雲端運算與資訊科技管理能力對於企業流程敏捷性的影響：以資訊科技基礎建設和資訊科技統合協作能力為中介變項

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：63

、訪客IP：3.142.166.186

姓名

曾思瑋(Tze-Wei Tseng) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

資訊管理學系

論文名稱

雲端運算與資訊科技管理能力對於企業流程敏捷性的影響：以資訊科技基礎建設和資訊科技統合協作能力為中介變項
(The Influence of Cloud Computing and IT Management on Business Process Agility: Mediated by IT Infrastructure and IT Application Orchestration Capability)

相關論文

★ 影響ERP導入過程及成效因素之研究 - 單一公司兩次導入SAP系統之比較分析	★ 運用資料倉儲技術建置物力動員資訊系統之開發
★ 買方採用自有電子市集之個案研究─以台塑企業為例	★ DEA模型評估經營效率之研究—以某綜合證券商為例
★ 尋求卓越：中小企業資訊部門的管理之個案研究	★ 「證券商共同網路交易平台」之可行性分析
★ 產業競合模式策略探討－以自行車產業為例	★ RFID導入航空貨運站出口作業流程應用之研究
★ 綠色供應鏈活動建構之個案研究-以筆記型電腦製造業為例	★ 導入資訊科技服務管理之評估-以遠東銀行為例
★ 資訊系統導入歷程中專案團隊決策衝突之探討	★ 應用資源基礎理論探討持久競爭優勢-以智慧型手機H公司為例
★ 服務導向架構為基礎的企業流程管理之探討 - 以瀚宇博德股份有限公司為例	★ 沙賓法案實施與企業遵循個案研究--以K公司為例
★ 資訊服務委外之個案分析－以銀行簡訊為例	★ 有線電視業者經營IPTV之競爭優勢分析—以個案公司為例

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

在變化快速且競爭激烈的市場中，企業流程敏捷性（Business Process Agility）是個能夠讓企業快速調整流程以因應市場的一個重要能力。具備此能力的企業能夠更動態的調整像是供應鏈管理（Supply Chain Management, SCM）、產品生命週期管理（Product Lifecycle Management, PLM）和顧客關係管理（Customer Relationship Management, CRM）等企業流程。現在的環境下，企業已經普遍使用資訊科技來管理各式各樣的企業流程，而資訊部門則必須快速的開發及部署來支持。然而，對於資訊主管來說如何提供一個好的資訊科技基礎建設來讓資訊專員更流暢地開發應用軟體就成了一個重要的議題。
在本研究中，我們相信資訊科技基礎建設能夠透過雲端運算及資訊科技管理能力來進行改善。因此，我們提出了一個模型用以衡量雲端運算和資訊科技管理能力對於企業流程敏捷性的影響，並由資訊科技基礎建設和資訊科技統合協作能力作為中介變項。我們收集了台灣前1337大製造業的資料來支持我們的假說。最後，本研究提供一個較為系統的角度來瞭解如何透過資訊科技來獲取企業流程敏捷性。

摘要(英)

Business process agility is a critical ability for firms to make firms adjust their processes to react the rapid market changes. Firms with business process agility can be more dynamic to modify their business processes such as supply chain management (SCM), product lifecycle management (PLM), and customer relationship management (CRM). In the current environment, firms use information technology (IT) to manage various business processes so IT department have to develop and deploy IT applications quickly so as to support the business processes. However, it is an important issue for IT managers to provide a good IT infrastructure to make IT specialists develop and deploy IT applications smoothly.
In this study, we believe IT managers can improve IT infrastructure quality through deploying cloud computing and enhancing IT management capability. Thus, we propose a conceptual model in which the effect of cloud computing and IT management on business process agility are mediated by IT infrastructure quality and IT application orchestration capability. We collected survey data from Top 1337 Taiwanese manufacturing firms to test our hypotheses. This study provides a systematic perspective for understanding how to obtain business process agility through information technologies.

關鍵字(中)

★ 雲端運算
★ 資訊科技管理能力
★ 資訊科技基礎建設
★ 商業流程敏捷性
★ 資訊科技統合協作能力

關鍵字(英)

★ Cloud Computing
★ IT Management
★ IT Infrastructure
★ Business Process Agility
★ IT Application Orchestration Capability

論文目次

摘要 i
Abstract ii
1. Introduction 1
1.1 Research Background and Motivations 1
1.2 Research Objectives and Questions 4
2. Literature Review 5
2.1 Cloud Computing 5
2.2 IT Management Capability 6
2.3 IT Infrastructure Quality 7
2.4 IT Application Orchestration Capability 7
2.5 Business Process Agility 8
3. Research Model and Hypotheses 10
3.1 Research Framework 10
3.2 Cloud Infrastructure Capability and IT Infrastructure Quality 10
3.2.1 Cloud Infrastructure Flexibility and IT Infrastructure Quality 11
3.2.2 Cloud Infrastructure Integration and IT Infrastructure Quality 11
3.3 IT Management Capability and IT Infrastructure Quality 12
3.4 IT Infrastructure Quality and IT Application Orchestration Capability 13
3.5 IT Application Orchestration Capability and Business Process Agility 14
4. Research Methodology 15
4.1 Sample Selection and Data Collection 15
4.2 Operationalization of Constructs 15
4.2.1 Cloud Infrastructure Capability 17
4.2.2 IT Management Capability 19
4.2.3 IT Infrastructure Quality 20
4.2.4 IT Application Orchestration Capability 21
4.2.5 Business Process Agility 22
4.3 Control Variables 23
4.4 Research Procedures 23
5. Data Analysis and Results 24
5.1 Respondent Characteristics 24
5.2 Measurement Model 29
5.2.1 Examination of Second-Order Construct 29
5.2.2 Reliability and Validity 31
5.3 Structural Model 36
5.3.1 PLS Results of Hypotheses Testing 36
5.3.2 Robustness Analysis 38
6. Conclusions 39
6.1 Findings and Discussions 39
6.2 Implications and Future Research 40
6.3 Limitations 41
References 42
Appendix Questionnaire 45

List of Figures
Figure 3.1 The Research Model 10
Figure 5.2 PLS Results for Research Model 37

List of Tables
Table 4.1 Description of Construct Measurement 16
Table 4.2 Measurement Items of Cloud Infrastructure Capability 18
Table 4.3 Measurement Items of IT Management Capability 19
Table 4.4 Measurement Items of IT Infrastructure Quality 20
Table 4.5 Measurement Items of IT Application Orchestration Capability 21
Table 4.6 Measurement Items of Business Process Agility 22
Table 5.1 Characteristics of Respondents (N=86) 25
Table 5.2 Characteristics of Companies (N=86) 26
Table 5.3 Cloud Computing of Companies (N=86) 28
Table 5.4 Analysis of the Two Dimensions of Cloud Infrastructure Capability 30
Table 5.5 Hierarchical Measurement Model Results 30
Table 5.6 Cross-Loadings of Measurement Items 32
Table 5.7 Correlation Matrix and Reliability Scores 34
Table 5.8 Heterotrait-Monotrait Ratio of Correlations (HTMT) Matrix 35
Table 5.9 PLS Results of Hypotheses Testing 37

參考文獻

Banker, R. D., Bardhan, I. R., Chang, H., & Lin, S. (2006). Plant information systems, manufacturing capabilities, and plant performance. MIS quarterly, 30(2), 315-337.
Battleson, D. A., West, B. C., Kim, J., Ramesh, B., & Robinson, P. S. (2016). Achieving dynamic capabilities with cloud computing: an empirical investigation. European Journal of Information Systems, 25(3), 209-230.
Bharadwaj, A., Sambamurthy, V., & Zmud, R. (1999). IT capabilities: theoretical perspectives and empirical operationalization. ICIS 1999 Proceedings, 35.
Bharadwaj, A. S. (2000). A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: an empirical investigation. MIS Quarterly, 24(1), 169-196.
Bharadwaj, S., Bharadwaj, A., & Bendoly, E. (2007). The performance effects of complementarities between information systems, marketing, manufacturing, and supply chain processes. Information Systems Research, 18(4), 437-453.
Bhatt, G., Emdad, A., Roberts, N., & Grover, V. (2010). Building and leveraging information in dynamic environments: The role of IT infrastructure flexibility as enabler of organizational responsiveness and competitive advantage. Information & Management, 47(7-8), 341-349.
Bhatt, G. D., & Grover, V. (2005). Types of information technology capabilities and their role in competitive advantage: An empirical study. Journal of Management Information Systems, 22(2), 253-277.
Boynton, A. C., Zmud, R. W., & Jacobs, G. C. (1994). The influence of IT management practice on IT use in large organizations. MIS Quarterly, 18(3), 299-318.
Broadbent, M., Weill, P., & St. Clair, D. (1999). The implications of information technology infrastructure for business process redesign. MIS Quarterly, 23(2), 159-182.
Brown, C.V., Sambamurthy, V., Repositioning the IT Organization to Enable Business Transformation (Pinnaflex Educational Resources, Cincinnati, OH, 1999)
Chen, Y.-C., & Wu, J.-H. (2011). IT management capability and its impact on the performance of a CIO. Information & Management, 48(4-5), 145-156.
Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern methods for business research, 295(2), 295-336.
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334.
Devece, C. (2013). The value of business managers ‘Information Technology’competence. The Service Industries Journal, 33(7-8), 720-733.
Fornell, C., & Bookstein, F. L. (1982). Two structural equation models: LISREL and PLS applied to consumer exit-voice theory. Journal of Marketing Research, 19(4), 440-452.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. In: SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
Gartner (2019). Gartner Forecasts Worldwide Public Cloud Revenue to Grow 17.5 Percent in 2019. https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2019-04-02-gartner-forecasts-worldwide-public-cloud-revenue-to-g
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Babin, B. J., & Black, W. C. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective (Vol. 7). In: Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing theory and Practice, 19(2), 139-152.
Hattie, J. (1985). Methodology review: assessing unidimensionality of tests and ltenls. Applied psychological measurement, 9(2), 139-164.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 43(1), 115-135.
Hinkin, T. R., Tracey, J. B., & Enz, C. A. (1997). Scale construction: Developing reliable and valid measurement instruments. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 21(1), 100-120.
Johnson, J. L., Lee, R. P.-W., Saini, A., & Grohmann, B. (2003). Market-focused strategic flexibility: conceptual advances and an integrative model. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 31(1), 74-89.
Lee, G., & Xia, W. (2010). Toward agile: An integrated analysis of quantitative and qualitative field data on software development agility. MIS quarterly, 34(1).
Liu, S., Chan, F. T., Yang, J., & Niu, B. (2018). Understanding the effect of cloud computing on organizational agility: An empirical examination. International Journal of Information Management, 43, 98-111.
Mell, P., & Grance, T. (2011). The NIST definition of cloud computing.
Nazir, S., & Pinsonneault, A. (2012). IT and firm agility: an electronic integration perspective. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 13(3), 2.
Rai, A., Patnayakuni, R., & Seth, N. (2006). Firm performance impacts of digitally enabled supply chain integration capabilities. MIS quarterly, 225-246.
Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., & Straub, D. (2012). A critical look at the use of PLS-SEM in MIS Quarterly. MIS Quarterly, 36(1).
Roberts, N., & Grover, V. (2012). Leveraging information technology infrastructure to facilitate a firm′s customer agility and competitive activity: An empirical investigation. Journal of Management Information Systems, 28(4), 231-270.
Sambamurthy, V., Bharadwaj, A., & Grover, V. (2003). Shaping agility through digital options: Reconceptualizing the role of information technology in contemporary firms. MIS quarterly, 237-263.
Sambamurthy, V., Zmud, R. W., & Byrd, T. A. (1994). The comprehensiveness of IT planning processes: a contingency approach. Journal of information technology management, 5(1), 1-10.
Saraf, N., Langdon, C. S., & Gosain, S. (2007). IS application capabilities and relational value in interfirm partnerships. Information Systems Research, 18(3), 320-339.
Sirmon, D. G., Hitt, M. A., & Ireland, R. D. (2007). Managing firm resources in dynamic environments to create value: Looking inside the black box. Academy of management review, 32(1), 273-292.
Sirmon, D. G., Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., & Gilbert, B. A. (2011). Resource orchestration to create competitive advantage: Breadth, depth, and life cycle effects. Journal of management, 37(5), 1390-1412.
Tallon, P. P. (2008). Inside the adaptive enterprise: an information technology capabilities perspective on business process agility. Information technology and management, 9(1), 21-36.
Tallon, P. P., & Pinsonneault, A. (2011). Competing perspectives on the link between strategic information technology alignment and organizational agility: insights from a mediation model. MIS quarterly, 463-486.
Tiwana, A., Bharadwaj, A., & Sambamurthy, V. (2003). The antecedents of information systems development capability in firms: a knowledge integration perspective. ICIS 2003 Proceedings, 21.
Truong, D. (2010). How cloud computing enhances competitive advantages: A research model for small businesses. The Business Review, Cambridge, 15(1), 59-65.
Wang, N., Liang, H., Zhong, W., Xue, Y., & Xiao, J. (2012). Resource structuring or capability building? An empirical study of the business value of information technology. Journal of Management Information Systems, 29(2), 325-367.
Weill, P., Subramani, M., & Broadbent, M. (2002). IT infrastructure for strategic agility.
Weill, P., & Vitale, M. (1999). Assessing the health of an information systems applications portfolio: An example from process manufacturing. MIS quarterly, 601-624.
Weske, M. (2012). Business process management architectures. In Business Process Management (pp. 333-371): Springer.
Younas, M., Jawawi, D. N., Ghani, I., Fries, T., & Kazmi, R. (2018). Agile development in the cloud computing environment: A systematic review. Information and Software Technology, 103, 142-158.

指導教授

王存國(Eric T.G. Wang)

審核日期

2019-7-17

推文