博碩士論文 106423039 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:68 、訪客IP:3.136.234.187
姓名 王薏慈(Yih-Tsyr Wang)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 資訊管理學系
論文名稱 探討軟體專案團隊交互記憶系統對於流程調適績效之影響
(The Effects of Transactive Memory System of Software Project Teams on Process Tailoring Performance: The Moderating Role of Task Conflict and Shared Temporal Cognition)
相關論文
★ 專案管理的溝通關鍵路徑探討─以某企業軟體專案為例★ 運用並探討會議流如何促進敏捷發展過程中團隊溝通與文件化:以T銀行系統開發為例
★ 專案化資訊服務中人力連續派遣決策模式之研究─以高鐵行控資訊設備維護為例★ 以組織正義觀點介入案件指派決策之研究
★ 應用協調理論建立系統軟體測試中問題改善之協作流程★ 應用案例式推理於問題管理系統之研究 -以筆記型電腦產品為例
★ 運用限制理論於多專案開發模式的人力資源配置之探討★ 應用會議流方法於軟體專案開發之個案研究:以翰昇科技公司為例
★ 多重專案、多期再規劃的軟體開發接案決策模式:以南亞科技資訊部門為例★ 會議導向敏捷軟體開發及系統設計:以大學畢業專題為例
★ 一種基於物件、屬性導向之變更影響分析方法於差異化產品設計★ 會議流方法對大學畢業專題的團隊合作品質影響之實驗研究
★ 實施敏捷式發展法於大學部畢業專題之 行動研究 – 以中央大學資管系為例★ 建立一個用來評核自然語言需求品質的線上資訊系統
★ 結合本體論與模糊分析網路程序法於軟體測試之風險與風險關聯辨識★ 在軟體反向工程中針對UML結構模型圖之線上品質評核系統
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   [檢視]  [下載]
  1. 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
  2. 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
  3. 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。

摘要(中) 軟體專案具有其獨特性,因此當專案團隊在進行軟體開發時,需要針對所面臨到的情境去調適流程。在這樣如此變動複雜且知識密集的環境下,交互記憶系統(TMS)讓團隊共享彼此經驗及專業化知識,並具備動態調整的能力,使團隊更能善加利用過去成功的經驗,提升日後進行調試時的有效性及效率。此外,由於任務間環環相扣的特性往往會牽一髮而動全身,因此在調適的過程中容易造成任務衝突,再加上時間為團隊間不可忽視的重要元素,成員間對於時間上是否具備共識,都是影響團隊在運作軟體流程調適(SPT)時的因素。

綜合上述,本研究提出一概念模型來討論TMS是否會對SPT績效造成影響,並加入任務衝突以及時間共識作為調節變數,以探討兩者是否會有增強或削弱的作用。本研究採用線上問卷調查法,共取得236份有效樣本,並透過SPSS、SmartPLS3.0進行資料分析及驗證模型與假說。研究結果顯示,TMS對SPT的有效性及效率皆有正向的影響,且此影響會受到任務衝突的負向調節以及時間共識的正向調節。本研究為首先探討TMS與SPT績效之研究,並且驗證出任務衝突在複雜性高的環境下仍受到其他環境因素影響導致負向結果,以及過往幾乎不提及的時間元素會使團隊成員產生不同時間框架,導致團隊難以取得一個時間共識,影響團隊的運作。
摘要(英) Software projects have uniqueness in nature, such as team size, complexity, project time etc. Project teams need to tailor their own software process to fit the characteristics or the situations when developing a new project. In such a complex and knowledge-intensive environment, transactive memory system (TMS) can help teams make a good use of their successful tailoring experiences in the past and improve the tailoring performance includes effectiveness and efficiency when they have a need. Besides, tasks are thus closely connected and inseparable, so they’re easy to cause the task conflict. Plus, time is an important element in the teams. Task conflict and the shared temporal cognitions (STC) are factors that affect the software process tailoring (SPT).

With the aforementioned backdrop, this research proposed a model to explore whether and how TMS affects the SPT performance, in which task conflict and STC are added as moderator variables. This research adapted online questionnaire survey, obtained 236 valid samples, and analyzed the data by using SmartPLS3.0 and SPSS. The results reveal that TMS has positive impact on the performance of SPT. Moreover, TMS can also be negative moderated by task conflict and positive moderated by STC. Discussions in terms of theoretical and practical implications are also provided.
關鍵字(中) ★ 軟體流程調適
★ 交互記憶系統
★ 任務衝突
★ 時間共識
★ 軟體開發
關鍵字(英) ★ Software Process Tailoring
★ Transactive Memory System
★ Task Conflict
★ Shared Temporal Cognitions
★ Software Project Development
論文目次 目錄
摘要 i
Abstract iii
誌謝 iv
目錄 v
圖目錄 vii
表目錄 viii
第一章 緒論 1
1.1. 研究背景與問題 1
1.2. 研究目的與方法 4
1.3. 研究範圍與假設 5
1.4. 研究架構 5
第二章 理論背景 7
2.1 軟體流程調適績效 7
2.2 交互記憶系統 10
2.3 衝突 13
2.4 時間共識 16
第三章 研究假說與模型 19
3.1 交互記憶系統與軟體流程調適績效 19
3.2 任務衝突過程之調節效果 21
3.3 時間共識之調節效果 22
第四章 研究方法 26
4.1 資料收集與樣本 26
4.2 變數定義與衡量 27
4.3 問卷設計 28
4.4 資料分析方法 30
第五章 資料分析與結果 33
5.1 樣本結構分析 33
5.2 樣本特徵分析 34
5.3 測量模型分析 36
5.4 結構模型分析 42
第六章 結果與討論 49
6.1 研究結果 49
6.2 理論意涵 51
6.3 實務意涵 54
第七章 結論 56
7.1 研究貢獻 56
7.2 研究限制與未來發展 56
參考文獻 58
中文文獻 58
英文文獻 58

圖目錄
圖1 研究架構圖 6
圖2 研究模型 25
圖3 顯著性分析 44
圖4 調節效果圖_任務衝突 47
圖5 調節效果圖_時間共識 48

表目錄
表1 變數定義 27
表2 本研究之問項內容與參考文獻 29
表3 MISQ期刊文獻使用PLS-SEM之原因 32
表4 樣本特徵 34
表5 測量模型結果 38
表6 HTMT值 40
表7 VIFS值 41
表8 假說驗證之結果 46
參考文獻 中文文獻
朱長豐. (2010). 基於時間框架效應下的企業知識團隊衝突與管理. 企業活力(2), 48-52.
張鋼 & 袁國方. (2008). 時間框架效應與團隊知識衝突.
袁國方 & 張鋼. (2015). 時間框架效應下時間個性差異對知識團隊創新的影響機制研究. 南開管理評論, 18(3), 102-110.

英文文獻
Açıkgöz, A., Günsel, A., Bayyurt, N., & Kuzey, C. (2014). Team climate, team cognition, team intuition, and software quality: The moderating role of project complexity. Group Decision and Negotiation, 23(5), 1145-1176.
Afzalur Rahim, M. (2002). Toward a theory of managing organizational conflict. International journal of conflict management, 13(3), 206-235.
Aiken, L. S., West, S. G., & Reno, R. R. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions: Sage.
Amason, A. C., & Sapienza, H. J. (1997). The effects of top management team size and interaction norms on cognitive and affective conflict. Journal of management, 23(4), 495-516.
Amason, A. C., & Schweiger, D. M. (1994). Resolving the paradox of conflict, strategic decision making, and organizational performance. International journal of conflict management, 5(3), 239-253.
Amason, A. C., & Schweiger, D. M. (1997). The effects of conflict on strategic decision making effectiveness and organizational. Using conflict in organizations, 101.
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological bulletin, 103(3), 411.
Andersson, J., Baresi, L., Bencomo, N., De Lemos, R., Gorla, A., Inverardi, P., & Vogel, T. (2013). Software engineering processes for self-adaptive systems. In Software Engineering for Self-Adaptive Systems II (pp. 51-75): Springer.
Argote, L. (2015). An opportunity for mutual learning between organizational learning and global strategy researchers: transactive memory systems. Global Strategy Journal, 5(2), 198-203.
Argote, L., & Ren, Y. (2012). Transactive memory systems: A microfoundation of dynamic capabilities. Journal of Management Studies, 49(8), 1375-1382.
Ariely, D., & Zakay, D. (2001). A timely account of the role of duration in decision making. Acta psychologica, 108(2), 187-207.
Asch, S. E. (1946). Forming impressions of personality. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41(3), 258.
Austin, J. R. (2003). Transactive memory in organizational groups: the effects of content, consensus, specialization, and accuracy on group performance. Journal of applied psychology, 88(5), 866.
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 16(1), 74-94.
Bar-Anan, Y., Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (2006). The association between psychological distance and construal level: evidence from an implicit association test. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135(4), 609.
Barki, H., & Hartwick, J. (2001). Interpersonal conflict and its management in information system development. MIS quarterly, 195-228.
Barsade, S. G., Ward, A. J., Turner, J. D., & Sonnenfeld, J. A. (2000). To your heart′s content: A model of affective diversity in top management teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(4), 802-836.
Bollen, K. A. (1989). A new incremental fit index for general structural equation models. Sociological Methods & Research, 17(3), 303-316.
Brandon, D. P., & Hollingshead, A. B. (2004). Transactive memory systems in organizations: Matching tasks, expertise, and people. Organization science, 15(6), 633-644.
Chandran, S., & Menon, G. (2004). When a day means more than a year: Effects of temporal framing on judgments of health risk. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(2), 375-389.
Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern methods for business research, 295(2), 295-336.
Chin, W. W. (2010). How to write up and report PLS analyses. In Handbook of partial least squares (pp. 655-690): Springer.
Choi, S. Y., Lee, H., & Yoo, Y. (2010). The impact of information technology and transactive memory systems on knowledge sharing, application, and team performance: a field study. MIS quarterly, 855-870.
Chow, T., & Cao, D.-B. (2008). A survey study of critical success factors in agile software projects. Journal of systems and software, 81(6), 961-971.
Chronicles, C. (2003). The Standish Group International. In: Inc.
Churchill Jr, G. A. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of marketing research, 16(1), 64-73.
Cohen, J. (2013). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences: Routledge.
De Dreu, C. K. (1997). Productive conflict: The importance of conflict management and conflict issue. Using conflict in organizations, 9-22.
De Dreu, C. K. (2006). When too little or too much hurts: Evidence for a curvilinear relationship between task conflict and innovation in teams. Journal of management, 32(1), 83-107.
De Dreu, C. K., & Weingart, L. R. (2003). Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: a meta-analysis. Journal of applied psychology, 88(4), 741.
De Wit, F. R., Greer, L. L., & Jehn, K. A. (2012). The paradox of intragroup conflict: a meta-analysis. Journal of applied psychology, 97(2), 360.
DeChurch, L. A., & Marks, M. A. (2001). Maximizing the benefits of task conflict: The role of conflict management. International journal of conflict management, 12(1), 4-22.
DeChurch, L. A., & Mesmer-Magnus, J. R. (2010). The cognitive underpinnings of effective teamwork: A meta-analysis. Journal of applied psychology, 95(1), 32.
Demirors, O., Demirors, E., Tarhan, A., & Yildiz, A. (2000). Tailoring ISO/IEC 12207 for instructional software development. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 26th Euromicro Conference. EUROMICRO 2000. Informatics: Inventing the Future.
Diegmann, P., & Rosenkranz, C. (2017). Team Performance in Agile Software Development Projects: The Effects of Requirements Changes, Time Pressure, Team Diversity, and Conflict. Management, 2.
Dokko, G., Kane, A. A., & Tortoriello, M. (2014). One of us or one of my friends: How social identity and tie strength shape the creative generativity of boundary-spanning ties. Organization Studies, 35(5), 703-726.
Dooley, R. S., & Fryxell, G. E. (1999). Attaining decision quality and commitment from dissent: The moderating effects of loyalty and competence in strategic decision-making teams. Academy of Management journal, 42(4), 389-402.
Drucker, P. (2012). The practice of management: Routledge.
Ellis, A. P. (2006). System breakdown: The role of mental models and transactive memory in the relationship between acute stress and team performance. Academy of Management journal, 49(3), 576-589.
F. Hair Jr, J., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & G. Kuppelwieser, V. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) An emerging tool in business research. European Business Review, 26(2), 106-121.
Faraj, S., & Sproull, L. (2000). Coordinating expertise in software development teams. Management science, 46(12), 1554-1568.
Filippova, A., & Cho, H. (2016). The effects and antecedents of conflict in free and open source software development. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing.
Firesmith, D. (2004). Creating a project-specific requirements engineering process. Journal of Object technology, 3(5), 31-44.
Fornell, C., & Bookstein, F. L. (1982). Two structural equation models: LISREL and PLS applied to consumer exit-voice theory. Journal of marketing research, 19(4), 440-452.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39-50.
Gevers, J. M., & AG Peeters, M. (2009). A pleasure working together? The effects of dissimilarity in team member conscientiousness on team temporal processes and individual satisfaction. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 30(3), 379-400.
Gevers, J. M., Rutte, C. G., & van Eerde, W. (2004). How project teams achieve coordinated action: A model of shared cognitions on time. In Time in groups (pp. 67-85): Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Gevers, J. M., Rutte, C. G., & Van Eerde, W. (2006). Meeting deadlines in work groups: Implicit and explicit mechanisms. Applied psychology, 55(1), 52-72.
Gevers, J. M., Van Eerde, W., & Rutte, C. G. (2009). Team self-regulation and meeting deadlines in project teams: Antecedents and effects of temporal consensus. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 18(3), 295-321.
Gino, F., Argote, L., Miron-Spektor, E., & Todorova, G. (2010). First, get your feet wet: The effects of learning from direct and indirect experience on team creativity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 111(2), 102-115.
Ginsberg, M. P., & Quinn, L. H. (1995). Process tailoring and the the software capability maturity model.
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. In: Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing theory and Practice, 19(2), 139-152.
Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Pieper, T. M., & Ringle, C. M. (2012). The use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in strategic management research: a review of past practices and recommendations for future applications. Long range planning, 45(5-6), 320-340.
Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Mena, J. A. (2012). An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 40(3), 414-433.
Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): Sage publications.
Hair Jr, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Gudergan, S. P. (2017). Advanced issues in partial least squares structural equation modeling: Sage Publications.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 43(1), 115-135.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. In New challenges to international marketing (pp. 277-319): Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Hey, J. D., & Paradiso, M. (2006). Preferences over temporal frames in dynamic decision problems: An experimental investigation. The Manchester School, 74(2), 123-137.
Hollingshead, A. B. (1998). Communication, learning, and retrieval in transactive memory systems. Journal of experimental social psychology, 34(5), 423-442.
Hood, A. C., Bachrach, D. G., & Lewis, K. (2014). Transactive Memory Systems, Conflict, Size and Performance in Teams. Journal of Leadership, Accountability & Ethics, 11(3).
Hsu, J. S.-C., Shih, S.-P., Chiang, J. C., & Liu, J. Y.-C. (2012). The impact of transactive memory systems on IS development teams′ coordination, communication, and performance. International Journal of Project Management, 30(3), 329-340.
Hu, L. t., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, 6(1), 1-55.
Huang, C.-C., & Chen, P.-K. (2018). Exploring the antecedents and consequences of the transactive memory system: an empirical analysis. Journal of Knowledge Management, 22(1), 92-118.
Humphrey, D. R. (2001). Systems, methods, and devices for controlling external devices by signals derived directly from the nervous system. In: Google Patents.
Humphrey, W. S., Snyder, T. R., & Willis, R. R. (1991). Software process improvement at Hughes Aircraft. IEEE software, 8(4), 11-23.
Jackson, M., & Moreland, R. L. (2009). Transactive memory in the classroom. Small Group Research, 40(5), 508-534.
Jacobson, I., Booch, G., & Rumbaugh, J. (1999). The unified process. IEEE software(3), 96-102.
Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Majchrzak, A. (2008). Knowledge collaboration among professionals protecting national security: Role of transactive memories in ego-centered knowledge networks. Organization science, 19(2), 260-276.
Jehn, K. A. (1994). Enhancing effectiveness: An investigation of advantages and disadvantages of value-based intragroup conflict. International journal of conflict management, 5(3), 223-238.
Jehn, K. A. (1995). A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 256-282.
Jehn, K. A. (1997). A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in organizational groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 530-557.
Jehn, K. A., Greer, L., Levine, S., & Szulanski, G. (2008). The effects of conflict types, dimensions, and emergent states on group outcomes. Group Decision and Negotiation, 17(6), 465-495.
Jehn, K. A., & Mannix, E. A. (2001). The dynamic nature of conflict: A longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance. Academy of Management journal, 44(2), 238-251.
Jehn, K. A., Northcraft, G. B., & Neale, M. A. (1999). Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(4), 741-763.
Jiang, J., & Klein, G. (2000). Software development risks to project effectiveness. Journal of systems and software, 52(1), 3-10.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). On the interpretation of intuitive probability: A reply to Jonathan Cohen. Cognition, 7(4), 409-411.
Kalus, G., & Kuhrmann, M. (2013). Criteria for software process tailoring: a systematic review. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Software and System Process.
Kankanhalli, A., Tan, B. C., & Wei, K.-K. (2006). Conflict and performance in global virtual teams. Journal of management information systems, 23(3), 237-274.
Karniol, R., & Ross, M. (1996). The motivational impact of temporal focus: Thinking about the future and the past. Annual review of psychology, 47(1), 593-620.
Kees, J. (2010). Temporal framing in health advertising: The role of risk and future orientation. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 32(1), 33-46.
Kelley, H. H., & Thibaut, J. W. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence: John Wiley & Sons.
Kim, D., Mu, H., & Moon, T. (2018). Impact of Transactive Memory Systems on Team Performance and the Moderating Effect of Joint Decision Making. Paper presented at the International Conference on Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking and Parallel/Distributed Computing.
Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration (IJeC), 11(4), 1-10.
Kraemer, H. C., & Blasey, C. M. (2004). Centring in regression analyses: a strategy to prevent errors in statistical inference. International journal of methods in psychiatric research, 13(3), 141-151.
Kühberger, A. (1998). The influence of framing on risky decisions: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 75(1), 23-55.
Lee, M.-J., Lee, C. B., Lee, D., Lee, S. R., Chang, M., Hur, J. H., . . . Seo, S. (2011). A fast, high-endurance and scalable non-volatile memory device made from asymmetric Ta 2 O 5− x/TaO 2− x bilayer structures. Nature materials, 10(8), 625.
Lewis, K. (2003). Measuring transactive memory systems in the field: scale development and validation. Journal of applied psychology, 88(4), 587.
Lewis, K. (2004). Knowledge and performance in knowledge-worker teams: A longitudinal study of transactive memory systems. Management science, 50(11), 1519-1533.
Lewis, K., Belliveau, M., Herndon, B., & Keller, J. (2007). Group cognition, membership change, and performance: Investigating the benefits and detriments of collective knowledge. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 103(2), 159-178.
Lewis, K., & Herndon, B. (2011). Transactive memory systems: Current issues and future research directions. Organization science, 22(5), 1254-1265.
Lewis, K., Lange, D., & Gillis, L. (2005). Transactive memory systems, learning, and learning transfer. Organization science, 16(6), 581-598.
Liang, D. W., Moreland, R., & Argote, L. (1995). Group versus individual training and group performance: The mediating role of transactive memory. Personality and social psychology bulletin, 21(4), 384-393.
Liang, T.-P., Jiang, J., Klein, G. S., & Liu, J. Y.-C. (2009). Software quality as influenced by informational diversity, task conflict, and learning in project teams. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 57(3), 477-487.
Liao, J., Jimmieson, N. L., O’Brien, A. T., & Restubog, S. L. (2012). Developing transactive memory systems: Theoretical contributions from a social identity perspective. Group & organization management, 37(2), 204-240.
Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (1998). The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: A test of temporal construal theory. Journal of personality and social psychology, 75(1), 5.
Liu, H., Wang, Q., & Mei, Y. (2012). Effects of start-up firm′s social network on knowledge transfer: An empirical study. Paper presented at the 2012 International Conference on Information Management, Innovation Management and Industrial Engineering.
Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (1992). Anomalies in intertemporal choice: Evidence and an interpretation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(2), 573-597.
Loewenstein, G. F. (1988). Frames of mind in intertemporal choice. Management science, 34(2), 200-214.
Machado, C. F., De Oliveira, L. C., & Fernandes, R. A. (1999). Experience Report-Restructure of Processes based on ISO/IEC 12207 and SW-CMM in CELEPAR. Paper presented at the Proceedings 4th IEEE International Software Engineering Standards Symposium and Forum (ISESS′99).′Best Software Practices for the Internet Age′.
Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2001). A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of management review, 26(3), 356-376.
Marques Santos, C., & Margarida Passos, A. (2013). Team mental models, relationship conflict and effectiveness over time. Team Performance Management, 19(7/8), 363-385.
Maruping, L. M., Venkatesh, V., Thatcher, S. M., & Patel, P. C. (2015). Folding under pressure or rising to the occasion? Perceived time pressure and the moderating role of team temporal leadership. Academy of Management journal, 58(5), 1313-1333.
Mathieu, J. E., Heffner, T. S., Goodwin, G. F., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (2000). The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. Journal of applied psychology, 85(2), 273.
Matthews, L. M., Zablah, A. R., Hair, J. F., & Marshall, G. W. (2016). Increased engagement or reduced exhaustion: which accounts for the effect of job resources on salesperson job outcomes? Journal of Marketing theory and Practice, 24(3), 249-264.
Michinov, N., & Michinov, E. (2009). Investigating the relationship between transactive memory and performance in collaborative learning. Learning and Instruction, 19(1), 43-54.
Mohammed, S., & Nadkarni, S. (2011). Temporal diversity and team performance: The moderating role of team temporal leadership. Academy of Management journal, 54(3), 489-508.
Mohammed, S., Tesler, R., & Hamilton, K. (2013). : Time and Team Cognition: Toward Greater Integration of Temporal Dynamics. In Theories of Team Cognition (pp. 113-142): Routledge.
Moreland, R. L., & Thompson, L. (2006). Transactive memory: Learning who knows what in work groups and organizations. Small groups: Key readings, 327.
Nicotera, A. M. (1993). Beyond two dimensions: A grounded theory model of conflict-handling behavior. Management Communication Quarterly, 6(3), 282-306.
Nunnally, J., & Bernstein, I. (1994). Psychometric Theory 3rd edition (MacGraw-Hill, New York).
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory: 2d Ed: McGraw-Hill.
O′Neill, T. A., Allen, N. J., & Hastings, S. E. (2013). Examining the “Pros” and “Cons” of Team Con flict: A Team-Level Meta-Analysis of Task, Relationship, and Process Conflict. Human Performance, 26(3), 236-260.
Olson, T. G., & Reizer, N. R. (1994). A Software Process Framework for the SEI Capability Maturity Modelsm. Software Engineer Institute September.
Paese, P. W. (1995). Effects of framing on actual time allocation decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 61(1), 67-76.
Pearsall, M. J., & Ellis, A. P. (2006). The effects of critical team member assertiveness on team performance and satisfaction. Journal of management, 32(4), 575-594.
Pedreira, O., Piattini, M., Luaces, M. R., & Brisaboa, N. R. (2007). A systematic review of software process tailoring. ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 32(3), 1-6.
Pelled, L. H. (1996). Demographic diversity, conflict, and work group outcomes: An intervening process theory. Organization science, 7(6), 615-631.
Pelled, L. H., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Xin, K. R. (1999). Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), 1-28.
Peltokorpi, V. (2008). Transactive memory systems. Review of General Psychology, 12(4), 378-394.
Peterson, R. S., & Behfar, K. J. (2003). The dynamic relationship between performance feedback, trust, and conflict in groups: A longitudinal study. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 92(1-2), 102-112.
Ployhart, R. E., & Vandenberg, R. J. (2010). Longitudinal research: The theory, design, and analysis of change. Journal of management, 36(1), 94-120.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of applied psychology, 88(5), 879.
Polo, M., Piattini, M., Ruiz, F., & Calero, C. (1999). MANTEMA: A complete rigorous methodology for supporting maintenance based on the ISO/IEC 12207 Standard. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Third European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering (Cat. No. PR00090).
Rahim, A., & Bonoma, T. V. (1979). Managing organizational conflict: A model for diagnosis and intervention. Psychological reports, 44(3_suppl), 1323-1344.
Rau, D. (2006). Top management team transactive memory, information gathering, and perceptual accuracy. Journal of Business Research, 59(4), 416-424.
Ren, Y., & Argote, L. (2011). Transactive memory systems 1985–2010: An integrative framework of key dimensions, antecedents, and consequences. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 189-229.
Resick, C. J., Murase, T., Bedwell, W. L., Sanz, E., Jiménez, M., & DeChurch, L. A. (2010). Mental model metrics and team adaptability: A multi-facet multi-method examination. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 14(4), 332.
Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., & Straub, D. (2012). A critical look at the use of PLS-SEM in MIS Quarterly. MIS Quarterly (MISQ), 36(1).
Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J.-M. (2015). SmartPLS 3. Boenningstedt: SmartPLS GmbH, http://www. smartpls. com.
Roberts, J. A., Hann, I.-H., & Slaughter, S. A. (2006). Understanding the motivations, participation, and performance of open source software developers: A longitudinal study of the Apache projects. Management science, 52(7), 984-999.
Rolland, C. (2009). Method engineering: towards methods as services. Software Process: Improvement and Practice, 14(3), 143-164.
Rulke, D. L., & Rau, D. (2000). Investigating the encoding process of transactive memory development in group training. Group & organization management, 25(4), 373-396.
Rus, I., Lindvall, M., & Sinha, S. (2002). Knowledge management in software engineering. IEEE software, 19(3), 26-38.
Rusbult, C. E., & Van Lange, P. A. (2003). Interdependence, interaction, and relationships. Annual review of psychology, 54(1), 351-375.
Rutherford, B., Park, J., & Han, S.-L. (2011). Increasing job performance and decreasing salesperson propensity to leave: An examination of an Asian sales force. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 31(2), 171-183.
Rutherford, B. N., Wei, Y., Park, J., & Hur, W.-M. (2012). Increasing job performance and reducing turnover: An examination of female Chinese salespeople. Journal of Marketing theory and Practice, 20(4), 423-436.
Ryan, S., & O’Connor, R. V. (2013). Acquiring and sharing tacit knowledge in software development teams: An empirical study. Information and Software Technology, 55(9), 1614-1624.
Santos, C. M., Uitdewilligen, S., & Passos, A. M. (2015). Why is your team more creative than mine? The influence of shared mental models on intra‐group conflict, team creativity and effectiveness. Creativity and Innovation Management, 24(4), 645-658.
Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., Thiele, K. O., & Gudergan, S. P. (2016). Estimation issues with PLS and CBSEM: Where the bias lies! Journal of Business Research, 69(10), 3998-4010.
Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., Smith, D., Reams, R., & Hair Jr, J. F. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): A useful tool for family business researchers. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 5(1), 105-115.
Schreiber, J. B., Nora, A., Stage, F. K., Barlow, E. A., & King, J. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. The Journal of educational research, 99(6), 323-338.
Schwalbe, K. (2015). Information technology project management: Cengage Learning.
Shah, P. P., & Jehn, K. A. (1993). Do friends perform better than acquaintances? The interaction of friendship, conflict, and task. Group Decision and Negotiation, 2(2), 149-165.
Simons, T. L., & Peterson, R. S. (2000). Task conflict and relationship conflict in top management teams: The pivotal role of intragroup trust. Journal of applied psychology, 85(1), 102.
Srivannaboon, S. (2006). 2006 Graduate Student of the Year Paper Award Winner: Linking Project Management with Business Strategy. Project Management Journal, 37(5), 88-96.
Standifer, R., & Bluedorn, A. (2006). Alliance management teams and entrainment: Sharing temporal mental models. Human Relations, 59(7), 903-927.
Standifer, R. L., Raes, A. M., Peus, C., Passos, A. M., Santos, C. M., & Weisweiler, S. (2015). Time in teams: Cognitions, conflict and team satisfaction. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 30(6), 692-708.
Stone, M. (1974). Cross‐validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 36(2), 111-133.
Swann Jr, W. B., Polzer, J. T., Seyle, D. C., & Ko, S. J. (2004). Finding value in diversity: Verification of personal and social self-views in diverse groups. Academy of management review, 29(1), 9-27.
Tenenhaus, M., Vinzi, V. E., Chatelin, Y.-M., & Lauro, C. (2005). PLS path modeling. Computational statistics & data analysis, 48(1), 159-205.
Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2000). Temporal construal and time-dependent changes in preference. Journal of personality and social psychology, 79(6), 876.
Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2003). Temporal construal. Psychological review, 110(3), 403.
Turner, R., Huemann, M., & Keegan, A. (2008). Human resource management in the project-oriented organization: employee well-being and ethical treatment. International Journal of Project Management, 26(5), 577-585.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453-458.
Urbach, N., & Ahlemann, F. (2010). Structural equation modeling in information systems research using partial least squares. Journal of Information technology theory and application, 11(2), 5-40.
von Wangenheim, C. G., Lichtnow, D., Von Wangenheim, A., & Comunello, E. (2001). Supporting knowledge management in university software R&D groups. Paper presented at the International Workshop on Learning Software Organizations.
Waller, M. J., Conte, J. M., Gibson, C. B., & Carpenter, M. A. (2001). The effect of individual perceptions of deadlines on team performance. Academy of management review, 26(4), 586-600.
Wegner, D. M. (1987). Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. In Theories of group behavior (pp. 185-208): Springer.
Wegner, D. M. (1995). A computer network model of human transactive memory. Social cognition, 13(3), 319-339.
Wegner, D. M., Giuliano, T., & Hertel, P. T. (1985). Cognitive interdependence in close relationships. In Compatible and incompatible relationships (pp. 253-276): Springer.
Whelan, E., & Teigland, R. (2013). Transactive memory systems as a collective filter for mitigating information overload in digitally enabled organizational groups. Information and Organization, 23(3), 177-197.
Wold, H. (2004). Partial least squares. Encyclopedia of statistical sciences, 9.
Xia, W., & Lee, G. (2004). Grasping the complexity of IS development projects. Communications of the ACM, 47(5), 68-74.
Xu, P. (2005). Knowledge support in software process tailoring. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
Xu, P., & Ramesh, B. (2003). A tool for the capture and use of process knowledge in process tailoring. Paper presented at the 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the.
Xu, P., & Ramesh, B. (2007). Software process tailoring: an empirical investigation. Journal of management information systems, 24(2), 293-328.
Xu, P., & Ramesh, B. (2008). Using process tailoring to manage software development challenges. IT Professional, 10(4), 39-45.
Xu, T. (2005). Ion exchange membranes: state of their development and perspective. Journal of membrane science, 263(1-2), 1-29.
Xue, J., Grift, T. E., & Hansen, A. C. (2011). Effect of biodiesel on engine performances and emissions. Renewable and Sustainable energy reviews, 15(2), 1098-1116.
Yoo, Y. (2010). Computing in everyday life: A call for research on experiential computing. MIS quarterly, 213-231.
Yoo, Y., & Kanawattanachai, P. (2001). Developments of transactive memory systems and collective mind in virtual teams. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 9(2), 187-208.
Yoon, I.-C., Min, S.-Y., & Bae, D.-H. (2001). Tailoring and verifying software process. Paper presented at the Proceedings Eighth Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference.
Zhang, Z.-X., Hempel, P. S., Han, Y.-L., & Tjosvold, D. (2007). Transactive memory system links work team characteristics and performance. Journal of applied psychology, 92(6), 1722.
Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (2015). Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual-differences metric. In Time perspective theory; review, research and application (pp. 17-55): Springer.
指導教授 陳仲儼 審核日期 2019-7-5
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明