無法被系統保護。因此，在本研究中，我們提出了一種 HA 叢集的保護方法， HA 系統可以動態地改變保護範圍。我們用了不同層級的保護在主機和 VM 上，來查找故障檢測時間和確定哪種組合提供最佳結果。從最終結果中我們得知：當使用 2 個主機階層時，最佳的階層組合為主機服務-主機網路；而當使用 3 個主機階層時，最佳的階層組合為主機服務-主機網路-主機作業系統而當使用 4 個主機階層時，最佳的階層組合為主機服務-主機網路-主機作業系統-主机功率。此外，用戶能額外使用 1階層（ VM 網絡）來保護其 VM。該研究表明，系統可以透過有限的保護階層來檢測所有故障。因此，如果在故障發生在未受保護的階層，則系統可以防止最壞
情況發生。

摘要(英)

A high availability (HA) cloud platform provides high availability protection to the compute pool, which involves at least two nodes. Each node typically involves host and virtual
machine (VM) protection. In our previous work, the HA system provides both host and VM protection once an HA cluster is created. Our HA system has 7 layer protections: host service,
host network, host OS, host power for host protection and VM network, VM OS, VM power for VM protection. If any failure occurred in the high availability cluster, the system uses
sequential diagnosis process to detect a failure. However, in some environment, some of the layer protections may not be supported. Therefore, in this study, we propose a way to modify
high availability protection in the HA cluster. So, the system can dynamically change the protection and the system can be more useful. We use various combination layer protections
for both hosts and VMs to find failure detection time and determine which combination layer protection that provides the best result. From the final result, we found out that the best
combination layer using 2 host layers is Host Service-Host Network; 3 host layers is Host Service-Host Network-Host OS; all layers (4 host layers) is Host Service-Host Network-Host
OS-Host Power. In addition, it could be better for the user to use 1 layer (VM network) to protect their VM. This study demonstrated that the system can detect all faults through limited layer protection. Thus, the system can prevent the worst case scenario if the failure occurred on the disabled layer protection.

關鍵字(中)

★ 高可用性
★ 集群
★ 保護

關鍵字(英)

★ high availability
★ cluster
★ protection

論文目次

摘要 i
Abstract ii
ACKNOWLEDGMENT iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS iv
LIST OF FIGURES vi
LIST OF TABLES viii
1 INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Background 1
1.2 Motivation 1
1.3 Research Objective 2
1.4 Research Contributions 2
1.5 Thesis Structure 2
2 BACKGROUND KNOWLEDGE & RELATED WORK 4
2.1 High Availability 4
2.1.1 High Availability Service System 5
2.2 Related Multiple Layers in Cloud 7
2.3 Related Detection Methods 8
3 METHODOLOGY 10
3.1 HASS Overview 10
3.2 Fault Detection Mechanism 11
3.2.1 Fault Detection Mechanism on Host Layer 11
3.2.2 Fault Detection Mechanism on VM Layer 18
3.3 Fault Recovery Mechanism 22
3.3.1 Fault Recovery Mechanism on Host Layer 22
3.3.2 Fault Recovery Mechanism on VM Layer 23
3.4 Integrate with OpenStack Horizon 23
4 EXPERIMENT SETUP AND ANALYSIS 25
4.1 Experiment Setup 25
4.2 Experiment Design 25
4.2.1 Experiment Design on Host Layer 25
4.2.2 Experiment Design on VM Layer 27
4.3 Experiment Result and Analysis 28
4.3.1 Host Experiment Result for 1 Active Layer 28
4.3.2 Host Experiment Result for 2 Layers 29
4.3.3 Host Experiment Result for 3 Layers 33
4.3.4 Host Experiment Result for 4 Layers (All Layers) 37
4.3.5 VM Experiment Result for 1 Layer 38
4.3.6 VM Experiment Result for 2 Layers 39
4.3.7 VM Experiment Result for 3 Layers 41
5 CONCLUSION 42
REFERENCES 44

參考文獻

[1] C. Y. Cheng, Z. J. Su, C. C. Chen, S. J. Chen, and W. J. Wang, “Supporting Software-Defined HA Clusters on Openstack Platform,” Proc. 2017 IEEE Int. Conf. Appl. Syst. Innov. Appl. Syst. Innov. Mod. Technol. ICASI 2017, pp. 268–271, 2017.
[2] Intel, “Intelligent Platform Management Interface (IPMI).” [Online]. Available: https://www.intel.com.tw/content/www/tw/zh/servers/ipmi/ipmi-technical-resources.html.
[3] V. R. Yerravalli and A. Tharigonda, “High Availability Cluster Failover Mechanism Using Artificial Neural Networks,” Proc. - 2015 IEEE Int. Conf. Cloud Comput. Emerg. Mark. CCEM 2015, pp. 81–84, 2016.
[4] L. G. Zhu, D. Z. Han, S. Z. Zhou, and C. S. Xie, “High Availability Cluster with Combining NAS and ISCSI,” Proc. 2006 Int. Conf. Mach. Learn. Cybern., vol. 2006, no. August, pp. 4455–4460, 2006.
[5] S. L. Campbell and R. Nikoukhah, “Auxiliary Signal Design for Failure Detection,” IEEE Control Syst., vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 124–126, 2006.
[6] D. Trihinas, “Monitoring Elastically Adaptive Cloud Services,” Master Comput. Sci. Thesis, vol. X, no. X, p. 74, 2014.
[7] Y. Wu, Y. Yuan, G. Yang, and W. Zheng, “An Adaptive Task-Level Fault-Tolerant Approach to Grid,” J. Supercomput., vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 97–114, 2010.
[8] Y. L. Lee, M. H. Ho, A. Suharsono, Y. C. Pan, W. J. Wang, and D. Liang, “NCU-HA: A Lightweight HA System for Kernel-Based Virtual Machine,” 2017 Int. Conf. Platf. Technol. Serv. PlatCon 2017 - Proc., 2017.
[9] C.D. Lu, "Scalable Diskless Checkpointing for Large Parallel Systems." [Online]. Available:
https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/bitstream/handle/2142/11054/Scalable%20Diskless%20Checkpointing%20for%20Large%20Parallel%20Systems.pdf?sequence=2&isAllowe
d=y

指導教授

王尉任梁德容(Wei-Jen Wang Deron Liang)

審核日期

2019-7-27

推文