Investigation of Facilitating Physics Learning using Ubiquitous-Physics APP with Learning Map and Discussion Board in Authentic Contexts

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：39

、訪客IP：18.224.43.245

姓名

鮑世鈞(PAO-SHIH-CHIN) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

網路學習科技研究所

論文名稱

(Investigation of Facilitating Physics Learning using Ubiquitous-Physics APP with Learning Map and Discussion Board in Authentic Contexts)

相關論文

★ 同步表演機器人之建構與成效評估	★ 探討國小學童使用電子書多媒體註記系統結合註記分享機制對其學習行為與時間之影響
★ 先備知識對註記式多媒體電子書的影響研究：從個別環境到分享環境	★ Facilitating EFL speaking and writing with peer-tutoring and storytelling strategies in authentic learning context
★ An investigation into CKEL-supported EFL learning with TPR to reveal the importance of pronunciation and interactive sentence making	★ 智慧互動SmartVpen在真實情境對於英文學習之影響
★ 利用合作虛擬化的網絡設計輔助計算機網路學習	★ 探討擴展合作式多媒體認知理論和其對EFL聽力與口語能力之影響 - 結合動覺辨識和學習者設計內容之猜謎遊戲
★ 在真實情境中利用智慧機制提升國小學生之外語口說及對話能力之評估	★ 探討在真實情境下教師回饋對學習認知與學習持續性之影響
★ 註釋、對話代理和協作概念圖支持大學生議論文寫作和後設認知的培養	★ Developing and Validating the Questionnaire and Its Model for Sustainable and Scalable Authentic Contextual Learning Supported by Mobile Apps
★ 探討個人化、情境化及社會化的智慧機制輔助真實情境國小幾何學習與其對學習成效之影響	★ Investigation of smart mechanisms for authentic contextual learning with sensor and recognition technologies
★ 探討智慧回饋如何影響學習時眼動和觸控操作的表現-以 Covid-19 快篩模擬為例	★ 在真實情境下結合圖像與位置辨識促進英文寫作

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

本研究旨在探討學生學習行為與學習成績的關係，利用U-Physics系統學習物體滑動時的加速度變化。作為一種教學工具，U-Physics可以將實驗中的數據轉換成圖表，以便於學生理解，因此學生可以通過解釋圖形和應用公式來解決問題。這個實驗的參與者是一年級高職生。本研究的目的是通過學習地圖來改善學生的學習行為和動機，並幫助他們學習物理公式。此外，這項研究以真實環境中學習作為基礎，幫助學生理解在日常生活中如何應用的物理公式。本研究的學習行為如下：解釋圖形，應用公式，敘述結論，真實情境的貼文/評論和學習記錄。在實驗中，我們分別選擇了兩個班級的學生作為實驗組和對照組，實驗結果表明，實驗組在所有學習行為中均顯著優於對照組，這表明學習地圖有效地提高了學生的學習行為。

關鍵詞：物理學習，真實物理學習，移動學習，無所不在的學習，無所不在的物理（U-Physics）

摘要(英)

This study is to explore the effect and relation of students′ learning behaviors and learning achievement using the U-Physics system to learn the acceleration of the sliding object. As a teaching tool, U-Physics can transform the data in the experiment into a graph, which is easy for the students to understand, students therefore, can solve the problem by explaining the graph and applying the formula. The participants of this experiment were first-year vocational high school students. The goal of this study is to improve students′ learning behaviors as well as motivation through learning map, and help them learn physical formulas. In addition, this research is based on learning in an authentic environment to help students understand the physics formulas which is adaptive in their daily life. The learning behaviors of this study are as follows: interpreting graph, applying formula, drawing conclusion, the authentic post /comment, and the learning record. In the experiment, we selected two classes as the experimental group and the control group respectively, and the experimental results show that the experimental group outperformed the control group significantly in all learning behaviors, which indicates that the learning map was effective in improving students′ learning behaviors.

Keywords: Physics Learning, Authentic Physics Learning, Mobile Learning, ubiquitous learning, Ubiquitous Physics (U-Physics).

關鍵字(中)

★ Ubiquitous Physics

關鍵字(英)

論文目次

摘要 i
Abstract ii
Content iii
List of Figures v
Chapter 1 Introduction 1
1.1 Background and Motivation 1
1.2 Research questions and objectives 3
Chapter 2 Literature review 4
2.1 Physics teaching 4
2.2 Authentic context learning and practical work 5
2.3 Learning behavior and peer assessment 6
2.4 The benefits of google map for teaching 6
Chapter 3 System design 7
3.1 Measurement angle function 10
3.2 Main function of the experiment -- measuring acceleration 11
3.3 Map function introduction 13
3.4 Scoreboard function 15
Chapter 4 Research Method 17
4.1 Research framework and research variables 17
4.2 Research procedure 20
4.3 Experimental procedure 22
4.4 Experimental participants 23
4.5 Research tools 24
4.6 Data collection and processing 25
Chapter 5 Result and discussion 26
5.1 Comparison of pre- and post-tests of the groups 26
5.2 Analysis of learning behaviors 27
5.3 Analysis of discussion board and learning records 30
5.4 Pearson correlation among learning behavior and learning achievement 32
5.5 TAM & ARCS Questionnaire 35
Chapter 6 Conclusion 41
Future works and limitation 42
Reference 44
Appendix A : Pre-test (Paper-based test) 48
Appendix B: Post-test (Paper-based test) 51
Appendix C: In-classroom learning sheet 53
Appendix D: Outside the classroom learning sheet 59
Appendix E: TAM&ARCS 65

參考文獻

Al-Emran, M., Mezhuyev, V., & Kamaludin, A. (2018). Technology Acceptance Model in M-learning context: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 125, 389-412.
Ateş, Ö., & Eryilmaz, A. (2011, April). Effectiveness of hands-on and minds-on activities on students′ achievement and attitudes towards physics. In Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning & Teaching (Vol. 12, No. 1).
Baek, S., Lee, J., Kim, C., Ko, J. H., Ryu, S. H., Lee, S. G., ... & Sethi, G. (2017). Ginkgolic acid C 17: 1, derived from Ginkgo biloba leaves, suppresses constitutive and inducible STAT3 activation through induction of PTEN and SHP-1 tyrosine phosphatase. Molecules, 22(2), 276.
Boote, S. K. (2014). Assessing and understanding line graph interpretations using a scoring rubric of organized cited factors. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(3), 333-354.
v. Using a mobile phone acceleration sensor in physics experiments on free and damped harmonic oscillations. American Journal of Physics, 81(6), 472-475.
Daluba, N. E. (2013). Effect of Demonstration Method of Teaching on Students′ Achievement in Agricultural Science. World Journal of Education, 3(6), 1-7.
DuFrene, D. D., Sharbrough, W., Clipson, T., & McCall, M. (1999). Bringing outdoor challenge education inside the business communication classroom. Business Communication Quarterly, 62(3), 24-36.
DuFrene, D. D., Sharbrough, W., Clipson, T., & McCall, M. (1999). Bringing outdoor challenge education inside the business communication classroom. Business Communication Quarterly, 62(3), 24-36.
Elliot, S., & Joppe, M. (2009). A case study and analysis of e-tourism curriculum development. Journal of Teaching in Travel & Tourism, 9(3-4), 230-247.
Erinosho, S. Y. (2013). How do students perceive the difficulty of physics in secondary school? An exploratory study in Nigeria. International Journal for Cross-disciplinary Subjects in Education (IJCDSE), 3(3), 1510-1515.
González, M. Á., González, M. Á., Martín, M. E., Llamas, C., Martínez, Ó., Vegas, J., ... & Hernández, C. (2017). Teaching and learning physics with smartphones. In Blended Learning: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (pp. 866-885). IGI Global.
Gump, S. E. (2004). Keep students coming by keeping them interested: Motivators for class attendance. College Student Journal, 38(1), 157-161.
Hayes, D. F., Thor, A. D., Dressler, L. G., Weaver, D., Edgerton, S., Cowan, D., ... & Henderson, I. C. (2007). HER2 and response to paclitaxel in node-positive breast cancer. New England Journal of Medicine, 357(15), 1496-1506.
Hirschfeld, D. (2012). Interest in science careers wanes in Latin America. Retrieved November 10, 2016, from http://www.scidev.net/global/capacity-building/news/interest-in-science-careers-wanes-in-latin-america.html#
https://whatis.techtarget.com/definition/Google-Map
Keller, J. M. (1987). Development and use of the ARCS model of instructional design. Journal of instructional development, 10(3), 2.
Kibirige, I., & Hodi, T. (2013). Learners’ performance in Physical Sciences using laboratory investigations. International Journal of Educational Sciences, 5(4), 425-432.
King, W. R., & He, J. (2006). A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 43(6), 740-755.
Lee, M. C., & Sulaiman, F. (2018). THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PRACTICAL WORK IN PHYSICS TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ ACADEMIC PERFORMANCES. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 3(3).
Lu, R., & Bol, L. (2007). A comparison of anonymous versus identifiable e-peer review on college student writing performance and the extent of critical feedback. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 6(2).
Macy Jr, J. (2013). Foundation. Ensuring an Effective Physician Workforce for the United States: Recommendations for Graduate Medical Education to Meet the Needs of the Public. May 2011.
Mailath, G. J., & Postlewaite, A. (2003). The social context of economic decisions. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1(2-3), 354-362.
Mwangi, W., & Sweller, J. (1998). Learning to solve compare word problems: The effect of example format and generating self-explanations. Cognition and Instruction, 16, 173-199.
Neil, Jarrett. (July 7, 2016). Engaging Students Through google map Social Media Today RSS. Retrieved fromhttps://www.edutopia.org/discussion/engaging-students-through-google-map
Pietarinen, T., Vauras, M., Laakkonen, E., Kinnunen, R., & Volet, S. (2019). High school students′ perceptions of affect and collaboration during virtual science inquiry learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 35(3), 334-348.
Purba, S. W. D., & Hwang, W. Y. (2017). Investigation of Learning Behaviors and Achievement of Vocational High School Students Using an Ubiquitous Physics Tablet PC App. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 26(3), 322-331.
Purba, S. W. D., & Hwang, W. Y. (2018). Investigation of learning behaviors and achievement of simple pendulum for vocational high school students with Ubiquitous-Physics app. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(7), 2877-2893.
Saleh, S. (2011). The Effectiveness of the Brain-Based Teaching Approach in Generating Students′ Learning Motivation towards the Subject of Physics: A Qualitative Approach. Online Submission.
Shen, C. H., & Huang, X. Y. (2006). The App of Moodle for Web-Based Peer Assessment. Journal of Educational Media & Library Sciences, 43(3).
Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learning and instruction, 4(4), 295-312.
Trautwein, U. (2007). The homework–achievement relation reconsidered: Differentiating homework time, homework frequency, and homework effort. Learning and Instruction, 17(3), 372-388.
Vogt, P., & Kuhn, J. (2012). Analyzing free fall with a smartphone acceleration sensor. The Physics Teacher, 50(3), 182-183.
Williams, C., Stanisstreet, M., Spall, K., Boyes, E., & Dickson, D. (2003). Why aren’t secondary students interested in physics ? IOP Publishing Ltd., 38(4), 324–329.
Williams, C., Stanisstreet, M., Spall, K., Boyes, E., & Dickson, D. (2003). Why aren′t secondary students interested in physics?. Physics Education, 38(4), 324.
Wilson, M. S., & Miller, C. T. (2015). Using google map web-app to create virtual plant map for use as an online study tool in plant identification courses. HortTechnology, 25(2), 253-256.
Xia, J. C., Fielder, J., & Siragusa, L. (2013). Achieving better peer interaction in online discussion forums: A reflective practitioner case study. Issues in Educational Research, 23(1), 97-113.
Xiao-Yun, Y., Zhi-yang, Z., Peixing, D., & Xiao-Yun, Y. A. N. (2007). Principled eclecticism in college English teaching in China. Asian EFL Journal, 17, 1-38.
Zurida, M. N. A. A. I., & Mashita, A. B. D. U. L. L. A. H. (2009). Chemistry Practicals in Malaysian Secondary Schools. In 13~(th) Asian Chemical Congress Abstract Book (3).
李洪濤. (2006). 物理思維比物理公式更重要——大學物理教改探索之一. 東莞理工學院學報, 13(3), 98-100.
周志發. (2007). 教學 “新” 理念: 分享錯誤. 上海教育科研, (1), 53-55.
孫朝平. (1995). 淺談抽象物理概念的教學方法. 中學物理教學參考, (5), 7-7.
孫朝平. (1995). 淺議高中物理實物圖表教學. 中學物理教學參考, (6), 2-3.
翁立衛. (2008). 圖在幾何解題中所扮演的角色. 科學教育月刊.
張宗揚. (2007). 傳統教學與多媒體教學在醫學教育中的比較分析. 中國高等醫學教育, 2007(3), 3-4.
許倖甄. (2012). 國小六年級數學補救教學之行動研究: 以 [小數除法] 及 [分數與小數四則運算] 單元為例. 中正大學課程研究所學位論文, 1-217.
賴育瑩（2007）。老師回饋與學生反應的個案研究。國立清華大學外國語文學系碩士論文，新竹市。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/mx883j

指導教授

黃武元(Wu-Yuin Hwang)

審核日期

2019-8-5

推文