An investigation into CKEL-supported EFL learning with TPR to reveal the importance of pronunciation and interactive sentence making

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：24

、訪客IP：18.221.41.214

姓名

蔡東哲(Dong-Jhe Cai) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

網路學習科技研究所

論文名稱

(An investigation into CKEL-supported EFL learning with TPR to reveal the importance of pronunciation and interactive sentence making)

相關論文

★ 同步表演機器人之建構與成效評估	★ 探討國小學童使用電子書多媒體註記系統結合註記分享機制對其學習行為與時間之影響
★ 先備知識對註記式多媒體電子書的影響研究：從個別環境到分享環境	★ Facilitating EFL speaking and writing with peer-tutoring and storytelling strategies in authentic learning context
★ Investigation of Facilitating Physics Learning using Ubiquitous-Physics APP with Learning Map and Discussion Board in Authentic Contexts	★ 智慧互動SmartVpen在真實情境對於英文學習之影響
★ 利用合作虛擬化的網絡設計輔助計算機網路學習	★ 探討擴展合作式多媒體認知理論和其對EFL聽力與口語能力之影響 - 結合動覺辨識和學習者設計內容之猜謎遊戲
★ 在真實情境中利用智慧機制提升國小學生之外語口說及對話能力之評估	★ 探討在真實情境下教師回饋對學習認知與學習持續性之影響
★ 註釋、對話代理和協作概念圖支持大學生議論文寫作和後設認知的培養	★ Developing and Validating the Questionnaire and Its Model for Sustainable and Scalable Authentic Contextual Learning Supported by Mobile Apps
★ 探討個人化、情境化及社會化的智慧機制輔助真實情境國小幾何學習與其對學習成效之影響	★ Investigation of smart mechanisms for authentic contextual learning with sensor and recognition technologies
★ 探討智慧回饋如何影響學習時眼動和觸控操作的表現-以 Covid-19 快篩模擬為例	★ 在真實情境下結合圖像與位置辨識促進英文寫作

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

許多過去的相關研究表明，身體動作可以促進學習者的學習過程。我們開始考慮將肢體反應教學法和技術相結合，以提高他們的英文能力。在這項研究中，我們開發了一個基於Microsoft Kinect 的系統，並整合五個識別機制，包括身體運動辨識、語音辨識、臉部辨識、方向辨識和物體辨識，這種機制有助於學習者通過動作和姿勢來理解英文單字的含義。我們在系統中設計兩個主要模塊，一個是學習模塊，另一個是動覺辨識機制。
實驗組採用雙人合作模式，另一方面，對照組採用單人模式。在實驗組中，學習者必須相互合作，為了使學習者更容易合作和討論，因此我們以面對面的方式進行活動。在硬體部署框架中，每位學習者都有一台電腦、KinectV2、螢幕和耳機。此外，我們使用資料庫儲存學習者的學習行為，建構伺服器用於數據傳輸，以便學習者可以在活動中進行合作和互動，結果表明，該系統可以提高學習者在英語寫作、發音和詞彙記憶方面的表現，並且我們發現兩人合作的使用優於個人。

摘要(英)

A number of past-related studies have revealed that physical movements could facilitate the learner’s learning process. We came to think of combining Total Physical Response and technology to enhance their English ability. In this research, we developed a system based on Microsoft Kinect and integrated five components, physical movement recognition, speech recognition, emotion recognition, direction recognition, and object recognition. This mechanism helps the learners go through the meaning of vocabularies through physical movements. We designed two main modules in our system. One is the learning module, and another is kinesthetic recognition mechanism. For the experimental group, a two-person cooperation mode is adopted, on the other hand, a single play mode is adopted for the control group. In the experimental group, learners cooperate with each other to help. In order to make
it easier for learners to cooperate and discuss. we conducted the activities in a face-to-face manner. In the hardware deployment framework, each learner has one computer、KinectV2、screen and headset. In addition, we use the database to store the learner′s learning behavior and construct a server for data transfer so that learners can cooperate and interact in the activities. The results show that the system can improve the learner′s performance in English writing,pronunciation and the memorization of vocabulary.

關鍵字(中)

★ 全肢體反應教學法
★ 體感學習
★ 合作學習
★ 英文學習

關鍵字(英)

★ Total Physical Response
★ Kinesthetic learning
★ Collaborative learning
★ English learning
★ Kinect

論文目次

中文摘要 .............................................................................................................................. i
Abstract ............................................................................................................................... ii
Contents ............................................................................................................................. iii
List of Tables ........................................................................................................................ v
List of Figures ..................................................................................................................... vi
Chapter 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................ 1
1.1 Research background and motivation .......................................................................... 1
1.2 Research questions ....................................................................................................... 3
1.3 Definition of Terms ....................................................................................................... 3
Chapter 2 Literature review ................................................................................................. 5
2.1 Background theory ....................................................................................................... 5
2.1.1 Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning ......................................................... 5
2.1.2 Total Physical Response (TPR) and L2 learning .................................................. 6
2.2 Kinesthetic technology and language learning with TPR ............................................. 8
2.3 Language learning with recognition technology .......................................................... 9
2.4 Collaborative learning ................................................................................................. 10
2.4.1 Collaborative Kinesthetic learning ................................................................... 11
Chapter 3 System Design and Implementation .................................................................. 12
3.1 System Design ............................................................................................................. 12
3.2 System Architecture .................................................................................................... 13
3.3 Kinesthetic Recognition Mechanism .......................................................................... 13
3.3.1 Physical Movement Recognition ..................................................................... 13
3.3.2 Object Recognition .......................................................................................... 14
3.3.3 Direction Recognition ...................................................................................... 15
3.3.4 Speech Recognition ......................................................................................... 15
3.3.5 Emotion Recognition ....................................................................................... 16
3.4 Learning Activity Module ............................................................................................ 17
3.4.1 Vocabulary Learning ........................................................................................ 18
3.4.2 Pair Vocabulary Game / Sentence Game ......................................................... 20
3.4.3 Pair Experience-based Sentence-Making ........................................................ 23
3.4.4 Interactive Dialogue ......................................................................................... 24
3.4.5 Competitive game elements ............................................................................ 24
Chapter 4 Methodology ..................................................................................................... 26
4.1 Research Framework .................................................................................................. 26
4.2 Research Participants and Learning Material ............................................................. 28
4.3 Experimental flow ....................................................................................................... 30
iv
4.4 Research tool .............................................................................................................. 31
4.5 Data collection and processing ................................................................................... 33
Chapter 5 Results and Discussion ...................................................................................... 34
5.1 Analysis of Learning Achievement .............................................................................. 34
5.1.1 Learning achievement between two groups ................................................... 34
5.1.2 Comparison of Achievement on Post-test Sections between Groups ............. 35
5.1.3 Comparison of Speaking Accuracy of Each Activity between Groups ............. 37
5.1.4 Performance Comparison of Each Activity between Groups (Game) ............. 39
5.2 Relationship of Learning Behavior and Activity Performance with learning
achievement ..................................................................................................................... 40
5.2.1 Correlation between learning behavior and learning achievement ............... 40
5.2.2 Correlation between Activity Performance and learning achievement .......... 41
5.3 Learners’ perception of CKEL ...................................................................................... 43
5.3.1 TAM - Learners Perceptions Toward CKEL ....................................................... 43
5.3.2 ARCS - Learners Attitudes Toward Learning Activities ..................................... 48
5.4 Qualitative analysis of learners’ learning product demonstration ............................. 50
Chapter 6 Conclusion and suggestions ............................................................................... 52
6.1 Conclusion .................................................................................................................. 52
6.2 Suggestions ................................................................................................................. 53
References ......................................................................................................................... 54
Appendix A: Word list ........................................................................................................ 57
Appendix B: Pre-test (Paper based test) ............................................................................ 58
Appendix C: Post-test (Paper based test) ........................................................................... 62
Appendix D: Questionnaire TAM ....................................................................................... 71
Appendix E: Questionnaire ARCS ....................................................................................... 74
Appendix F: Interview Question ........................................................................................ 76

參考文獻

Alexiadis, D. S., Kelly, P., Daras, P., O′Connor, N. E., Boubekeur, T., & Moussa, M. B. (2011,
November). Evaluating a dancer′s performance using kinect-based skeleton tracking.
In Proceedings of the 19th ACM international conference on Multimedia (pp. 659-
662). ACM.
Asher, J. J. (1966). The learning strategy of the total physical response: A review. The Modern
Language Journal, 50(2), 79–84.
Asher, J. J. (1968). The total physical response method for second language learning. SAN
JOSE STATE COLL CA DEPT OF PSYCHOLOGY.
Asher, J. J. (1968). The total physical response method for second language learning.DTIC
Document. Retrieved from the DTIC Document website: http://www.dtic.mil/cgibin/
GetTRDoc?Location=U2&doc=GetTRDoc.pdf&AD=AD0674868
Asher, J. J. (1969). The total physical response approach to second language learning. The
modern language journal, 53(1), 3-17.
Asher, J. J. (2014). TPR catalog - With a special introduction by the criginator of the Total
Physical Response. PDF document. Retreived from http://www.tprworld.
com/mm5/TPRarticles/TPRCatalog.pdf
Cao, N., Chen, G. The Role of Gesture in the Second Language Learning and Teaching (2017).
American Journal of Applied Sciences 14 (12): 1070.1074
Chang, Y. H., Hwang, J. H., Fang, R. J., & Lu, Y. T. (2017). A Kinect-and Game-Based Interactive
Learning System. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education,
13(8), 4897-4914.
Chao, K. J., Huang, H. W., Fang, W. C., & Chen, N. S. (2013). Embodied play to learn: Exploring
K inect-facilitated memory performance. British Journal of Educational Technology,
44(5), E151-E155.
Chen, C. J., Liu, P., L. (2015). Learning English through actions: a study of mobile-assisted
language learning. Technoligies and Learning Environements. Volume 23, 2015 - Issue
2
Chen, N. S., Hsieh, S. W., Athabasca, K. (2008) Effects of short-term memory and content
representation type on mobile language learning Language Learning & Technology
pp. 93-112
Emma Liu, P. H., Vivian, Wu, W. C., Shiehc, R., S. (2015). Enhancing EFL students’ critical
thinking and writing: An asynchronous debate instructional design. English Teaching
& Learning 39.3 (Fall 2015): 33-59
Gibbs Jr, R. W. (2005). Embodiment and cognitive science. Cambridge University Press.
Gullberg, M. (2008). Gestures and second language acquisition. In Handbook of cognitive
55
linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 276-305). Routledge.
Gullberg, M. (2014). Gestures and second language acquisition.
Hamako, F. (1999). Traditional, Natural and TPR Approaches to ESL: A Study of Japanese
Students. Language, Culture and Curriculum, Volume 12, 1999 - Issue 2
Handoyo, P. W. (2005). Teaching Children Using a Total Physical Response (TPR) Method.
Rethinking. Jurnal Bahasa dan S eni, Tahun 33. No. 2.
Hwang, W. Y., Chen, H. S. L., Shadiev, R., Huang, R. Y. M., & Chen, C. Y. (2014).Improving
English as a foreign language writing in elementary schools using mobile devices in
familiar situational contexts. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(5),359–378.
Hwang, W. Y., Shih, T. K., Yeh, S. C., Chou, K. C., Ma, Z. H., & Sommool, W. (2014).
Recognition-based physical response to facilitate EFL learning. Journal of Educational
Technology & Society, 17(4), 432-445.
Hwang, W.-Y., Huang, Y. M., Shadiev, R., Wu, S. Y., Chen, S. L. (2014). Effects of using mobile
devices on English listening diversity and speaking for EFL elementary students
Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 2014, 30(5).
Hwang, W.-Y., Ma, Z.-H., Shadiev, R., Shih, T. K., & Chen, S.-Y. (2015). Facilitating listening and
speaking with game-based learning activities in situational context. In G. Chen, V.
Hwang, W.-Y., Timothy, Shih, K., Yeh, S. C., Chou, K. C., Ma, Z. H., Sommol, W. (2014).
Recognition-Based Physical Response to Facilitate EFL Learning. Educational
Technology & Society, 17 (4), 432–445.
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Stanne, M. B. (2000). Cooperative learning methods: A
meta-analysis.
Justina. Hsu, H., M. (2011). The Potential of Kinect in Education International Journal of
Information and Education Technology, Vol. 1, No. 5, December 2011
Kumar, Kinshuk, R. Huang & S. Kong (Eds.), Emerging issues in smart learning (pp. 193–200).
Berlin, Germany: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-662-44188-6_27
Kuo, F. R., Hsu, C. C., Fang, W. C., & Chen, N. S. (2014). The effects of Embodiment-based TPR
approach on student English vocabulary learning achievement, retention and
acceptance. Journal of King Saud University-Computer and Information Sciences,
26(1), 63-70.
Lie, A. (2002). Cooperative learning.
Liu, Q. et al. Blended Learning. New Challenges and Innovative Practices pp 354-365 (2017)
Macedonia, M., & von Kriegstein, K. (2012). Gestures enhance foreign language learn-ing.
Biolinguistics, 6(3-4), 393–416.
Mayer, R. E. (2005). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. The Cambridge handbook of
multimedia learning, 3148.
Mayer, R., & Mayer, R. E. (Eds.). (2005). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning.
Cambridge university press.
56
Michelle Kay Compton, Robin Chappele Thompson. (2018). StoryMaking: The Maker
Movement Approach to Literacy for Early Learners. Redleaf Press.
Qiu, Y. (2016). Research on the Application of Total Physical Response Approach to
Vocabulary Teaching in Primary Schools. International Journal of Arts and Commerce.
Vol. 5 No. 7
Sarvari, S., & Shakouri, N. (2016). The Effect of Gesture on Pre-school EFL Learners′
Vocabulary Learning and Word Retention in an EFL Teaching Context. Journal of
Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 3(7), 219-229.
Shi, T. (2018). A Study of the TPR Method in the Teaching of English to Primary School
Students. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 8(8), 1087-1093.
Slavin, R. E. (1980). Cooperative learning. Review of educational research, 50(2), 315-342.
Slavin, R. E. (1985). An introduction to cooperative learning research. In Learning to
cooperate, cooperating to learn (pp. 5-15). Springer, Boston, MA.
Slavin, R. E. (1996). Research on cooperative learning and achievement: What we know, what
we need to know. Contemporary educational psychology, 21(1), 43-69.
Wang, F., Hwang, W. Y., Li, Y. H., Chen, P. T., & Manabe, K. (2019). Collaborative kinesthetic
EFL learning with collaborative total physical response. Computer Assisted Language
Learning, 1-37.
Widodo, H. P. (2005). Teaching children using a total physical response (TPR) method:
Rethinking. Bahasa dan seni, 33(2), 235-238.
Yang, J. C., Chen, C. H., & Jeng, M. C. (2010). Integrating video-capture virtual reality
technology into a physically interactive learning environment for English learning.
Computers & Education, 55(3), 1346-1356.

指導教授

黃武元(Wu-Yuin Hwang)

審核日期

2019-6-28

推文